Mass oratory and political power in the late Roman republic

Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-306

  Morstein Marx, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929743341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511482878     Document Type: Book

References (441)

1. Achard, G. 1981, Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “optimates” de Cicéron (Mnemosyne Suppl. 68), Leiden.
2. Achard, G. 1982, “Langage et société: à propos des optimates et des populares,” Latomus 41: 794–800.
3. Achard, G. 1991, La communication à Rome, Paris.
4. Achard, G. 2000, “L’influence des jeunes lecteurs sur la rédaction des discours cicéroniens,” in Achard and Ledentu 2000, pp. 75–90.
5. Achard, G. and M. Ledentu (eds.) 2000, Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat, Lyon.
6. Aldrete, G. S. 1999, Acclamations in Ancient Rome, Baltimore.
7. Alexander, M. C. 1990, Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC, Toronto.
8. Alexander, M.C. 2003, The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era, Ann Arbor.
9. Alföldi, A. 1956, “TheMain Aspects of Political Propaganda on the Coinage of the Roman Republic,” in Essays in Roman Coinage Presented to Harold Mattingly, ed. R. A. G. Carson and C. H. V. Sutherland, Oxford, pp. 63–95.
10. Althusser, L. 1971, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, tr. B. Brewster, London.
11. Andreau, J. 1987, “L’espace de la vie financière à Rome,” in L’urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome, pp. 157–74.
12. Assmann, A. and J. Assmann 1988, “Schrift, Tradition und Kultur,” in Zwischen Festtag und Alltag. Zehn Beiträge zum Thema “Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit,” ed. W. Raible, Tübingen, pp. 25–49.
13. Astin, A. E. 1971, Scipio Aemilianus, Oxford.
14. Atkinson, M. 1984, OurMasters’ Voices: the Language and Body Language of Politics, London and New York.
15. Austin, R. G. 1960, Cicero: Pro M. Caelio Oratio, 3rd edn., Oxford.
16. Austin, R. G. 1971, P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus, Oxford.
17. Badian, E. 1958, Studies in Greek and Roman History, Oxford.
18. Badian, E. 1967, “The Testament of Ptolemy Alexander,” RhM 110: 178–92.
19. Badian, E. 1972, “Tiberius Gracchus and the Beginning of the Roman Revolution,” ANRW i.1: 668–731.
20. Badian, E. 1977, “The Auctor of the Lex Flavia,” Athenaeum 55 n.s.: 233–38.
21. Badian, E. 1984, “The Death of Saturninus: Studies in Chronology and Prosopography,” Chiron 14: 101–47.
22. Badian, E. 1988, “E.H.L.N.R.,” MH 45: 203–18.
23. Badian, E. 1989, “The Case of the Cowardly Tribune. C.T.H.R.E. on E.H.L.N.R.,” AHB 3: 78–84.
24. Badian, E. 1990a, “The Consuls, 179–49 bc,” Chiron 20: 371–413.
25. Badian, E. 1990b, Review of Meier, Caesar, Gnomon 62: 22–39.
26. Baldwin, B. 1979, “The acta diurna,” Chiron 9: 189–203.
27. Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1966, “Fabula Clodiana,” Historia 15: 65–73.
28. Beard, M. 1989, “Acca LarentiaGains a Son,” in Images of Authority: Papers Presented to Joyce Reynolds (PCPhS Suppl. 16), ed. M. M. Mackenzie and C. Roueché, Cambridge, pp. 41–61.
29. Beard, M. 1990, “Priesthood in the Roman Republic,” in Pagan Priests. Religion and Power in the Ancient World, ed. M. Beard and J. North, Ithaca, pp. 17–48.
30. Behr, H. 1993, Die Selbstdarstellung Sullas: ein aristokratischer Politiker zwischen persönlichem Führungsanspruch und Standessolidarität, Frankfurt.
31. Bell, A. J. E. 1997, “Cicero and the Spectacle of Power,” JRS 87: 1–22.
32. Belloni, G. G. 1976, “Monete romane e propaganda,” in I canali della propaganda nel mondo antico, ed. M. Sordi, Milan, pp. 131–59.
33. Benner, H. 1987, Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher (Historia Einzelschrift 50), Stuttgart.
34. Béranger, J. 1972, “Les jugements de Cicéron sur lesGracques,” ANRWi.1: 732–63.
35. Berrendonner, C. 2001, “La formation de la tradition sur M’. Curius Dentatus et C. Fabricius Luscinus: un homme nouveau peut-il être un grand homme?,” in Coudry and Späth 2001, pp. 97–116.
36. Berry, D. H. 1996, Cicero, Pro P. Sulla Oratio, Cambridge.
37. Bettini, M. 2000, “Mos, mores und mos maiorum: die Erfindung der ‘Sittlichkeit’ in der römischen Kultur,” in Braun, Haltenhoff, and Mutschler 2000, pp. 303–52.
38. Bleicken, J. 1955, Das Volkstribunat der klassischen Republik, Göttingen.
39. Bleicken, J. 1972, Staatliche Ordnung und Freiheit in der römischen Republik, Kallmünz.
40. Bleicken, J. 1975, Lex Publica. Gesetz und Recht in der römischen Republik, Berlin.
41. Bleicken, J. 1981, “Das römische Volkstribunat. Versuch einer Analyse seiner politischen Funktion in republikanischer Zeit,” Chiron 11: 87–108.
42. Bleicken, J. 1982, Die Verfassung der römischen Republik, 3rd edn., Paderborn.
43. Blösel, W. 2000, “Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero,” in Linke and Stemmler 2000, pp. 25–97.
44. Bohman, J. 1997, “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom: Capabilities, Resources, and Opportunities,” in Bohman and Rehg 1997, pp. 321–48.
45. Bohman, J. and W. Rehg (eds.) 1997, Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA.
46. Bonnefond-Coudry, M. 1989, Le sénat de la république romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste, Rome.
47. Botsford, G. W. 1909, The Roman Assemblies, New York.
48. Braun, M., A. Haltenhoff, and F.-H. Mutschler (eds.) 2000, Moribus antiquis res stat Romana: römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr., Leipzig.
49. Braund, D. 1983, “Royal Wills and Rome,” PBSR 51: 16–57.
50. Brunt, P. A. 1966, “The Roman Mob,” P&P 35: 3–27.
51. Brunt, P. A. 1968, Review of C. Meier, Res publica amissa, JRS 58: 229–32.
52. Brunt, P. A. 1971a, Italian Manpower, 225 bc–ad 14, Oxford.
53. Brunt, P. A. 1971b, Social Conflicts in the Roman Republic, New York.
54. Brunt, P. A. 1988, The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays, Oxford.
55. Büchner, K. 1982, Sallust, 2nd edn., Heidelberg.
56. Burckhardt, L. A. 1988, Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik (Historia Einzelschrift 57), Stuttgart.
57. Burckhardt, L. A. 1990, “The Political Elite of the Roman Republic: Comments on Recent Discussion of the Concepts Nobilitas and Homo Novus,” Historia 39: 77–99.
