Gender shifts in the history of English

Gender Shifts in the History of English

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-223

  Curzan, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929756341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486913     Document Type: Book

References (309)

1. Aitchison, Jean 1995. Tadpoles, Cuckoos, and Multiple Births: Language Contact and Models of Change. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 1-13. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Aitchison, Jean 2001. Language Change: Progress or Decay? 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. August, Eugene R. 1992. Real Men Don’t: Anti-Male Bias in English. in G. Goshgarian (ed.), Exploring Language, 6th edn, 238-48. New York: HarperCollins.
4. Back, Hilding 1934. The Synonyms for ‘Child’, ‘Boy’, ‘Girl’in OldEnglish: An Etymological-SemasiologicalInvestiga tion. in E. Ekwall (ed.), Lund Studies in English II. Lund: A.-B. Ph. Lindstedts Univ.-Bokhandel.
5. Bäcklund, Ingegerd 1996. Males and Females in Jane Austen’s World: A Study of Terms. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19, 1994, 9-28. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
6. Bailey, Charles J. and Karl Maroldt 1977. The French Lineage in English. in J. M. Meisel (ed.), Langues en Contact-Pidgins-Creoles-Languages in Contact, 21-53. Tübingen: TBL Verlag Gunter Narr.
7. Bailey, Richard 1991. Images of English: A Cultural History of the Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Bailey, Richard 1996. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Bain, Alexander 1879. A Higher English Grammar. New edn. London: Longmans.
10. Barber, Charles 1993. The English Language: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Barlow, Michael 1992. A Situated Theory of Agreement. New York: Garland.
12. Baron, Dennis 1986. Grammar and Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
13. Baron, Naomi S. 1971. A Reanalysis of English Grammatical Gender. Lingua 27: 113-40.
14. Batliner, Anton 1984. The Comprehension of Grammatical and Natural Gender: a Cross-Linguistic Experiment. Linguistics 22: 831-56.
15. Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable 1978. A History of the English Language. 3rd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16. Beardsmore, H. Baetens 1971. A Gender Problem in a Language Contact Situation. Lingua 27: 141-59.
17. Beattie, James 1968 [1788]. Theory of Language. Reprint. Menston: Scolar Press.
18. Bebout, Linda 1984. Asymmetries in Male-Female Word Pairs. American Speech 59.1: 13-30.
19. Bebout, Linda 1995. Asymmetries in Male/Female Word Pairs: A Decade of Change. American Speech 70.2: 163-85.
20. Bennett-Kastor, Tina L. 1996. Anaphora, Nonanaphora, and the Generic Use of Pro nouns by Children. American Speech 71: 285-301.
21. Benson, Larry D. (ed.) 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Bergvall, Victoria L., Janet M. Bing, and Alice F. Freed (eds.) 1996. Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. London; New York: Longman.
23. Bing, Janet B. and Victoria L. Bergvall 1998. The Qμestion of Qμestions: Beyond Binary Thinking. in J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 495-510. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24. Björkman, Erik 1969 [1900]. Scandinavian Loanwords in Middle English. New York: Greenwood Press.
25. Bloomfield, Morton W. and Leonard Newmark 1963. A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
26. Bodine, Ann 1975. Androcentrism in Prescriptive Grammar: Singular ‘they,’ Sex-indefinite ‘he,’ and ‘he or she.’ Language in Society 4: 129-46.
27. Bourcier, Georges 1981. An Introduction to the History of the English Language. (English adaptation by Cecily Clark.) Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
28. Bradley, Henry 1924 [1904]. The Making of English. London: Macmillan.
29. Bresnan, Joan, and Sam Mchombo 1986. Grammatical and Anaphoric Agreement. in A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley, and K. McCullough (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragma tics and Grammatical Theory at the Twenty-Second Regional Meeting (Chicago Linguistics Society, 22), 278-97.
30. Britton, Derek 1991. On Middle English She, Sho:A Scots Solution to an English Problem. North-Western European Language Evolution 17: 3-51.
31. Brown, Goold 1982 [1828]. The Institutes of English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
32. Bryson, Bill 1990. Our Mother Tongue: English and How it Got to Be That Way. London: Penguin.
33. Buccini, Anthony F. Southern Middle English Hise and the Question of Pronominal Transfer in Language Contact. Unpublished paper.
34. Bullions, Peter 1983 [1846]. The Principles of English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
35. Burgschmidt, Ernst 1988. Gender in Modern English - Sub-systems and Variation. Historical English: on the Occasion of Karl Brunner’s 100th Birthday, 219-30. Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, Universität Innsbruck.
