Software for the analysis and visualization of deep mutational scanning data

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Bloom, Jesse D ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid preferences; Deep mutational scanning; Sequence logo

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; SCANNING; SITE SELECTION; VISUALIZATION;

ACCURATE INFERENCE; SCANNING DATA; SELECTION PRESSURES; SEQUENCE LOGOS;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84930207201     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0590-4     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fowler DM, Fields S. Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(8):801-7.
2. Fowler DM, Araya CL, Fleishman SJ, Kellogg EH, Stephany JJ, Baker D, et al. High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(9):741-6.
3. Traxlmayr MW, Hasenhindl C, Hackl M, Stadlmayr G, Rybka JD, Borth N, et al.Construction of a stability landscape of the CH3 domain of human IgG1 by combining directed evolution with high throughput sequencing. J Mol Biol. 2012; 423:397-412.
4. McLaughlin Jr RN, Poelwijk FJ, Raman A, Gosal WS, Ranganathan R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature. 2012; 491(7422):138.
5. Starita LM, Pruneda JN, Lo RS, Fowler DM, Kim HJ, Hiatt JB, et al. Activity-enhancing mutations in an E3 ubiquitin ligase identified by high-throughput mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110(14):1263-72.
6. Melamed D, Young DL, Gamble CE, Miller CR, Fields S. Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly (A)-binding protein. RNA. 2013; 19(11):1537-51.
7. Roscoe BP, Thayer KM, Zeldovich KB, Fushman D, Bolon DN. Analyses of the effects of all ubiquitin point mutants on yeast growth rate. J Mol Biol. 2013; 425:1363-77.
8. Firnberg E, Labonte JW, Gray JJ, Ostermeier M. A comprehensive, high-resolution map of a gene's fitness landscape. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31(6):1581-92.
9. Bloom JD. An experimentally determined evolutionary model dramatically improves phylogenetic fit. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 30:1956-78. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/8/1956 .
10. Melnikov A, Rogov P, Wang L, Gnirke A, Mikkelsen TS. Comprehensive mutational scanning of a kinase in vivo reveals context-dependent fitness landscapes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:112.
11. Thyagarajan B, Bloom JD. The inherent mutational tolerance and antigenic evolvability of influenza hemagglutinin. eLife. 2014; 3:03300. http://elifesciences.org/content/3/e03300 .
12. Wu NC, Young AP, Al-Mawsawi LQ, Olson CA, Feng J, Qi H, et al. High-throughput profiling of influenza A virus hemagglutinin gene at single-nucleotide resolution. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:4942.
13. Wu NC, Young AP, Al-Mawsawi LQ, Olson CA, Feng J, Qi H, et al. High-throughput identification of loss-of-function mutations for anti-interferon activity in the influenza A virus NS segment. J Virol. 2014; 88(17):10157-64.
14. Olson CA, Wu NC, Sun R. A comprehensive biophysical description of pairwise epistasis throughout an entire protein domain. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(22):2643-51.
15. Kitzman JO, Starita LM, Lo RS, Fields S, Shendure J. Massively parallel single-amino-acid mutagenesis. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:203-6.
16. Firnberg E, Ostermeier M. PFunkel: efficient, expansive, user-defined mutagenesis. PLoS One. 2012; 7:52031.
17. Jain PC, Varadarajan R. A rapid, efficient, and economical inverse polymerase chain reaction-based method for generating a site saturation mutant library. Anal Biochem. 2014; 449:90-8.
18. Findlay GM, Boyle EA, Hause RJ, Klein JC, Shendure J. Saturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair. Nat. 2014; 513(7516):120-3.
19. Fowler DM, Araya CL, Gerard W, Fields S. Enrich: software for analysis of protein function by enrichment and depletion of variants. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(24):3430-1.
20. Bank C, Hietpas RT, Wong A, Bolon DN, Jensen JD. A bayesian mcmc approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments. Genet. 2014; 196(3):841-52.
21. Araya CL, Fowler DM, Chen W, Muniez I, Kelly JW, Fields S. A fundamental protein property, thermodynamic stability, revealed solely from large-scale measurements of protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012; 109(42):16858-63.
22. Bank C, Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon DN. A systematic survey of an intragenic epistatic landscape. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32(1):229-38.
23. Hiatt JB, Patwardhan RP, Turner EH, Lee C, Shendure J. Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(2):119-22.
24. Wu NC, De La Cruz J, Al-Mawsawi LQ, Olson CA, Qi H, Luan HH, et al. HIV-1 quasispecies delineation by tag linkage deep sequencing. PloS one. 2014; 9(5):97505.
25. Bloom JD. An experimentally informed evolutionary model improves phylogenetic fit to divergent lactamase homologs. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31:2753-769. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/10/2753 .
26. Yampolsky LY, Stoltzfus A. The exchangeability of amino acids in proteins. Genet. 2005; 170(4):1459-72.
27. Stoltzfus A, Yampolsky LY. Climbing mount probable: mutation as a cause of nonrandomness in evolution. J Hered. 2009; 100(5):637-47.
28. Pearson K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc Royal Society London. 1896; 60(359-367):489-98.
29. Pearson K. On the constants of index-distributions as deduced from the like constants for the components of the ratio, with special reference to the opsonic index. Biometrika. 1910; 7(4):531-41. doi:10.1093/biomet/7.4.531.
30. Ogliore R, Huss G, Nagashima K. Ratio estimation in SIMS analysis. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section B: beam interactions with materials and atoms. 2011; 269(17):1910-18. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.120.
31. Van Kempen G, Van Vliet L. Mean and variance of ratio estimators used in fluorescence ratio imaging. Cytometry. 2000; 39(4):300-5.
32. Stan Development Team. PyStan: the Python interface to Stan, Version 2.5.0. 2014. http://mc-stan.org/pystan.html .
33. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci. 1992; 7:457-72.
34. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. Weblogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004; 14(6):1188-90. doi:10.1101/gr.849004.
35. Blainey P, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Points of significance: replication. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(9):879-80.
36. Shortle D, Lin B. Genetic analysis of staphylococcal nuclease: identification of three intragenic "global" suppressors of nuclease-minus mutations. Genet. 1985; 110:539-55.
37. Rennell D, Bouvier SE, Hardy LW, Poteete AR. Systematic mutation of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1991; 222:67-87.
38. Shafikhani S, Siegel RA, Ferrari E, Schellenberger V. Generation of large libraries of random mutants in Bacillus subtilis by PCR-based plasmid multimerization. Biotechniques. 1997; 23:304-10.
39. Guo HH, Choe J, Loeb LA. Protein tolerance to random amino acid change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:9205-210.
40. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, Arnold FH. Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102:606-11.