Intra-individual and inter-individual variability in daily sitting time and MVPA

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 476-481

  Barreira, Tiago V ^a,b   Hamilton, Marc T ^a   Craft, Lynette L ^c   Gapstur, Susan M ^d   Siddique, Juned ^c   Zderic, Theodore W ^a  

^a PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

ActivPAL; Exercise; Inactivity; Posture; Reliability; Sedentary behavior

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MODERATE VIGOROUS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; MONITOR; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RELIABILITY; SITTING; THEORY; ACTIMETRY; ACTIVITY TRACKER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; TIME FACTOR;

ACTIGRAPHY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FITNESS TRACKERS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84930332132     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: 18781861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Stephens B.R., Granados K., Zderic T.W., et al. Effects of 1 day of inactivity on insulin action in healthy men and women: interaction with energy intake. Metabolism 2011, 60(7):941-949.
2. Dunstan D.W., Kingwell B.A., Larsen R., et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care 2012, 35(5):976-983.
3. Bey L., Hamilton M.T. Suppression of skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity during physical inactivity: a molecular reason to maintain daily low-intensity activity. J Physiol 2003, 551(2):673-682.
4. Zderic T.W., Hamilton M.T. Physical inactivity amplifies the sensitivity of skeletal muscle to the lipid-induced downregulation of lipoprotein lipase activity. J App Physiol 2006, 100(1):249-257.
5. Hamilton M.T., Hamilton D.G., Zderic T.W. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes 2007, 56(11):2655-2667.
6. Hamilton M.T., Hamilton D.G., Zderic T.W. Sedentary behavior as a mediator of type 2 diabetes. Med Sport Sci 2014, 60:11-26.
7. McCrady S.K., Levine J.A. Sedentariness at work: how much do we really sit?. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009, 17(11):2103-2105.
8. van Uffelen J.G., Watson M.J., Dobson A.J., et al. Comparison of self-reported week-day and weekend-day sitting time and weekly time-use: results from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Int J Behav Med 2011, 18(3):221-228.
9. Levine J., Melanson E.L., Westerterp K.R., et al. Measurement of the components of nonexercise activity thermogenesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001, 281(4):E670-E675.
10. Matthews C.E., Chen K.Y., Freedson P.S., et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 167(7):875-881.
11. Healy G.N., Matthews C.E., Dunstan D.W., et al. Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003-06. Eur Heart J 2011, 32(5):590-597.
12. Bauman A., Ainsworth B.E., Sallis J.F., et al. The descriptive epidemiology of sitting a 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med 2011, 41(2):228-235.
13. Atkin A.J., Gorely T., Clemes S.A., et al. Methods of measurement in epidemiology: sedentary behaviour. Int J Epidemiol 2012, 41(5):1460-1471.
14. Kozey-Keadle S., Libertine A., Lyden K., et al. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(8):1561-1567.
15. Lyden K., Kozey Keadle S.L., Staudenmayer J.W., et al. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012, 44(11):2243-2252.
16. Grant P.M., Ryan C.G., Tigbe W.W., et al. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 2006, 40(12):992-997.
17. Taraldsen K., Askim T., Sletvold O., et al. Evaluation of a body-worn sensor system to measure physical activity in older people with impaired function. Phys Ther 2011, 91(2):277-285.
18. Aminian S., Hinckson E.A. Examining the validity of the ActivPAL monitor in measuring posture and ambulatory movement in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:119.
19. Baranowski T., Masse L.C., Ragan B., et al. How many days was that? We're still not sure, but we're asking the question better!. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40(7 Suppl):S544-S549.
20. Allen M.J., Yen W.M. Introduction to Measurement Theory 2002, Waveland Press, Inc, Long Groove, IL.
21. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: Be Active, Healthy, and Happy! 2008, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
22. Jerome G.J., Young D.R., Laferriere D., et al. Reliability of RT3 accelerometers among overweight and obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41(1):110-114.
23. Craft L., Zderic T., Gapstur S., et al. Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: an observational inclinometry study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9(1):122.
24. Marshall S.J., Levy S.S., Tudor-Locke C.E., et al. Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med 2009, 36(5):410-415.
25. Tudor-Locke C., Sisson S.B., Collova T., et al. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol 2005, 30(6):666-676.
26. Wickel E.E., Welk G.J. Applying generalizability theory to estimate habitual activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42(8):1528-1534.
27. Welk G.J., Schaben J.A., Morrow J.R. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 36(9):1637-1645.
28. Duvivier B.M.F.M., Schaper N.C., Bremers M.A., et al. Minimal intensity physical activity (standing and walking) of longer duration improves insulin action and plasma lipids more than shorter periods of moderate to vigorous exercise (cycling) in sedentary subjects when energy expenditure is comparable. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(2).
29. Balkau B., Mhamdi L., Oppert J.M., et al. Physical activity and insulin sensitivity: the RISC study. Diabetes 2008, 57(10):2613-2618.
30. Hart T.L., Swartz A.M., Cashin S.E., et al. How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:62.
31. Sirard J.R., Forsyth A., Oakes J.M., et al. Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms: results from the Twin Cities Walking Study. J Phys Act Health 2011, 8(5):668-674.
32. Matthews C.E., Ainsworth B.E., Thompson R.W., et al. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002, 34(8):1376-1381.
33. Siegel P.Z., Brackbill R.M., Heath G.W. The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups. Am J Public Health 1995, 85(5):706-710.
34. Kang M., Bassett D.R., Barreira T.V., et al. How many days are enough?. A study of 365 days of pedometer monitoring. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009, 80(3):445-453.