Patient-specific targeting guides for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: Technique and initial clinical experience

Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 103-108

  Throckmorton, Thomas W ^a   Vogt, Wolfgangf ^a   Wasmaier, Johann ^a   Hurst, Jason M ^a   Frostick, Simon ^a   Sperling, John W ^a  

^a Campbell Clinic Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical outcome; glenoid component placement; patient specific targeting guide; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; GLENOID CAVITY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SHOULDER ARTHRITIS; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84930013247     PISSN: 15239896     EISSN: 1539591X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTE.0000000000000029     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hopkins AR, Hansen UN, Amis AA, et al. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:668-675.
2. Mansat P, Briot J, Mansat M, et al. Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(suppl):S79-S83.
3. Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS, et al. Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15: 625-629.
4. Oosterom R, Rozing PM, Bersee HE. Effect of glenoid component inclination on its fixation and humeral head subluxation in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19: 1000-1008.
5. Shapiro TA, McGarry MH, Gupta R, et al. Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(suppl):S90-S95.
6. Suárez DR, van der Linden JC, Valstar ER, et al. Influence of the positioning of a cementless glenoid prosthesis on its interface micro-motions. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009;223:795-804.
7. Favre P, Moor B, Snedeker JG, et al. Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:175-183.
8. Favre P, Sussmann PS, Gerber C. The effect of component positioning on intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:550-556.
9. Gutiérrez S, Greiwe RM, Frankle MA, et al. Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(suppl): S9-S12.
10. Ho JC, Sabesan VJ, Iannotti JP. Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e82.
11. Warren RF, Coleman SH, Dines JS. Instability after arthroplasty: the shoulder. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(suppl):28-31.
12. Gregory T, Hansen U, Emery R, et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty does not correct the orientation of the eroded glenoid. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:529-535.
13. Gregory TM, Sankey A, Augereau B, et al. Accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75791.
14. Iannotti JP, Greeson C, Downing D, et al. Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:48-55.
15. Hendel MD, Bryan JA, Barsoum WK, et al. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2167-2175.
16. Suero EM, Citak M, Lo D, et al. Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2860-2866.