Surgical simulation: An overview

Surgical Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-14

  Lee, Jason Y ^a,b   McDougall, Elspeth M ^c  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ASSESSMENT PROCESS; COMPUTER BASED SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES; PATIENT-CENTRED CARES; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL SIMULATION; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84930044833     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Halsted WS. The training of the surgeon. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1904;15:267–276.
2. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay; 1956.
3. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, second edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
4. McGaghie WC. Simulation in professional competence assessment: basic considerations. In: Tekian A, McGuire CH, McGaghie WC, and associates, eds. Innovative Simulations for Assessing Professional Competence: From Paper-and-Pencil to Virtual Reality. Chicago: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois; 1999.
5. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79(10):S70–81.
6. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.
7. Kneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med. 2005;80:549–553.
8. Kirkpatrick J, DeWitt-Weaver D, Yeager L. Strategies for evaluating learning outcomes. In: Billings D, Halstead J, eds. Teaching in Nursing: A Guide to Curriculum, Instruction and Evaluation. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1998.
9. McDougall EM. Validation of Surgical Simulations. J Endourol. 2007;21(3):244–247.
10. Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ 2004;38:1006–1012.
11. Yudkowsky R, Downing SM, Tekian A. Standard setting. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R, eds. Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York: Routledge; 2009.
12. Lee J Y, Mucksavage P, Canales C, McDougall EM, Lin S. High fidelity simulation-based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1385–1391.
13. Gettman MT, Pereira CW, Lipsky K, Wilson T, Arnold JJ, Leibovich BC, et al. Use of high fidelity operating room simulation to assess and teach communication, teamwork, and laparoscopic skills: initial experience. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1289–1296.