Law and nature

Law and Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-440

  Delaney, David ^a  

^a AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929735759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493690     Document Type: Book

References (339)

1. Abbott, Jack Henry, 1982. in the Belly of the Beast. New York.
2. Abramson, Paul, and Steven Pinkerton, 1995. With Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Human Sexuality. Oxford.
3. Adams, Carol, 1995. “Bestiality: The Unmentioned Abuse,” Animal Agenda 15: 29–31.
4. Ajami, Fouad, 1996. “Why Bosnia Needs a Nuremberg,” US News and World Report, 19 February.
5. Alford, C. Fred, 1997. What Evil Means to Us. Ithaca, NY.
6. Allen, Anita, 1990. “Surrogacy, Slavery, and the Ownership of Life,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13: 139–149.
7. Andrews, Lori, 1990. “Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 167–182.
8. Andriette, Bill, 1999. “Laying with Beasts,” The Guide, January (www. guidemag.com), 1.
9. Angier, Natalie, 1995. The Beauty of the Beastly: New Views on the Nature of Life. New York.
10. Animal Sexual Abuse Information and Resources (www.asairs.com/zoosummary.htm).
11. Annas, George, 1990. “Fairy Tales Surrogate Mothers Tell,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 43–58.
12. Aplet, Gregory, 1999. “On the Nature of Wildness: Exploring What Wilderness Protects,” Denver University Law Review 76: 347–367.
13. Appy, Christian, 1993. Working Class War: American Combat Soldiers in Vietnam. Chapel Hill, NC.
14. Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders, 1996. Regarding Animals. Philadelphia.
15. Aronowitz, Stanley, 1988. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Science. Minneapolis, MN.
16. Baker, C. Edwin, 1986. “Property and its Relation to Constitutionally Protected Liberty,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 134: 741–816.
17. Baker, Lynne Rudder, 1987. Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton, NJ.
18. Baker, Nicola, 1996. “Let’s Talk about our Relationships,” New Statesman, 20 September, 12.
19. Barnard, Neal, and Steven Kaufman, 1997. “Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading,” Scientific American 2: 80–82.
20. Barrett, Robert, 1998. “The ‘Schizophrenic’ and the Liminal Persona in Modern Society,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 22: 465–494.
21. Barrow, John, 1991. Theories of Everything. Oxford.
22. Bazelon, David, 1969. “Implementing the Right to Treatment,” University of Chicago Law Review 36: 742–754.
23. Becker, Ernst, 1973. The Denial of Death. New York.
24. Berg, Barbara, 1995. “Listening to theVoices of the Infertile,” in Joan Callahan (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Perspectives. Bloomington IN: 80–108.
25. Berlin, Isaiah, 1965-1999. The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ.
26. Bierne, Piers, 1997. “Rethinking Bestiality: Towards a Concept of Interspecies Sexual Assault,” Theoretical Criminology 1: 317–340.
27. Binder, Denis, 1996. “Act of God? or Act of Man: A Reappraisal of the Act of God Defense in Tort,” Review of Litigation 15: 1–79.
28. Birch, Thomas, 1990. “The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons,” Environmental Ethics 12: 3–26.
29. Bitz, D. Michael, and Jean Bitz, 1999. “Incompetence and the Brain Injured Individual,” St. Thomas Law Review 12: 205–276.
30. Blecker, Robert, 1990. “Haven or Hell: Inside Lorton Central Prison,” Stanford Law Review 42: 1149–1249.
31. Blum, Deborah, 1994. The Monkey Wars. Oxford.
32. Bogert, Laurence, 1994. “That’s My Story and I’m Stickin’ to it: Is ‘the Best Available’ Science Any Available Science under the Endangered Species Act?” Idaho Law Review 31: 85–150.
33. Bookchin, Murray, 1986. The Modern Crisis. Philadelphia.
34. Borges, Ellen, 1995. “A Social Critique of Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 211–240.
35. Boswell, John, 1980. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Chicago.
36. Botting, Jack, and Adrian Morrison, 1997. “Animal Research is Vital to Medicine,” Scientific American 2: 83–85.
37. Boyle, James, 1991. “Is Subjectivity Possible? The Post-Modern Subject in Legal Theory,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 489–524.
38. Bransford, Helen, 1995. “Surrogacy: A Mother’s Story,” Vogue, July, 134.
39. Brown, Bill, 2001. “Thing Theory,” Critical Inquiry 28: 1–22.
40. Burton, Steven, 1992. Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge.
41. Button, Lori, 1989. “Postpartum Psychosis: The Birth of a New Defense,” Cooley Law Review 6: 323–344.
42. Cahoone, Lawrence, 1988. The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture and Anti-Culture. Albany, NY.
43. Callicott, J. Baird, 1998. “That Good Old-Time Wilderness Religion,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 387–394.
