Legal revision and religious renewal in Ancient Israel

Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-206

  Levinson, Bernard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929874315     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499029     Document Type: Book

References (355)

1. A. D. H. Mayes, Deuteronomy (NCB; London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1979), 248.
2. B. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 17-20.
3. John J. Collins, The Bible after Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age (Grand Rapids, Mich.:William B. Eerdmans, 2005).
4. Anselm C. Hagedorn, “Local Law in an Imperial Context: The Role of Torah in the (Imagined) Persian Period,” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson;Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007), 57-76.
5. Robert P. Carroll, “Poststructuralist Approaches: New Historicism and Postmodernism,“ in The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation (ed. John Barton; Cambridge: Cambridge University ress), 50-66.
6. Keith Whitelam, The Invention of Ancient Israel: The Silencing of Palestinian History (London: Routledge, 1997).
7. George Aichele et al. [as the Bible and Culture Collective], The Postmodern Bible (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995).
8. Meir Sternberg, Hebrews between Cultures: Group Portraits and National Literature (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998).
9. James Nohrnberg, Like untoMoses: The Constitution of an Interruption (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995).
10. Stephen P. Weitzman, JQR 94 (2004): 537-41.
11. Edward W. Said, Humanism and Democratic Criticism (Columbia Themes in Philosophy; New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).
12. David Stern, “Literary Criticism or Literary Homilies? Susan Handelman and the Contemporary Study of Midrash,” Proof 5 (1985): 96-103.
13. idem, “Midrash and Hermeneutics: Polysemy vs. Indeterminacy,” in idem, Midrash and Theory: Ancient Jewish Exegesis andContemporary Literary Studies (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1996), 15-38.
14. Azzan Yadin, “The Hammer on the Rock: Mekhilta Deuteronomy and the Question of Rabbinic Polysemy,” JSQ 9 (2002): 1-27.
15. Barbara A. Holdrege, “The Bride of Israel: The Ontological Status of Scripture in the Rabbinic and Kabbalistic Traditions,” in Rethinking Scripture, 180-261.
16. eadem, Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996).
17. Robert Alter, Canon and Creativity: Modern Writing and the Authority of Scripture (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2000), 5.
18. idem, Pleasure and Change: The Aesthetics of Canon (ed. Robert Alter; The Berkeley Tanner Lectures; New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
19. Louis Jonker, “Reforming History: The Hermeneutical Significance of the Books of Chronicles,” VT 57 (2007): 21-44.
20. Helmuth Plessner, “Ein Volk der Dichter und Denker?: Zu einem Wort der Madame de Staël” [1964], in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 6: Die verspätete Nation (ed. Günter Dux et al.; Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1982), 281-91.
21. Jeffrey L. Sammons, “The Land Where the Canon B(l)ooms: Observations on the German Canon and Its Opponents, There and Here,” in Canon vs. Culture: Reflections on the Current Debate (Wellesley Studies in Critical Theory, Literary History, and Culture 23; New York: Garland, 2001), 117-33.
22. Michel Espagne, “‘De l'Allemagne,’” in Deutsche Erinnerungsorte (ed. Etienne François and Hagen Schulze; 3 vols.; 4th ed.; Munich: C. H. Beck, 2002), 1: 225-41.
23. Heinrich Heine, Sämtliche Schriften in zwölf Bänden, vol. 11: Schriften 1851-1855 (ed. Klaus Briegleb; Munich: Hanser Verlag, 1968), 483.
24. Anat Feinberg, “Abiding in a Haunted House: The Issue of Heimat in Contemporary German-Jewish Writing,” New German Critique 70 (1997): 161-81.
25. Susannah Heschel, Abraham Geiger and the Jewish Jesus (CSHJ; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
26. Thomas Albert Howard, Religion and the Rise of Historicism: W. M. L. de Wette, Jacob Burckhardt, and the Theological Origins of Nineteenth-Century Historical Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
27. idem, Protestant Theology and the Making of the Modern German University (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
28. Suzanne L. Marchand, “Philhellenism and the Furor Orientalis,” Modern Intellectual History 1 (2004): 331-58.
29. Christian Wiese, Challenging Colonial Discourse: Jewish Studies and Protestant Theology in Wilhelmine Germany (trans. Barbara Harshav; Studies in Jewish History and Culture 10; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2005).
30. Herbert N. Schneidau, Sacred Discontent: The Bible and Western Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).
31. Brayton Polka, The Dialectic of Biblical Critique: Interpretation and Existence (New York: St. Martin's, 1986).
32. idem, Truth and Interpretation: An Essay in Thinking (New York: St. Martin's; London: Macmillan, 1990).
33. Bernard M. Levinson, “The Neo-Assyrian Origins of the Canon Formula in Deuteronomy 13:1,” in Scriptural Exegesis: The Shapes of Culture and the Religious Imagination (Essays in Honour of Michael Fishbane) (ed. Deborah A. Green and Laura S. Lieber; Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming in 2009).
34. Johannes Leipoldt and Siegfried Morenz, Heilige Schriften: Betrachtungen zur Religionsgeschichte der antiken Mittelmeerwelt (Leipzig: Harrassowitz, 1953), 53-65.
35. Nahum M. Sarna, “Psalm 89: A Study in Inner Biblical Exegesis,” in Biblical and Other Studies (ed. Alexander Altmann; Brandeis University Studies and Texts 1; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963), 29-46.
36. idem, Studies inBiblical Interpretation (JPS Scholar of Distinction Series; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2000), 377-94.
37. Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Oxford: Clarendon, 1972; reprint, Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 261-65.
38. Michael Fishbane, “Varia Deuteronomica,“ ZAW 84 (1972): 349-352.
39. Eleonore Reuter, “‘Nimm nichts davon weg und füge nichts hinzu’: Dtn 13,1, seine alttestamentlichen Parallelen und seine altorientalischen Vorbilder,” BN 47 (1989): 107-14.
40. Christoph Dohmen and Manfred Oeming, Biblischer Kanon: Warum und Wozu? Eine Kanontheologie (QD 137; Freiburg: Herder, 1992), 68-89.
41. Choon-Leong Seow, Ecclesiastes (AB 18C; New York: Doubleday, 1997), 388, 394.
42. Karl-Joachim Hölkeskamp, Schiedsrichter, Gesetzgeber und Gesetzgebung im archaischen Griechenland (Historia-Einzelschrift 131; Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1999).
43. idem, “(In)Schrift und Monument: Zum Begriff des Gesetzes im archaischen und klassischen Griechenland,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 132 (2000): 73-96.
44. Anselm C. Hagedorn, Between Moses and Plato: Individual and Society in Deuteronomy and Ancient Greek Law (FRLANT 204; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004), 76-78, 163.
45. James A. Sanders, “‘Adaptable for Life’: The Nature and Function of Canon,” in Magnalia Dei: The Mighty Acts of God. Essays on the Bible and Archaeology in Memory of G. Ernest Wright (ed. Frank Moore Cross, Werner E. Lemke, and Patrick D. Miller Jr.; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1976), 531-60.
46. James A. Sanders, From Sacred Story to Sacred Text: Canon as Paradigm (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987), 9-39.
