Lexical meaning in context: A web of words

Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-332

  Asher, Nicholas ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929923313     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511793936     Document Type: Book

References (167)

1. Abney, S.: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Distributed by MITWorking Papers in Linguistics.
2. Abusch, D.: 1989, Reflexives, reference shifters and attitudes, Proceedings of the 8th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association.
3. Aehling, K. and Schwichtenberg, H.: 2000, A syntactical analysis of non-sizeincreasing polynomial time computation, Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2000), IEEE Computer Science Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 84–91.
4. Aloni, M.: 2001, Quantification under Conceptual Convers, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
5. Asher, N.: 1986, Belief in discourse representation theory, Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 127–189.
6. Asher, N.: 1987, A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties, Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 125–198.
7. Asher, N.: 1989, Belief, acceptance and belief reports, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19, 321–361.
8. Asher, N.: 1992, A default, truth conditional semantics for the progressive, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508.
9. Asher, N.: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, number 50 in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
10. Asher, N.: 2006, Aspects of Things, Philosophical Issues: A Supplement to Nous, Philosophy of Language 7, 1–20.
11. Asher, N.: 2007, Objects, locations and complex types, in L. Vieu and M. Aurnague (eds), The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition, Benjamin.
12. Asher, N. and Denis, P.: 2004, Dynamic typing for lexical semantics, a case study: The genitive, Proceedings of FOIS 2004, University of Torino, Italy, pp. 11–18.
13. Asher, N. and Denis, P.: 2005, Lexical ambiguity as type disjunction, Proceedings of GL 05, University of Paris 7, France.
14. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 1995, Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context, Journal of Semantics 12, 69–108.
15. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 1998a, Bridging, Journal of Semantics 15, 83–113.
16. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 1998b, The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition, Journal of Semantics 15, 239–299.
17. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 1999, Metaphor in discourse, in F. Busa and J. Pustejovsky (eds), Views on the Generative Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
18. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 2001, Indirect speech acts, Synthese 129(1–2), 183–228.
19. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.: 2003, Logics of Conversation, Cambridge University Press.
20. Asher, N. and Morreau, M.: 1995, What some generic sentences mean, in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, pp. 300–338.
21. Asher, N. and Pustejovsky, J.: 2006, A type composition logic for generative lexicon, Journal of Cognitive Science 6, 1–38.
22. Asher, N. and Reese, B.: 2005, Negative bias in polar questions, in E. Maier, C. Bary and J. Huitink (eds), Proceedings of SuB 9, pp. 30–43. www.ru.nl/ncs/sub9.
23. Asher, N. and Sablayrolles, P.: 1995, A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial pps in french, Journal of Semantics.
24. Asher, N. and Vieu, L.: 1995, Toward a Geometry of Common Sense: A Semantics and a Complete Axiomatization of Mereotopology, International Joint Conference onArtificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montréal, Canada, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 846–852.
25. Asher, N. and Wang, L.: 2003, Ambiguity, anaphora and plurals in discourse, in C. Publications (ed.), SALT XIII, Cornell University, pp. 151–168.
26. Asperti, A. and Longo, G.: 1991, Catgories, Types and Structures: An Introduction to Category Theory for the Working Computer Scientist, MIT Press.
27. Aurnage, M. and Vieu, L.: 1997, A three-level approach to the semantics of space, in C. Zelinski-Wibbelt (ed.), From Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing, Natural Language Processing 3, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 393–439.
28. Aurnague, M.: 1998, Basque genitives and part whole relations: Typical configurations and dependencies, Technical Report, CLLE, Universit`e Toulouse le Mirail.
29. Barr, M. and Wells, C.: 1990, Category theory for computing science, 3rd edition, available from University of Montréal’s centre de recherches mathématiques.
30. Barwise, J. and Cooper, R.: 1981, Generalized quantifiers in natural language, Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1), 159–219.
31. Bary, C.: 2009, The Semantics of the Aorist and Imperfective in Ancient Greece, PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.
32. Bassac, C., Méry, B. and Rétoré, C.: 2010, Towards a type-theoretical account of lexical semantics, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19(2), 229–245.
33. Beaver, D.: 2001, Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
34. Beaver, D. and Condoravdi, C.: 2007, On the logic of verbal modification, available at https://webspace.utexas.edu/dib97/.
35. Black, M.: 1962, Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press.
36. Black, M.: n.d., More about metaphor, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.
37. Blackburn, P.: 1997, Modal logic and attribute value structures, in M. de Rijke (ed.), Diamonds and Defaults, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 151–168.
