NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: What do pregnant women think?

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 598-604

  van Schendel, Rachèl V ^a   Dondorp, Wybo J ^b   Timmermans, Danielle R M ^a   van Hugte, Eline J H ^a   de Boer, Anne ^a   Pajkrt, Eva ^c   Lachmeijer, Augusta M A ^a   Henneman, Lidewij ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL ATTITUDE; MENTAL DISEASE; NETHERLANDS; NONINVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING; PHYSICAL DISEASE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

DNA;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DNA; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930324149     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4579     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lo YMD. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA. Open Biol 2012;2(6).
2. Verweij EJ, Oepkes D, De Vries M, et al. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:641-5.
3. Tischler R, Hudgins L, Blumenfeld YJ, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:1292-9.
4. Lewis C, Hill M, Silcock C, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol 2014;121:582-94.
5. Lewis C, Silcock C, Chitty LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake. Public Health Genomics 2013;16:223-32.
6. van Schendel RV, Kleinveld JH, Dondorp WJ, et al. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2014;22:1345-50.
7. Avent ND, Madgett TE, Maddocks DG, Soothill PW. Cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal serum and plasma: current and evolving applications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:175-9.
8. Lo YM, Chan KC, Sun H, et al. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci Transl Med 2010;2:61ra91.
9. Kitzman JO, Snyder MW, Ventura M, et al. Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:137ra76.
10. Chitty LS, Griffin DR, Meaney C, et al. New aids for the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia: dysmorphic features, charts of fetal size and molecular confirmation using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:283-9.
11. Vora NL, O'Brien BM. Noninvasive prenatal testing for microdeletion syndromes and expanded trisomies: proceed with caution. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1097-9.
12. Van Dijk M, Visser A, Posthuma J, et al. Naturally occurring variation in trophoblast invasion as a source of novel (epigenetic) biomarkers. Front Genet 2012;3:22.
13. Van der Steen SL, Diderich KEM, Riedijk SR, et al. Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing. Clin Genet 2014:Epub ahead of print.
14. Farrell RM, Agatisa PK, Nutter B. What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care. Birth 2014;41:276-82.
15. De Jong A, Dondorp W, Krumeich A, et al. The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users. J Community Genet 2013;4:125-35.
16. Schielen P. Quality control parameters of Dutch Down's syndrome screening laboratories 2010. RIVM; 2010. Report No.: 230083003/2012.
17. TRIDENT 2014. Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). URL http://www.emgo.nl/research/quality-of-care/research-projects/1451/trident-study-trial-by-dutch-laboratories-for-evaluation-of-non-invasive-prenatal-testing-nipt/background/ [accessed on 10 December 2014].
18. Verweij EJ, Oepkes D, de Boer MA. Changing attitudes towards termination of pregnancy for trisomy 21 with non-invasive prenatal trisomy testing: a population-based study in Dutch pregnant women. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:397-9.
19. Taylor J, Chock V, Hudgins L. NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability. J Genet Counsel 2014;23:72-8.
20. Chetty S, Garabedian MJ, Norton ME. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:542-6.
21. Alsulaiman A, Hewison J, Abu-Amero KK, et al. Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for 30 conditions among women in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:1109-13.
22. Van den Heuvel A, Chitty L, Dormandy E, et al. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:24-8.
23. Dondorp W, Sikkema-Raddatz B, De Die-Smulders C, De Wert G. Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnosis: an exploration of the ethics of consent. Hum Mutat 2012;33:916-22.
24. Bredenoord AL, De Vries MC, Van Delden JJM. Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future? Nat Rev Genet 2013;14:306.
25. Donley G, Hull SC, Berkman BE. Prenatal whole genome sequencing. Hastings Cent Rep 2012;42:28-40.
26. Farrimond HR, Kelly SE. Public viewpoints on new non-invasive prenatal genetic tests. Publ Understand Sci 2013;22:730-44.
27. Soini S, Ibarreta D, Anastasiadou V, et al. The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14:588-645.
28. Kelly SE, Farrimond HR. Non-invasive prenatal genetic testing: a study of public attitudes. Public Health Genomics 2011;15:73-81.
29. De Jong A, Dondorp WJ, De Die-Smulders CEM, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;18:272-7.
30. Hewison J, Green JM, Ahmed S, et al. Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a comparison of White and Pakistani women in the UK. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:419-30.
31. De Jong A, Dondorp WJ, Frints SGM, et al. Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:657-63.
32. Bakker M, Birnie E, Pajkrt E, et al. Low uptake of the combined test in the Netherlands-which factors contribute? Prenat Diagn 2012;32:1305-12.
33. Statistics Netherlands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/home/default.htm [accessed on 10 November 2014].