47. Jonathan Z. Smith, “Sacred Persistence: Toward a Redescription of Canon,” in idem, Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown (CSHJ; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 36-52.
48. Smith's further reflections on that study in idem, “Canons, Catalogues and Classics,” in Canonization and Decanonization, 303-9.
49. Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (2d ed.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1988), 79, 263.
50. Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (2d ed.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1988), 79, 263.
51. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 17-20.
52. Gershom Scholem, “Revelation and Tradition as Religious Categories in Judaism,” in idem, The Messianic Idea in Judaism and Other Essays on Jewish Spirituality (New York: Schocken, 1971), 282-303.
53. Haim H. Cohn, “Legal Change in Unchangeable Law: The Talmudical Pattern,” in Legal Change: Essays in Honour of Julius Stone (ed. A. R. Blackshield; Sydney: Butterworths, 1983), 10-33.
54. Richard E. Palmer's Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer (Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy; Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1969), 23-24.
55. Werner G. Jeanrond still views both interpretation and reception as theological categories separate from and subsequent to the composition of the text (Text and Interpretation as Categories of Theological Thinking [New York: Crossroad, 1988]).
56. Brayton Polka, Truth and Interpretation: An Essay in Thinking (New York: St. Martin's; London: Macmillan, 1990).
57. James L. Kugel, “Early Interpretation: The Common Background of Late Forms of Biblical Exegesis,” in Early Biblical Interpretation (ed. James L. Kugel and Rowan Greer; Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986), 9-106.
58. idem, Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998).
59. Jacob Weingreen, From Bible to Mishna: The Continuity of Tradition (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1976).
60. Yair Zakovitch, An Introduction to Inner-Biblical Interpretation (Even Yehudah: Rekhes, 1992).
61. Eckart Otto, “Innerbiblische Exegese im Heiligkeitsgesetz Levitikus 17-26,” in Levitikus als Buch (ed.Heinz-Josef Fabry and Hans-Winfried Jüngling; BBB 119; Berlin: Philo, 1999), 125-96.
62. James L. Kugel, “The Bible's Earliest Interpreters,” Proof 7 (1987): 269-83.
63. Nahum M. Sarna, “Abraham Geiger and Biblical Scholarship,” in idem, Studies in Biblical Interpretation (JPS Scholar of Distinction Series; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2000), 161-72.
64. Åke W. Sjöberg, “The Old Babylonian Eduba,” in Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen on His Seventieth Birthday, June 7, 1974 (ed. Stephen J. Lieberman; AS 20; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975), 159-79.
65. Herman L. J. Vanstiphout, “On the Old Babylonian Eduba Curriculum,” in Centres of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East (ed. Jan Willem Drijvers and Alasdair A. MacDonald; Brill's Studies in Intellectual History 61; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 3-16.
66. Andrew R. George, “In Search of the é.dub.ba.a: The Ancient Mesopotamian School in Literature and Reality,” in “An Experienced Scribe Who Neglects Nothing”: Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Jacob Klein (ed. Yitzhak [Yitschak] Sefati et al.; Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2005), 127-37.
67. Niek Veldhuis, Religion, Literature, and Scholarship: The Sumerian Composition “Nanše and the Birds,” with a Catalogue of Sumerian Bird Names (Cuneiform Monographs 22; Leiden: E. J. Brill/Styx, 2004).
68. Benno Landsberger, The Conceptual Autonomy of the Babylonian World (trans. Thorkild Jacobsen, BenjaminR. Foster, and Heinrich von Siebenthal; Monographs on the Ancient Near East 1/4; Malibu, Calif.: Undena, 1976).
69. F. R. Kraus, “Ein zentrales Problem des altmesopotamischen Rechtes: Was ist der Codex Hammu-rabi?” Aspects du contact suméro-akkadien [9th Rencontre assyriologique internationale, Geneva, June 20-23, 1960].
70. Raymond Westbrook, “Biblical and Cuneiform Law Codes,” Revue biblique 92 (1985): 247-64.
71. Jean Bottéro, Mesopotamia: Writing, Reasoning, and the Gods (trans. Zainab Bahrani and Marc Van De Mieroop; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 156-84.
72. Martha T. Roth, “Mesopotamian Legal Traditions and the Laws of Hammurabi,“ Chicago-Kent Law Review 71 (1995): 13-39.
73. Victor Avigdor Hurowitz, “Hammurabi in Mesopotamian Tradition,” in “An Experienced Scribe Who Neglects Nothing”: Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Jacob Klein (ed. Yitzhak [Yitschak] Sefati et al.; Bethesda, Md.: CDL Press, 2005), 497-532.
74. Bernard M. Levinson, “Is the Covenant Code an Exilic Composition? A Response to John Van Seters,” in idem, “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation (FAT 54; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), 276-330.
75. Reuven Yaron, “‘Enquire Now about Hammurabi, Ruler of Babylon,’” The Legal History Review 59 (1991): 223-38.
76. Martha T. Roth, “Hammurabi's Wronged Man,” JAOS 122 (2002): 38-45.
77. David P. Wright, “The Laws of Hammurabi as a Source for the Covenant Collection (Exodus 20:23-23:19),” Maarav 10 (2003): 11-87.
78. Benno Landsberger, The Conceptual Autonomy of the Babylonian World (trans. Thorkild Jacobsen, Benjamin R. Foster, and Heinrich von Siebenthal; Monographs on the Ancient Near East 1/4; Malibu, Calif.: Undena, 1976).
79. Hans Ulrich Steymans, Deuteronomium 28 und die adê zur Thronfolgeregelung Asarhaddons: Segen und Fluch im Alten Orient und in Israel (OBO 145; Freiburg: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1995), 143-94.
80. Moshe Greenberg, “Some Postulates of Biblical Criminal Law,” in Yehezkel Kaufmann Jubilee Volume (ed. Menahem Haran; Jerusalem: Magnes, 1960), 5-28.
81. William Shakespeare, King Lear (ed. Stanley Wells, text prepared by Gary Taylor; The Oxford Shakespeare; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 237.
82. William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of King Lear (ed. Jay L. Halio; The New Cambridge Shakespeare; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 224.
83. Peter B. Machinist, “On Self-Consciousness in Mesopotamia,” in The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations (ed. Shmuel N. Eisenstadt; Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986), 183-202.
84. idem, “Mesopotamia in Eric Voegelin's Order and History,” in Occasional Papers, Eric-Voegelin-Archiv 26 (ed. Peter J. Opitz and Dietmar Herz; Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians University, 2001), 1-54.
85. Jóhann Páll Árnason, “The Axial Age and Its Interpreters: Reopening a Debate,” in Axial Civilizations and World History (ed. Jóhann Páll Árnason, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, and Björn Wittrock; Jerusalem Studies in Religion and Culture 4; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2005), 19-49;.
86. Jan Assmann, “Axial ‘Breakthroughs’ and Semantic ‘Relocations’ in Ancient Egypt and Israel,” in Axial Civilizations and World History, 133-56.
87. Robert N. Bellah, “What is Axial about the Axial Age?” Archive of European Sociology 46 (2005): 69-87.
88. J. Alberto Soggin, Introduction to the Old Testament: From Its Origins to the Closing of the Alexandrian Canon (3ded.; OTL; Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1989), 445-47.