36. Butler, Judith 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
37. Cameron, Deborah 1990. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
38. Cameron, Deborah 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
39. Cameron, Deborah and Jennifer Coates 1985. Some Problems in the Sociolinguistic Explanation of Sex Differences. Language & Communication 5: 143-51.
40. Campbell, Alistair 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
41. Cassidy, Frederic G. (chief ed.) 1985. Dictionary of American Regional English. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
42. Cawdrey, Robert 1966 [1604]. A Table Alphabetical! of Hard Usual English Words. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/ret/cawdrey/cawdrey0.html.
43. Champneys, A. C. 1893. History of English. London: Percival.
44. Christy, Craig 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series III, Studies in the History of Linguistics, 31.) Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
45. Claiborne, Robert 1983. Our Marvelous Native Tongue: The Life and Times of the English Language. New York: Times Books.
46. Clancy, Steven J. 1999. The Ascent of guy. American Speech 74.3: 282-97.
47. Clark, C. 1957. Gender in the ‘Peterborough Chronicle.’ English Studies 38: 109-15.
48. Clark, C. 1970. The Peterborough Chronicle, 1070-1154. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.
49. Clark Hall, J. R. 1960. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 4th edn. (With a Supplement by Herbert D. Meritt.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
50. Classen, E. 1919. On the Origin of Natural Gender in Middle English. Modern Language Review 14: 97-103.
51. Classen, E. 1919. Outlines of the History of the English Language. London: Macmillan.
52. Coates, Jennifer 1996. Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Cobbett, William 1986 [1832]. A Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
54. Cockayne, Thomas Oswald 1961 [1864]. Leechdoms, Wortcunning and Starcraft of Early England. London: Holland Press.
55. Comrie, Bernard 1999. Grammatical Gender Systems: A Linguist’s Assessment. Journal of Psycholmguistic Research 28.5: 457-66.
56. Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Cornish, Francis 1986. Anaphoric Relations in English and French: A Discourse Perspective. London; Sydney; Dover: Croom Helm.
58. Crawford, Mary 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.
59. Crystal, David 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Curme, George O. 1931. Syntax. Boston: D. C. Heath.
61. Curzan, Anne 1998. When it Became All Things: A Study of the Rise of Natural Gender in English Anaphoric Pronouns. Unpublished dissertation.
62. Curzan, Anne 1999. Gender Categories in Early English Grammars: Their Message to the Modern Grammarian. in B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 561-76. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Dahl, Östen 1999. Animacy and the Notion of Semantic Gender. in B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 99-115. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
64. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1995. Middle English is a Creole and Its Opposite: On the Value of Plausible Speculation. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 35-50. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
65. Daly, Mary, conjurer, in cahoots with Jane Caputi 1987. Websters’ First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language. Boston: Beacon Press.
66. Danchev, Andrei 1997. The Middle English Creolization Hypothesis Revisited. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, 79-108. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
67. Daniel, Neil 1992. A Guide to Style and Mechanics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
68. Dekeyser, X. 1980. The Diachrony of Gender Systems in English and Dutch. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, 97-111. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
69. Devis, Ellin 1801. The Accidence or First Rudiments of English Grammar. London.
70. Diensberg, Bernhard 1981. The Etymology of Modern English Boy. A New Hypothesis. Medium Ævum 50.1: 79-87.
71. Diensberg, Bernhard 1985. The Lexical Fields Boy/Girl-Servant-Child in Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 328-36.
72. Diller, Hans-Jürgen 1991. Pronoun and Reference in Old English Poetry. in D. Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English Syntax, 125-40. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
73. Dobson, E. J. 1940. The Etymology and Meaning of Boy. Medium Ævum 9.3: 121-54.
74. Domingue, Nicole Z. 1977. Middle English: Another Creole? Journal of Creole Studies 1: 89-100.
75. Dunayer, Joan 1995. Sexist Words, Speciesist Roots. in C. J. AdamsandJ. Donovan (eds.), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, 11-31. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
76. Dykema, Karl W. 1960-61. Where Our Grammar Came From. College English 22:455-65.
77. Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet 1998. Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender, and Power All Live. in J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 484-94. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
78. Emerson, O. F. 1895. The History of the English Language. New York: Macmillan.
79. Erades, P. A. 1956. Contributions to Modern English Syntax: A Note on Gender. Moderna Sprak 50: 2-11.
80. Ervin, Susan 1962. The Connotations of Gender. Word 18: 249-61.
81. Farmer, J. S. and W. E. Henley (eds.) 1970 [1890-1904]. Slang and Its Analogues. Reprint. New York: Arno Press.
82. Fell, Christine, Cecily Clark, and Elizabeth Williams 1984. Women in Anglo-Saxon England and the Impact of 1066. London: British Museum Publications.
