Comparison between Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Meta-analysis

Urology

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 748-756

  Cui, Xin ^a   Ji, Fan ^a   Yan, Hao ^a   Ou, Tong Wen ^a   Jia, Chun Song ^a   He, Xin Zhou ^a   Gao, Wei ^a   Wang, Qi ^a   Cui, Bo ^a   Wu, Jiang Tao ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LITHOTRIPSY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL CALCULI; URETEROSCOPY;

HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY; OPERATIVE TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL CALCULI; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 84929940075     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.041     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. V. Kumar, A.K. Abbas, J.C. Aster Robbins Basic Pathology 9th ed. 2013 Elsevier Philadelphia 545 547
2. O.M. Aboumarzouk, S.G. Kata, F.X. Keeley et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 CD006029
3. M.J. Bader, B. Eisner, F. Porpiglia et al. Contemporary management of ureteral stones Eur Urol 61 2012 764 772
4. O.M. Aboumarzouk, S.G. Kata, F.X. Keeley, G. Nabi Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 CD006029
5. K. Lindqvist, G. Holmberg, R. Peeker, L. Grenabo Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies Scand J Urol Nephrol 40 2006 113 118
6. M.L. Liong, R.V. Clayman, R.F. Gittes et al. Treatment options for proximal ureteral urolithiasis: review and recommendations J Urol 141 1989 504 509
7. A. Kumar, B. Nanda, N. Kumar et al. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience J Endourol 27 2013 1 5
8. M. Khalil Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy Urol Ann 5 2013 88 92
9. A.C. Lopes Neto, F. Korkes, J.L. Silva 2nd et al. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy J Urol 187 2012 164 168
10. Y.H. Lee, J.Y. Tsai, B.P. Jiaan et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones Urology 67 2006 480 484
11. B.R. Matlaga, J.P. Jansen, L.M. Meckley et al. Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials J Urol 188 2012 130 137
12. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 151 2009 264 269 W64
13. J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org Accessed June 30, 2014
14. H.K. Salem A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi Urology 74 2009 1216 1221
15. S. Manzoor, A.H. Hashmi, M.A. Sohail et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) vs. ureterorenoscopic (URS) manipulation in proximal ureteric stone J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 23 2013 726 730
16. E.R. Tawfick Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast Int Arch Med 3 2010 3
17. S.A. Ziaee, P. Halimiasl, A. Aminsharifi et al. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy? Urology 71 2008 28 31
18. C.F. Wu, C.S. Chen, W.Y. Lin et al. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy Urology 65 2005 1075 1079
19. C.F. Wu, J.J. Shee, W.Y. Lin et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones J Urol 172 2004 1899 1902
20. J.D. Denstedt, R.V. Clayman, G.M. Prerningcr Efficiency quotient as a means of comparing lithotripters J Endourol Suppl 4 1990 100 104
21. R.F. Youssef, A.R. El-Nahas, A.M. El-Assmy et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study Urology 73 2009 1184 1187