Mapping natural capital: Optimising the use of national scale datasets

Ecography

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 632-638

  Henrys, P A ^a   Bee, E J ^b   Watkins, J W ^a   Smith, N A ^b   Griffiths, R I ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; GIS; LAND COVER; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NATURAL CAPITAL; SOIL MICROORGANISM; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84930174033     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00402     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Algar, A. C. et al. 2009. Predicting the future of species diversity: macroecological theory, climate change, and direct tests of alternative forecasting methods. - Ecography 32: 22-33.
2. Araújo, M. B. and Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1677-1688.
3. Austin, M. P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. - Ecol. Model. 157: 101-108.
4. Bunce, R. G. H. et al. 1996. Land classification for strategic ecological survey. - J. Environ. Manage. 47: 37-60.
5. British Geological Survey 2013. Soil parent material model. - accessed 7 February 2012.
6. Carpenter, S. R. et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 1305-1312.
7. Costanza, R. and Daly, H. E. 1992. Natural capital and sustainable development. - Conserv. Biol. 6: 37-46.
8. Costanza, R. et al. 2006. The value of New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital. - Gund Inst. for Ecological Economics, Univ. of Vermont and New Jersey Dept of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ.
9. Diggle, P. J. et al. 1998. Model-based geostatistics (with discussion). - J. R. Stat. Soc. C 47: 299-351.
10. Friedman, J. H. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. - Ann. Stat. 19: 1-141.
11. French, J. L. and Wand, M. P. 2004. Generalized additive models for cancer mapping with incomplete covariates. - Biostatistics 5: 177-191.
12. Griffiths, R. I. et al. 2011. The bacterial biogeography of British soils. - Environ. Microbiol. 13: 1642-1654.
13. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. 1990. Generalized additive models. - Chapman and Hall.
14. Holland, P. W. 1986. Statistics and causal inference. - J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81: 945-960.
15. Lawley, R. 2008. The soil-parent material database: a user guide. - British Geological Survey Internal Report.
16. Lin, X. and Zhang, D. 1999. Inference in generalized additive mixed models by using smoothing splines. - J. R. Stat. Soc. B 61: 381-400.
17. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. - Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. - Island Press.
19. Morton, D. et al. 2011. Land cover map 2007. Countryside survey: final report for LCM2007 - the new UK Land Cover Map. - Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, CS technical Report No 11/07.
20. Naidoo, R. and Ricketts, T. 2006. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. - PLoS Biol. 4: doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360
21. National Research Council 2005. Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision-making. - National Academy Press.
22. Nengwang, C. et al. 2009. A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. - Ecol. Econ. 68: 2768-2776.
23. Norgaard, R. B. 2009. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. - Ecol. Econ. 69: 1219-1227.
24. Norton, L. R. et al. 2012. Trialling a method to quantify the 'cultural services' of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. - Land Use Policy 29: 449-455.
25. Norton, L. R. et al. 2013. Measuring stock and change in the GB countryside for policy - key findings and developments from the Countryside Survey 2007 field survey. - J. Environ. Manage. 113: 117-127.
26. Raymond, C. M. et al. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. - Ecol. Econ. 68: 1301-1315.
27. Sayre, R. et al. 2009. A new map of standardized terrestrial ecosystems of the conterminous United States. - U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1768, .
28. Swetnam, R. D. et al. 2011. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. - J. Environ. Manage. 92: 563-574.
29. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: synthesis of the key findings. - UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
30. Troy, A. and Wilson, M. A. 2006. Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. - Ecol. Econ. 60: 435-449.
31. Turner, R. K. et al. 2010. An Introduction to socio-economic assessment with a marine strategy framework CSERGE, UEA. - Dept for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
32. Veloz, S. D. et al. 2012. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. - Global Change Biol. 18: 1698-1713.
33. Vieira, V. et al. 2005. Spatial analysis of lung, colorectal, and breast cancer on Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to case-control data. - Environ. Health 4: 11.
34. Williams, J. W. and Jackson, S. T. 2007. Novel climates, no-analog plant communities, and ecological surprises: past and future. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 5: 475-482
35. Wood, S. N. 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. - J. R. Stat. Soc. B 73: 3-36