Reliability of the nitrogen washin-washout technique to assess end-expiratory lung volume at variable PEEP and tidal volumes

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Richard, Jean Christophe ^a,b,c   Pouzot, Céline ^d,e   Pinzón, Alfredo Morales ^b,f   González, Juan Sebastian Torres ^b,f   Orkisz, Maciej ^b,c   Neyran, Bruno ^b   Hoyos, Marcela Hernández ^f   Lavenne, Franck ^g   Guerin, Claude ^a,b,c  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d VETAGRO SUP   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^f UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^g HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

ARDS; Computed tomography; End expiratory lung volume; PEEP

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929990794     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2197425X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2197-425X-2-10     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Olegard C, Sondergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O: Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction.Anesth Analg 2005, 101:206–212.
2. Chiumello D, Cressoni M, Chierichetti M, Tallarini F, Botticelli M, Berto V, Mietto C, Gattinoni L: Nitrogen washout/washin, helium dilution and computed tomography in the assessment of end expiratory lung volume.Crit Care 2008, 12:R150.
3. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med 2013, 39:165–228.
4. Sondergaard S, Karason S, Wiklund J, Lundin S, Stenqvist O: Alveolar pressure monitoring: an evaluation in a lung model and in patients with acute lung injury.Intensive Care Med 2003, 29:955–962.
5. Top A, Hamarneh G, Abugharbieh R: Spotlight: Automated Confidence-Based user Guidance for Increasing Efficiency in Interactive 3D Image Segmentation. In Medical Computer Vision. Recognition Techniques and Applications in Medical Imaging. Edited by: Menze B, Langs G, Tu Z, Criminisi A. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011:204.
6. Top A, Hamarneh G, Abugharbieh R: Active Learning for Interactive 3D Image Segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2011. Edited by: Fichtinger G, Martel A, Peters T. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2011.
7. Attinger EO, Cahill JM: Cardiopulmonary mechanics in anesthetized pigs and dogs.Am J Physiol 1960, 198:346–348.
8. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1301–1308.
9. R Core Team: R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2013. http://cran.r-project.org
10. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D, The R Development Core Team: Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. 2013. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html
11. Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrom C, Figurski M: MethComp: Functions for Analysis of Agreement in Method Comparison Studies. 2013. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MethComp/index.html
12. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M: pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves.BMC Bioinforma 2011, 12:77.
13. Lopez-Raton M, Rodriguez-Alvarez MX: Optimal Cutpoints: Computing Optimal Cutpoints in Diagnostic Tests. 2012. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/OptimalCutpoints/index.html
14. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P: Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.Biom J 2008, 50:346–363.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG: Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.J Biopharm Stat 2007, 17:571–582.
16. Carstensen B: Comparing Clinical Measurement Methods: a Practical Guide (Statistics in Practice). 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
17. Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC: Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements.Int J Biostat 2008, 4:1–26.
18. Critchley LA, Critchley JA: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15:85–91.
19. Graf J, Santos A, Dries D, Adams AB, Marini JJ: Agreement between functional residual capacity estimated via automated gas dilution versus via computed tomography in a pleural effusion model.Respir Care 2010, 55:1464–1468.
20. Tummers B: Datathief III. 2006. http://datathief.org
21. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM-H: A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.Anesth Analg 2010, 111:1180–1192.
22. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A: Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011, 25:536–546.
23. Dellamonica J, Lerolle N, Sargentini C, Beduneau G, Di Marco F, Mercat A, Richard JC, Diehl JL, Mancebo J, Rouby JJ, Lu Q, Bernardin G, Brochard L: PEEP-induced changes in lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two methods to estimate alveolar recruitment.Intensive Care Med 2011, 37:1595–1604.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Stat Methods Med Res 1999, 8:135–160.
25. Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri VM, Quintel M, Russo S, Patroniti N, Cornejo R, Bugedo G: Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med 2006, 354:1775–1786.