89. Thomas Krüger, Qoheleth:A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2004), 27-28.
90. Erich Zenger et al., eds., Einleitung in das Alte Testament (6th ed.; Kohlhammer Studienbucher Theologie 1.1; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2006), 369.
91. Trevor Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites (2d ed.; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
92. Gerhard Ries, Prolog und Epilog in Gesetzen desAltertums (MBPF 76; Munich: C. H. Beck, 1983).
93. Jeffrey H. Tigay, “The Stylistic Criterion of Source Criticism in the Light of Ancient Near Eastern and Postbiblical Literature,” in Empirical Models for Biblical Criticism (ed. Jeffrey H. Tigay; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), 150-73.
94. Victor Avigdor Hurowitz, “Inu Anum sïrum”: Literary Structures in the Non-Juridical Sections of Codex Hammurabi (Philadelphia: Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund 15, 1994), 90-103.
95. Ephraim Neufeld, The Hittite Laws (London: Luzac & Co., 1951), 95-101.
96. V. Korošec, “Le problème de la codification dans le domaine du droit hittite,” RIDA 4 (1957): 93-105.
97. Harry Angier Hoffner Jr., The Laws of the Hittites: A Critical Edition (DMOA 23; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 21.
98. Martin S. Jaffee, “The Taqqanah in Tannaitic Literature: Jurisprudence and the Construction of Rabbinic Memory,” JJS 41 (1990): 204-25.
99. Goetze, trans., “The Hittite Laws,” in Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (ed. James B. Pritchard; 3d ed.; Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969), 188-97.
100. Ronald Hendel, “Appendix: Linguistic Notes on the Age of Biblical Literature,” in Remembering Abraham: Culture, Memory, and History in the Hebrew Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 109-64.
101. Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (2d ed.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1988), 98-102.
102. Jean-Luc Vesco, “La date du livre de Ruth,” RB 74 (1967): 235-47.
103. Robert L. Hubbard, The Book of Ruth (NICOT; Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1988), 23-35.
104. Jack M. Sasson, Ruth: A New Translation with a Philological Commentary and a Formalist-Folklorist Interpretation (2d ed.; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989), 240-52.
105. Christian Frevel, Das Buch Rut (Neuer Stuttgarter Kommentar, Altes Testament 6; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1992), 34.
106. Yair Zakovitch, Das Buch Rut: Ein jüdischer Kommentar (SBS 177; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1999), 38-40.
107. Erich Zenger, “Das Buch Rut,” in Einleitung in das Alte Testament (ed. Erich Zenger et al.; 6th ed.; Kohlhammer Studienbucher Theologie 1.1; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2006), 222-29.
108. Erich Zenger, Das Buch Ruth (2d ed.; ZBKAT 8; Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1992), 28.
109. Georg Braulik, “Das Deuteronomium und die Bucher Ijob, Sprichwörter und Rut: Zur Frage früher Kanonizitat des Deuteronomiums,” in idem, Studien zum Deuteronomium und seiner Nachgeschichte (SBAB 33; Stuttgart: Katholisches, 2001), 213-93.
110. Alexander Rofé, “The Strata about the Organization of Justice in Deuteronomy (16:18-20; 17:8-13),” Beth Miqra 65 (1976): 199-210.
111. Gary N. Knoppers, “Jehoshaphat's Judiciary and ‘the Scroll of yhwh’s Torah,’” JBL 113 (1994): 59-80.
112. James I. Porter, “Feeling Classical: Classicism and Ancient Literary Criticism,” in Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome (ed. James I. Porter; Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006), 301-52.
113. David Janzen, Witch-Hunts, Purity, and Social Boundaries: The Expulsion of the Foreign Women in Ezra 9-10 (JSOTSup 350; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002).
114. Joachim Schaper, “Rereading the Law: Inner-Biblical Exegesis of Divine Oracles in Ezekiel 44 and Isaiah 56,” in Recht und Ethik im Alten Testament: Studies in German and English in Honor of Gerhard von Rad (ed. Bernard M. Levinson and Eckart Otto, with assistance from Walter Dietrich; ATM 13; Munster: LIT Verlag, 2004), 125-44.
115. Victor H. Matthews, “Entrance Ways and Threshing Floors: Legally Significant Sites in the Ancient Near East,” Fides et Historia 19 (1987): 25-40.
116. Moshe Weinfeld, “Elders,” in Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1972), 6: 578-80.
117. Leslie J. Hoppe, The Origins of Deuteronomy (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, 1978).
118. idem, “Elders and Deuteronomy,” EgT 14 (1983): 259-72.
119. Joachim Buchholz, Die Ältesten Israels im Deuteronomium (GTA 36; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1988).
120. Jan Christian Gertz, Die Gerichtsorganisation Israels im deuteronomischen Gesetz (FRLANT 165; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994), 173-225.
121. Hanoch Reviv, The Elders in Ancient Israel: A Study of a Biblical Institution (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1989), 61-70.
122. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 124-26.
123. Timothy M. Willis, The Elders of the City: A Study of the Elders-Laws in Deuteronomy (SBLMS 55; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2001).
124. Raymond Westbrook, Property and the Family in Biblical Law (JSOTSup 113; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1991), 65-67.
125. Wilhelm Rudolph, Das Buch Ruth; das Hohe Lied; die Klagelieder (KAT 17.1-3; Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1962), 67-68.
126. E. F. Campbell Jr., Ruth (AB 7; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1975), 147-48.
127. Avi Hurvitz, “On the Term in Ruth 4:7,” in Shnaton I: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies (ed. Jonas C. Greenfield and Moshe Weinfeld; Jerusalem: Israel Bible Company; Tel Aviv: M. Newman; 1975), 45-49.
128. Åke Viberg, Symbols of Law: A Contextual Analysis of Legal Symbolic Acts in the Old Testament (ConBOT 34; Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1992), 145-48.
129. Paul A. Kruger, “The Removal of the Sandal in Deuteronomy XXV 9: ‘A Rite of Passage’?“ VT 46 (1996): 534-39.
130. idem, “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation (FAT 54; Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), 7-39.
131. Jean-Pierre Sonnet, “God's Repentance and ‘False Starts’ in Biblical History,” in Congress Volume Ljubljana 2007 (ed. André Lemaire; VTSup; Leiden: E. J. Brill, forthcoming in 2009).
132. Robert P. Carroll, When Prophecy Failed: Reactions to Failure in the Old Testament Prophetic Traditions (London: SCM Press, 1979).
133. Moshe Weinfeld, “Jeremiah and the Spiritual Metamorphosis of Israel,” ZAW88 (1976): 17-55.
134. Christoph Levin, Die Verheißung des neuen Bundes: in ihrem theologiegeschichtlichen Zusammenhang ausgelegt (FRLANT 137; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1985), 68-69.
135. Christoph Levin, “Der Dekalog am Sinai,” in idem, Fortschreibungen: Gesammelte Studien zumAlten Testament(BZAW 316; New York: WalterdeGruyter, 2003), 60-80.
136. Moshe Weinfeld, “Jeremiah and the Spiritual Metamorphosis of Israel,” ZAW 88 (1976): 17-55.
137. Moshe Weinfeld, “The Decalogue: Its Significance, Uniqueness, and Place in Israel’s Tradition,” in Religion and Law: Biblical-Judaic and Islamic Perspectives (ed. Edwin Brown Firmage, Bernard G. Weiss, and John W. Welch; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1990), 3-47.
