Resource book on trips and development

Resource Book on Trips and Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-829

  Unctad Ictsd, U I ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929815473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511511363     Document Type: Book

References (261)

1. Frederick M. Abbott, Bargaining Power and Strategy in the Foreign Investment Process: A Current Andean Code Analysis, 3 SYRACUSE J. OF INT' L L. & COMM. 319 (1975).
2. Susan Sell, Power of Ideas: North South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust (1998), State University of New York Press.
3. S.J. Patel. P. Roffe, A. Yusuf, International Technology Transfer: The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct. 2001, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
4. Frederick M. Abbott, Protecting First World Assets in the Third World: Intellectual Property Negotiations in the GATT Multilateral Framework, 22 VAND. J. OF TRANSNAT' L L. 689 (1989).
5. J.H. Reichman, From Free Riders to Fair Followers: Global Competition Under the TRIPS Agreement., 29 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 11 (1996).
6. UNCTAD, The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries (1996), United Nations Publication, Sales No. E.96.II.D.10.
7. UNCTAD-ICTSD Policy Discussion Paper, Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for De-velopment (2003), Geneva [hereinafter UNCTAD-ICTSD Policy Discussion Paper].
8. Communication from India, Standards and Principles Concerning the Availability, Scope and Use of Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/37, 10 July 1989.
9. Secretariat, Meeting of Negotiating Group of 12-14 July 1989.
10. Negotiating Group on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, including Trade in Counterfeit Goods, MTN.GNG/NG11/14, 12 September 1989.
11. Chairman's Report to the GNG, Status of Work in the Negotiating Group, Negotiating Group on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, including Trade in Counterfeit Goods, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/76, 23 July 1990.
12. Trade Negotiations Committee, Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNG/W/FA, 20 Dec. 1991 (generally referred to as the “Dunkel Draft”).
13. Frederick M. Abbott, The Enduring Enigma of TRIPS:A Challenge for the World Economic System, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 497 (1998) (Oxford Univ. Press).
14. Lall, Indicators of the Relative Importance of Intellectual Property Rights to Develop-ing Countries, UNCTAD-ICTSD, Geneva, 2003 also available at http://www.iprsonline.org/index.htm.
15. U.S. Federal Trade Commission, To Promote Innovation:The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, October 2003.
16. Correa, Carlos (2001) “El re gimen de patentes tras la adopcio n del Acuerdo sobre los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual Relacionados con el Comercio”, Jurisprudencia Argentina, No. 6239, Buenos Aires.
17. John Dugard and Iain Currie, International Law and Foreign Relations, in Annual Survey of South African Law 1995, at 76 et seq. (Juta & Co., Limited) [hereinafter Dugard and Currie].
18. Azanian Peoples Organization V. President Of The Republic, Constitutional Court of South Africa, Case CCT17/96, decided July 25, 1996, at paras. 26-27.
19. Carlos Correa, Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries (South Centre 2000).
20. Jerome H. Reichman, Securing Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement After U.S. V. India,1 J. INT' L ECON. L. 585 (1998).
21. J.H. Reichman, Charting the Collapse of the Patent-Copyright Dichotomy: Premises for a Restructured International Intellectual Property System, 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 475, 480 (1995).
22. P. Ladas, The International Protection of Literary and Artistic Property 9-10 (1938).
23. Correa and Musungu, The WIPO Patent Agenda:The Risks for Developing Countries, Working Paper no. 12, South Centre, 2002.
24. Frederick M. Abbott, GATT and the European Community: A Formula for Peaceful Coexistence, 12 Mich. J. Int'l. L. 1 (1990).
25. D. Vivas-Eugui, Regional and bilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), TRIPS Issues Papers 1, Quaker United Nations Ofice (QUNO), Geneva.
26. Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents (2002).
27. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, 2003 (available at http://www.geneva. Quno.info/pdf/FTAA%20(A4).pdf).
28. Frederick M. Abbott, First Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of Parallel Importation, 1 J. Int'l Econ. L. 607 (1998).
29. Thomas Cottier and Marc Stucki, Parallelimporte im Patent-, Urheber-und Muster-und Modellrecht aus europarechtlicher und vo lkerrechtlicher Sicht, in B. Dutoit (edit.), Con?its entre importations paralle` les et proprie te intellectuelle?, Librairie Droz, Geneva 1996, p. 29.
30. Frederick M. Abbott, Bargaining Power and Strategy in the Foreign Investment Process; A Current Andean Code Analysis,3 SYR. J, INT'L L & COMM. 320, 346-51 (1975).
31. European Communities, Draft Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/68, 29 March 1990.
32. Status of Work in the Negotiating Group, Chairman's Report to the GNG, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/76, 23 July 1990 [hereinafter Anell Draft].
33. Paris Union Assembly, Nineteenth Session, WIPO doc. P/A/XIX/3, July 31, 1992.
34. Frederick M. Abbott, Second Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Importation, presented in London, July 2000.