38. Borer, H.: 2005a, Structuring Sense, Vol.1: In Name Only, Oxford University Press.
39. Borer, H.: 2005b, Structuring Sense, Vol.2: The Normal Course of Events, Oxford University Press.
40. Bouillon, P.: 1997, Polymorphie et sémantique lexicale: le cas des adjectifs, Presses Universitaires du Spetentrion, Lille, France.
41. Bowdle, B. and Gentner, D.: 2006, The career of metaphor, Psychological Review 112(1), 193–216.
42. Burge, T.: 1979, Individualism and the mental, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, 73–121.
43. Busa, F.: 1996, Compositionality and the Semantics of Nominals, PhD thesis, Brandeis University.
44. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E.: 2004, Insensitive Semantics, Basil Blackwells, Oxford.
45. Cardelli, L.: 1988, A semantics for multiple inheritance, Information and Computation 76, 138–164.
46. Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA. Distributed by GLSA.
47. Carpenter, R.: 1992, The Logic of Typed Feature Structures, Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press.
48. Carston, R.: 2002, Thought and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Blackwell’s Publishing, Oxford.
49. Chen, G. and Longo, G.: 1995, Parametric and type-dependent polymorphism, Fundamentae Informaticae 22, 69–92.
50. Chierchia, G.: 1984, Topics in the Syntax and Sematics of Infinitives and Gerunds, PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA. Distributed by GLSA.
51. Church, A.: 1936, An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory, American Journal of Mathematics 58, 354–363.
52. Church, A.: 1940, A formulation of the simple theory of types, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5(2), 56–68.
53. Cinque, G.: 1999, Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Oxford studies in comparative syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
54. Climent, S.: 2001, Individuation by partitive constructions in spanish, in P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds), The Syntax of Word Meaning, Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–123.
55. Cooper, R.: 2005, Do delicious lunches take a long time?, ESSLLI 2005 presentation.
56. Coquand, T.: 1986, An analysis of girard’s paradox, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium in Logic and Computer Science, pp. 227–236.
57. Crole, R. L.: 1993, Categories for Types, Cambridge University Press.
58. Cruse, D. A.: 1986, Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press.
59. Danlos, L.: 2001, Event coherence in causal discourses, in P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds), The Syntax of Word Meaning, Cambridge University Press.
60. Danlos, L.: 2007, Integrating discourse relations into lexical semantics, Proceedings of GL’07, Paris, France.
61. Davidson, D.: 1968/69, The logical form of action sentences, in P. Ludlow (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Language, MIT Press, pp. 337–346.
62. de Groote, P.: 2001, Towards abstract categorial grammars, Association for Computational Linguistics, 39th Annual Meeting and 10th Conference of the European Chapter, Proceedings of the Conference, pp. 148–155.
63. de Groote, P.: 2006, Towards a montegovian account of dynamics, SALT 16, CLC Publications, pp. 148–155.
64. de Swart, H.: 1998, Aspect shift and coercion, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 347–385.
65. Donnelly, M.: 2001, An Axiomatization of Common-Sense Geometry, PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
66. Dowty, D. R.: 1979, Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ, number 7 in Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
67. Dretske, F.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
68. Egg, M.: 2003, Beginning novels and finishing hamburgers: Remarks on the semantics of to begin, Journal of Semantics 20, 163–191.
69. Enç, M.: 1986, Towards a Referential Analysis of Temporal Expressions, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(4), 405–426.
70. Fernando, T.: 2004, A finite-state approach to events in natural language semantics, J. Log. Comput. 14(1), 79–92.
71. Fine, K.: 1982, Acts, events and things, Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg-Wechsel, Austria, pp. 97–105.
72. Fodor, J. and Lepore, E.: 1998, The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky’s the generative lexicon, Linguistic Inquiry 29(2), 269–288.
73. Frank, A. and van Genabith, J.: 2001, Glue Tag: Linear Logic based Semantics Construction for LTAG- and what it teaches us about the relation between LFG and LTAG, in M. Butt and T. H. King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG’01 Conference, CSLI Publications, Online Proceedings, Stanford, CA. http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/6/lfg01.html.
74. Gärdenfors, P.: 1988, Conceptual Spaces, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
75. Gentner, D. and Markman, A.: 2006, Defining structural similarity, The Journal of Cognitive Science 6, 1–20.
76. Girard, J. Y.: 1971, Une extension de l’interprétation de Goedel, in J. Fenstad (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scandanavian Logic Symposium, Studies in Logic 63, North Holland, pp. 63–92.
77. Girard, J.-Y.: 1987, Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102.
78. Godard, D. and Jayez, J.: 1993, Towards a proper treatment of coercion phenomena, Proceedings of the 1993 European ACL.
79. Goldblatt, R.: 1979, Topoi, Thge Categorial Analysis of Logic, North Holland.
80. Grimshaw, J. B.: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
81. Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M.: 1991, Dynamic predicate logic, Linguistics and Philosophy 14(1), 39–100.