138. Reinhard G. Kratz, “Der Dekalog im Exodusbuch,” VT 44 (1994): 205-38.
139. Erich Zenger, “Wie und wozu die Tora zum Sinai kam: Literarische und theologische Beobachtungen zu Exodus 19-34,” in Studies in the Book of Exodus: Redaction-Reception-Interpretation (ed. Marc Vervenne; BETL 126; Leuven: University Press/Peeters Press, 1996), 265-88.
140. idem, “Der Stand der Dekalogforschung,” in Recht und Ethik im Alten Testament (ed. Bernard M. Levinson and Eckart Otto, with assistance from Walter Dietrich; ATM 13; Munster/London: LIT Verlag, 2004), 57-65.
141. Mordechai Breuer, “Dividing the Decalogue into Verses and Commandments,” in The Ten Commandments in History and Tradition (ed. Ben-Zion Segal; trans. Gershon Levi; Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1990), 291-330.
142. Bernard M. Levinson, “Deuteronomy: Introduction and Commentary,” in The Jewish Study Bible (ed. Adele Berlin and Marc Zvi Brettler; New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 356-450.
143. Walther Zimmerli, “Das zweite Gebot” [1950], in Gottes Offenbarung: Gesammelte Aufsatze zum Alten Testament (TB 19; Munich: Chr. Kaiser, 1969), 234-48.
144. Jacob Z. Lauterbach, Mekilta de-Rabbi Ishmael (3 vols.; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1933), 2:239.
145. William L. Moran, “The Ancient Near Eastern Background of the Love of God in Deuteronomy,” CBQ 25 (1963): 77-87.
146. Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Oxford: Clarendon, 1972; reprint, Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 81-91.
147. Lothar Perlitt, Bundestheologie im Alten Testament (WMANT 36; Neukirchen Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1969).
148. Ernest W. Nicholson, God and His People: Covenant and Theology in the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
149. Eckart Otto, “Die Ursprunge der Bundestheologie im Alten Testament und im Alten Orient,” ZABR 4 (1998): 1-84.
150. Delbert R. Hillers, Covenant: The History of a Biblical Idea (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969).
151. Meir Weiss, “Some Problems in the Biblical Doctrine of Retribution,” Tarbiz 31 (1961-1962): 236-63.
152. Josef Scharbert, “Das Verbum PQD in der Theologie des Alten Testaments,” BZ 4 (1960): 209-26.
153. Yochanan Muffs, Love & Joy: Law, Language and Religion in Ancient Israel (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1992),.
154. Frank Moore Cross Jr., “The Cave Inscriptions from Hirbat Bayt Layy [Khirbet Beit Lei],” in Near Eastern Archaeology in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Nelson Glueck (ed. James A. Sanders; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1970), 299-306.
155. idem, Leaves From an Epigrapher's Notebook: Collected Papers in Hebrew and West Semitic Palaeography and Epigraphy (HSS 51; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2003), 166-70.
156. Patrick D. Miller Jr., “Psalms and Inscriptions,” in Congress Volume, Vienna, 1980 (ed. J. A. Emerton; VTSup 32; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981), 311-32.
157. Benjamin D. Sommer, “Exegesis, Allusion and Inter- textuality in the Hebrew Bible: A Response to Lyle Eslinger,” VT 46 (1996): 479-89.
158. idem, A Prophet Reads Scripture: Allusion in Isaiah 40-66 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998), 6-72.
159. Michael Fishbane, “Torah and Tradition,” in Tradition and Theology in the Old Testament (ed. Douglas A. Knight; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977), 275-82.
160. idem, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (2ded.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1988), 335-50.
161. Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 1-20 (AB 22; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1983), 325.
162. Christoph Levin, Die Verheißung des neuen Bundes: in ihrem theologiegeschichtlichen Zusammenhang ausgelegt (FRLANT 137; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1985), 38-39.
163. Eckart Otto, Das Deuteronomium: Politische Theologie und Rechtsreform in Juda und Assyrien (BZAW 284; Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999), 296-98.
164. idem, Das Buch des Propheten Hesekiel [Ezechiel], Kapitel 1-19 [ATD 22.1; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996], 257-76.
165. Baruch J. Schwartz, “Repentance and Determinism in Ezekiel,” Proceedings of the Eleventh World Congress of Jewish Studies, Division A, The Bible and Its World (ed. David Assaf; Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies, 1994), 123-30.
166. Paul M. Joyce, “Individual Responsibility in Ezekiel 18?” in Studia biblica i978:SixthInternationalCongressonBiblicalStudies, Oxford,3-7 April 1978 (ed. Elizabeth A. Livingstone; Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 1979), 185-96.
167. Gordon H. Matties, Ezekiel 18 and the Rhetoric of Moral Discourse in the Book of Ezekiel (SBLDS 126; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990), 113-58.
168. idem, “Ezekiel and Individual Responsibility,” in Ezekiel and His Book (ed. Johan Lust; BETL 74; Leuven: Peeters Press, 1986), 317-32.
169. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (trans. Norman Kemp Smith; unabridged ed.; New York: St. Martin's; Toronto: Macmillan, 1965), 478.
170. Yitzhak Y. Melamed, “Solomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004): 67-96.
171. Brayton Polka, Between Philosophy and Religion: Spinoza, the Bible, and Modernity, vol. 1: Hermeneutics and Ontology, and vol. 2: Politics and Ethics (Lanham, Md.: Lexington, 2006-2007).
172. Nancy K. Levene, Spinoza's Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
173. idem, “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation (FAT 54; Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), 7-39.
174. Jean-Pierre Sonnet, The Book within the Book: Writing in Deuteronomy (Biblical Interpretation Series 14; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), 29-32.
175. Timo Veijola, Dasfünfte Buch Mose, Deuteronomium: Kapitel 1,1-16,17 (ATD 8.1; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004), 206-8.
176. Moshe Seidel, “Parallels between Isaiah and Psalms,” Sinai 38 (1955-56): 149-72,.
177. Shemaryahu Talmon, “The Textual Study of the Bible—A New Outlook,” in Qumran and the History of the Biblical Text (ed. Frank Moore Cross and Shemaryahu Talmon; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975), 321-400.
178. Pancratius C. Beentjes, “Inverted Quotations in the Bible: A Neglected Stylistic Pattern,” Bib 63 (1982): 506-23.
179. Benjamin D. Sommer, A Prophet Reads Scripture: Allusion in Isaiah 40-66 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998), 35,.
180. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 17-20.
181. Contra Josef Scharbert, “Formgeschichte und Exegese von Ex. 34,6 f und seiner Parallelen,” Bib 38 (1957): 130-50.
182. Konrad Schmid, “Kollektivschuld? Der Gedanke ubergreifender Schuldzusammenhange im Alten Testament und im Alten Orient,” ZABR 5 (1999): 192-222.
183. Samuel R. Driver, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Deuteronomy (3d ed.; ICC; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1902), 102.