44. Callicott, J. Baird, and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA.
45. Cardozo, Benjamin, 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven.
46. Carhart, Arthur, 1961. Planning for America’s Wildlands. Harrisburg, PA.
47. Carney, Robert, and Brian Williams, 1983. “Note – Criminal Law: Premenstrual Syndrome – a Criminal Defense,” Notre Dame Law Review 59: 253–269.
48. Castree, Noel, and Bruce Braun, 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Malden, MA.
49. Charo, R. Alta, 1994. “And Baby Makes Three – or Four, or Five, or Six: Defining Family after the Genetic Revolution,” in M. Frankel and A. Teich (eds.), The Genetic Frontier: Ethics, Law and Policy.Washington: 25–44.
50. Charo, R. Alta, and Karen Rothenberg, 1994. “ ‘The Good Mother’: The Limits of Reproductive Accountability and Genetic Choice,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 105–130.
51. Charvet, John, 1999. “Rousseau, the Problem of Sovereignty and the Limits of Political Obligation,” in Christopher Morris (ed.), Social Contract Theorists. Lanham, MD: 205–218.
52. Cheah, Pheng, and Elizabeth Grosz, 1996. “The Body of the Law: Notes toward a Theory of Corporeal Justice,” in David Fraser and Judith Grbich (eds.), Thinking through the Body of the Law. New York: 3–25.
53. Chesler, Phyllis, 1988. The Sacred Bond. New York.
54. Cichon, Dennis, 1992. “The Right to ‘Just Say No’: A History and Analysis of the Right to Refuse Antipsychotic Drugs,” Louisiana Law Review 53: 283–426.
55. Clayton, Ellen, 1994. “What the Law Says about Reproductive Genetic Testing and What it Doesn’t,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 131–161.
56. Coffey, Maureen, 1993. “The Genetic Defense: Excuse or Explanation?” William and Mary Law Review 35: 353–399.
57. Cohen, Felix, 1935. “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–849.
58. Coke, Edward, 1628-1979. First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. New York.
59. Collingwood, R. G., 1945. The Idea of Nature. Oxford.
60. Colson, Charles, 1993. “Society Must Cultivate Man’s Innate Moral Sense,” Insight on the News, 17 November.
61. Cook-Deegan, Robert, 1994. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York.
62. Cooper, David E., 1990. Existentialism. Oxford.
63. Corea, Gena, 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York.
64. Cover, Robert, 1986. “Violence and the Word,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–1630.
65. Cronon,William, 1995. “The Trouble withWilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature,” in Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: 69–90.
66. Csordas, Thomas, 1994. “Introduction: The Body as Representation and Being-in-the-World,” in Thomas Csordas (ed.), Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: 1–27.
67. Dallmayr, Fred, 1981. Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-Individualist Theory of Politics. Amherst, MA.
68. Dan-Cohen, Meir, 1992. “Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self,” Harvard Law Review 105: 959–1004.
69. Daston, Lorraine, 1998. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” in Mario Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader. New York: 110–123.
70. Davies, Margaret, 1994. Asking the Law Question. London.
71. Davies, Margaret 1996. Delimiting the Law: “Postmodernism” and the Politics of Law. London.
72. Davies, Paul, 1998. “What are the Laws of Nature?” in John Brockman (ed.), Doing Science: The Reality Club. New York: 45–72.
73. Dekkers, Midas, 1994. Dearest Pet: On Bestiality. London.
74. Dennett, Daniel, 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Having. Cambridge, MA.
75. Dolgin, Janet, 1993. “Just a Gene: Judicial Assumptions about Parenthood,” UCLA Law Review 40: 637–694.
76. Donovan, Josephine, 1996. “Animal Rights and Feminist Theory,” in Josephine Donovan and Carol Adams (eds.), Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: 34–59.
77. Douglas, William O., 1965. A Wilderness Bill of Rights. Boston.
78. Doyle, Richard, 1997. On Beyond Living: Rhetorical Transformations of the Life Sciences. Stanford, CA.
79. Dresser, Rebecca, 1991. “Making up our Minds: Can Law Survive Cognitive Science?” Criminal Justice Ethics 6: 27–40.
80. Dressler, Joshua, 1998. “Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers,” Rutgers Law Journal 19: 671–709.
81. Dressler, Joshua 1994. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. St. Paul, MN.
82. Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, and Dorothy Nelkin, 1992. “The Jurisprudence of Genetics,” Vanderbilt Law Review 45: 313–348.
