Kant on representation and objectivity

Kant on Representation and Objectivity

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-217

  Dickerson, A B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929761855     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487163     Document Type: Book

References (118)

1. Briefwechsel, ed. R. Malter, 3rd edn Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1986.
2. Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. Deutschen Akademie derWissenschaften, 29 vols., Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–83; 2nd edn for vols. i–ix, 1968.
3. Correspondence, ed. and trans. Arnulf Zweig, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
4. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. Paul Guyer and AllenW.Wood, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
5. Lectures on Logic, ed. and trans. J. Michael Young, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
6. ‘On a discovery according to which any new critique of pure reason has been made superfluous by an earlier one’, in The Kant–Eberhard Controversy, ed. And trans. Henry E. Allison, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973, 107–60.
7. Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
8. Prolegomena to any future Metaphysics that will be able to come Forward as Science, ed. and trans. Gary Hatfield, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
9. Adams, R. M., Leibniz, Oxford University Press, 1994.
10. Aldrich, V. C., ‘Mirrors, Pictures, Words, Perceptions’, inNew Representationalisms, ed. E. Wright, Aldershot: Avebury, 1993, 117–35.
11. Allison, H. E., Idealism and Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
12. Kant's Transcendental Idealism, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
13. Ameriks, K., ‘Kant's Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument’, Kant Studien, 69 (1978), 273–87.
14. Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature’, in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: The Collected Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, vol. ii, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981, 3–20.
15. Aquila, R. E., Matter in Mind, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.
16. Representational Mind, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.
17. Ariew, R. and Grene, M., ‘Ideas, in and before Descartes’, Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (1995), 87–106.
18. Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P., Logic or the Art of Thinking, trans. J. V. Buroker, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
19. Ayers, M., Locke, 2 vols., London: Routledge, 1991.
20. Baker, G. and Morris, K. J., Descartes’ Dualism, London: Routledge, 1996.
21. Baum, M., ‘The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism’, Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement) 25 (1986), 89–107.
22. Beck, L. W., A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, University of Chicago Press, 1960.
23. ‘Did the Sage of Königsberg have no Dreams?’, in Essays on Kant and Hume, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978, 38–60.
24. Bell, D., Frege's Theory of Judgment, Oxford University Press, 1979.
25. Husserl, London: Routledge, 1990.
26. Bencivenga, E., Kant's Copernican Revolution, Oxford University Press, 1987.
27. ‘TheMetaphysical Structure of Kant'sMoral Philosophy’, in My Kantian Ways, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995, 33–46.
28. Bennett, J., Kant's Analytic, Cambridge University Press, 1966.
29. Kant's Dialectic, Cambridge University Press, 1974.
30. Berkeley, G., A New Theory of Vision and otherWritings, London: J. M.Dent, 1910.
31. Boswell, T., ‘On the Textual Authenticity of Kant's Logic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1988), 193–203.
32. Brook, A., Kant and the Mind, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
33. Burrell, D. B., ‘Distinguishing God from the World’, in Language, Meaning and God, ed. B. Davies, London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1987, 75–91.
34. Carriero, J. P., ‘The First Meditation’, in Descartes's Meditations, ed. V. Chappell, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997, 1–31.
35. Charlton, W., Aesthetics, London: Hutchinson, 1970.
36. Collins, A. W., Possible Experience, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
37. Cottingham, J., ‘Descartes’ Treatment of Animals’, in Descartes, ed. J. Cottingham, Oxford University Press, 1998, 225–33.
38. Davidson, D., ‘Truth and Meaning’, in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 1984, 17–36.
39. Dennett, D., Brainstorms, Brighton: Harvester Press, 1978.
40. Descartes, R., The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and DugaldMurdoch, 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1985-91.
41. Diamond, C., The Realistic Spirit, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
42. Dummett, M., ‘Frege and Husserl on Reference’, in The Seas of Language, Oxford University Press, 1993, 224–9.
43. Engstrom, S., ‘The Transcendental Deduction and Skepticism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994), 359–80.
44. Falkenstein, L., Kant's Intuitionism, University of Toronto Press, 1995.
45. Frege, G., The Frege Reader, ed. and trans. M. Beaney, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
46. Gardner, S., Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, London: Routledge, 1999.
47. Geach, P. T., ‘God's Relation to theWorld’, in Logic Matters, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972, 318–27.
48. Mental Acts, 2nd edn, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1992.
49. ‘Saying and Showing in Frege and Wittgenstein’, in Essays on Wittgenstein in Honour of G. H. Von Wright, ed. J. Hintikka, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 1976, 54–70.
50. George, R., ‘Kant's Sensationism’, Synthese 47 (1981), 229–55.
51. Gram, M. S., ‘Intellectual Intuition: The Continuity Thesis’, Journal of the History of Ideas 42 (1981), 287–304.
52. Grene, M., Descartes, 2nd edn, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.
53. Guyer, P., Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
54. Haldane, J., ‘A Return to Form in the Philosophy of Mind’, in Form and Matter, ed. D. S. Oderberg, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, 40–64.
55. Hatfield, G. C. and Epstein, W., ‘The Sensory Core and theMedieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory’, Isis 70 (1979), 363–84.
56. Henrich, D., ‘Identity and Objectivity: An Inquiry into Kant's Transcendental Deduction’, in The Unity of Reason, ed. R. L. Velkley, trans. J. Edwards, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994, 123–208.
