A synthetic formulation for the Italian seismic hazard and code implications for the seismic risk

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 77, Issue , 2015, Pages 111-122

  Vanzi, I ^a   Marano, G C ^b   Monti, G ^c   Nuti, C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Code calibration; Reliability; Seismic hazard; Seismic risk; Structural safety; Surface spectra

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CODES (SYMBOLS); HAZARDS; RELIABILITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

CODE CALIBRATION; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SEISMIC RISK; STRUCTURAL SAFETY; SURFACE SPECTRA;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BEDROCK; CALIBRATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SEISMIC HAZARD; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

ITALY;

EID: 84930209105     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ministero delle Infrastrutture. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, D.Min.Inf. 14 gennaio 2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 of February 4th 2008 - Suppl. Ordinario n. 30; 2008.
2. CEN. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode - Basis of structural design, EN 1990:2002+A1, (Incorporating corrigenda December 2008 and April 2010); 2010.
3. CEN. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, EN 1998-1 (Incorporating corrigendum July 2009); 2009.
4. INGV. Project S1, Continuation of assistance to DPC for improving and using the seismic hazard map compiled according to the Prime Minister "Ordinanza" 3274/2003 and planning future initiatives, Final Report, (available at ) July; 2007 . http://esse1.mi.ingv.it/index.html.
5. Wald D.J., Earle P.S., Quitoriano V. Topographic Slope as a Proxy for Seismic Site Correction and Amplification. EOS Trans AGU 2004, 85(47):F1424.
6. Wald D.J., Allen T.I. Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2007, 97(5):1379-1395.
7. United States Geological Service. Global Vs30 Map Server, available at . http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/apps/vs30/.
8. Michelini Alberto, Faenza Licia, Lauciani Valentino, Malagnini Luca ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 2008, 79(5):688-697.
9. Nuti C., Vanzi I. To retrofit or not to retrofit. Eng Struct 2003, 25:701-711.
10. Vanzi I. When should seismic retrofitting of existing structures be implemented in order to minimize expected losses. J Earthq Eng 2002, 6(1):53-73.
11. Mathworks. Matlab R2012b, Natick, Massachusetts, USA; 2012.
12. Braga F., Gigliotti R.1, Monti G., Morelli F., Nuti C., Salvatore W., et al. Speedup of post earthquake community recovery. The case of precast industrial buildings after the Emilia 2012 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 2014, 12(5):2405-2418.