83. Duxbury, Neil, 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford.
84. Dyn, Barry, and Michael Glenn, 1993. “Forecast for Couples,” Psychology Today, July.
85. Edmundson, William, 1993. “Transparency and Indeterminacy in the Critique of Critical Legal Studies,” Seton Hall Law Review 24: 557–602.
86. Ehrlich, Paul, 1986. The Machinery of Nature. New York.
87. Elias, Norbert, 1939-1982. The Civilizing Process. Oxford.
88. Elliot, Robert, 1982. “Faking Nature,” Inquiry 25: 81–94.
89. Equ Adept, “The Essence of Zoophilia” (http://home.worldonline.dk/horsies).
90. Eskridge, William, 1999. Gaylaw. Cambridge, MA.
91. Faulstich, Paul, 1994. “The Cultured Wild and the Limits of Wilderness,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild.Washington: 161–174.
92. Feldman, Stephen, 2000. American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism. New York.
93. Fingarette, Herbert, 1972. The Meaning of Criminal Insanity. Berkeley.
94. Flanagan, Dennis, 1988. Flanagan’s Version. New York.
95. Floyd, Jami, 1990. “The Administration of Psychotropic Drugs to Prisoners: State of the Law and Beyond,” California Law Review 78: 1243–1285.
96. Foreman, Dave, 1994. “Where Man is a Visitor,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild.Washington: 225–235.
97. Foucault, Michel, 1965. Madness and Civilization. New York.
98. Foucault, Michel, 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York.
99. Francione, Gary, 1995. Animals, Property and the Law. Philadelphia.
100. Francione, Gary 1996. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia.
101. Frank, Jerome, 1949. Courts on Trial. Princeton.
102. Franklin, Sarah, 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London.
103. Fraser, Caroline, 1993. “The Raid at Silver Spring,” New Yorker, 19 April, 66.
104. Freud, Sigmund, 1930-1962. Civilization and its Discontents. New York.
105. Freyfogle, Eric, 1994. “The Ethical Strands of Environmental Law,” University of Illinois Law Review 1994: 819–846.
106. Fuller, Steven, 1996. “Does Science Put an End to History, or History to Science? Or, Why Being Pro-Science is Harder than you Think,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 29–60.
107. Fuss, Diana, 1989. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. New York.
108. Garber, Marjorie, 1996. Dog Love. New York.
109. Gelman, Sheldon, 1995. “The Biological Alteration Cases,”William and Mary Law Review 36: 1203–1301.
110. Gelman, Sheldon 1999. Medicating Schizophrenia. New Brunswick, NJ.
111. George, Robert, 1992. “Natural Law and Human Nature,” in Robert George (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford: 31–41.
112. Gerety, Tom, 1997. “Redefining Privacy,” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 12: 233–296.
113. Gilbert, Walter, 1992. “A Vision of the Grail,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 83–97.
114. Gilman, Owen, 1992. Vietnam and the Southern Imagination. Jackson, MS.
115. Gladwell, Malcolm, 1997. “Damaged,” New Yorker, 24 February, 132.
116. Goldstein, Abraham, 1967. The Insanity Defense. New Haven.
117. Graves-Brown, Paul, 2000. “Introduction,” in Paul Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London: 1–9.
118. Greenawalt, Kent, 1992. Law and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA.
119. Griffin, David Ray, 1988. “Introduction,” in David Griffin (ed.), The Reenchantment of Science. Albany: 1–46.
120. Gross, Paul, 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. New York.
121. Grosz, Elizabeth, 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, IN.
122. Gruchow, Paul, 1997. The BoundaryWaters: The Grace of theWild. Minneapolis, MN.
123. Guthiel, Thomas, 1980. “In Search of True Freedom: Drug Refusal, Involuntary Medication, and ‘Rotting with your Rights on’,” American Journal of Psychiatry 137: 327–328.
124. Guthiel, T., and P. Appelbaum, 1983. “ ‘Mind Control’, ‘Synthetic Sanity’, ‘Artificial Competence’ and General Confusion: Legally Relevant Effects of Antipsychotic Medication,” Hofstra Law Review 12: 77–120.
125. Hacking, Ian, 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA.
126. Halewood, Peter, 1996. “Law’s Bodies: Disembodiment and the Structure of Liberal Property Rights,” Iowa Law Review 81: 1331–1393.
127. Ham, Jennifer, and Mathew Senior (eds.), 1997. Animal Acts: Configuring the Human in Western History. London.
128. Hanson, F. Allan, 1996. “Suits for Wrongful Life, Counterfactuals and the Nonexistence Problem,” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 5: 1–24.
