Usefulness of hyperemic microvascular resistance index as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Korean Circulation Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 194-201

  Jin, XiongJie ^a   Yoon, Myeong Ho ^a   Seo, Kyoung Woo ^a   Tahk, Seung Jea ^a   Lim, Hong Seok ^a   Yang, Hyoung Mo ^a   Choi, Byoung Joo ^a   Choi, So Yeon ^a   Hwang, Gyo Seung ^a   Shin, Joon Han ^a   Park, Jin Sun ^a  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Microcirculation; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA PRESSURE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HEART DEATH; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; INCIDENCE; INTRACORONARY DOPPLER GUIDE WIRE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE INDEX; MICROVASCULATURE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SURVIVAL;

EID: 84930391467     PISSN: 17385520     EISSN: 17385555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2015.45.3.194     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000;101:125-30.
2. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;105:1909-13.
3. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-32.
4. Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:560-5.
5. Lim HS, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, et al. Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2854-60.
6. Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O, et al. Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [correction of angiography] in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:2368-74.
7. Takahashi T, Hiasa Y, Ohara Y, et al. Usefulness of coronary flow reserve immediately after primary coronary stenting in predicting wall motion recovery in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1033-7.
8. Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yang HM, et al. Comparison of accuracy in the prediction of left ventricular wall motion changes between invasively assessed microvascular integrity indexes and fluorine-18-uorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:129-34.
9. Yamamoto K, Ito H, Iwakura K, et al. Pressure-derived collateralów index as a parameter of microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1383-9.
10. Kawamoto T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, et al. Can coronary blood flow velocity pattern after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [correction of angiography] predict recovery of regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Circulation 1999;100:339-45.
11. Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2006;113:2054-61.
12. Klauss V, Ackermann K, Henneke KH, et al. Epicardial intimal thickening in transplant coronary artery disease and resistance vessel response to adenosine: a combined intravascular ultrasound and Doppler study. Circulation 1997;96(Suppl 9): II-159-64.
13. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-67.
14. McKee PA, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1441-6.
15. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007;356:830-40.
16. Furber AP, Prunier F, Nguyen HC, Boulet S, Delépine S, Geslin P. Coronary blood flow assessment after successful angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction predicts the risk of long-term cardiac events. Circulation 2004;110:3527-33.
17. Leung DY, Leung M. Non-invasive/invasive imaging: significance and assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Heart 2011;97:587-95.
18. Van Liebergen RA, Piek JJ, Koch KT, De Winter RJ, Lie KI. Immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty or stent implantation on the absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998;98:2133-40.
19. Kitabata H, Imanishi T, Kubo T, et al. Coronary microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of the transmural extent of infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation anterior acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:263-72.
20. Anjeja BG, Gibson CM. Preserved coronary flow reserve in viable myocardium: further evidence for the microvascular hypothesis. Am Heart J 2001;141:329-30.
21. Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, et al. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation 2004;110:2137-42.