35. Thomas Cottier, The WTO System and the Exhaustion of Rights, draft of November 6, 1998.
36. Marco C.E.J. Bronckers, The Exhaustion of Patent Rights under World Trade Organization Law, 32 J. WORLD TR. L. 32 (1998).
37. F. Abbott, The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting A Dark Corner at the WTO, in: Journal of International Economic Law (2002), 469-505.
38. World Intellectual Property Organization: Copyright Treaty [adopted in Geneva, Dec. 20, 1996], 36 I.L.M. 65 (1997) and World Intellectual Property Organization: Performances and Phonograms Treaty [adopted in Geneva, Dec. 20, 1996], 36 I.L.M. 76 (1997).
39. Chris Creswell, Recent Developments in Australia and New Zealand, paper [furnished following Committee meeting of November 6-7, 1998].
40. Abraham Van Melle, Parallel Importing in New Zealand: Historical Origins, Recent Developments, and Future Directions, [1999] EIPR 63.
41. Carl Baudenbacher, Trademark Law and Parallel Imports in a Globalized World-Recent Developments in Europe with Special Regard to the Legal Situation in the United States, 22 Fordham Int'l L. J. 645 (1999).
42. Frederick M. Abbott and D.W. Feer Verkade, The Silhouette of a Trojan Horse:Re?ections on the Advocate General Jacobs' Opinion in Silhouette v. Hartlauer, Bijblad bij De Industrie le Eigendom 111, Apr. 16, 1998.
43. W. R. Cornish, Trade Marks: Portcullis for the EEA?, 20 EIPR 172, May 1998.
44. Frederick M. Abbott, First Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of Parallel Importation, 1 J. Int'l Econ. L. 607 (1998).
45. Keith Maskus, Parallel Imports in Pharmaceuticals:Implications for Competition and Prices in Developing Countries, Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organization, draft of April 2001.
46. Scherer, F.M. And Watal, Jayashree, Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Countries, June 2001.
47. Communication from India, Standards and Principles Concerning the Availability, Scope and Use of Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/37, 10 July 1989.
48. Bellmann, C., Dutield, G. And Melendez-Ortiz, R., London, 2003, Earthscan: 9, 209.
49. Frederick M. Abbott, Are the Competition Rules in the WTO TRIPS Agreement Adequate?,7 J Int'l Econ. L No. 3, 2004, at 687-703.
50. UNCTAD, The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries, Geneva, 1996 [hereinafter UNCTAD 1996.
51. WIPO, Guide to the Berne Convention for the Pro-tection of Literary and Artistic Works (Paris Act, 1971) 93 (1978).
52. Claude Masouye, Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary Artistic Works, 12 (1978).
53. Jessica Litman, The Public Domain, 39 Emory L.J. 965 (1990).
54. Berne Convention, Article 2(8).
55. Daniel Gervais, The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis (1998) [hereinafter Gervais], p. 72, para. 2.51.
56. Sam Ricketson, The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works:1886-1986, Queen Mary, Univ. Of London, 1987, 229-230 [hereinafter Ricketson].
57. Alfred Yen, Copyright Opinions and Aesthetic Theory, 71 S. Cal. L. Rev. 247 (1998).
58. Herman Cohen Jeroham, The EC Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors' Rights, 25 Int'l Rev. Indus. Prop. & Copyright Law 821 (1994) (providing comparisons of the originality require-ment in different European countries).
59. Gerhard Schricker, Farewell to the “Level of Creativity” (Schopfungshohe) in German Copy-right Law? 26 Int. Rev. Of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, 1995.
60. Paul Goldstein, International Copyright, 164, 2001.
61. Ysolde Gendreau, The Criteria of Fixation in Copyright Law, 159 R.I.D.A. 100, 126 (1994).
62. Michael S. Keplinger, International Protection for Computer Programs 315 PLI/Pat 457 (1991).
63. Teruo Doi, The TRIPS Agreement and the Copyright Law of Japan: A Comparative Analysis, Journal of the Japanese Group of AIPPI (1996).
64. J.H. Reichman, Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection Under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement, 29 International Lawyer 345, 360 (1995).
65. UNCTAD, The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries, New York and Geneva, 1996, paras. 181-183.
66. Lawrence D. Graham & Richard O. Zerbe, Jr., Economically Ef?cient Treatment of Computer Software: Reverse Engineering, Protection and Disclosure, 22 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L. J. 61, 67 (1996).
67. Dennis S. Karjala, The Relative Roles of Patent and Copyright in the Protection of Computer Programs, 17 John Marshall J. Of Computer & Information L., 41, 53 (1998).
68. Pamela Samuelson et al., A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs, 94 Columbia Law Review, 2308 (1994).
69. J.H. Reichman and P. Samuelson, Intellectual Property Right and Data?, 50 Vanderbilt Law Review, 51 (1997).
70. John N. Adams & Michael Edenborough, The Duration of Copyright in the United Kingdom after the 1995 Regulations, 11 E.I.P.R. 590 (1996).
71. Roffe, Pedro (2004), Bilateral Agreements and a TRIPS-plus World:the Chile-USA Free Trade Agreement, TRIPS Issues Papers-No 4, Quaker International Affairs Programme, Ottawa.