83. Fennell, Barbara 2001. A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
84. Fillmore, Charles J. 1978. On the Organization of Semantic Information in the Lexicon: Chicago Linguistic Society April 14-15, 1978. in D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen and K. W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, 148-73. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
85. Fisher, John H. 1977. Chancery and the Emergence of Standard Written English in the Fifteenth Century. Speculum 52: 870-99.
86. Fisiak, Jacek 1977. Sociolinguistics and Middle English: Some Socially Motivated Changes in the History of English. Kmartalnik Neofilologiczny 24: 247-59.
87. Fodor, István 1959. The Origin of Grammatical Gender I & II. Lingua 8: 1-41, 186-214.
88. Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
89. Fowler, Henry W. and Francis G. Fowler 1906. The King’s English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
90. Frank, Francine and Frank Anshen 1983. Language and the Sexes. New York: State University of New York Press.
91. Gazdar, G., E. Klein and G. K. Pullum 1983. Order, Concord and Constituency. Dordrecht: Foris.
92. Geeraerts, Dirk 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
93. Geipel, John 1971. The Viking Legacy: The Scandinavian Influence on the English and Gaelic Languages. Devon: David & Charles.
94. Gibbens, V. E. 1955. Shifts in Gender and Meaning of Nouns Designating the Sexes. American Speech 30: 296-98.
95. Goatly, Andrew 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London; New York: Routledge.
96. Goldstein, Norm (ed.) 1998. The Associated Press Styìebook and Libel Manual. Updated and Revised. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
97. Görlach, Manfred 1986. Middle English - A Creole? in D. Kastovsky and A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics Across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. 1, 329-44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
98. Gouëffìc, Louise 1996. Breaking the Patriarchal Code. Manchester, CT: Knowledge, Ideas & Trends.
99. Green, Jonathon 1996. Chasing the Sun: Dictionary Makers and the Dictionaries They Made. New York: Henry Holt.
100. Greenbaum, Sidney 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
101. Greene, Samuel S. 1983 [1874]. An Analysis of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
102. Grimm, Jakob Karl Ludwig 1984. On the Origin of Language. Trans, by Raymond A. Wiley. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
103. Grossman, Ellie 1997. The Grammatically Correct Handbook. New York: Hyperion.
104. Hall, R. A., Jr. 1951. Sex Reference and Grammatical Gender in English. American Speech 26: 170-72.
105. Halliday, Frank E. 1975. The Excellency of the English Tongue. London: Gollancz.
106. Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107. Harris, James 1765 [1751]. Hermes, or a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. 2nd edn. London.
108. Harvey, Thomas W. 1987 [1878]. A Practical Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
109. Heltveit, Trygve 1958. Attribute and Anaphora in the Gender System of English. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 18: 357-69.
110. Henley, Nancy 1987. This New Species that Seeks a New Language: On Sexism in Language and Language Change. in J. Penfield (ed.), Women and Language in Transition, 3-27. New York: State University of New York Press.
111. Hines, Caitlin 1994. “Let me call you sweetheart”: The woman as dessert metaphor. in M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton, and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings ofthe Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 295-303. Berkeley: Women and Language Group.
112. Hines, Caitlin 1999. Foxy Chicks and Playboy Bunnies: A Case Study in Metaphorical Lexicalization. in M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, S. Wilcox (eds.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 9-23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
113. Hines, John 1991. Scandinavian English: A Creole in Context. in P. S. Ureland and G. Broderick (eds.), Language Contact in the British Isles: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Language Contact, 403-27. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
114. Hooks, Julius N. and Ernst G. Mathews 1956. Modern American Grammar and Usage. New York: Roland Press.
115. Horn, Lawrence R. and Steven R. Kleinedler 2000. Parasitic Reference versus R-based Narrowing: Lexical Pragmatics Meets He-Man. Linguistic Society of America Convention, Chicago, 6 January. Unpublished paper.
116. Howe, Stephen 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages. (Studia Linguistica Germanica, 43.) Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
117. Huddleston, Rodney D. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
118. Hughes, Geoffrey 1988. Words in Time: A Social History of the English Vocabulary. Oxford; New York: Blackwell.
119. Hughes, Geoffrey 1991. Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths, and Profanity in English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
120. Ibrahim, M. H. 1973. Grammatical Gender, Its Origin and Development. Paris: La-Hay.
121. Jakobson, Roman 1966. On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. in R. A. Brower (ed.), On Translation, 232-39. New York: Oxford University Press.