58. Burnett, A. M. 1977, “The Authority to Coin in the Late Republic and Early Empire,” NC 17 (ser. 7): 37–63.
59. Cameron, A. 1976, Circus Factions, Oxford.
60. Camp, J. MCK., 1996, “The Form of Pnyx III,” in The Pnyx in the History of Athens, ed. B. Forsén and G. Stanton, Helsinki, pp. 41–46.
61. Canetti, E. 1978, Crowds and Power, New York.
62. Carafa, P. 1998, Il comizio di Roma dalle origini all’età di Augusto (Bull. della Comm. Arch. Com. di Roma Suppl. 5), Rome.
63. Carandini, A. 1988, Schiavi in Italia. Gli strumenti pensanti dei Romani fra tarda Repubblica e medio Impero, Rome.
64. Carney, W. 1960, “Cicero's Picture of Marius,” WS 73: 83–122.
65. Cavaggioni, F. 1998, L. Apuleio Saturnino. Tribunus plebis seditiosus (Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti:Memorie, Classe di ScienzeMorali, Lettere ed Arti 79), Venice.
66. Cerutti, S. M. 1998, “P. Clodius and the Stairs of the Temple of Castor,” Latomus 57: 292–305.
67. Churchill, J. B. 1999, “Ex qua quod vellent facerent: RomanMagistrates’ Authority over Praeda and Manubiae,” TAPhA 129: 85–116.
68. Clark, A. C. 1895, M. Tulli Ciceronis pro T. Annio Milone ad iudices oratio, Oxford.
69. Classen, C. J. 1985, Recht-Rhetorik-Politik, Darmstadt.
70. Coarelli, F. 1985, Il foro romano (II): periodo repubblicano e augusteo, Rome.
71. Coarelli, F. 1986, Il foro romano (I): periodo arcaico, 2nd edn., Rome.
72. Coarelli, F. 1988, Il foro boario dalle origini alla fine della repubblica, Rome.
73. Coarelli, F. 1997, Il Campo Marzio, Rome.
74. Converse, P. E. 1964, “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, ed. D. E. Apter, New York, pp. 206–61.
75. Corbeill, A. 1996, Controlling Laughter, Princeton.
76. Corbeill, A. 2002, “Political Movement: Walking and Ideology in Republican Rome,” in The Roman Gaze, ed. D. Fredrick, Baltimore, pp. 182–215.
77. Corbier, M. 1987, “L’écriture dans l’espace public romain,” in L’urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome, pp. 27–60.
78. Corbier, M. 1991, “L’écriture en quête de lecteurs,” in Literacy in the Roman World (JRA Suppl. 3), ed. J. H. Humphrey, Ann Arbor.
79. Cornell, T. J. 1995, The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 bc), London and New York.
80. Coudry, M. and T. Späth (eds.) 2001, L’invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique / Die Konstruktion der großen Männer Altroms, Paris.
81. Crawford, J. W. 1984, M. Tullius Cicero: the Lost and Unpublished Orations, Göttingen.
82. Crawford, J. W. 1994, M. Tullius Cicero: the Fragmentary Speeches, 2nd edn., Atlanta.
83. Crawford, M. H. 1974, Roman Republican Coinage, 2 vols., Cambridge.
84. Crawford, M. H. 1983, “Roman Imperial Coin Types and the Formation of Public Opinion,” in Studies in Numismatic Method Presented to Philip Grierson, ed. C. N. L. Brooke, B. H. I. H. Stewart, J. G. Pollard, and T. R. Volk, Cambridge, pp. 47–64.
85. Crawford, M. H. 1988, “The Laws of the Romans: Knowledge and Diffusion,” in Estudios sobre la Tabula Siarensis, ed. J. Gonzalez and J. Arce, Madrid, pp. 127–40.
86. Crawford, M. H. (ed.) 1996, Roman Statutes (BICS Suppl. 64), 2 vols., London.
87. Culham, P. 1989, “Archives and Alternatives in Republican Rome,” CPh 84: 100–15.
88. Curti, E. 2000, “From Concordia to the Quirinal: Notes on Religion and Politics in Mid-Republican/Hellenistic Rome,” in Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome and Italy: Evidence and Experience, ed. E. Bispham and C. Smith, London, pp. 77–91.
89. Damon, C. 1992, “Sex. Cloelius, Scriba,” HSPh 94: 227–50.
90. David, J.-M. 1979, “Promotion civique et droit à la parole. L. Licinius Crassus, les accusateurs et les rhéteurs latins,” MEFRA 91: 135–81.
91. David, J.-M. 1980a, “ ‘Eloquentia popularis’ et conduites symboliques des orateurs de la fin de la République: problèmes d’efficacité,” QS 6.12: 171–211.
92. David, J.-M. 1980b, “Maiorum exempla sequi: l’exemplum historique dans les discours judiciaires de Cicéron,” MEFRM 92: 67–86.
93. David, J.-M. 1983a, “L’action oratoire de C. Gracchus: l’image d’un modèle,” in Demokratia et Aristokratia. A propos de Caius Gracchus: mots grecs et réalités romaines, ed. C. Nicolet, Paris, pp. 103–16.
94. David, J.-M. 1983b, “Les orateurs des minicipes à Rome: intégration, réticences et snobismes,” in Les “bourgeoisies” municipales italiennes aux IIe et Ier siècles av. J.-C., Paris and Naples, pp. 309–23.
95. David, J.-M. 1992, Le patronat judiciaire au dernier siècle de la République Romaine, Rome.
96. David, J.-M. 1995, “Le tribunal du préteur: contraintes symboliques et politiques sous la République et le début de l’Empire,” Klio 77: 371–85.
97. Deissmann-Merten, M. 1974, “Zu einem Ausspruch des Scipio Aemilianus,” Chiron 4: 177–81.
98. Delli Carpini, M. X. and S. Keeter 1989, What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven and London.
99. Denniston, J. D. 1926, M. Tulli Ciceronis In M. Antonium Orationes Philippicae Prima et Secunda, Oxford.
100. Diehl, H. 1988, Sulla und seine Zeit im Urteil Ciceros, Hildesheim.
101. Dilke, O. A. W. 1978, “Cicero's Attitude to the Allocation of Land in the De lege agraria,” Ciceroniana 3 n.s.: 183–87.
102. Döbler, C. 1999, Politische Agitation und Öffentlichkeit in der späten Republik, Frankfurt.
103. Drumann, W. 1899–1929, Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergang von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung, 2nd edn., ed. P. Groebe, 6 vols., Berlin.
104. Drummond, A. 1995, Law, Politics, and Power. Sallust and the Execution of the Catilinarian Conspirators (Historia Einzelschrift 93), Stuttgart.