72. C. Correa, Fair use in the digital era, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law (IIC), vol. 33, No. 5/2002.
73. R. Okediji, Toward an International Fair Use Doctrine, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 39, 2000-2001, pp. 75
74. W. Cornish and D. Llewelyn, Intellectual Property:Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (5 th ed. 2003), pp. 440-443.
75. Frederick M. Abbott, Protecting First World Assets in the Third World:Intellectual Property Negotiations in the GATT Multilateral Framework, 22 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 689 (1989).
76. W.R. Cornish, Intellectual Property:Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights(4 th ed. 1999), at Chapter 16.
77. G.H.C. Bodenhausen, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property as revised at Stockholm in 1967, BIRPI, Geneva, 1968, p. 90.
78. WTO Appellate Body, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/AB/R, 2 January 2002.
79. F. Abbott, WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the TRIPS Agreement, in: WTO Jurisprudence 1995-2002 Law and Dispute Settlement Practice of the World Trade Organization, Kluwer Publishers, Studies in Transnational Economic Law, 2003.
80. Marco C.E.J. Bronckers, The Exhaustion of Patent Rights under World Trade Organization Law, 32 J. World Tr. 137-159 (No. 5, 1998).
81. Frederick M. Abbott, Political Economy of the U.S. Parallel Trade Experience:Toward a More Thoughtful Policy, 4 World Trade Forum (Thomas Cottier and Petros Mavroidis eds. 2002)(University of Michigan Press).
82. J. Watal, Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries, Kluwer Law International, 2001, p. 394.
83. W.R. Cornish, Intellectual Property:Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights(4 th ed. 1999), at Chapter 16.
84. C. Correa, Protection of Geographical Indications in the CARICOM Countries, September 2002 (manuscript).
85. Rangnekar, The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications. A Review of Empirical Evidence from Europe, UNCTAD-ICTSD, Geneva, 2004 (also available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/projectoutputs.htm#casestudies).
86. J.H. Reichman, Symposium:Uruguay Round-GATT/WTO Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement, (1995) 29 International Lawyer 345, at p. 375.
87. L. Duncan, Improvement of international protection of designs and models., (1993) AIPJ 32.
88. U. Suthersanen, Design Law in Europe, Sweet & Maxwell 2000, Chapter 22.
89. J. C. Ross and J. Wasserman, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1993, pp. 55-56.
90. G.H.C. Bodenhausen, Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, BIRPI, Geneva, 1968, p. 86.
91. U. Suthersanen, Incremental Inventions in Europe:A Legal and Economic Appraisal of Second Tier Patents, Journal of Business Law 2001, 319.
92. U. Suthersanen, The Economic Efficacy Of Utility Model Protection:A Comparative Review Of European Union, Asia-Pacific And U.S. Policy And Practice, in: Industrial Property Rights in the Bio-tech Age-Challenges for Asia (eds. Christopher Heath and A. Kamperman Sanders), Kluwer International, 2002.
93. Bernd Hansen and Fritjoff Hirsch, Protecting inventions in chemistry. Commentary on chemical case law under the European Patent Convention and the German Patent Law, WILEY-VCH, Weinheim 1997, p. 120.
94. Robert P. Merges, Patent law and policy. Cases and materials, Contemporary Legal Educational Series, Boston 1992, p. 489.
95. Carlos Correa, Trends in drug patenting. Case studies, Corregidor, Buenos Aires, 2001.
96. Carlos Correa, Traditional knowledge and intellectual property. Issues and options surrounding the protection of traditional knowledge, QUNO, Geneva, 2001.
97. Jay Dratler, Intellectual property law, commercial, creative, and industrial property, Law Journal Press 1999.
98. John Barton, Reforming the patent system, Science, vol. 287, 17 March 2000, p. 1933-1934.
99. World Bank (2001), Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries, p. 143.
100. Carlos Correa, Trends in Drug Patenting.Case Studies, Corregidor, Buenos Aires, 2001.
101. Donald S. Chisum and Michael A. Jacobs, Understanding Intellectual Property Law, Legal Text series, Matthew Bender, New York 1992, pp. 2-50.
102. Graham Dutfield, Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries:A Twentieth Century History, Ashgate, Aldershot 2003, p. 81.
103. Keith Maskus, Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, IIE 2000, p. 160.
104. Jerome H. Reichman and Catherine Hasenzahl (2002), Non-Voluntary Licensing of Patented Inventions: The Canadian Experience. Intellectual Property Rights & Sustainable Development Series, November 2002 [hereinafter Reichman, Hasenzahl, The Canadian Experience], available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/reichmanhasenzahlCanada.pdf.
105. Lester Thurow, Needed:A New System of Intellectual Property Rights, Harvard Business Review, September-October: 1997.
106. Alberto Bercovitz, Panel Discussion on Biotechnology, in Kraih Hill and Laraine Morse (Eds.), Emergent Technologies and Intellectual Property. Multimedia, Biotechnology & Others Issues, ATRIP, CASRIP Publications Series No. 2, Seattle 1996, p. 53.