129. Haraway, Donna, 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York.
130. Harding, Sandra, 1996. “Science is ‘Good to Think with’,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 16–28.
131. Hart, H. L. A., 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA.
132. Hayles, N. Katherine, 1996. “Consolidating the Canon,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 226–237.
133. Healy, David, 2002. The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge, MA.
134. Hearne, Vicki, 1986. Adam’s Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York.
135. Hegert, James, 1990. American Jurisprudence 1870–1970. Houston.
136. Heller, Agnes, 1988. General Ethics. Oxford.
137. Henifin, Mary Sue, Ruth Hubbard, and Judy Norsigian, 1989. “Prenatal Screening,” in Sherrill Cohen and Nadine Taub (eds.), Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: 155–183.
138. Hill, John Lawrence, 1997. “Law and the Concept of the Core Self: Toward a Reconciliation of Naturalism and Humanism,” Marquette Law Review 80: 289–390.
139. Hobbes, Thomas, 1650-1994. The Elements of Law. Oxford.
140. Hobbes, Thomas 1651-1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis.
141. Holmes, OliverWendell, 1881. The Common Law. Boston.
142. Horan, Susan, 1992. “The XYY Supermale and the Criminal Justice System: A Square Peg in a Round Hole,” Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 25: 1343– 1376.
143. Horgan, John, 1999. The Undiscovered Mind: How the Human Brain Defies Replication, Medication and Explanation. New York.
144. Hosp, Christina, 1991. “Has the PMS Defense Gained a Legitimate Foothold in Virginia Criminal Law?” George Mason Law Review 14: 427–446.
145. Houck, Oliver, 1995. “Reflections on the Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 25: 689–702.
146. Hubbard, Ruth, and Elijah Wald, 1993. Exploding the Gene Myth. Boston.
147. Hyde, Alan, 1997. Bodies of Law. Princeton.
148. Jeffery, C. Ray, 1992. “The Brain, the Law and the Medicalization of Crime,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law. Carbondale, IL: 161–178.
149. Johnston, David, 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton.
150. Jordan, Mark, 1997. The Invention of Sodomy in Christian Theology. Chicago.
151. Julien, Robert, 1996. A Primer of Drug Action: A Concise, Nontechnical Guide to the Actions, Uses and Side Effects of Pyschoactive Drugs, 8th ed. New York.
152. Kadish, Sanford, 1987. “Excusing Crime,” California Law Review 75: 257–290.
153. Kay, Lily, 2000. “The Book of Life? How a Genetic Code Became a Language,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 99–124.
154. Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1992. “Nature, Nurture and the Human Genome Project,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 281–299.
155. Keller, Evelyn Fox 1995. Refiguring Life. New York.
156. Kelley, Donald, 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in theWestern Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA.
157. Kelsen, Hans, 1945. General Theory of Law and the State. Cambridge, MA.
158. Kennedy, J. S., 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge.
159. Kennedy, Walter, 1941. “My Philosophy of Law,” in My Philosophy of Law: Credos of 16 American Legal Scholars. Boston: 147–160.
160. Kevles, Daniel, 1992. “Out of Eugenics: The Historical Politics of the Human Genome,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 3–36.
161. Kevles, Daniel, and Leroy Hood (eds.), 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA.
162. Kilbourne, James, 1991. “The Endangered Species Act under the Microscope: A Closeup Look from a Litigator’s Perspective,” Environmental Law 21: 499–585.
163. King, Martin Luther Jr., 1963. Letter from the Birmingham City Jail. Philadelphia.
164. Kirmayer, Laurence, 1992. “The Body’s Insistence on Meaning: Metaphor as Presentation and Representation in Illness Experience,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6: 323–346.
165. Kirwin, Barbara, 1997. The Mad, The Bad and the Innocent: The Criminal Mind on Trial. Boston.
166. Kitcher, Philip, 2000. “Utopian Genetics and Social Inequality,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 229–264.
167. Klaver, Irene, 1995. “Silent Wolves: The Howl of the Implicit,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 117–132.
168. Klein, Richard, 1995. “The Power of Pets,” New Republic, 10 July, 18–23.
169. Klinenberg, Eric, 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago.
170. Krafft-Ebing, Richard von, 1924. Psychopathia Sexualis. New York.
171. Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago.
172. Lakoff, George, 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago.
173. Langdell, Christopher, 1879. Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2nd ed. Boston.
174. Latour, Bruno, 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA.
175. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar, 1986. Laboratory Life. Princeton.