57. ‘The Identity of the Subject in the Transcendental Deduction’, in Reading Kant, ed. E. Schaper and W. Vossenkuhl, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989, 250–80.
58. ‘Kant's Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique’, in Kant's Transcendental Deductions, ed. E. Förster, Stanford University Press, 1989, 29–46.
59. ‘The Proof-Structure of Kant'sTranscendentalDeduction’, Review ofMetaphysics 22 (1969), 640–59.
60. Howell, R., Kant's Transcendental Deduction, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.
61. Hume, D., Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 1975.
62. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 1978.
63. Hurley, S. L., ‘Kant on Spontaneity and the Myth of the Giving’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1994), 137–64.
64. Hylton, P., ‘TheNature of the Proposition and the Revolt against Idealism’, in Philosophy inHistory, ed. R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner, Cambridge University Press, 1984, 375–97.
65. Ishiguro, H., ‘Imagination – II’, Aristotelian Society Proceedings (Supplement) 41 (1967), 37–56.
66. ‘On Representations’, European Journal of Philosophy 2 (1994), 109–24.
67. ‘Representation: An Investigation Based on a Passage in the Tractatus’, in Forms of Representation, ed. B. Freed, A.Marras and P.Maynard, Amsterdam:North Holland Publishing, 1975, 189–202.
68. Jolley, N., Leibniz and Locke, Oxford University Press, 1984.
69. The Light of the Soul, Oxford University Press, 1990.
70. Locke, Oxford University Press, 1999.
71. Keller, P., Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
72. Kemp Smith, N., A Commentary to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’, 2nd edn, New York: Humanities Press, 1962.
73. Kitcher, P., Kant's Transcendental Psychology, Oxford University Press, 1990.
74. Kulstad, M. A., Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection, Munich: Philosophia, 1991.
75. Leibniz, G. W. F., Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and trans. L. E. Loemker, 2nd edn, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.
76. New Essays on Human Understanding, trans. Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
77. Linsky, L., ‘Terms and Propositions in Russell's Principles of Mathematics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1988), 621–42.
78. ‘The Unity of the Proposition’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992), 243–73.
79. Locke, J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. H. Nidditch, Oxford University Press, 1979.
80. Longuenesse, B., Kant and the Capacity to Judge, trans. C. T. Wolfe, Princeton University Press, 1998.
81. McCann, E., ‘Skepticism and Kant's B Deduction’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985), 71–89.
82. McDowell, J., Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
83. McRae, R., ‘ “Idea” as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century’, Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (1965), 175–90.
84. Leibniz, University of Toronto Press, 1976.
85. Palmer, A., Concept and Object, London: Routledge, 1988.
86. Parsons, C., ‘The Transcendental Aesthetic’, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. P. Guyer, Cambridge University Press, 1992, 62–100.
87. Pereboom, D., ‘Kant on Intentionality’, Synthese 77 (1988), 321–52.
88. ‘Self-Understanding in Kant's Transcendental Deduction’, Synthese 103 (1995), 1–42.
89. Pippin, R. B., ‘Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1987), 449–75.
90. Kant's Theory of Form, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.
91. Pitkänen, R., ‘The Resemblance View of Pictorial Representation’, British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (1976), 313–23.
92. Prauss, G., Erscheinung bei Kant, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1971.
93. Robinson, H., ‘Intuition andManifold in theTranscendentalDeduction’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1984), 403–12.
94. ‘The Transcendental Deduction from A to B: Combination in the Threefold Synthesis and the Representation of a Whole’, Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement) 25 (1986), 45–61.
95. ‘Two Perspectives on Kant's Appearances and Things in Themselves’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 32, no. 3 (1994), 411–41.
96. Rorty, R., ‘Strawson's Objectivity Argument’, Review of Metaphysics 24 (1970), 207–44.
97. Rousseau, J.-J., The Social Contract and the Discourses, trans. G. D. H. Cole, London: J. M. Dent, 1993.
98. Russell, B., The Principles of Mathematics, London: Routledge, 1992.
99. Sellars, W., Science and Metaphysics, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
100. Sleigh, R. C., Leibniz and Arnauld, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
101. Sluga, H., ‘Frege against the Booleans’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1987), 80–98.
102. Gottlob Frege, London: Routledge, 1980.
103. Strawson, P. F., The Bounds of Sense, London: Routledge, 1966.
104. Stump, E., ‘The Mechanisms of Cognition: Ockham on Mediating Species’, in The Cambridge Companion toOckham, ed. P. V. Spade, CambridgeUniversity Press, 1999, 168–203.
105. Thomas, A., ‘Book Review: D. Henrich's The Unity of Reason’, Mind 105 (1996), 706–8.
106. Vendler, Z., The Matter of Minds, Oxford University Press, 1984.
107. Walker, R. C. S., Kant, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
108. Waxman, W., Kant's Model of the Mind, Oxford University Press, 1991.
109. Weinberg, J. R., Abstraction, Relation, and Induction, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1965.
110. Wilkerson, T. E., Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd edn, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1998.
111. Williams, B., Descartes, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1978.
112. Wilson, M. D., ‘Kant and “the Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley”’, in Ideas and Mechanism, Princeton University Press, 1999, 276–93.
113. Winkler, K. P., Berkeley, Oxford University Press, 1989.
114. Wittgenstein, L., Notebooks 1914–1916, ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press, 1979.
115. Philosophical Investigations, ed. and trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
116. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F.McGuinness, London: Routledge, 1961.
117. Wolff, R. P., Kant's Theory ofMental Activity, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1963.
118. Wood, A.W., Kant's Rational Theology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.