107. Robert Beaglehole and Ruth Bonita, Public Health at the Crossroads. Achievements and prospects, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne 1999, p. 45.
108. Fraser Mustard, Health, health care and social cohesion, in Daniel Drache and Terry Sullivan (editors), Health Reform. Public Success. Private Failure, Routledge, London and New York 1999.
109. Rainer Moufang, The Concept of “Ordre Public” and Morality in Patent Law, in Geertrui Van Overwalle (Ed.), Patent Law, Ethics and Biotechnology, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel, Bruxelles 1998, No.13, p. 69.
110. Adrian Otten, Viewpoint of the WTO, (M. Swaminathan, Ed.), in Agrobiodiversity and Farmers' Rights Proceedings of a Technical Consultation on an Implementation Framework for Farmers' Rights, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Madras 1996.
111. Dan Leskien and Michael Flitner, Intellectual Property Rights and Plant Genetic Resources: Options for a Sui Generis System, Issues in Genetic Resources No. 6, IPGRI, Rome 1997, p. 15.
112. Jan Neumann, Elisabeth Turk, Necessity Revisited-Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law After Korea-Beef, EC-Asbestos and EC-Sardines, Journal of World Trade 2003, vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 199-233.
113. Carlos Correa, Implementing National Public Health Policies in the Framework of the WTO Agreements, 34 Journal of World Trade 2000, vol. 34, No. 5, 2, p. 92-96.
114. Stephen P. Ladas, Patents, Trademarks, and Related Rights. National and International Protection, Harvard University Press 1975, pp. 1685-1686.
115. Vandergheynst, Dominique, La notion d'ordre public et des bonnes murs dans la proposition de directive europ' eenne relative a la protection juridique des inventions biotechnologiques, in Geertrui Van Overwalle (Ed.), Patent Law, Ethics and Biotechnology, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel, Bruxelles 1998, No. 13, pp. 82-92.
116. Deryck Beyleveld; Roger Brownsword and Margaret Llewelyn, The morality clauses of the Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions:conflict, compromise and the patent community, in Richard Goldberg and Julian Lonbay (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Medicine. Biotechnology, and European Law, Cambridge University Press 2000.
117. Jeremy Phillips and Alison Firth, Introduction to Intellectual Property, 4th ed., Butterworths, Witltshire 2000, p. 59.
118. Kell, Expanding the Frontiers of Patentability:Methods of Medical Treatment of the Human Body, EIPR 1995, p. 202.
119. Bengt Domeij, Pharmaceutical Patents in Europe, Kluwer Law International /Norstedts Juridik, Stockholm 2000, p. 178.
120. W. Hale and J. Margham, The Harper Collins Dictionary:Biology, Harper Perennial, New York 1991, p. 430.
121. Geoff Tansey, Food Security, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property. Unpacking some issues around TRIPS. A Discussion Paper, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva 2002, p. 6, quoting Peter Lund.
122. Terence Stewart (Ed.), The GATT Uruguay Round. A negotiating History(1986-1992), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1993, p. 2294.
123. J. Coombs, Macmillan Dictionary of Biotechnology, Macmillan, London and Basinstoke 1986, p. 198.
124. Biswajit Dhar, Sui Generis Systems for Plant Variety Protection. Options under TRIPS. A Discussion Paper, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva 2002, p. 15.
125. Graham Dutfield, Intellectual Property Rights, Biogenetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, Earthscan: London 2004, p. 35.
126. R. Jordens, Legal and technological developments leading to this symposium:UPOV's perspective. Paper presented at WIPO-UPOV Symposium on the Co-existence of Patents and Plant Breeders' Rights in the Promotion of Biotechnological Developments. 25 October 2002, Geneva, p. 6.
127. Carlos Correa, Options for the implementation of Farmers' Rights at the national level, South Centre, Working Paper, Geneva 2000.
128. M. Ruiz and I. Lapena, New Peruvian Law Protects Indigenous Peoples' Collective Knowledge, in: Bridges Between Trade and Sustainable Development, September 2002 (year 6, no. 6), p. 15, available at http://www.ictsd.org/monthly/bridges/BRIDGES6-6.pdf.
129. W. Cornish, Intellectual property:Patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights, second edition, Sweet & Maxwell, New York 1989, p. 167.
130. Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman, Intellectual property law, Oxford University Press, New York 2001, p. 490.
131. Joseph Straus, Reversal of the burden of proof, the principle of ‘fair and equitable procedures’ and preliminary injunctions under the TRIPS Agreement, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 2000, vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 807-823 (809).
132. Jayashree Watal, Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/Boston 2001, p. 114.
133. Richard Neff and Fran Smallson (1994), NAFTA. Protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights in North America, SHEPARd'S, Colorado, p. 86.
134. Harold Wegner, Patent law in biotechnology, chemicals & pharmaceuticals, Stockton, Chippenham 1994, p. 526.
135. Carlos Correa, Reforming the Intellectual Property Rights System in Latin America, The World Economy 2000, vol. 23, no.6.