82. Gross, M.: 1975, Méthodes en Syntaxe, Hermann, Paris.
83. Hardt, D., Asher, N. and Busquets, J.: 2001, Discourse parallelism, scope and ellipsis, Journal of Semantics 18, 1–16.
84. Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA.
85. Heim, I.: 1983, On the projection problem for presuppositions, in M. Barlow, D. Flickinger and M. Westcoat (eds), Second Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University, pp. 114–126.
86. Howard, W. A.: 1980, The formulas-as-types notion of construction, in P. Seldin and J. R. Hindley (eds), To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalism, Academic Press, pp. 479–490. First appeared in Language, Vol. 29 (1953), pp.47-58.
87. Hunter, J. and Asher, N.: 2005, A presuppositional account of indexicals, in P. Dekker and M. Francke (eds), Proceedings of Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, pp. 119–124.
88. Jackendoff, R.: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
89. Jaeger, G.: 2003, Toward an explanation of copula effects, Linguistics and Philosophy.
90. Kamp, H.: 1981, A theory of truth and semantic representation, in J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds), Formal Methods in Study of Languages, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam.
91. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U.: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
92. Kamp, H. and Rossdeutscher, A.: 1994a, Drs-construction and lexically driven inference, Theoretical Linguistics 20(2), 165–235.
93. Kamp, H. and Rossdeutscher, A.: 1994b, Remarks on lexical structure and drs construction, Theoretical Linguistics 20(2), 97–164.
94. Kennedy, C.: 1997, Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
95. Kleiber, G.: 1999, La Polysémie en question, Presses Universitaires de Septentrion.
96. Kratzer, A.: 2002, Telicity and the meaning of objective case, manuscript.
97. Kratzer, A.: 2005, Building resultatives, in C. Maienborn and A. Wölstein-Leisten (eds), Event in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Niemeyer Publishers, Tübingen, pp. 177–212.
98. Krifka, M.: 1987, Nominal and temporal constitution: Towards a semantics of quantity, Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam, Institute for Language, Logic and Information, pp. 153–173.
99. Kripke, S. A.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
100. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press.
101. Lambek, J. and Scott, P. J.: 1986, Introduction to Higher Order Categorial Logic, Cambridge University Press.
102. Landman, F.: 1998, Groups ii, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 125–170.
103. Langacker, R.: 1990, Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
104. Lascarides, A. and Copestake, A.: 1995, The pragmatics of word meaning, Proceedings SALT V, Ithaca, NY.
105. Lascarides, A., Briscoe, E., Asher, N. and Copestake, A.: 1996, Order independent and persistent typed default unification, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 1–89.
106. Levin, B.: 1993, Towards a Lexical Organization of English Verbs, University of Chicago Press.
107. Levin, B.: 1999, Objecthood: An event structure perspective, CLS 35, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 233–247.
108. Levin, B. and Rappaport, M.: 1994, A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English, Lingua 92, 35–77.
109. Lewis, D.: 1969, Convention, Cambridge University Press.
110. Lieber, R.: 2004, Morphology and Lexical Semantics, University of Chicago Press.
111. Longo, G.: 2004, Subtyping parametric and dependent types: An introduction, Unpublished lecture available from Giuseppe Longo’s website.
112. Luo, Z.: 1994, Computation and Reasoning: A Type Theory for Computer Science, Oxford University Press.
113. Luo, Z.: 1999, Coercive subtyping, Journal of Logic and Computation 9(1), 105–130.
114. Luo, Z. and Callaghan, P.: 1998, Mathematical vernacular and conceptual wellformedness in mathematical language, Proceedings of LACL 97, Springer Verlag, LNCS series.
115. Marantz, A.: 1997, No escape from syntax, in A. D. et. al. (ed.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, University of Pennsylvania, pp. 201–225.
116. Martin-Löf, P.: 1980, Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis, Naples, Italy.
117. Melloni, C.: 2007, Polysemy in Word Formation: The Case of Deverbal Nominals, PhD thesis, University of Verona, Italy.
118. Merin, A.: 1999, Information, relevance, and social decisionmaking: some principles and results of decision-theoretic semantics, available at http://folli.loria.fr/cds/1999/library/pdf/irsdmu.pdf.
119. Moltmann, F.: 2004, Nonreferential complements, nominalizations, and derived objects, Journal of Semantics 21, 1–45.
120. Moravscik, J.: 1975, Aitia as generative factors in Aristotle’s philosophy, Dialogue 14, 622–636.
121. Muller, P.: 2002, Topological spatio-temporal reasoning and representation, Computational Intelligence 18(3), 420–450.