122. James, Deborah 1998. Gender-Linked Derogatory Terms and Their Use by Women and Men. American Speech 73.4: 399-420.
123. Jespersen, Otto 1912. Growth and Structure of the English Language. 2nd edn. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
124. Jespersen, Otto 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: G. Allen & Unwin; New York: H. Holt and Co.
125. Jespersen, Otto 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Henry Holt.
126. Johnson, Samuel 1882. A Dictionary of the English Language. Ed. Rev. H. J. Todd. Revised by Robert G. Latham. London.
127. Joly, André 1975. Toward a Theory of Gender in Modern English. in A. Joly and T. Fraser (eds.), Studies in English Grammar, 229-87. Paris: Editions Universitaires.
128. Jones, Charles 1967a. The Functional Motivation of Linguistic Change: a Study in the Development of the Grammatical Category of Gender in the late Old English Period. English Studies 4: 97-111.
129. Jones, Charles 1967b. The Grammatical Category of Gender in Early Middle English. English Studies 48:289-305.
130. Jones, Charles 1988. Grammatical Gender in English: 950-1250. London; New York; Sydney: Croom Helm.
131. Jones, Richard F. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
132. Jonson, Ben 1972 [1640]. The English Grammar. A Scolar Press Facsimile. Menston: Scolar Press.
133. Kanekiyo, T. 1965. Notes on Gender in English. Philologica Pragensia 8: 234-37.
134. Kastovsky, Dieter 1999. Inflectional Classes, Morphological Restructuring, and the Dissolution of Old English Grammatical Gender. in B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 709-28. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
135. Keller, Rudi 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans, by Brigitte Nerlich. London; New York: Routledge.
136. Kerl, Simon 1985 [1878]. A Common-School Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars Facsimiles & Reprints.
137. Kirkham, Samuel 1833. English Grammar in Familiar Lectures. New York: McElrath, Bangs, & Herbert.
138. Kitson, Peter 1990. On Old English Nouns of More Than One Gender. English Studies 71: 185-221.
139. Kittredge, George L. and Frank E. Farley 1913. An Advanced English Grammar. Boston: Ginn and Co.
140. Klaeber, Friedrich (ed.) 1950. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. 3rd edn. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
141. Kleparski, Grzegorz A. 1996. Semantic Change in an Onomasiological Perspective. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19,1994, 41-91. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
142. Kleparski, Grzegorz A. 1997. Theory and Practice of Historical Semantics: The Case of Middle English and Early Modern English Synonyms of girl/young woman. Lublin: University Press of the Catholic University of Lublin.
143. Kolln, Martha 1999. Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects. 3rd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
144. Kytö, Merja (compiler) 1991. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
145. Labov, William 1978. On the Use of the Present to Explain the Past. in P. Baldi and R. Werth (eds.), Readings in Historical Phonology, 275-312. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
146. Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
147. Labov, William 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: External Factors. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
148. Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
149. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
150. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
151. Lakoff, Robin 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Octagon Books.
152. Langenfelt, Gösta 1951. She and Her Instead of it and Its. Anglia 70: 90-101.
153. Laqueur, Thomas 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Lass, Roger 1987. The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: Dent.
155. Lass, Roger 1992. Phonology and Morphology. in N. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2 (1066-1476), 23-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
156. Lehmann, Winfred P. 1958. On Earlier Stages of Indo-European Influence. Language 34: 179-202.
157. Le Page, Robert 1987. The Need for a Multidimensional Model. in G. Gilbert (ed.), Pidgin and Creole Languages, 113-29. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
158. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1967. Le Sexe des Astres. To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, Vol. 2, 1163-70. The Hague: Mouton.
159. Liberman, Anatoly 1998. English Girl under the Asterisked Sky of the Indo-Europeans. in A. della Volpe and E. C. Polomé (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, 1995, 150-172. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Number Twenty-Seven. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
160. Liberman, Anatoly 2000. The Etymology of English Boy, Beacon, and Buoy. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12.2: 201-34.
161. Lighter, J. E. (ed.) 1994. Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang. New York: Random House.
162. Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163. Lippi-Green, Rosina 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London; New York: Routledge.