136. Carlos Correa, Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries, South Centre 2000.
137. U Suthersanen, Incremental inventions in Europe: A legal and economic appraisal of second tier patents. Journal of Business Law, July 2001, pp 319-343.
138. Robert Cooter and Thomas Ulen, Law and Economics, Harper Collins Publishers, USA 1988, p. 138.
139. W. Cornish, Experimental Use of Patented Inventions in European Community States, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 1998, vol. 29, No.7, p.736.
140. Alan Gutterman, Innovation and competition policy: A comparative study of regulation of patent licensing and collaborative research & development in the United States and the European Community, Kluwer Law International, London 1997.
141. Paul Welfens; John Addison; David Audretsch; Thomas Gries and Hariolf Grupp, Globalization, Economic Growth and Innovation Dynamics, Springer, Berlin 1999, p. 138.
142. W. Viscusi; John Vernon and Joseph Harrington, Economics of regulation and antitrust, Second Edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge 1997, p. 857.
143. Harvey Bale, TRIPS, Pharmaceuticals and Developing Countries: Implications for Drug Access and Drug Development, paper presented at the WHO Workshop on the TRIPS Agreement and its Impact on Pharmaceuticals, IFPMA, Jakarta 2000, p. 18.
144. Jayashree Watal, Pharmaceutical patents, prices and welfare losses: A simulation study of policy options for India under the WTO TRIPS Agreement, Washington DC 2000.
145. Jay Dratler (Jr.), Intellectual property law: Commercial, creative and industrial property, vol. 1, Law Journal Seminars-Press, New York 1996, p. 2-85.
146. Mark Janis, On courts herding cats: Contending with the “written description” requirement (and other unruly patent disclosure doctrines), Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 2000, vol. 2, p. 68.
147. Robert Merges and Richard Nelson, On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: the effect of patent-scope decisions, The Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 1994, No. 25, p. 129.
148. T. Penrose, The economics of the international patent system, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore 1951, p. 32.
149. John Duffy, On improving the legal process of claims interpretation: administrative alternatives, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 2000, vol. 2.
150. R. Nelson, The sources of economic growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (USA)-London (UK), 1996, pp. 109-166.
151. Carlos Correa, Integrating Public health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries, South Centre 2000, p. 81.
152. Charles Hauff, The best mode requirement of the U.S. Patent system, in Michael Lechter (Ed.), Successful Patents and Patenting for Engineers and Scientists, IEEE Press, New York 1995, p. 219.
153. Trevor Cook, Catherine Doyle, and David Jabbari, Pharmaceuticals biotechnology & The Law, Stockton Press, New York 1991, p. 80.
154. Pires de Nuno Carvalho, Requiring disclosure of the origin of genetic resources and prior informed consent in patent applications without infringing the TRIPS Agreement: The problem and the solution, ReEngineering Patent Law 2000, vol. 2, p. 380.
155. Peter Groves, Source Book on Intellectual Property Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London 1997, p. 202.
156. Elizabeth Henderson, TRIPs and the Third World: The Example of Pharmaceutical Patents in India,19EURJ. INT.PROP.REV. 651, 658-59 (1997).
157. Carlos Correa, Intellectual property rights and the use of compulsory licences: options for developing countries, Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity, Working Papers, South Centre, Geneva 1999.
158. Jerome H. Reichman and Catherine Hasenzahl, Non-Voluntary Licensing of Patented Inventions: Historical Perspective, Legal Framework under TRIPS, and an Overview of the Practice in Canada and the United States of America, also available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/projectoutputs.htm#casestudies.
159. Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier, and Francis Gurry, The International Intellectual Property System: Commentary and Materials, Kluwer Law 1998, pp. 717-718.
160. Carlos Correa, The strengthening of IPRs in developing countries and complimentary legislation (2000), prepared upon the request of DFID (UK), available at www.dfid.gov.uk.
161. Friedrich-Karl Beier, The European Patent System,14VAND.J.TRANSNAT'L L. 1 (1981).
162. Frederick M. Abbott, The Containment of TRIPS to Promote Public Health: A Commentary on the Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration, manuscript with reference to be provided (forthcoming 2004).
163. Carlos Correa, Implementation Of The WTO General Council Decision on Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, WHO 2004.
164. Paul Vandoren and Jean Charles Van Eeckhaute, The WTO Decision on Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, 6J. World Intell. Prop. 779 (2003).
165. F. M. Scherer, Commentsin Robert Anderson and Nancy Gallini (Eds.), Competition policy and intellectual property rights in the knowledge-based economy, University of Calgary Press, Alberta 1998.
166. Miguel Vidal-Quadras Trias des Bes, Process patents on new products and reversal of the burden of proof: factors contributing to the interpretation of its scope, European Intellectual Property Review 2002, vol. 24, No. 5, p. 237-243 (237).