105. Dudley, D. R. 1941, “Blossius of Cumae,” JRS 31: 94–99.
106. Dulière, C. 1979, Lupa Romana. Recherches d’iconographie et essai d’interprétation, Rome.
107. Dyck, A. R. 1996, A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis, Ann Arbor.
108. Eagleton, T. 1991, Ideology: an Introduction, London.
109. Earl, D. C. 1961, The Political Thought of Sallust, Cambridge.
110. Edelman, M. 1964, The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana.
111. Edelman, M. 1971, Politics as Symbolic Action, Chicago.
112. Edelman, M. 1977, Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail, New York.
113. Edelman, M. 1988, Constructing the Political Spectacle, Chicago and London.
114. Edwards, C. 1993, The Politics of Immorality, Cambridge.
115. Ehrhardt, C. T. H. R. 1989, “ ‘E.H.L.N.R.’ Again,” AHB 3: 45–46.
116. Elster, J. 1997, “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Bohman and Rehg 1997, pp. 3–33.
117. Evans, J. D. 1992, The Art of Persuasion: Political Propaganda from Aeneas to Brutus, Ann Arbor.
118. Famerie, E. 1998, Le latin et le grec d’Appien: contribution à l’étude du lexique d’un historien grec de Rome, Geneva.
119. Fantham, E. 1997, “The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. W. J. Dominik, London, pp. 111–28.
120. Favory, F. 1976, “Classes dangereuses et crise de l’Etat dans le discours cicéronien (d’après les écrits de Cicéron de 57 à 52),” in Texte, politique, idéologie: Cicéron, Paris, pp. 109–233.
121. Favro, D. 1988, “The Roman Forum and Roman Memory,” Places 5: 17–24.
122. Favro, D. 1994, “The StreetTriumphant: theUrban Impact ofRomanTriumphal Parades,” in Streets. Critical Perspectives on Public Space, ed. Z. C¸ elik, D. Favro, and R. Ingersoll, Berkeley, pp. 151–64.
123. Favro, D. 1996, The Urban Image of Augustan Rome, Cambridge.
124. Fehrle, R. 1983, Cato Uticensis, Darmstadt.
125. Ferrary, J.-L. 1982, “L’idee politiche aRoma nell’epoca repubblicana,” in Storia delle idee politiche economiche e sociali, ed. L. Firpo, vol. i, Torino, pp. 723–804.
126. Ferrary, J.-L. 1988, “Rogatio Servilia Agraria,” Athenaeum 66: 141–64.
127. Ferrary, J.-L. 1997, “Optimates et populares. Le problème du rôle de l’idéologie dans la politique,” in Die späte römischeRepublik / La fin de la république romaine.Un débat franco-allemand d’histoire et d’historiographie, ed. H. Bruhns, J.-M.David, and W. Nippel, Rome, pp. 221–35.
128. Flach, D. 1990, Römische Agrargeschichte, Munich.
129. Flaig, E. 1993, “Politisierte Lebensführung und ästhetischeKultur. Eine semiotische Untersuchung am römischen Adel,” Historische Anthropologie 1: 193–217.
130. Flaig, E. 1995a, “Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs,” in Jehne 1995a, pp. 77–127.
131. Flaig, E. 1995b, “Die pompa funebris. Adlige Konkurrenz und annalistische Erinnerung in der römischen Republik,” in Memoria als Kultur, ed. O. G.Oexle, Göttingen, pp. 115–48.
132. Flaig, E. 1998, “War die römische Volksversammlung ein Entscheidungsorgan? Institution und soziale Praxis,” in Institutionen und Ereignis. Über historische Praktiken und Vorstellungen gesellschaftlichen Ordnens, ed. R. Blänkner and B. Jussen, Göttingen, pp. 49–73.
133. Flower, H. 1995, “Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When Were Plays on Contemporary Subjects Performed in Rome?” CQ 45: 170–90.
134. Flower, H. 1996, Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture, Oxford.
135. Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972– 77, ed. C. Gordon, New York.
136. Frisch, H. 1946, Cicero's Fight for the Republic, Copenhagen.
137. Fuhrmann, M. 1990, “Mündlichkeit und fiktive Mündlichkeit in den von Cicero veröffentlichten Reden,” in Strukturen derMündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur, ed. G. Vogt-Spira, Tübingen, pp. 53–62.
138. Gabba, E. 1966, “Nota sulla Rogatio Agraria di P. Servilio Rullo,” in Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire offerts à André Piganiol, vol. 2, ed. R. Chevallier, Paris, pp. 769–75.
139. Gabba, E. 1994, “Rome and Italy: the Social War,” in Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9: The Last Age of the Roman Republic 146–43 bc, ed. J. A. Crook, A. Lintott, and E. Rawson, 2nd edn., Cambridge, pp. 104–28.
140. Garnsey, P. and D. Rathbone 1985, “The Background to the Grain Law of Gaius Gracchus,” JRS 75: 20–25.
141. Gelzer, M. 1969, Cicero. Ein biographischer Versuch, Wiesbaden.
142. Gendre, M. and C. Loutsch 2001, “C. Duilius et M. Atilius Regulus,” in Coudry and Späth 2001, pp. 131–72.
143. Girardet, K. M. 1996, “Politische Verantwortung im Ernstfall: Cicero, dieDiktatur und der Diktator Caesar,” in Festschrift für CarlWerner Müller, ed. C. Mueller-Goldingen and K. Sier, Stuttgart and Leipzig, pp. 217–51.
144. Gjerstad, E. 1941, “Il comizio romano dell’età repubblicana,” Opuscula archaeologica 2: 97–158.
145. Gleason, M. W. 1995, Making Men: Sophists and Self-Representation in Ancient Rome, Princeton.
146. Gnoli, F. 1980, “La ‘rogatio Servilia agraria’ del 63 a.C. e la responsabilità penale del generale vittorioso per la preda bellica,” in Atti del II Seminario Romanistico Gardesano, Milan, pp. 293–309.
147. Goltz, A. 2000, “Maiestas sine viribus – Die Bedeutung der Lictoren für die Konfliktbew ältigungsstrategien römischer Magistrate,” in Linke and Stemmler 2000, pp. 237–67.
148. Gotoff, H. 1979, Cicero's Elegant Style: an Analysis of the Pro Archia, Urbana.
149. Gotter, U. 1996, Der Diktator ist Tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats (Historia Einzelschrift 110), Stuttgart.
150. Gowing, A. 1992, The TriumviralNarratives of Appian and Cassius Dio, Ann Arbor.
151. Gruen, E. S. 1965, “The Lex Varia,” JRS 55: 59–73.
152. Gruen, E. S. 1968, Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts 149–78 bc, Cambridge, MA.
153. Gruen, E. S. 1974, The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley. Reprinted with new introduction, 1995.
154. Gruen, E. S. 1984, The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, Berkeley.
155. Gruen, E. S. 1991, “The Exercise of Power in the Roman Republic,” in City-States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. A. Molho, K. Raaflaub, and J. Emlen, Stuttgart, pp. 251–67.
156. Gruen, E. S. 1992, Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, Ithaca.
157. Gruen, E. S. 1996, “The Roman Oligarchy: Image and Perception,” in Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic (Historia Einzelschrift 105), ed. J. Linderski, Stuttgart, pp. 215–34.
158. Habermas, J. 1973, “Wahrheitstheorien,” in Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. H. Fahrenbach, Pfullingen, pp. 211–65.