164. Lipton, Jack P. and Alan M. Hershaft 1984. “Girl,” “Woman,” “Guy,” “Man”: The Effects of Sexist Labeling. Sex Roles 10: 183-94.
165. Liske, Holly Bea 1994. The Status of the Sexes: A View Through Language. in K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Vol. 2, 356-361. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
166. Livia, Anna 2001. Pronoun Envy: Literary Uses of Linguistic Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Lounsbury, T. R. 1891. History of the English Language. New York: Henry Holt.
168. Lüdtke, Helmut 1995. On the Origin of Middle and Modern English. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 51-53. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
169. Lunsford, Andrea and Robert Connors 1997. The Everyday Writer. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
170. MacKay, Donald 1983. Prescriptive Grammar and the Pronoun Problem. in B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, 38-53. Rowley: Newbury House.
171. Major, Clarence (ed.) 1994. Juba to Jive: A Dictionary of African-American Slang. New York: Penguin Books.
172. Malone, Joseph L. 1985. On the Feminine Pronominalization of Irish and English Boat Nouns. General Linguistics 25: 189-98.
173. Marckwardt, Albert H. and Fred G. Walcott 1938. Facts about Current English Usage. A Publication of the National Council of Teachers of English. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.
174. Marcoux, Dell 1973. Deviation in English Gender. American Speech 48: 98-107.
175. Markey, Thomas L. 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or Non-Creole? Zeitschrift fiir Dialektologie und Linguistik 49: 169-207.
176. Markus, Manfred 1988. Reasons for the Loss of Gender in English. in D. Kastovsky and G. Bauer (eds.), Luick Revisited: Papers Read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloβ Liechtenstein, 15-18.9.1985, 241-58. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
177. Markus, Manfred 1995. On the Growing Role of Semantic and Pragmatic Features in Middle English. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 161-78. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
178. Martyna, Wendy 1978. What Does ‘He’ Mean? Use of the Generic Masculine. Journal of Communication 28.1: 131-38.
179. Martyna, Wendy 1980a. Beyond the ‘He/Man’ Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5: 482-93.
180. Martyna, Wendy 1980b. The Psychology of the Generic Masculine. in S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society, 69-78. New York: Praeger.
181. Martyna, Wendy 1983. Beyond the He/Man Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language. in B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, 25-37. Rowley: Newbury House.
182. Mathiot, Madeleine 1979. Sex Roles as Revealed Through Referential Gender in American English. in M. Mathiot (ed.), Ethnoìinguistics: Boas, Sapirand WhorfRevisited, 1-47. The Hague: Mouton.
183. Mausch, Hanna 1986. A Note on LME Gender. Studia Angìica Posnaniensia 18: 89-100.
184. Mausch, Hanna 1989. Personal Pronouns and Markedness: An Interpretation of Grammatically Conditioned Changes. Studia Angìica Posnaniensia 22: 81-90.
185. McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1979. Prototypes, Pronouns and Persons. in M. Mathiot (ed.), Ethnoìinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, 63-83. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
186. McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1988. Language and Gender. in F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 75-99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
187. McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1989. The Sexual (Re)Production of Meaning: A Discourse-Based Theory. in F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelinesfor Nonsexist Usage, 35-50. New York: Modern Language Association.
188. McIntosh, Angus 1956. The Analysis of Written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 54: 26-55.
189. McIntosh, Angus 1989. Middle English Word-Geography: Its Potential Role in the Study of the Long-Term Impact of the Scandinavian Settlements upon English. in M. Laing (ed.), Middle English Dialectology, 98-105. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
190. McIntosh, Angus, M. L. Samuels, Michael Benskin, et al. 1987. Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
191. McMahon, April 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. McWhorter, John 1998. Word on the Street: Debunking the Myth of a “Pure” Standard English. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
193. Megginson, David 1994. He (pi) and Other New Old English Pronouns. ANQjAQitarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes & Reviews 7: 6-13.
194. Middle English Dictionary 1952. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/med/.
195. Miller, Casey and Kate Swift 1977. Words and Women. New York: Anchor Books.
196. Miller, Casey and Kate Swift 1980. The Handbook on Nonsexist Writing. New York: Lippincott and Crowell.
197. Miller, Thomas (ed.) 1959 [1890]. The Old English Version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. (EETS, 95.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
198. Mills, Jane 1989. Worn an words. London: Virago Press.
199. Millward, C. M. 1996. Biography of the English Language. 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
200. Milroy, James 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
201. Milroy, James 2000. Historical Description and the Ideology of the Standard Language. in L. Wright (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300-1800, 11-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Milroy, Lesley 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
203. Mitchell, Bruce 1986. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
204. Modern English Collection, Humanities Text Initiative, University of Michigan, http://www.hti.umich.edu/p/pd-modeng/.