167. Harold Wegner, Patent Harmonization, Sweet & Maxwell, London 1993, p. 334.
168. Jay Dratler, Intellectual Property Law: Commercial, Creative, and Industrial Property, Intellectual Property Series, Law Journal Seminars-Papers, Vol. 2, New York 1997, pp. 8-6.
169. Debora Sper, Attracting high technology investment. INTEL's Costa Rican Plant, FIAS/World Bank, Occasional Paper No. 11, Washington D.C. 1998.
170. Carlos Correa, Intellectual Property in the Field of Integrated Circuits: Implications for Developing Countries, World Competition, vol.14, No.2, Geneva 1990.
171. Richard Neff and Fran Smallson, NAFTA. Protecting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in North America, Shepard's,/McGraw Hill, Colorado Springs 1994, p. 96.
172. Richard Levin; Alvin Klovorick; Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter, Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, No 3, 1987, p. 788.
173. Daniel Siegel and Ronald Laurie, Beyond microcode: Alloy v. Ultratek. The first attempt to extend copyright protection to computer hardware, The Computer Lawyer, vol. 6, No. 4, April 1989, p.14.
174. Mark Lemley; Peter Menell; Robert Merges and Pamela Samuelson, Software and Internet Law, Aspen Law & Business, New York 2000, p. 410.
175. J. H. Reichman, Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO Agreement, The International Lawyer 1995, vol. 29, No. 2, p. 378.
176. R. Gadbaw and T. Richards, Intellectual Property Rights-Global Consensus, Global conflict?, Boulder 1988, p. 60.
177. F. Dessemontet, Protection of trade secrets and confidential information, in C. Correa and A. Yusuf, Intellectual Property and International Trade, Kluwer Law International, London, 1998, p. 238.
178. J. Reinbothe and A. Howard, The state of play in the negotiations on TRIPS (GATT/Uruguay Round), European Intellectual Property Review 1991, vol. 13, No.5, p. 163.
179. T. Cottier, The prospects for intellectual property in GATT, Common Market Law Review 1991, No.2, p. 396.
180. A. Font Segura, La protecci' on internacional del secreto empresarial, MONOGRAFIAS, Eurolex, Madrid 1999, p. 106.
181. A. Kamperman Sanders, Unfair Competition Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997, p. 7.
182. S. Ladas, Patents, Trademarks, and Related Rights. National and International Protection, vol. III, Cambridge 1975, pp. 1685-1686, 1689.
183. R. Neff and F. Smallson, NAFTA. Protecting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in North America, SHEPARd'S, Colorado 1994, p. 102.
184. T. Cook, Special Report: The protection of regulatory data in the pharmaceutical and other sectors, Sweet & Maxwell, London 2000, p. 6.
185. R. Kampf, Patents versus Patients? Archiv des Volkerrechts, vol. 40 (2002), pp. 90-234
186. C. Priapantja, Trade Secret: How does this apply to drug registration data? Paper presented at “ASEAN Workshop on the TRIPS Agreement and its Impact on Pharmaceuticals”, Department of Health and World Health Organization, May 2-4 2000, p. 4.
187. Carlos Correa, Protection of Data Submitted for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals. Implementing the Standards of the TRIPS Agreement, South Centre, Geneva 2002 (available at http://www.southcentre.org/publications/protection/toc.htm).
188. Frederick Abbott, The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health and the Contradictory Trend in Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreements, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva 2004.
189. Graham Dutfield, Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. A review of progress in diplomacy and policy formulation, Issue Paper No. 1, UNCTADICTSD, Geneva 2003.
190. Joseph Stiglitz, The roaring nineties. A new history of the world's most prosperousdecade, W.W. Norton & Company, New York-London, 2003, p. 208.
191. Frederick M. Abbott, Public Policy and Global Technological Integration: An Introduction, in Public Policy and Global Technological Integration 3 (F. M. Abbott and D. Gerber eds. 1997).
192. Reinbothe, Howard, The State of Play in the Negotiations on TRIPS (GATT/Uruguay Round), (1991).
193. Tom, Newberg, U.S. Enforcement Approaches to the Antitrust-Intellectual Property Interface, in Anderson, Gallini, at 343, 347.
194. Tavares de Aranjo, Jr., Timeo, Harmonization of competition policies among Mercosur countries, 43 Antitrust Bull. 45, 57 et seq. (1998).
195. Bernard Hoekman, Michel Kostecki, The Political Economy of the World Trading System, From GATT to WTO, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1997.
196. Jay Dratler, Intellectual property law, commercial, creative, and industrial property, Law Journal Press, New York 1999, pp. 1A-115.
197. F. Beier and G. Schricker, From GATT to TRIPS, Max Planck Institute/VCH, Weinheim 1996, p. 255.
198. Jerome Reichman, Enforcing the enforcement procedures of the TRIPS Agreement, Virginia Journal of International Law 1997, vol. 37, No. 2, p. 350.
199. Carlos Correa, Internationalization of the patent system and new technologies, Wisconsin International Law Journal 2002, vol. 20, No. 3, p. 543.