159. Habermas, J. 1984–87, The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy, 2 vols., Boston.
160. Habermas, J. 1996, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA.
161. Habermas, J. 2001, On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action, trans. B. Fultner, Cambridge, MA.
162. Hall, U. 1990, “Greeks and Romans and the Secret Ballot,” in “Owls to Athens.” Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, edited by E. M. Craik, Oxford, pp. 191–99.
163. Haltenhoff, A. 2001, “Institutionalisierte Geschichten. Wesen und Wirken des literarischen exemplum im alten Rom,” in Melville 2001, pp. 213–17.
164. Hardy, E. G. 1924, Some Problems in Roman History, Oxford.
165. Harris, W. V. 1979, War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 bc, Oxford.
166. Harris, W. V. 1989, Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA and London.
167. Harris, W. V. 1990, “On Defining the Political Culture of the Roman Republic: Some Comments on Rosenstein, Williamson, and North,” CPh 85: 288–94.
168. Harvey, P. 1981, “Cicero, Consius, and Capua, I,” Athenaeum 59: 299–316.
169. Harvey, P. 1982, “Cicero, Consius, and Capua, II,” Athenaeum 60: 145–71.
170. Havas, L. 1976a, “L’arrière-plan politique du procès de perduellio contre Rabirius,” ACD 12 (1976) 19–27.
171. Havas, L. 1976b, “La Rogatio Servilia (Contribution à l’étude de la propriété terrienne à l’époque du déclin de la République Romaine),” Oikumene 1: 131–56.
172. Heath, J. 2001, Communicative Action and Rational Choice, Cambridge, MA.
173. Heinze, R. 1960, Vom Geist des Römertums. Ausgewählte Aufsätze, ed. E. Burck, 3rd edn., Darmstadt.
174. Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963, Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République, Paris.
175. Hersh, C. A. 1977, “Notes on the Chronology and Interpretation of the Roman Republican Coinage. Some Comments on Crawford's Roman Republican Coinage,” NC 17 (ser. 7): 19–36.
176. Hersh, C. and A. Walker 1984, “The Mesagne Hoard,” ANSMusN 29: 103–34.
177. Heuß, A. 1983, “Grenzen und Möglichkeiten einer politischen Biographie,” HZ 237: 85–98.
178. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1995, “Oratoris maxima scaena: Reden vor dem Volk in der politischen Kultur der Republik,” in Jehne 1995a, pp. 11–49.
179. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1996, “Exempla und mos maiorum. Ü berlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität,” in Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt. Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, ed. H.-J. Gehrke and A. Möller, Tübingen, pp. 301–38.
180. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2000, “The Roman Republic: Government of the People, by the People, for the People?,” review of F.Millar, The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic, SCI 19: 203–33.
181. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2001, “Capitol, Comitium und Forum. Ö ffentlicheRaüme, sakraleTopographie und Erinnerungslandschaften der römischenRepublik,” in Studien zu antiken Identitäten, ed. S. Faller, Würzburg, pp. 97–132.
182. Hölscher, T. 1978, “Die Anfänge römischer Repräsentationskunst,” MDAI(R) 85: 315–57.
183. Hölscher, T. 1980, “Römische Siegesdenkmäler der späten Republik,” in Tainia. Festschrift R. Hampe, ed. H. A. Cahn and E. Simon, Mainz, pp. 351–71.
184. Hölscher, T. 1984, Staatsdenkmal und Publikum vomUntergang der Republik bis zum Festigung des Kaisertums in Rom, Constance.
185. Hölscher, T. 1994, Monumenti statali e pubblico, Rome.
186. Hölscher, T. 2001, “Die Alten vor Augen. Politische Denkmäler und öffentliches Gedächtnis im republikanischen Rom,” in Melville 2001, pp. 183–211.
187. Holliday, P. J. 2002, The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts, Cambridge.
188. Hopkins, K. 1983, Death and Renewal, Cambridge.
189. Horsfall, N. 1996, La cultura della Plebs Romana, Barcelona.
190. Howarth, D. and Y. Stavrakis 2000, “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis,” in Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, ed. D. Howarth, A. J. Norval, and Y. Stavrakis, Manchester, pp. 1–23.
191. Hughes, J. J. 1992, “Piso's Eyebrows,” Mnemosyne 45: 234–36.
192. Humphrey, J. H. (ed.) 1991, Literacy in the Roman World (JRA Suppl. 3), Ann Arbor.
193. Hutchinson, G. O. 1995, “Rhythm, Style, andMeaning in Cicero's Prose,” CO 45: 485–99.
194. Jaeger, M. 1997, Livy's Written Rome, Ann Arbor.
195. Jehne, M. 1987, Der Staat des Dictators Caesar, Cologne.
196. Jehne, M. 1993, “Geheime Abstimmung und Bindungswesen in der römischen Republik,” HZ 257: 593–613.
197. Jehne, M. (ed.) 1995a, Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik (Historia Einzelschrift 96), Stuttgart.
198. Jehne, M. 1995b, “Einführung: zur Debatte um die Rolle des Volkes in der römischen Politik,” in Jehne 1995a: 1–9.
199. Jehne, M. 2000a, “Jovialität und Freiheit. Zur Institutionalität der Beziehungen zwischen Ober- und Unterschichten in der römischen Republik,” in Linke and Stemmler 2000, pp. 207–35.
200. Jehne, M. 2000b, “Rednertätigkeit und Statusdissonanzen in der späten römischenRepublik,” in Rede und Redner. Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen, ed. C. Neumeister and W. Raeck, Möhnesee, pp. 167–89.
201. Jonkers, E. J. 1963, Social and Economic Commentary on Cicero's De Lege Agraria Orationes Tres, Leiden.
202. Joslyn, R. A. 1986, “Keeping Politics in the Study of Political Discourse,” in Form, Genre, and the Study of Political Discourse, ed. H. W. Simons and A. A. Aghazarian, Columbia, SC, pp. 301–38.
203. Kallet-Marx R. M. 1990, “The Trial of Rutilius Rufus,” Phoenix 44: 122–39.
204. Kallet-Marx, R. M. 1995, Hegemony to Empire: the Development of the Roman Imperium in the East from 148 to 62 bc, Berkeley.
205. Key, V. O. 1966, The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936– 1960, Cambridge, MA.
206. Knight, J. and J. Johnson 1997, “What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require?,” in Bohman and Rehg 1997, pp. 297–319.
207. Kolb, F. 1995, Rom. Die Geschichte der Stadt in der Antike, Munich.
208. Krause, C. 1976, “Zur bauliche Gestalt des republikanischen Comitiums,” MDAI(R) 83: 31–69.
209. Kühner, R. and C. Stegmann 1974–76, Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, 5th edn., 2 vols., Hanover.
210. Kühnert, B. 1991, Die Plebs Urbana der späten römischen Republik. Ihre ökonomische Situation und soziale Struktur, Berlin.