205. Moe, Albert F. 1963. “Lady” and “Woman”: The Terms’ Use in the 1880s. American Speech 38: 295.
206. Moore, Samuel 1921. Grammatical and Natural Gender in Middle English. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 36: 79-103.
207. Morris, Lori 1993. Gender in Modern English: The System and Its Uses. Unpublished dissertation.
208. Moulton, Janice 1977. The Myth ofNeutral ‘Man.’ in M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston, and J. English (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy, 124-137. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
209. Moulton, Janice 1981. The Myth of the Neutral ‘Man.’ in M. Vetterling-Braggin (ed.), Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis, 100-115. New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams, & Co.
210. Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.) 2000. Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
211. Mühlhäusler, Peter 1986. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
212. Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
213. Murray, K. M. Elizabeth 1977. Caught in the Web of Words: James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
214. Murray, Lindley 1981 [1824]. English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
215. Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax Part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
216. Namai, Kenichi 2000. Gender Features in English. Linguistics 38.4: 771-79.
217. Naro, Anthony J. and Miriam Lemle 1976. Syntactic Diffusion. in S. Steever, C. Walker, S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, 221-40. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
218. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg 1994. Its Strength and the Beauty of It: The Standardization of the Third Person Neuter Possessive in Early Modern English. in D. Stein and I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600-1800, 171-216. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
219. Newman, Michael 1997. Epicene Pronouns: The Linguistics of a Prescriptive Problem. New York, London: Garland.
220. Ng, Sik Hung, Kam Kuen Chan, Ann Weatherall, and Joanna Moody 1993. Polarized Semantic Change of Words Associated with Females and Males. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12: 66-80.
221. Norberg, Catherine 1996. Chaucer’s Women: Female Occupational Terms in The Canterbury Tales. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19, 1994, 115-34. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
222. Ogilvie, John 1882. The Imperial Dictionary, English, Technological, and Scientific. New edn. Ed. Charles Annandale. London: Blackie & Son.
223. Oxford English Dictionary 1989. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon. Oxford English Dictionary Online: http://dictionary.oed.com.
224. Pauwels, Anne 1998. Women Changing Language. London; New York: Longman.
225. Penelope, Julia and Cynthia McGowan 1979. Woman and Wife: Social and Semantic Shifts in English. Papers in Linguistics 12: 491-502.
226. Persson, Gunnar 1990. Meanings, Models and Metaphors: A Study in Lexical Semantics in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
227. Persson, Gunnar 1996. Invectives and Gender in English. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19, 1994, 157-73. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
228. Persson, Gunnar and Mats Rydén 1995. The Project “Male and Female Terms in English”: A Diachronic Study of a Semantic Field. in H. Kardela and G. Persson (eds.), New Trends in Semantics and Lexicography, 145-50. Umeå: Acta Universitatis Umensis.
229. Peyton, V. J. 1771. The History of the English Language. Reprint. Menston: Scolar Press.
230. Plag, Ingo 1994. Creolization and Language Change: A Comparison. in D. Adone and I. Plag (eds.), Creolization and Language Change, 3-19. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
231. Poussa, Patricia 1982. The Evolution of Early Standard English: The Creolization Hypothesis. Studia Angìica Posnaniensia 14: 69-85.
232. Robbins, Susan and Julia Stanley 1978. Going Through the Changes: The Pronoun She in Middle English. Papers in Linguistics 11.1-2: 71-88.
233. Roberts, Jane A. 1970. Traces of Unhistorical Gender Congruence in a Late Old English Manuscript. English Studies 51: 30-37.
234. Robins, R. H. 1971 [1951]. Ancient andMediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe. Reprint. New York: Kennikat.
235. Robinson, Fred 1968. European Clothing Names and the Etymology of Girl. in W. Arndt, P. Brosman, F. Loenen, W. Friederich (eds.), Studies in Historical Linguistics in Honor of George Sherman Lane, 233-40. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
236. Rodgers, Bruce 1972. The Qiteens’ Vernacular: A Gay Lexicon. San Francisco: Straight Arrow Books.
237. Romaine, Suzanne 1982. Sociohistorical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
238. Romaine, Suzanne 1988. Pidgin and Creole Languages. New York: Longman.
239. Romaine, Suzanne 1999. Communicating Gender. New Jersey; London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
240. Ross, A. S. C. 1936. Sex and Gender in the Lindisfarne Gospels. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 35: 321-30.
