|
|
Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 368-
|
|
Screening for Group B streptococcus should be routine in pregnancy: AGAINST: current evidence does not support the introduction of microbiological screening for identifying carriers of Group B streptococcus
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN;
ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION;
MALE;
MASS SCREENING;
MICROBIOLOGY;
NEWBORN;
PERINATAL CARE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS;
PRENATAL CARE;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
PROCEDURES;
STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONS;
STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS;
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
GUIDELINE ADHERENCE;
HOSPITALS, MATERNITY;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
MALE;
MASS SCREENING;
PERINATAL CARE;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS;
PRENATAL CARE;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONS;
STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE;
|
|
EID: 84929998371
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14710528
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13085 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|