211. La Penna, A. 1968, Sallustio e la “rivoluzione” romana, Milan.
212. Laser, G. 1997, Populo et scaenae serviendum est. Die Bedeutung der städtischen Masse in der Späten Römischen Republik, Trier.
213. Laurence, R. 1994, “Rumour and Communication in Roman Politics,” G&R 41: 62–74.
214. Lears, T. J. J. 1985, “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony,” AHR 90: 567–93.
215. Ledentu, M. 2000, “L’orateur, la parole et le texte,” in Achard and Ledentu 2000, pp. 57–74.
216. Leeman, A. D., H. Pinkster, and J. Wisse 1981–96, M. Tullius Cicero, De Oratore Libri 3, 4 vols., Heidelberg.
217. Leonhardt, J. 1998/99, “Senat und Volk in Ciceros Reden De lege agraria,” ACD 34/35: 279–92.
218. Leovant-Cirefice, V. 2000, “Le rôle de l’apostrophe aux Quirites dans les discours de Cicéron adressés au peuple,” in Achard and Ledentu 2000, pp. 43–56.
219. Levick, B. 1999, “Messages on the Roman Coinage: Types and Inscriptions,” in Paul and Ierardi 1999, pp. 41–60.
220. Libero, L. de 1992, Obstruktion. Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v. Chr.) (Hermes Einzelschrift 59), Stuttgart.
221. Linderski, J. 1982, “Patientia fregit: M. Octavius and Ti. Gracchus (Cic. Brut. 95),” Athenaeum 60: 244–47.
222. Linderski, J. 1986, “The Augural Law,” ANRW 2.16.3: 2146–312.
223. Linderski, J. 1995, Roman Questions: Selected Papers, Stuttgart.
224. Linke, B. and M. Stemmler (eds.) 2000, Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik (Historia Einzelschrift 141), Stuttgart.
225. Lintott, A. W. 1965, “Trinundinum,” CQ 59: 281–85.
226. Lintott, A. W. 1968a, Violence in Republican Rome, Oxford.
227. Lintott, A. W. 1968b, “Nundinae and the Chronology of the Late Roman Republic,” CQ 62: 189–94.
228. Lintott, A. W. 1972, “Provocatio. From the Struggle of the Orders to the Principate,” ANRW 1.2: 226–67.
229. Lintott, A. W. 1999, The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford.
230. Liou-Gille, B. 1994, “La perduellio: les procès d’Horace et de Rabirius,” Latomus 53: 3–38.
231. Litchfield, H.W. 1914, “National Exempla virtutis in Roman Literature,” HSPh 25: 1–71.
232. Loane, H. J. 1938, Industry and Commerce of the City of Rome (50 bc–200 ad), Baltimore.
233. Lo Cascio, E. 1994a, “La dinamica della popolazione in Italia da Augusto al III secolo,” in L’Italie d’Auguste à Dioclétien, Rome, pp. 91–125.
234. Lo Cascio, E. 1994b, “The Size of the Roman Population: Beloch and the Meaning of the Augustan Census Figures,” JRS 84: 23–40.
235. Lo Cascio, E. 1997, “Le procedure di recensus dalla tarda Repubblica al tardo antico e il calcolo della popolazione di Roma,” in La Rome impériale: démographie et logistique (Actes de la table ronde Rome, 25 mars 1994), Rome, pp. 3–76.
236. Lo Cascio, E. 2001, “Recruitment and the Size of the Roman Population from the Third to the First Century bce,” in Debating Roman Demography, ed. W. Scheidel, Leiden, pp. 111–37.
237. Loutsch, C. 1982, “Cicéron et l’affaire Rabirius (63 av. J.-C.),” MH 39: 305–15.
238. Lowenthal, D. 1985, The Past Is a Foreign Country, Cambridge.
239. McCarthy, T. A. 1982, The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge, MA.
240. McClelland, J. S. 1989, The Crowd and the Mob from Plato to Canetti, London.
241. McDermott, W. C. 1972, “Cicero's Publication of his Consular Speeches,” Philologus 116: 277–84.
242. McGushin, P. 1977, C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Catilinae. A Commentary (Mnemosyne Supp. 45), Leiden.
243. McGushin, P. 1992–1994, Sallust: The Histories, 2 vols., Oxford.
244. Mack, D. 1937, Senatsreden und Volksreden bei Cicero, Würzburg.
245. Mackay, C. 2000, “Sulla and the Monuments: Studies in His Public Persona,” Historia 49: 161–210.
246. Mackie, N. 1992, “Popularis Ideology and Popular Politics at Rome in the First Century bc,” RhM 135: 49–73.
247. MacMullen, R. 1980, “How Many Romans Voted?,” Athenaeum 58: 454–57.
248. Madvig, J. N. 1873, Adversaria critica ad scriptores graecos et latinos, vol. ii: Emendationes latinae, Copenhagen.
249. Maria, S. de 1988, Gli archi onorari di Roma e dell’Italia Romana, Rome.
250. Marshall, A. J. 1984, “Symbols and Showmanship in Roman Public Life: The Fasces,” Phoenix 38: 120–41.
251. Marshall, B. A. 1985, A Historical Commentary on Asconius, Columbia.
252. Marshall, B. A. 1997, “Libertas Populi: The Introduction of Secret Ballot at Rome and Its Depiction on Coinage,” Antichthon 31: 54–73.
253. Martin, Jochen 1965, “Die Popularen in der Geschichte der späten Republik,” diss. Freiburg.
254. Martin, Josef. 1974, Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Methode, Munich.
255. Martin, P. M. “Sur quelques thèmes de l’éloquence popularis, notamment l’invective contre la passivité du peuple,” in Achard and Ledentu 2000, pp. 27–41.
256. Maslowski, T. 1976, “Domus Milonis oppugnata,” Eos 64: 23–30.
257. Mason, H. J. 1974, Greek Terms for Roman Institutions: A Lexicon and Analysis, Toronto.
258. May, J. M. 1988, Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos, Chapel Hill.
259. Meadows, A. and J. Williams 2001, “Moneta and the Monuments: Coinage and Politics in Republican Rome,” JRS 91: 27–49.
260. Meier, C. 1965, “Populares,” RE Suppl. 10: 549–615.
261. Meier, C. 1966, Res Publica Amissa. Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik, Wiesbaden. Reprinted with new introduction, Frankfurt 1980.
262. Meier, C. 1968, “Die loca intercessionis bei Rogationen,” MH 25: 86–100.
263. Meier, C. 1978, “Fragen und Thesen zu einer Theorie historischer Prozesse,” in Historische Prozesse, ed. K.-G. Faber and C. Meier, Munich, pp. 11–66.
264. Meier, C. 1980, DieOhnmacht des allmächtigen Dictators Caesar: Drei biographische Skizzen, Frankfurt.
265. Meier, C. 1982, Caesar: A Biography, trans. D. McLintock, New York.
266. Melville, G. (ed.) 2001, Institutionalität und Symbolisierung, Cologne, Weimar, and Vienna.
267. Mencacci, F. 2001, “Genealogia metaforica e maiores collettivi prospettive antropologiche sulla costruzione dei viri illustres,” in Coudry and Späth 2001, pp. 413–37.