241. Rot, Sandor 1984. Inherent Variability and Linguistic Interference of Anglo-Old-Scandinavian and Anglo-Norman French Language Contacts in the Formation of Grammatical Innovations in Late Old English and Middle English. in N. F. Blake and C. Jones (eds), English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development, 67-86. Sheffield: Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield.
242. Rudskoger, A. 1955. A Note on the Use of she for Inanimate Things in Australian. Modern a Sprak 49: 264-5.
243. Ruud, Martin 1926. She Once More. Review of English Studies 2: 201-204.
244. Rydén, Mats 1996. Aspects of Language Use. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19,1994,1-7. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
245. Safire, William 1999. Genderese: Looking for a Masterful Webmistress? New York Times Magazine, 16 May.
246. Sampson, Gloria P. 1979. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Pronoun Usage in Middle English. in W. C. McCormack and S. A. Wurm (eds.), Language and Society: Anthropolgical Issues, 61-69. The Hague: Mouton.
247. Samuels, M. L. 1963. Some Applications of Middle English Dialectology. English Studies 44:81-94.
248. Samuels, M. L. 1969. The Role of Functional Selection in the History of English. in R. Lass (ed.), Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, 325-44. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
249. Samuels, M. L. 1972. Linguistic Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
250. Samuels, M. L. 1988. Dialect and Gram mar. in J. A. Alford (ed.), A Companion to Piers Plowman, 201-21. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press.
251. Samuels, M. L. 1989. The Great Scandinavian Belt. in M. Laing (ed.), Middle English Dialectology, 106-15. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
252. Sandred, Karl Inge 1991. Nominal Inflection in the Old English of the Anglo-Saxon Land Charters: Change of Gender or Analogy? Studia Neophilologica 63: 3-12.
253. Sandström, Caroline 1999. The Changing System of Grammatical Gender in Swedish Dialects of Nyland, Finland. in B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 793-806. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
254. Sankis, Lizabeth M., Elizabeth M. Corbitt, and Thomas A. Widiger 1999. Gender Bias in the English Language? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77.6: 1289-95.
255. Schaffner, Paul. A Brief History of ‘Man and Woman.’ Unpublished Paper.
256. Schultz, Muriel R. 1975. The Semantic Derogation of Women. in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, 64-75. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
257. Seppänen, Aimo 1985. The who/what Contrast in Germanic Languages. Zeitschrift fir Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 38: 387-97.
258. Sigley, Robert and Janet Holmes 2002. Looking at girls in Corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30.2: 138-57.
259. Simon, John 1980. The Corruption of English. in L. Michaels and C. Ricks (eds.), The State of the Language, 35-42. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
260. Sklar, Elizabeth S. 1983. Sexist Grammar Revisited. College English 45: 348-58.
261. Smith, Jeremy 1992. The Use of English: Language Contact, Dialect Variation, and Written Standardisation During the Middle English Period. in T. W. Machan and C. T. Scott (eds.), English in Its Social Contexts, 47-68. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
262. Smitherman, Geneva 2000. Black Talk: Words and Phrases from the Hood to the Amen Corner. Revised edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
263. Spender, Dale 1985. Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
264. Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1977a. Gender-Marking in American English: Usage and Reference. in A. P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. L. Gershuny, and J. Stanley (eds.), Sexism and Language, 43-76. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
265. Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1977b. Paradigmatic Woman: The Prostitute. in D. L. Shores and C. P. Hines (eds.), Papers in Language Variation: SAMŁ4-ADS Collection, 303-21. University: University of Alabama Press.
266. Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1978. Sexist Grammar. College English 39.7: 800-811.
267. State of Washington Voters Pamphlet: General Election November 2, 1999, Edition 12. Published by the Office of the Secretary of State, King County Records and Elections, and the City of Seattle.
268. Stein, Dieter 1986. Old English Northumbrian Verb Inflection Revisited. in D. Kastovsky and A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics Across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. 1, 637-50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
269. Stevick, Robert 1963. The Biological Model and Historical Linguistics. Language 39: 159-69.
270. Strang, Barbara 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.
271. Sutton, Laurel A. 1995. Bitches and Skankly Hobags: The Place of Women in Contemporary Slang. in K. Hall and M. Bucholtz (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, 279-86. New York; London: Routledge.
272. Svartengren, T. Hilding 1927. The Feminine Gender for Inanimate Things in Anglo-American. American Speech 3: 83-113.
