Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 261, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 144-148

  Russell, Marcia M ^a,b   Ganz, Patricia A ^a,b   Lopa, Samia ^a,c   Yothers, Greg ^a,c   Ko, Clifford Y ^a,d   Arora, Amit ^a,e   Atkins, James N ^f   Bahary, Nathan ^a,g   Soori, Gamini S ^a,h   Robertson, John M ^a,i   Eakle, Janice ^a,j   Marchello, Benjamin T ^a,k   Wozniak, Timothy F ^l   Beart, Robert W ^a,m   Wolmark, Norman ^a,n  

^a NSABP Foundation Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^f CCOP Southeast Cancer Control Consortium   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h MISSOURI VALLEY CANCER CONSORTIUM   (United States)

ⁱ Beaumont Hospital System   (United States)

^j Florida Cancer Specialists   (United States)

^k Montana Cancer Consortium   (United States)

^l HELEN F GRAHAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^m Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center   (United States)

ⁿ ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Quality of life; Rectal cancer; Surgery

Indexed keywords

CAPECITABINE; FLUOROURACIL; OXALIPLATIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BODY IMAGE; CANCER SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COLORECTAL CANCER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR THE RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF CANCER MODULE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER THERAPY COLORECTAL; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CARCINOMA; RECTUM SURGERY; SPHINCTER SPARING SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ABDOMEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANAL CANAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; URINATION DISORDERS;

ABDOMEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANAL CANAL; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 84930413877     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000594     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63: 11-30.
2. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
3. Allal AS, Bieri S, Pelloni A, et al. Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes. Br J Cancer. 2000; 82: 1131-1137.
4. Pucciarelli S, Del Bianco P, Efficace F, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 71-77.
5. How P, Stelzner S, Branagan G, et al. Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 400-406.
6. Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR, et al. Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 147-154.
7. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 2: CD004323.
8. NSABP clinical trials overview: protocol R-04.Available at: http://www.nsabp. pitt.edu/R-04.asp. Accessed November 7, 2013.
9. NSABP Foundation Inc. Radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin before surgery in treating patients with resectable rectal cancer. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00058474?term=NSABP?R-04&rank=1. Accessed November 7, 2013.
10. Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999; 8: 181-195.
11. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQCR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer. 1999; 35: 238-247.
12. Patient-centered outcomes research institute. Available at: http://www.pcori. org. Accessed November 7, 2013.
13. Chambers SK, Meng X, Youl P, et al. A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer. Qual Life Res. 2012; 21: 1551-1564.