122. Muller, P. and Sarda, L.: 1999, Représentation de la sémantique des verbes de déplacements transitifs du français, Traitement Automatique des Langues 39(2), 127–147.
123. Muskens, R.: 2007, Intensional models for the theory of types, Journal of Symbolic Logic 72(1), 98–118.
124. Nunberg, G.: 1979, The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 143–184.
125. Nunberg, G.: 1993, Indexicality and deixis, Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1), 1–43.
126. Nunberg, G.: 1995, Transfers of meaning, Journal of Semantics 12, 109–132.
127. Ortony, A.: 1979, Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.
128. Partee, B.: 1984, Compositionality, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 281–311.
129. Partee, B.: 2004, Privative adjectives: Subsective plus coercion, Forthcoming in a Festschrift for Hans Kamp.
130. Partee, B. and Rooth, M.: 1983, Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwartze and A. von Stechow (eds), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.
131. Peacocke, C.: 1992, A Study of Concepts, MIT Press.
132. Pelletier, J. and Asher, N.: 1997, Generics and defaults, in J. van Bentham and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Dordrecht, pp. 1125–1175.
133. Pogodalla, S.: 2004, Computing semantic representation: Towards acg abstract terms as derivation trees, TAG+8, Proceedings of the sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Frameworks, University of Vancouver.
134. Pogodalla, S.: 2008, Exploring a type-theoretic approach to accessibility constraint modelling, Journées de sémantique et modélisation, Université de Toulouse 2.
135. Prévot, L.: 2006, The link between formal ontology and lexical semantics, 3rd Conference on Truth and Experience, SooChow University, Taipei.
136. Pustejovsky, J.: 1995, The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press.
137. Pustejovsky, J.: 2001, Type construction and the logic of concepts, in P. Bouillon and F. Busa (eds), The Syntax of Word Meaning, Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–123.
138. Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B.: 1993, Lexical knowledge representation and natural language processing, Artificial Intelligence 63, 193–223.
139. Pustejovsky, J. and Bouillon, P.: 1995, Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy, Journal of Semantics 12, 133–162.
140. Putnam, H.: 1975, The meaning of “meaning”, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 131–193.
141. Ranta, A.: 2004, Grammatical framework: A type-theoretical grammar formalism, Journal of Functional Programming 14(2), 145–189.
142. Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
143. Recanati, F.: 2002, Unarticulated constituents, Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 299–345.
144. Recanati, F.: 2004, Literal Meaning, Cambridge University Press.
145. Recanati, F.: 2005, Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties, in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds), Contextualism in Philosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 171–196.
146. Reese, B. and Asher, N.: 2007, The nuclear option: Prosody and the interpretation of tag questions, in E. Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, pp. 433–447.
147. Reynolds, J.: 1983, Types, abstraction and parametric polymorphism, in R. Mason (ed.), Information Processing’83, North Holland, pp. 513–523.
148. Rossdeutscher, A.: 2007, DM meets DRT: The Syntax and Semantics of German ung nominalization, Workshop on Theoretical Morphology.
149. Rothstein, S.: 2004, Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect, Blackwell’s Publishing.
150. Sag, I.: 1981, Formal semantics and extra-linguistic content, in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 13: Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 273–294.
151. Saul, J. M.: 1997, Substitution and simple sentences, Analysis 57(2), 102–108.
152. Scott, D.: 1972, Continuous lattices, inW. Lawvere (ed.), Toposes, Algebraic Geometry and Logic, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Publishers, pp. 97–136.
153. Searle, J.: 1979, Metaphor, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–123.
154. Smith, C.: 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
155. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
156. Stanley, J. and Szabo, Z.: 2000, On quantifier domain restriction, Mind and Language 15, 219–261.
157. Szabo, Z.: 2003, On qualification, Philosophical Perspectives 17, 409–438.
158. Turing, A.: 1937, Computability and λ-definability, Journal of Symbolic Logic 2, 153–163.
159. Tye, M.: 1999, Ten Problems of Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
160. van der Sandt, R.: 1992, Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution, Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377.
161. van Rooij, R. and Schulz, K.: 2004, Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 13, 491–519.
162. Veltman, F.: 1996, Defaults in update semantics, Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–261.
163. Verspoor, K.: 1997, Contextually Dependent Lexical Semantics, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
164. Vespoor, C.: 1996, Lexical Limits on the Influence of Context, Proceedings Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 116–120.
165. Vieu, L.: 1997, Spatial representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence, in O. Stock (ed.), Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 5–41.
166. Vikner, C. and Jensen, P. A.: 2002, Semantic analysis of the English genitive: Interaction of lexical and formal semantics, Studia Linguistica 56, 191–226.
167. Wechsler, S.: 2005, Resultatives under the “Event-Argument Homomorphism”, in N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds), The Syntax of Aspect, Oxford University Press.