268. Merguet, H. 1880, Lexikon zu den Reden des Cicero, 4 vols., Jena.
269. Metaxaki-Mitrou, F. 1984, “Violence in the Contio during the Ciceronian Age,” AC 54: 180–87.
270. Metcalf, W. E. 1999, “Coins as Primary Evidence,” in Paul and Ierardi 1999, pp. 1–17.
271. Michels, A. K. 1967, The Calendar of the Roman Republic, Princeton.
272. Millar, F. 1984, “The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic, 200–151 bc,” JRS 74: 1–19.
273. Millar, F. 1986, “Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 bc),” JRS 76: 1–11.
274. Millar, F. 1989, “Political Power inMid-Republican Rome: Curia or Comitium?,” JRS 79: 138–50.
275. Millar, F. 1995, “Popular Politics at Rome in the Late Republic,” in Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, ed. I. Malkin and Z. W. Rubinsohn, Leiden, New York, and Cologne, pp. 91–113.
276. Rubinsohn, Leiden, 1998, The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic, Ann Arbor.
277. Rubinsohn, Leiden, 2002, Roman Republic in Political Thought, Hanover, NH and London.
278. Mitchell, T. N. 1979, Cicero: The Ascending Years, New Haven.
279. Mitchell, T. N. 1991, Cicero: The Senior Statesman, New Haven.
280. Momigliano, A. 1942, “Camillus and Concord,” CQ 36: 111–20.
281. Momigliano, A. 1969, Quarto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico, Rome.
282. Mommsen, T. 1887, Römisches Staatsrecht, Leipzig.
283. Moreau, P. 1982, Clodiana religio: Un procès politique en 61 av. J.-C., Paris.
284. Morel, J.-P. 1987, “La topographie de l’artisanat et du commerce dans la Rome antique,” in L’urbs: Espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome, pp. 127–55.
285. Morley, N. 1996, Metropolis and Hinterland. The City of Rome and the Italian Economy, 200 bc–ad 200, Cambridge.
286. Morley, N. 2001, “The Transformation of Italy, 225–28 bc,” JRS 101: 50–62.
287. Morstein-Marx, R. 1998, “Publicity, Popularity and Patronage in the Commentariolum Petitionis,” CA 17: 259–88.
288. Morstein-Marx, R. 2000a, “The Alleged ‘Massacre’ at Cirta and Its Consequences (Sallust Bellum Iugurthinum 26–27),” CPh 95: 468–76.
289. Morstein-Marx, R. 2000b, “Res Publica Res Populi,” review of A. Yakobson, Elections and Electioneering in Rome, SCI 19: 224–33.
290. Motzo, R. B. 1940, “Le contiones di M. Antonio e di M. Bruto dopo la morte di Cesare,” in Studi di antichità classica offerti da colleghi e discepoli a E. Ciaceri, Geneva, Rome, and Naples, pp. 136–43.
291. Mouritsen, H. 2001, Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge.
292. Murray, W. M. and P. M. Petsas 1989, Octavian's Campsite Memorial for the Actian War (Trans. American Philos. Soc. 79.4), Philadelphia.
293. Nardo, D. 1970, Il “Commentariolum Petitionis”: La propaganda elettorale nella “ars” di Quinto Cicerone, Padua.
294. Nash, E. 1961, Pictorial Dictionary of Ancient Rome, 2nd edn., New York.
295. Neuman, W. R., M. R. Just, and A. N. Crigler 1992, Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning, Chicago and London.
296. Nicholson, J. 1992, Cicero's Return from Exile. The Orations Post Reditum, New York.
297. Nicolet, C. 1980, The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome, trans. P. S. Falla, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
298. Nielsen, I. and B. Poulsen (eds.) 1992, The Temple of Castor and Pollux, Rome.
299. Nielsen, I. and J. Zahle 1985, “The Temple of Castor and Pollux on the Forum Romanum. Preliminary Report on the Scandinavian Excavations 1983–1985 (i),” AArch 56: 1–29.
300. Nippel, W. 1984, “Policing Rome,” JRS 74: 20–29.
301. Nippel, W. 1988, Aufruhr und “Polizei” in der römischen Republik, Stuttgart.
302. Nippel, W. 1995, Public Order in Ancient Rome, Cambridge.
303. Noè, E. 1988, “Per la formazione del consenso nella Roma del I sec. a.C.” in Studi di storia e storiografia antiche: Per Emilio Gabba, Pavia, pp. 49–72.
304. North, J. 1990a, “Democratic Politics in Republican Rome,” P&P 126: 3–21.
305. North, J. 1990b, “Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic,” CPh 85: 277–87.
306. Ober, J. 1989, Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People, Princeton.
307. Ogilvie, R. M. 1965, A Commentary on Livy, Books 1–5, Oxford.
308. Oppermann, I. 2000, Zur Funktion historischer Beispiele in Ciceros Briefen, Leipzig.
309. Orlin, E. M. 1997, Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic (Mnemosyne Suppl. 164), Leiden.
310. Page, B. I. 1996, Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy, Chicago.
311. Page, B. I. and R. Y. Shapiro 1992, The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, Chicago.
312. Panciera, S. 1996, Iscrizioni greche e latine del Foro romano e del Palatino. Inventario generale, inediti, revisioni, Rome.
313. Pani, M. 1997, La politica in Roma antica, Rome.
314. Pape, M. 1975, “Griechische Kunstwerke aus Kriegsbeute und ihre öffentliche Aufstellung in Rom von der Eroberung von Syrakus bis in augusteische Zeit,” diss. Hamburg.
315. Pasoli, E. 1957, Cicero, Filippica IV, Brescia.
316. Paul, G. 1984, AHistorical Commentary on Sallust's Bellum Jugurthinum, Liverpool.
317. Paul, G. M. and M. Ierardi (eds.) 1999, Roman Coins and Public Life under the Empire: E. Togo Salmon Papers II, Ann Arbor.
318. Perelli, L. 1982, Il movimento popolare nell’ ultimo secolo della Repubblica, Torino.
319. Perelli, L. 1990, Il pensiero politico di Cicerone. Tra filosofia greca e ideologia aristocratica romana, Florence.
320. Perl, G. 1965, “Die Rede Cottas in Sallusts Historien,” Philologus 109: 75–82.
321. Perl, G. 1967, “Die Rede Cottas in Sallusts Historien (Fortsetzung),” Philologus 111: 137–41.
322. Phillips, E. J. 1970, “Cicero and the Prosecution of C. Manilius,” Latomus 29: 595–607.
323. Phillips, E. J. 1974, “The Prosecution of C. Rabirius in 63 bc,” Klio 56: 87–101.
324. Pietilä-Castrén, L. 1987, Magnificentia publica: TheVictoryMonuments of the Roman Generals in the Era of the Punic Wars, Helsinki.