200. Stuart Graham and David Mowery, Intellectual property in the U.S. Software industry, prepared for presentation at the NRC Board of Science, Technology and Economic Policy Conference “The Operation of the Patent System”, Washington, D.C., October 22, 2001, available at http://www4.nationalacademies.org/pd/step.nsf.
201. John Orange, Costs-an Issue for Whom?, Paper submitted to the Conference on the International Patent System, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, March 25-27, 2002.
202. John Barton, Adapting the intellectual property system to new technologies, International Journal of Technology Management 1995, vol. 10. No. 2/3, p. 163.
203. Mireille Buydens, L'Accord ADPIC (TRIPS) et les dispositions destinees a assurer la mise en oeuvre effective des droits de propriete intellectuelle, IR DI, Mys & Breess Ed., 1997, p. 9
204. Jerome Reichman and Catherine Hasenzahl, Non-voluntary Licensing of Patented Inventions: Historical Perspective, Legal Framework under TRIPS, and an Overview of the Practice in Canada and the United States of America(UNCTAD-ICTSD 2002), available at http://www.ictsd.org/iprsonline/unctadictsd/docs/reichman hasenzahl.pdf.
205. Liu Xiaohai, Enforcement of intellectual property rights in the People's Republic of China, IIC 2001, vol. 32, No. 2, p. 141.
206. Matthew Murphy, Patent litigation in China. How does it work?, Patent World, June/July 2001, p. 19.
207. Carlos Correa, Medidas cautelares en material de patentes de invencion, Lexis Nexis Jurisprudencia Argentina, JA-2002-IV, No. 8, p. 21-28.
208. J. Reichman and M. Zinnani, Las medidas precautorias en el derecho estadounidense: El justo balance entre las partes, Lexis Nexis Jurisprudencia Argentina, JA 2002-IV, No. 8, p. 15-21.
209. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition,4 th. Edition, Thomson, West, USA 2002, vol. 5, pp. 30-59.
210. Joseph Straus, Reversal of the burden of proof, the principle of ‘fair and equitable procedures’ and preliminary injunctions under the TRIPS Agreement, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 2000, Vol. 3., No. 6., p. 815-820.
211. Paul R. Paradise, Trademark Counterfeiting: Product Piracy and the Billion Dollar Threat to the U.S. Economy, Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut 1999, p. 30.
212. John Barton, Issues Posed by A World Patent System, Journal of International Economic Law 2004, Volume 7, Issue 2, p. 341-357.
213. R. Neff and F. Smallson, NAFTA: Protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights in North America, Shepard's/McGraw-Hill, 1994, p. 127.
214. Doron S. Ben-Atar, Trade Secrets: Intellectual Piracy and the Origins of American Industrial Power, Yale University Press, New Haven & London 2004.
215. B. Zorina Khan, Does Copyright Piracy Pay? The Effects of US International Copyright Laws on the Market for Books, 1790-1920. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper W10271, 2004.
216. Pury Tang, The social and economic effects of counterfeiting, IPI, London 2001.
217. Carlos Correa, Do small and medium enterprises benefit from patent protection?, in Carlo Pietrobelli and Arni Sverrisson (eds.), Linking Local and Global Economies. Organisation, Technology and Export Opportunities for SMEs, Routledge, London and New York 2003.
218. Arun Chandra, Antitrust liability for enforcing a fraudulent patent in the United States, Patent World, April 1999.
219. J. H. Reichmann, with C. Hasenzahl, Nonvoluntary Licensing of Patented Inventions: The Law and Practice of the United States, forthcoming at http://www.ictsd.org/iprsonline/unctadictsd/projectoutputs.htm#casestudies.
220. V. Bogdandy, The Non-Violation Procedure of Article XXIII:2 of GATT: Its Operational Rationale, in: 26 Journal of World Trade 1992, 95 (98).
221. E.-U. Petersmann, The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System since 1948, 31 Common Market Law Review, 1994, p. 1188.
222. O. Cattaneo, The Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement: Considerations for the WTO Panels and Appellate Body, Journal of World Intellectual Property, September 2000, volume 3, number 5, pp. 627-681 (p. 679).
223. V.D. Degan, L'interpretation des accords en droit international, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1963.
224. McDougal, S. Myres et al., The Interpretation of Agreements and World Public Order 90, 1967.
225. Peter C. Maki, Interpreting GATT Using the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Method to Increase the Legitimacy of the Dispute Settlement System, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 2000, vol. 9, pp. 343-360.
226. G. Fitzmaurice, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points, British Yearbook of International Law, 1951, p. 1 ff.
227. J. H. Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO. Emerging Problems, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 1998, pp. 329, 342.
228. R.E. Hudec, Transcending the Ostensible: Some Reflections on the Nature of Litigation Between Governments, 72 Minnesota Law Review 211, 1987, at. 218.
229. H.W.A. Thirlway, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989, British Yearbook of International Law, 1992, p. 19.
230. C. Correa, The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, vol. 4, March 2001, 251, 253.
231. F. Abbott, The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting A Dark Corner at the WTO, in: Journal of International Economic Law (2002), 469-505.