184. Israel Drazin, Targum Onkelos to Deuteronomy: An English Translation of the Text with Analysis and Commentary (Based on A. Sperber's Edition) (Hoboken, N.J.: Ktav, 1982), 115.
185. Michael L. Klein, The Fragment-Targums of the Pentateuch According to their Extant Sources (2 vols.; AnBib 76; Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1980): 1:213.
186. Avigdor Shinan, The Aggadah in the Aramaic Targums to the Pentateuch (2 vols.; Jerusalem: Makor, 1979): 2:301.
187. August Dillmann, Die Bücher Numeri, Deuteronomium, und Josua (2d ed.; Kurzgefasstes exegetisches Handbuch zum Alten Testament 13; Leipzig: Hirzel, 1886), 274.
188. Mikra at Qumran, ” in Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading, and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity (ed. Martin J. Mulder; CRINT 2.1; Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988), 339-77.
189. Reinhard G. Kratz, “Innerbiblische Exegese und Redaktionsgeschichte im Lichte empirischer Evidenz,” in Das Judentum im Zeitalter des Zweiten Tempels (FAT 42; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004), 126-56.
190. H. Gregory Snyder, Teachers and Texts in the Ancient World: Philosophers, Jews, and Christians (London: Routledge, 2000), 75-82.
191. Moshe J. Bernstein, “Pseudepigraphy in the Qumran Scrolls: Categories and Functions,” Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Orion Center, 12-14 January 1997 (ed. Esther G. Chazon and Michael E. Stone; STDJ 31; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1999), 1-26.
192. Martin S. Jaffee, Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Tradition in Palestinian Judaism, 200 BCE-400 ce (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 23-25.
193. Norbert Lohfink, “Kultzentralisation und Deuteronomium: Zu einem Buch von Eleonore Reuter,” ZABR 1 (1995): 115-48.
194. idem, Studien zum Deuteronomium und zur deuteronomistischen Literatur IV (SBAB 31; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 2000), 131-61.
195. Konrad Schmid, “Hatte Wellhausen Recht? Das Problem der literarhistorischen Anfange des Deuteronomismus in den Konigebuchern,” in Die deuteronomistischen Geschichtswerke: Redaktions- und religionsgeschichtliche Perspektiven zur “Deuteronomismus”-Diskussion in Tora und Vorderen Propheten (ed. Markus Witte et al.; BZAW 365; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006), 19-43.
196. Nadav Na'aman, “The King Leading Cult Reforms in his Kingdom: Josiah and Other Kings in the Ancient Near East,” ZABR 12 (2006): 131-68.
197. A. D. H. Mayes, Deuteronomy (NCB; London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1979), 181, 186.
198. Eckart Otto, Theologische Ethik des Alten Testaments (Theologische Wissenschaft 3.2; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1994), 230-4.
199. idem, “Innerbiblische Exegese im Heiligkeitsgesetz Levitikus 17-26,” in Levitikus als Buch (ed. Heinz-Josef Fabry and Hans-Winfried Jüngling; BBB 119; Berlin: Philo, 1999), 125-96.
200. John W. Bowker, The Targums and Rabbinic Literature: An Introduction to Jewish Interpretations of Scripture (London: Cambridge University Press, 1969).
201. Alexander Sperber, The Bible in Aramaic Based on Old Manuscripts and Printed Texts, vol. 1: The Pentateuch according to Targum Onkelos (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1959; reprint, 3 vols. in 1; 3d ed.; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2004), 122.
202. Michael L. Klein, The Fragment-Targums of the Pentateuch According to their Extant Sources (2 vols.; AnBib 76; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1980), 1:84.
203. Alejandro Díez Macho, Neophyti 1: Targum Palestinense Ms de la Biblioteca Vaticana, vol. 2: Exodo: Edición príncipe, introductión y versión castellana (Textos y Estudios 8; Madrid-Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1970), 2:129.
204. Ernest G. Clarke, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan of the Pentateuch: Text and Concordance (Hoboken, N.J.: Ktav, 1984), 91.
205. Reinhard Neudecker, “Does God Visit the Iniquity of the Fathers upon Their Children? Rabbinic Commentaries on Exod 20,5b (Deut 5,9b),” Greg 81 (2000): 5-24.
206. Bernard M. Levinson, “The Hermeneutics of Tradition in Deuteronomy,” in idem, “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation (FAT 54; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), 256-75.
207. Daniel Boyarin, Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 35.
208. Martin S. Jaffee, “The Pretext of Interpretation: Rabbinic Oral Torah and the Charisma of Revelation,“ in God in Language (ed. Robert P. Scharlemann and Gilbert E.M. Ogutu; New York: Paragon House, 1987), 73-89.
209. idem, The Semitic Background of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans; Livonia, Mich.: Dove, 1997), 3-58.
210. Elisha Qimron and John Strugnell, Qumran Cave 4, V: Miqs.at Ma'aśe ha-Torah (DJD 10; Oxford: Clarendon, 1994), 51, 141.
211. Jon D. Levenson, The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament, and Historical Criticism: Jews and Christians in Biblical Studies (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster/John Knox, 1993), 10-15.
212. Karl Rudolf, “Wellhausen as an Arabist,” Semeia 25 (1982): 111-55.
213. Bernard M. Levinson, “Goethe's Analysis of Exodus 34 and Its Influence on Julius Wellhausen: The Pfropfung of the Documentary Hypothesis,” ZAW 114 (2002): 212-23.
214. Reinhard G. Kratz, Reste hebräischen Heidentums am Beispiel der Psalmen (Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, I. Philologisch-Historische Klasse 2; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004).
215. C. M. Horowitz, Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer: A Critical Edition, Codex C. M. Horowitz (Jerusalem: Makor, 1972), 23.
216. Gerald Friedlander, Pirkê de Rabbi Eliezer (the Chapters of Eliezer the Great) according to the Text of the Manuscript Belonging to Abraham Epstein of Vienna (London: Kegan Paul, 1916; reprinted, New York: Harmon, 1965), 6.
217. Dagmar Börner-Klein, Pirke de-Rabbi Elieser: nach der Edition Venedig 1544 unter Berücksichtigung der Edition Warschau 1852 (Studia Judaica 26; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004), 8-9.
218. Bloch, Renée. Midrash. Pages 1263-81 in Supplément auDictionnaire de la Bible. Edited by Louis Pirot, André Robert, and Henri Cazelles. Book 4, suppl. 5. Paris: Librairie Letouzey et Ané, 1957.
219. Le DÉaut, Roger. “A propos d'une d'efinition du midrash.” Bib 50 (1969): 395-413.
220. Greenberg, Moshe. “Some Postulates of Biblical Criminal Law.” Pages 5-28 in Yehezkel Kaufman Jubilee Volume. Edited by Menahem Haran. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1960.
221. idem, Studies in the Bible and Jewish Thought. JPS Scholar of Distinction Series. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1995.
222. Pamela Barmash, Homicide in the Biblical World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
223. idem, Essays in Jewish and Comparative Legal History (SJLA 10; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1975), 25-63.
224. Jackson's attack in “More Reflections on Biblical Criminal Law,” Studies in Bible (ed. Sara Japhet; ScrHier 31; Jerusalem: Magnes 1986), 1-18.