325. Pina Polo, F. 1989, “Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma,” diss. Saragossa.
326. Pina Polo, F. 1995, “Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Rome,” Klio 77: 203–16.
327. Pina Polo, F. 1996, Contra arma verbis. Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik, Stuttgart.
328. Primmer, A. 1985, Die Überredungsstrategie in Ciceros Rede pro C. Rabirio, Vienna.
329. Purcell, N. 1994, “The City of Rome and the plebs urbana in the Late Republic,” in Cambridge Ancient History, vol. ix: The Last Age of the Roman Republic 146–43 bc, ed. J. A. Crook, A. Lintott, and E. Rawson, 2nd edn., Cambridge, pp. 644–88.
330. Ramage, E. S. 1991, “Sulla's Propaganda,” Klio 73: 93–121.
331. Rambaud, M. 1953, Cicéron et l’histoire romaine, Paris.
332. Ramsey, J. T. 1980, “The Prosecution of C. Manilius in 66 bc and Cicero's Pro Manilio,” Phoenix 34: 323–36.
333. Rawson, B. 1971, “De lege agraria 2.49,” CPh 66 (1971) 26–29.
334. Reusser, C. 1993, Der Fidestempel auf dem Kapitol in Rom und seine Ausstattung: ein Beitrag zu den Ausgrabungen an der Via delMare und um das Kapitol 1926–1943, Rome.
335. Richardson, L., Jr. 1992, A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome, Baltimore.
336. Riepl, W. 1913, Das Nachrichtenwesen des Altertums, Leipzig.
337. Riggsby, A. M. 1997, “Did the Romans Believe in Their Verdicts,” Rhetorica 15: 235–51.
338. Riggsby, A. M. 1999, Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome, Austin.
339. Rilinger, R. 1982, “Die Interpretation des Niedergangs der römischen Republik durch ‘Revolution’ und ‘Krise ohne Alternative,’ ” AKG 64: 279–306.
340. Rilinger, R. 1989, “ ‘Loca intercessionis’ und Legalismus in der späten Republik,” Chiron 19: 481–98.
341. Ritter, H.-W. 1998, “Zu libertas und den Tabellargesetzen in der republikanischen Münzprägung,” in Imperium Romanum. Studien zu Geschichte und Rezeption (Festschrift für Karl Christ), ed. P. Kneissl and V. Losemann, Stuttgart, pp. 608–14.
342. Robinson, A. 1994, “Cicero's Use of the Gracchi in Two Speeches before the People,” A&R 39: 71–76.
343. Roloff, H. 1938, “Maiores bei Cicero,” diss. Göttingen.
344. Roloff, H. 1967, “Maiores bei Cicero,” in RömischeWertbegriffe, ed. H.Oppermann, Darmstadt, pp. 274–322.
345. Rosenstein, N. 1990a, Imperatores Victi. Military Defeat and Aristocratic Competition in the Middle and Late Republic, Berkeley.
346. Rosenstein, N. 1990b, “War, Failure, and Aristocratic Competition,” CPh 85: 255–65.
347. Rudé, G. 1964, The Crowd in History. A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England 1730–1848, New York, London, Sydney.
348. Ruebel, J. S. 1979, “The Trial of Milo in 52 bc: A Chronological Study,” TAPhA 109: 231–49.
349. Ryan, F. X. 1998, Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate, Stuttgart.
350. Saller, R. P. 1994, Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family, Cambridge.
351. Sandys, J. E. 1885, M. Tulli Ciceronis ad M. Brutum Orator, Cambridge.
352. Santalucia, B. 1998, Diritto e processo penale nell’antica Roma, 2nd edn., Milan.
353. Schneider, H. 1982/83, “Die politische Rolle der plebs urbana während der Tribunate des L. Appuleius Saturninus,” AncSoc 13/14: 193–221.
354. Schoenberger, H. 1910, “Beispiele aus der Geschichte,” diss. Erlangen.
355. Schwind, F. von 1940, Zur Frage der Publikation im römischen Recht mit Ausblicken in das altgriechische und ptolemäische Rechtsgebiet, Munich.
356. Scullard, H. H. 1981, Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic, London.
357. Seager, R. 1972a, “Cicero and the Word Popularis,” CQ 22: 328–38.
358. Seager, R. 1972b, “Factio: Some Observations,” JRS 62: 53–58.
359. Sehlmeyer, M. 1999, Stadtrömische Ehrenstatuen der republikanischen Zeit (Historia Einzelschrift 130), Stuttgart.
360. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–1967, Cicero's Letters to Atticus, 6 vols., Cambridge.
361. Shackleton Bailey, 1980, Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem et M. Brutum, Cambridge.
362. Shackleton Bailey, 1991, Two Studies in Roman Nomenclature, Atlanta.
363. Shatzman, I. 1972, “The RomanGeneral's Authority over Booty,” Historia 21 (1972) 177–205.
364. Sherk, R. K. 1969, Roman Documents from the Greek East, Baltimore.
365. Sherwin-White, A. N. 1966, The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary, Oxford.
366. Sklenář, R. J. 1992, “Rullus’ Colonies: Cicero, De lege agraria 1.16–17 and 2.73–75,” Eos 80: 81–82.
367. Späth, T. 1998, “Faits de mots et d’images: Les grands hommes de laRome ancienne,” Traverse 1: 35–56.
368. Späth, T. 2001, “Erzählt, erfunden: Camillus. Literarische Konstruktion und soziale Normen,” in Coudry and Späth 2001, pp. 341–412.
369. Steinby, E. M. 1987, “Il lato orientale del Foro Romano. Proposte di lettura,” Arctos 21: 139–84.
370. Stemmler, M. 2000, “Auctoritas exempli. Zur Wechselwirkung von kanonisierten Vergangenheitsbildern und gesellschaftlicher Gegenwart in der spätrepublikanischen Rhetorik,” in Linke and Stemmler 2000, pp. 141–205.
371. Stemmler, M. 2001, “Institutionalisierte Geschichte. Zur Stabilisierungsleistung und Symbolizit ät historischer Beispiele in der Redekultur der römischen Republik,” in Melville 2001, pp. 219–40.