232. C. Correa, Recent International Developments in the Area of Intellectual Property Rights, paper submitted to the Second ICTSD-UNCTAD Bellagio Series on Development and Intellectual Property, 18-21 September 2003, available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/bellagio/docs/CorreaBellagio2.pdf.
233. Linsu Kim, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from Korea's Experience, UNCTAD-ICTSD, Geneva 2003 (available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/Kim2002.pdf.)
234. Keith Maskus, Encouraging International Technology Transfer, UNCTAD-ICTSD, Geneva 2004, available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/projectoutputs.htm#casestudies.
235. S. Patel/P. Roffe/A. Yusuf, International Technology Transfer. The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on A Draft Code of Conduct, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2001.
236. Michael Blakeney, Legal Aspects of the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries(Oxford 1989, ESC Publishing).
237. C. Correa, Can the TRIPS Agreement Foster Technology Transfer to Developing Countries? Draft of March 2003.
238. European Commission (EC) (2000), Partnership Agreement between the Members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou, Benin on 23 June 2000. (See http://www.acpsec.org/gb/cotonou/accorde.htm).
239. S. Musungu/G. Dutfield, Multilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), TRIPS Issue Paper 3, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva 2003 (available at http://www.geneva.quno.info/pdf/WIPO(A4)final0304.pdf).
240. Keith Maskus, Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy(Washington DC, Institute for International Economics, 2000), p. 225.
241. Stephen Obenski, Retroac-tive Protection and shame Diplomacy in the US-Japan Sound Recordings Dispute, or, How Japan Got Berne-d, 4 Minn. Intell. Prop. Rev. 183 (2002).
242. Jerome H. Reichman and Catherine Hasenzahl, Non-Voluntary Licenses of Patent Inventions: The Canadian Experience, UNCTAD/ICTSD, Oct. 2002 (available at http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/reichman hasenzahl Canada.pdf)
243. C. Correa, Can the TRIPS Agreement Foster Technology Transfer to Developing Countries? Draft of March 2003, submitted to a Conference at Duke University [hereinafter Correa, Draft].
244. Silvia Ostry, The Uruguay Round North-South Grand Bargain: Implications for future negotiations, at 285.
245. J. Michael Finger, The Uruguay Round North-South bargain: Will the WTO get over it?, at 301.
246. Frederick M. Abbott, The TRIPS-legality of measures taken to address public health crises: Responding to USTR-State-industry positions that undermine the WTO, at 311.
247. T.N. Srinivasan, The TRIPS Agreement, at 343, each in The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (eds. D. Kennedy and J. Southwick 2002)(Cambridge University Press).
248. D.M. McRae, The Contribution of International Trade Law to the Development of International Law, Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, 1996, v. 260, pp. 99-238, at pp. 130-131.
249. Mariano Garcia-Rubio, On the Application of Customary Rules of State Responsibility by the WTO Dispute Settlement Organs-A General International Law Perspective-Geneva, Studies and Working Papers, Graduate Institute of International Studies, 2000, p. 100.
250. Ramses Wessel, The European Union's Foreign and Security Policy-A Legal Institutional Perspective, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 340.
251. Hannes L. Schloemann, and Stefan Ohloff, ‘Constitutionalization’ and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence, American Journal of International Law, v. 93, no. 2, 1999, pp. 424-451.
252. Abi-Saab, Georges; ‘Interpretation’ et ‘Auto-Interpretation’: Quelques reiexions sur leur role dans la formation et la resolution du differend international, in Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung, Festschrift fur Rudolf Bernhardt, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp. 9-19.
253. Brussels, Bruylant: Ed. De l'Universitede Bruxelles, 1997.
254. M. Hahn, ‘Vital Interests in the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT's Security Exception, Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 12, 1991, p. 558.
255. Robert Kolb, La bonne foi en droit international public-Contribution al'etude des principes generaux de droit, Paris, PUF, 2000, particularly pp. 429.
256. J. Delbruck, Proportionality, in R. Bernhardt (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, v. 7, 1984, p. 396.
257. Andrea Giardina, The Eco-nomic Sanctions of the United States against Iran and Libya and the GATT Security Exception in G. Hafner and others (eds), Liber Amicorum Professor Seidl-Hohenveldern-in Honour of his 80th Birthday, the Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 1998.
258. R. Dattu, and J. Boscariol, GATT Article XXI, Helms-Burton and the Continuing Abuse of the National Security Exception, Canadian Business Law Journal, v. 28, No. 2, 1997, pp. 198-221.
259. K.J. Kuilwijk, Castro's Cuba and the U.S. Helms-Burton Act-An Interpretation of the GATT Security Exemption, Journal of World Trade, v. 31, No. 3, 1997, pp. 49-62.
260. A. Perez, WTO and U.N. Law: Institutional Comity in National Security, Yale Journal of International Law, v. 23, No. 2, 1998, pp. 302-381
261. K. Alexander, The Helms-Burton Act and the WTO Challenge: Making a Case for the United States under the GATT Security Exception, Florida Journal of International Law, v. 11, No. 3, 1997, pp. 487-516.