225. Sandmel, Samuel. “The Haggadah within Scripture.” JBL 80 (1961): 105-22.
226. Scholem, Gershom. “Tradition und Kommentar als religiése Kategorien im Judentum.” ErJb 31 (1962): 19-48.
227. idem, The Messianic Idea in Judaism and Other Essays on Jewish Spirituality. New York: Schocken, 1971.
228. Sarna, Nahum M. “Psalm 89: A Study in Inner Biblical Exegesis.” Pages 29-46.
229. idem, Studies in Biblical Interpretation. JPS Scholar of Distinction Series. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2000.
230. Sanders, James A., ed. The Psalms Scroll of Qummn Cave 11 (iiQPsa). DJD 4. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.
231. Sanders, James A. “Intertextuality and Dialogue: New Approaches to the Scriptural Canon.” Pages 175-90 in Canon versus Culture: Reflections on the CurrentDebate.Edited byJanGorak. Wellesley Studies in Critical Theory, Literary History, and Culture 23. New York: Garland, 2001.
232. Sanders, James A. “‘Adaptable for Life’: The Nature and Function of Canon.” Pages 531-60 in Magnalia Dei: The Mighty Acts of God. Essays on the Bible and Archaeology in Memory of G. Ernest Wright. Edited by Frank Moore Cross, Werner E. Lemke, and Patrick D. Miller Jr. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1976.
233. Sanders, James A. “Hermeneutics of Text Criticism.” Textus 18 (1995): 1-26.
234. Sanders, James A. Review article of the Hebrew University Bible and Biblia Hebraica Quinta. JBL 118 (1999): 518-26.
235. Sanders, James A. “Intertextuality and Dialogue: New Approaches to the Scriptural Canon.” Pages 175-90 in Canon versus Culture: Reflections on the Current Debate. Editedby JanGorak. Wellesley Studies in Critical Theory, Literary History, and Culture 23. New York: Garland, 2001.
236. Sanders, James A. Torah and Canon. 2d ed. Eugene, Ore.: Cascade Books, 2005.
237. Sanders, James A. Review article of David M. Carr. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart. RBL (2006), http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/4703_5599.pdf; cited January 30, 2007.
238. McDonald, Lee Martin, and James A. Sanders, eds. The Canon Debate. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2002.
239. Dominique Barthélemy, ed., Critique textuelle de l'Ancien Testament: Rapport final du Comité pour l'analyse de l'Ancien Testament hebreu institue par l'Alliance Biblique Universelle (4 vols.; OBO 50; Freiburg: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1982-2005).
240. Dominique Barthélemy et al., eds., Preliminary and Interim Report on the Hebrew Old Testament Text Project (5 vols.; 2d rev. ed.; New York: United Bible Societies, 1979-1980).
241. Vermes, Geza. “Bible and Midrash: Early Old Testament Exegesis.” Pages 199-231 in The Cambridge History of the Bible, vol. 1: From the Beginnings to Jerome. Edited by Peter R. Ackroyd and C. F. Evans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
242. Childs, Brevard S. “Psalm Titles and Midrashic Exegesis.” JSS 16 (1971): 137-50.
243. Cooper, Alan M. “The Life and Times of King David according to the Book of Psalms.” Pages 117-31 in The Poet and the Historian: Essays in Literary and Historical Criticism. Edited by Richard E. Friedman. HSM 26. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1983.
244. Slomovic, Elieser. “Toward an Understanding of the Formation of Historical Titles in the Book of the Psalms.” ZAW 91 (1979): 350-80.
245. Weinfeld, Moshe. Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972; reprint, Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1992.
246. Weingreen, Jacob. From Bible to Mishna: The Continuity of Tradition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1976.
247. Talmon, Shemaryahu. “Double Readings in the Massoretic Text.” Textus 1 (1960): 144-85.
248. Talmon, Shemaryahu. “Synonymous Readings in the Textual Tradition of the Old Testament.” Pages 335-83 in Studies in the Bible. Edited by Chaim Rabin. ScrHier 8. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961.
249. Talmon, Shemaryahu. “The Textual Study of the Bible—A New Outlook.” Pages 321-400 in Qumran and the History of the Biblical Text. Edited by Frank Moore Cross and Shemaryahu Talmon. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975.
250. Talmon, Shemaryahu. “The Presentation of Synchroneity and Simultaneity in Biblical Narrative.” Pages 9-26 in Studies in Hebrew Narrative Art throughout the Ages. Edited by Joseph Heinemann and Samuel Werses. ScrHier 27. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1978.
251. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 114-4.
252. Eslinger, Lyle. “Hosea 12:5a and Genesis 32:29: A Study in Inner Biblical Exegesis.” JSOT 18 (1980): 91-99.
253. Finkelstein, Jacob J. The Ox That Gored. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 71.2. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1981.
254. Fishbane, Michael. “Torah and Tradition.” Pages 275-300 in Tradition and Theology in the Old Testament. Edited by Douglas A. Knight. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.
255. Fishbane, Michael. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985; with addenda, 1988.
256. Fishbane, Michael. “The Hebrew Bible and Exegetical Tradition.” Pages 1530 in Intertextuality in Ugarit and Israel. Edited by Johannes C. de Moor. Oudtestamentische Studien 40. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998.
257. Fishbane, Michael. Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
258. Jonathan Frankel, “Assimilation and the Jews in Nineteenth-Century Europe: Towards a New Historiography,” in Assimilation and Community: The Jews in Nineteenth Century Europe (ed. Jonathan Frankel and Steven J. Zipperstein; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 1-37.
259. Levin, Christoph. Die Verheißung des neuen Bundes: in ihrem theologiegeschichtlichen Zusammenhang ausgelegt. FRLANT 137. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1985.
260. Christoph Levin, Der Jahwist (FRLANT 157; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993).
261. idem, “The Yahwist: The Earliest Editor of the Pentateuch,” JBL 126 (2007): 209-30.
262. Bernard M. Levinson, “Is the Covenant Code an Exilic Composition? A Response to John Van Seters,” in idem, “The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation (FAT 54; Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008), 276-330.
263. William McKane, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Jeremiah (2 vols.; ICC; Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark, 1986-1996),.
264. Tigay, Jeffrey H., ed. Empirical Models for Biblical Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1985.
265. Andrew R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition, and Cuneiform Texts (2 vols.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 1:28-33.
266. Reinhard Pummer, “The Samaritans and Their Pentateuch,” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson;Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007), 237-69.
267. Kugel, James L. “Early Interpretation: The Common Background of Late Forms of Biblical Exegesis.” Pages 9-106 in Early Biblical Interpretation. Edited by James L. Kugel and Rowan Greer. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.
268. Kugel, James L. Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.
269. Reinhard Pummer, “The Samaritans and Their Pentateuch,” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007), 237-69.
270. Norbert Lohfink, Studien zum Deuteronomium und zur deuteronomistischen Literatur V. SBAB 38; Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 2005.
271. Steck, Odil Hannes. Der Abschluss der Prophetie im Alten Testament: Ein Versuch zur Frage der Vorgeschichte des Kanons. BThSt 17. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1991.
272. Steck, Odil Hannes. The Prophetic Books and their Theological Witness. Translated by James D. Nogalski. St. Louis: Chalice, 2000.