372. Stockton, D. 1979, The Gracchi, Oxford.
373. Strasburger, H. 1939, “Optimates,” RE 18: 773–98.
374. Stroh, W. 1975, Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden, Stuttgart.
375. Sumi, G. S. 1997, “Power and Ritual: The Crowd at Clodius’ Funeral,” Historia 46: 80–102.
376. Sumner, G. V. 1965, “Asconius and the Acta,” Hermes 93: 134–36.
377. Sumner, G. V. 1966, “Cicero, Pompeius, and Rullus,” TAPhA 97: 569–82.
378. Sumner, G. V. 1973, The Orators in Cicero's Brutus. Prosopography and Chronology, Toronto.
379. Syme, R. 1939, The Roman Revolution, Oxford.
380. Syme, R. 1964, Sallust, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.
381. Talbert, R. J. A. 1984, The Senate of Imperial Rome, Princeton.
382. Tatum, W. J. 1986, “Cicero, ad Att. 1.14.5,” CQ 36: 539–41.
383. Tatum, W. J. 1990, “Another Look at the Spectators at the Roman Games,” AHB 4: 104–7.
384. Tatum, W. J. 1993, “The Lex Papiria de dedicationibus,” CPh 88: 319–28.
385. Tatum, W. J. 1999, The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher, Chapel Hill.
386. Taylor, L. R. 1963, “Was Tiberius Gracchus’ Last Assembly Electoral or Legislative?,” Athenaeum 41: 51–69.
387. Taylor, L. R. 1966, Roman Voting Assemblies, Ann Arbor.
388. Taylor, L. R. and T. R. S. Broughton 1949, “TheOrder of the Two Consuls’Names in the Yearly Lists,” MAAR 19: 2–14.
389. Thommen, L. 1989, Das Volkstribunat der späten Römischen Republik (Historia Einzelschrift 59), Stuttgart.
390. Thommen, L. 1995, “Les lieux de la plèbe et de ses tribuns dans la Rome républicaine,” Klio 77: 358–70.
391. Thompson, C. 1978, “To the Senate and to the People: Adaptation to the Senatorial and Popular Audiences in the Parallel Speeches of Cicero,” diss. Ohio State University.
392. Torelli, M. 1968, “Il donario di M. Fulvio Flacco nell’ area di S. Omobono,” Quaderni dell’ Istituto di topografia antica dell’ Università di Roma 5: 71–76.
393. Torelli, M. 1982, Typology and Structure of Roman Historical Reliefs, Ann Arbor.
394. Treggiari, S. 1969, Roman Freedmen, Oxford.
395. Tyrrell, W. B. 1973, “The Trial of C. Rabirius in 63 bc,” Latomus 32: 285–300.
396. Tyrrell, W. B. 1978, A Legal and Historical Commentary to Cicero's Oratio pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, Amsterdam.
397. Ulrich, R. B. 1994, The Roman Orator and the Sacred Stage: The Roman Templum Rostratum (Latomus Suppl. 222), Brussels.
398. Ungern-Sternberg, Jürgen von 1970, Untersuchungen zum spätrepublikanischenNotstandsrecht. Senatusconsultum ultimum und hostis-Erklärung, Munich.
399. Vaahtera, J. 1993, “On the Religious Nature of the Place of Assembly,” in Senatus Populusque Romanus: Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, ed. U. Paananen, K. Heikkulä, K. Sandberg, L. Savunen, and J. Vaahtera, Helsinki, pp. 97–116.
400. Van Dijk Teun 1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London.
401. Vanderbroeck, P. J. J. 1987, Popular Leadership and Collective Behavior in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 bc), Amsterdam.
402. Vasaly, A. 1993, Representations. Images of theWorld in Ciceronian Oratory, Berkeley.
403. Vigourt, A. 2001, “M’. Curius Dentatus et C. Fabricius Luscinus: Les grands hommes ne sont pas exceptionnels,” in Coudry and Späth 2001, pp. 117–29.
404. Virlouvet, C. 1991, “La plèbe frumentaire à l’époque d’ Auguste: Une tentative de définition,” in Nourrir la plèbe. Actes du colloque en hommage à Denis van Berchem, ed. A. Giovannini, Basel, pp. 43–65.
405. Vittinghoff, F. 1936, Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Untersuchungen zur “damnatio memoriae,” Berlin.
406. Vretska, K. 1976, Sallust: De Catilinae coniuratione, 2 vols., Heidelberg.
407. Walbank, F. W. 1957–1979, A Historical Commentary on Polybius, 3 vols.
408. Wallace, R.W. 1990, “Hellenization andRoman Society in the Late Fourth Century bc,” in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen Römischen Republik, ed.W. Eder, Stuttgart, pp. 278–92.
409. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1986, “Image and Authority in the Coinage of Augustus,” JRS 76: 66–87.
410. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1990, “Roman Arches and Greek Honours: The Language of Power at Rome,” PCPhS 216: 143–81.
411. Wanscher, O. 1980, Sella curulis. The Folding Stool: An Ancient Symbol of Dignity, Copenhagen.
412. Watkins, O. D. 1987, “Caesar solus? Senatorial Support for the Lex Gabinia,” Historia 36: 120–21.
413. Wechsberg, J. 1945, Looking for a Bluebird, Boston.
414. Weinstock, S. 1971, Divus Julius, Oxford.
415. Wellesley, K. 1971, “Real and Unreal Problems in the Pro Milone,” ACD 7: 27–31.
416. Welwei, K.-W. 1996, “CaesarsDiktatur, der Prinzipat des Augustus und die Fiktion der historischen Notwendigkeit,” Gymnasium 103: 477–97.
417. White, P. 1997, “Julius Caesar and the Publication of Acta in Late Republican Rome,” Chiron 27: 73–84.
418. White, S. K. (ed.) 1995, The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge.
419. Wille, G. 1967, Musica Romana, Amsterdam.
420. Willems, P. 1883–85, Le Sénat de la République Romaine, 2 vols., Louvain.
421. Williamson, C. 1990, “The Roman Aristocracy and Positive Law,” CPh 85: 266–76.
422. Wirszubski, C. 1960, Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate, Cambridge.
423. Wiseman, T. P. 1974, “The Circus Flaminius,” PBSR 42: 3–26.
424. Wiseman, T. P. 1985, Catullus and His World: a Reappraisal, Cambridge.
425. Wiseman, T. P. 1994, Historiography and Imagination. Eight Essays on Roman Culture, Exeter.
426. Wiseman, T. P. 1995, Remus. A Roman Myth, Cambridge.
427. Wiseman, T. P. 1998, Roman Drama and Roman History, Exeter.
428. Wisse, J. 1989, Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero, Amsterdam.
429. Wodak R., R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, and K. Liebhart 1999, The Discursive Construction of National Identity, Edinburgh.
430. Wood, N. 1988, Cicero's Social and Political Thought, Berkeley.
431. Wooten, C. W. 1983, Cicero's Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model: the Rhetoric of Crisis, Chapel Hill.
432. Yakobson, A. 1992, “Petitio et largitio: Popular Participation in the Centuriate Assembly of the Late Republic,” JRS 82: 32–52.
433. Yakobson, A. 1995, “Secret Ballot and Its Effects in the Late Roman Republic,” Hermes 123: 426–42.
434. Yakobson, A. 1999, Elections and Electioneering in Rome. A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic (Historia Einzelschrift 128), Stuttgart.
435. Yavetz, Z. 1969, Plebs and Princeps, Oxford.
436. Yavetz, Z. 1974, “Existimatio, Fama, and the Ides of March,” HSPh 78: 35–65.
437. Yunis, H. 1996, Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens, Ithaca and London.
438. Zaller, J. R. 1992, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge.
439. Zetzel, J. 1993, Reviewof C. P. Craig, FormasArgument inCicero's Speeches, BMC Rev 4: 446–51.
440. Zinserling, G. 1959/60, “Studien zu den Historiendarstellungen der römischen Republik,” WZ Jena 9: 403–48.
441. Ziolkowski, A. 1992, The Temples ofMid-Republican Rome and Their Historical and Topographical Context, Rome.