273. Svartengren, T. Hilding 1928. The Use of Personal Gender for Inanimate Things. Dialect Notes 6: 7-56.
274. Svartengren, T. Hilding 1954. The Use of Feminine Gender for Inanimate Things in American Colloquial Speech. Moderna Sprak 48: 261-92.
275. Swanton, Michael (ed.) 1996. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. London: J. M. Dent.
276. Sweet, Henry 1871. King Alfred’s West-Saxon Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care. (EETS 45, 50.) London: Oxford University Press.
277. Sweet, Henry 1931 [1891]. A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical. 2 vols. Reprint. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
278. Talbot, Mary M. 1998. Language and Gender: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
279. Thomas of Erfurt 1972. Grammatica Speculativa. With translation and commentary by G. L. Bursill-Hall. London: Longman.
280. Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman 1988. Language Contact, Creoìization, and Genetic Linguistics. California: University of California Press.
281. Toon, Thomas 1985. The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change. New York: Academic Press.
282. Toon, Thomas 1992. The Social and Political Contexts of Language Change in Anglo-Saxon England. in T. W. Machan and C. T. Scott (eds.), English in Its Social Contexts, 28-47. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
283. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
284. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1973. Some Thoughts on Natural Syntactic Processes. in C. J. N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, 313-22. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
285. Treichler, Paula A. 1989. From Discourse to Dictionary: How Sexist Meanings Are Authorized. in F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage, 51-79. New York: Modern Language Association.
286. Trench, Richard Chevenix 1870 [1855]. English, Past and Present. 7th edn. London: Macmillian.
287. Trudgill, Peter 1983. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
288. Trudgill, Peter 1992. Dialect Typology and Social Structure. in E. H. Jahr (ed.), Language Contact: Theoretical and Empirical Studies, 195-212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
289. Twain, Mark 1921. The Awful German Language. in A Tramp Abroad, Vol. 2, 267-84. New York; London: Harper & Bros.
290. Vachek, J. 1976. Notes on Gender in Modern English. Selected Writings in English and General Linguistics, 386-92. The Hague: Mouton.
291. van Marie, Jaap and Caroline Smits 1995. On the Impact of Language Contact on Inflectional Systems: The Reduction of Verb Inflection in American Dutch and American Frisian. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 179-206. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
292. Verstegan, Richard 1605. A Restitution of decayed intelligence: In antiquities. Concerning the most nohel and renowned English nation. Antwerp.
293. Visser, F. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
294. von Fleischhacker, R. 1888. On the Old English Nouns of More than One Gender. Transactions of the Philological Society 21: 235-54.
295. Vorlat, Emma 1975. The Development of English Grammatical Theory, 1586-1737. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
296. Wales, Katie 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
297. Wallin-Ashcroft, Anna-Lena 1996. Male and Female Terms in 18th Century English Novels. in G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18-19, 1994, 175-95. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press.
298. Weber, Doris 1999. On the Function of Gender. in B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 495-510. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
299. Webster, Noah 1864. An American Dictionary of the English Language. Edited by Chauncey A. Gooderich and Noah Porter. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
300. Welna, Jerzy 1980. On Gender Change in Linguistic Borrowing. in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, 399-420. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
301. Werner, Otmar 1991. The Incorporation of Old Norse Pronouns into Middle English. in P. S. Ureland and G. Broderick (eds.), Language Contact in the British Isles: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Language Contact, 369-401. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
302. Wescott, Roger W. 1978 [1974]. Women, Wife-men, and Sexist bias. in Verbatim: Volumes I and II, 15-16. Essex, CT: Verbatim.
303. Whaley, C. Robert and George Antonelli 1983. The Birds and the Beasts: Woman as Animal. Male diet a 7: 219-29.
304. Whitney, William Dwight (ed.) 1889-1891. The Century Dictionary. New York: The Century Co.
305. Whorf, Benjamin 1956. Grammatical Categories. in J. B. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality, 87-101. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
306. Winchester, Simon 1998. The Professor and the Madman. New York: HarperCollins.
307. Wolfe, Susan 1980a. Constructing and Reconstructing Patriarchy: Sexism and Diachronic Semantics. Papers in Linguistics 13.1-2: 321-44.
308. Wolfe, Susan 1980b. Gender and Agency in Indo-European Languages. Papers in Linguistics 13.1-2: 773-93.
309. Wolfe, Susan 1989. The Reconstruction of Word Meanings: A Review of the Scholarship. in F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage, 80-94. New York: Modern Language Association.