273. Steck, Odil Hannes. Gott in der Zeit entdecken: Die Prophetenbücher des Alten Testaments als Vorbild fur Theologie und Kirche. BThSt 42. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 2001.
274. James D. Nogalski, Literary Precursors to the Book of the Twelve (BZAW 217; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1993).
275. James D. Nogalski and Marvin A. Sweeney, eds., Reading and Hearing the Book of the Twelve (SBLSymS 15; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2000).
276. Contra Rainer Kessler, review of Odil Hannes Steck, Die Prophetenbücher und ihr theologischer Zeugnis: Wege der Nachfrage und Fahrten zur Antwort, TLZ 123 (1998): 370-71.
277. Marvin A. Sweeney, review of Erich Bosshard-Nepustil, Rezeptionen von Jesaja 1-39 im Zwolfprophetenbuch: Untersuchungen zur literarischen Verbindung von Prophetenbüchern in babylonischer und persischer Zeit, RBL (1999), http://www.bookreviews.org; cited September 22, 2007.
278. Heinrich Graetz, “Isaiah XXXIV and XXXV,” JQR 4 (1891): 1-8.
279. Charles C. Torrey, The Second Isaiah: A New Interpretation (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1928), 53.
280. Herbert Donner, “Jesaja LVI 1-7: Ein Abrogationsfall innerhalb des Kanons—Implikationen und Konsequenzen,” in Congress Volume, Salamanca 1983 (ed. J. A. Emerton; VTSup 36; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985), 81-95.
281. Kratz, Reinhard Gregor. Kyros im Deuterojesaja-Buch: Redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu Entstehung und Theologie von Jes 40-55. FAT 1. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1991.
282. Kratz, Reinhard Gregor. “Redaktionsgeschichte/Redaktionskritik I.” Pages 367-78 in vol. 28 (1997) of Theologische Realenzyklopädie. Edited by Gerhard Krause and Gerhard Muller. 36 vols. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1977-2004.
283. Kratz, Reinhard Gregor. “Die Entstehung des Judentums: Zur Kontroverse zwischen E. Meyer und J. Wellhausen.” Pages 1-22 in idem, Das Judentum im Zeitalter des Zweiten Tempels. FAT 42. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.
284. Kratz, Reinhard Gregor. “Innerbiblische Exegese und Redaktionsgeschicte im Lichte empirischer Evidenz.” Pages 126-56 in idem, Das Judentum im Zeitalter des Zweiten Tempels. FAT 42. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.
285. Kratz, Reinhard Gregor. “Temple and Torah: Reflections on the Legal Status of the Pentateuch between Elephantine and Qumran.” Pages 77-104 in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance. Edited by Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007.
286. Eduard Meyer, Die Entstehung des Judenthums: Einehistorische Untersuchung (Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1896), 71.
287. Eduard Meyer, Die Entstehung des Judenthums, in Göttingischen gelehrten Anzeigen 159 (1897): 89-97.
288. Zakovitch, Yair. An Introduction to Inner-Biblical Interpretation. Even Yehudah: Rekhes, 1992 (Hebrew).
289. Zakovitch, Yair. “The Book of the Covenant explains the Book of the Covenant: The ‘Boomerang Phenomenon.’” Pages 59-64 in Texts, Temples and Traditions. Edited by Michael V. Fox et al. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1996 (Hebrew).
290. Zakovitch, Yair. “Poetry Creates Historiography.” Pages 311-20 in “A Wise and Discerning Mind”: Essays in Honor of Burke O. Long. Edited by Saul M. Olyan and Robert C. Culley. BJS 325. Providence, R.I.: Brown Judaic Studies, 2000.
291. Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Literature of Paul. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993.
292. Hays, Richard B. “Aspects of Legal Reforms and Reformulations in Ancient Cuneiform and Israelite Law.” Pages 160-96 in Theory and Method in Biblical and Cuneiform Law: Revision, Interpolation and Development. Edited by Bernard M. Levinson. JSOTSup 181. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994.
293. Hays, Richard B. “Biblische Rechtsgeschichte als Fortschreibungsgeschichte.” BO 56 (1999): 5-14.
294. Bernard M. Levinson, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation, ZABR 5 (1999): 329-38.
295. Bernard M. Levinson, “Innerbiblische Exegese im Heiligkeitsgesetz Levitikus 17-26.” Pages 125-96 in Levitikus als Buch. Edited by Heinz-Josef Fabry and Hans-Winfried Jungling. BBB 119. Berlin: Philo, 1999.
296. Bernard M. Levinson, Das Deuteronomium: Politische Theologie und Rechtsreform in Juda und Assyrien. BZAW 284. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999.
297. Bernard M. Levinson, Max Webers Studien des Antiken Judentums. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.
298. Reinhard G. Kratz, Die Komposition der erzahlenden Bucher desAlten Testaments: Grundwissen der Bibelkritik (UTB 2157; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2000).
299. Jeffrey Stackert, Rewriting the Torah: Literary Revision in Deuteronomy and the Holiness Legislation (FAT 52; Tübingen: MohrSiebeck, 2007), 209-25.
300. Christophe Nihan, From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch: A Study in the Composition of the Book of Leviticus (FAT 2/25; Tübingen: MohrSiebeck, 2007), 553-54.
301. Joachim Schaper, “The ‘Publication’ of Legal Texts in Ancient Judah,” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007),.
302. Erhard Blum, Studien zur Komposition des Pentateuch (BZAW 189; Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990).
303. Morton Smith, “Pseudepigraphy in the Israelite Literary Tradition,” in Pseudepigrapha I: Pseudopythagorica, Lettres de Platon, Litterature pseudepigraphique juive (ed. Kurt von Fritz; Entretiens sur l'antiquite classique 18; Vandoeuvres, Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1972), 191-215.
304. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson, “How, When, Where, and Why Did the Pentateuch Become the Torah?” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (ed. Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard M. Levinson; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2007), 1-19.
305. Levinson, Bernard M. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
306. Levinson, Bernard M. “The Birth of the Lemma: The Restrictive Reinterpretation of the Covenant Code's Manumission Law by the Holiness Code (Leviticus 25:44-46).” JBL 124 (2005): 617-39.
307. Levinson, Bernard M. The Right Chorale”: Studies in Biblical Law and Interpretation. FAT 54. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
308. Sommer, Benjamin D. “Exegesis, Allusion and Intertextuality in the Hebrew Bible: A Response to Lyle Eslinger.” VT 46 (1996): 479-89.
309. Sommer, Benjamin D. A Prophet Reads Scripture: Allusion in Isaiah 40-66. Contraversions: Jews and Other Differences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998.
310. Sommer, Benjamin D. “Revelation at Sinai in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Theology.” JR 79 (1999): 422-51.
311. Sommer, Benjamin D. “Inner-biblical Interpretation.” Pages 1829-35 in The Jewish Study Bible. Edited by Adele Berlin and Marc Zvi Brettler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
312. Schmid, Konrad. Buchgestalten des Jeremiabuches: Untersuchungen zur Redaktions- und Rezeptionsgeschichte von Jer 3033 im Kontext des Buches. WMANT 72. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1996.
313. Schmid, Konrad.“Innerbiblische Schriftauslegung: Aspekte der Forschungsgeschichte.” Pages 1-22 in Schriftauslegung in der Schrift: Festschrift fur Odil Hannes Steck zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Edited by Reinhard Gregor Kratz, Thomas Krüger, and Konrad Schmid. BZAW 300. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2000.
314. Hans Heinrich Schmid, Der sogenannte Jahwist: Beobachtungen und Fragen zur Pentateuchforschung (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1976).
315. Thomas B. Dozeman and Konrad Schmid, eds., A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation (SBLSymS 34; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006).
316. Sonnet, Jean-Pierre. The Book within the Book: Writing in Deuteronomy. Biblical Interpretation 14. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997.
317. Sonnet, Jean-Pierre. “‘Lorsque Moise eutacheve d'ecrire…’ (Dt 31,24). Une theorie narrative de l'ecriture dans le Pentateuque.” RSR 90 (2002): 509-24.
318. Eckart Otto, “Mose der Schreiber: Zu ‘poetics’ und ‘genetics’ in der Deuteronomiumsanalyse anhand eines Buches von JeanPierre Sonnet,” ZABR 6 (2000): 320-29.
319. Bernard M. Levinson, “Goethe's Analysis of Exodus 34 and Its Influence on Julius Wellhausen: The Pfropfung of the Documentary Hypothesis,” ZAW 114 (2002): 212-23.
320. Ska, Jean Louis. Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Translated by Sr. Pascale Dominique. Winona Lake, Ind: Eisenbrauns, 2006.
321. Brettler, Marc Z. “‘A Literary Sermon’ in Deuteronomy 4.” Pages 33-50 in “A Wise and Discerning Mind”: Essays in Honor of Burke O. Long. Edited by Saul M. Olyan and Robert C. Culley. BJS 325. Providence, R.I.: Brown Judaic Studies, 2000.
322. Wevers, John W. Notes on the Greek Text of Deuteronomy. SBLSCS 39. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995.
323. Pietersma, Albert, and Benjamin G. Wright, eds. A New English Translation of the Septuagint. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Online: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/nets; cited March 20, 2008.
324. Kraus, Wolfgang, and Martin Karrer, eds. Septuaginta Deutsch, vol. 1: Das griechische Alte Testament in deutscher Übersetzung. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2008.
325. Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 2d rev. ed. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress; Assen: Royal Van Gorcum, 2001.
326. Tov, Emanuel. Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert. STDJ 54. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2004.
327. John W. Wevers, Deuteronomium (Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum graecum auctoritate academiae scientiarum gottingensis editum 3.2; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977).
328. Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 2d rev. ed. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress; Assen: Royal Van Gorcum, 2001.
329. Tov, Emanuel. Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert. STDJ 54. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2004.
330. Alfred Rahlfs and Robert Hanhart, Septuaginta: id est Vetus Testamentum graece iuxta LXX interpretes, editio altera (2 vols. in 1; 2d ed; Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2006).
331. Carr, David M. “Method in Determination of Direction of Dependence: An Empirical Test of Criteria Applied to Exodus 34,11-26 and Its Parallels.” Pages 107-40 in Gottes Volk am Sinai. Edited by Matthias Kockert and Erhard Blum. VWGTh 18. Gutersloh: Gutersloher Verlag, 2001.
332. Carr, David M. Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
333. Van Seters, John. “The Origins of the Hebrew Bible: Some New Answers to Old Questions, Part Two” (review essay of David M. Carr, Writing on the Tablets of the Tablets of the Heart: The Origins of Scripture and Literature). Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 7 (2007): 219-37.
334. Scoralick, Ruth. Gottes Güte und Gottes Zorn: Die Gottesprädikationen in Exodus 34,6f und ihre intertextuellen Beziehungen zum Zwölfprophetenbuch. HBS 33. Freiburg: Herder, 2002.
335. Najman, Hindy. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 77. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2003.
336. Stackert, Jeffrey. Rewriting the Torah: Literary Revision in Deuteronomy and the Holiness Legislation. FAT 52. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
337. Zahn, Molly M. “Schneiderei oder Weberei? Zum Verständnis der Diachronie der Tempelrolle.” RevQ 20 (2001): 255-86.
338. Zahn, Molly M. “Reexamining Empirical Models: The Case of Exodus 13.” Pages 36-55 in Das Deuteronomium zwischen Pentateuch und Deuteronomistischem Geschichtswerk. Edited by Eckart Otto and Reinhard Achenbach. FRLANT 206. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.
339. Zahn, Molly M. “New Voices, Ancient Words: The Temple Scroll's Reuse of the Bible.” Pages 435-58 in Temple and Worship in Biblical Israel. Edited by John Day. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 422. London: T & T Clark International, 2005.
340. Jan Christian Gertz, Tradition und Redaktion in der Exoduserzahlung: Untersuchungen zur Endredaktion des Pentateuch (FRLANT 186; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000).
341. Schaper, Joachim. “Rereading the Law: Inner-Biblical Exegesis of Divine Oracles in Ezekiel 44 and Isaiah 56.” Pages 125-44 in Recht und Ethik im Alten Testament. Edited by Bernard M. Levinson and Eckart Otto, with assistance from Walter Dietrich. ATM 13. Munster/London: LIT Verlag, 2004.
342. Schniedewind, William M. How the Bible Became a Book: The Textualization of Ancient Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
343. Veijola, Timo. “Die Deuteronomisten als Vorgänger der Schriftgelehrten: Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung des Judentums.” Pages 192-240 in Moses Erben: Studien zum Dekalog, zum Deuteronomismus und zum Schriftgelehrtentum. BWA(N)T 149. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 2000.
344. John Van Seters, “The Origins of the Hebrew Bible: Some New Answers to Old Questions,” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 7 (2007): 87-108.
345. Brettler, Marc Zvi. The Creation of History in Ancient Israel. London: Routledge, 1995.
346. Endres, John C., S.J., William R. Millar, and John Barclay Burns, eds. Chronicles and Its Synoptic Parallels in Samuel, Kings, and Related Biblical Texts. Collegeville, Minn.: Glazier/Liturgical, 1998.
347. Japhet, Sara. The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and Its Place in Biblical Thought. BEATAJ 9. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1989.
348. Japhet, Sara. I & II Chronicles: A Commentary. OTL. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster/John Knox, 1993.
349. Jonker, Louis. “Reforming History: The Hermeneutical Significance of the Books of Chronicles.” VT 57 (2007): 21-44.
350. Kalimi, Isaac. The Reshaping of Ancient Israelite History in Chronicles. Winona Lake, Ind: Eisenbrauns, 2005.
351. Klein, Ralph W. 1 Chronicles: A Commentary. Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.
352. Knoppers, Gary N. 1 Chronicles 1-9: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 12. New York: Doubleday, 2004.
353. Gary N. Knoppers, “The Deuteronomist and the Deuteronomic Law of the King: A Reexamination of a Relationship,” ZAW 108 (1996): 329-46.
354. idem, “Rethinking the Relationship between Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History: The Case of Kings,” CBQ 63 (2001): 393-415.
355. Bernard M. Levinson, “The Reconceptualization of Kingship in Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History's Transformation of Torah,” VT 51 (2001): 511-34.