176. Law, John, 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford.
177. Law, John, and Annemarie Mol, 1995. “Notes on Materiality and Sociality,” Sociological Review 43: 274–294.
178. Laycock, Steven, 1999. “The Animal as Animal: A Plea for Open Conceptuality,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 271–284.
179. Leder, Drew, 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago.
180. Leiss, William, 1972. The Domination of Nature. New York.
181. Lelling, Andrew, 1993. “Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 1471–1564.
182. Lessnoff, Michael, 1986. Social Contract. Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
183. Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1985. The View from Afar. New York.
184. Lewis, Dorothy, 1998. Guilty by Reason of Insanity. New York.
185. Libby, Ronald, 1998. Eco-Wars: Political Campaigns and Social Movements. New York.
186. Lieberman, Jethro, 1999. A Practical Companion to the Constitution. Berkeley.
187. Light, Andrew, 1995. “Urban Wilderness,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 195–212.
188. Lightman, Alan, 1996. Dance for Two. New York.
189. Liliequist, Jonas, 1992. “Peasants Against Nature: Crossing the Boundaries between Man and Animals in 17th and 18th Century Sweden,” in John Fout (ed.), Forbidden History. Chicago: 57–88.
190. Lindberg, David, 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science. Oxford.
191. Linzey, Andrew, 2000. “On Zoophilia,” Animal Agenda 20: 29.
192. Lippman, Abby, 1991. “Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 17: 15–49.
193. Lippman, Abby, 1994. “The Genetic Construction of Prenatal Testing: Choice, Consent or Conformity for Women,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 9–34.
194. Llewellyn, Karl, 1931. “Some Realism about Realism – Responding to Dean Pound,” Harvard Law Review 44: 1222–1256.
195. Llewellyn, Karl, 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston.
196. Lock, Margaret, 1993. “Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge,” Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 133–155.
197. Locke, John, 1690-1980. Second Treatise on Government. Indianapolis.
198. McKibben, Bill, 1989. The End of Nature. New York.
199. Macklin, Ruth, 1990. “Is There AnythingWrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 136–150.
200. McPhee, John, 1989. The Control of Nature. New York.
201. Mahoney, Joan, 1990. “An Essay on Surrogacy and Feminist Thought,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 181–197.
202. Mann, Charles, and Mark Plummer, 1995. Noah’s Choice: The Future of Endangered Species. New York.
203. Mann, Joe, 1999. “Making Sense of the Endangered Species Act: A Human Centered Justification,” New York University Environmental Law Journal 7: 246–304.
204. Mannix, Brian, 1992. “The Endangered Species Act and the Descent of Man (with apologies to Mr. Darwin),” The American Enterprise, 12 November, 56–63.
205. Marcuse, Herbert, 1966. Eros and Civilization. Boston.
206. Marks, Jonathan, 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Berkeley.
207. Martin, Emily, 1987. The Women in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston.
208. Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1995. When ElephantsWeep: The Emotional Lives of Animals. New York.
209. Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1997. Dogs Never Lie about Love: Reflections on the Emotional World of Dogs. New York.
210. Mathews, Mark, 1994. The Horseman: Obsessions of a Zoophile. Amherst, NY.
211. Mead, Margaret, 1983. Foreword, in Thomas Rhys Williams, Socialization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: v–viii.
212. Mele, Alfred, 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York.
213. Merchant, Caroline, 1989. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco.
214. Meyer, Linda Ross, 1998. “Is Practical Reason Mindless?” Georgetown Law Journal 86: 647–675.
215. Meyer, Michel, 2000. Philosophy and the Passions: Toward a History of Human Nature. University Park, PA.
216. Midgley, Mary, 1978. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Ithaca, NY.
217. Midgley, Mary, 1984. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens, GA.
218. Mill, John Stuart, 1874-1923. Nature, the Utility of Religion and Theism. London.
219. Miller, William, 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA.
220. Modrow, John, 1992. How to Become a Schizophrenic: The Case against Biological Psychiatry. Everett,WA.
221. Money, John, 1986. Lovemaps. Buffalo.
222. Moore, Michael, 1985. “Causation and the Excuses,” California Law Review 73: 1091–1148.
223. Moran, Leslie, 1996. The Homosexual(ity) of Law. London.
224. Morriss, Peter, 1997. “Blurred Boundaries,” Inquiry 40: 259–290.
225. Morse, Stephen, 1994. “Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 1587–1660.
226. Morse, Stephen, 1996. “Brain and Blame,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 527–549.
227. Morse, Stephen, 1999. “Crazy Reasons,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 10: 189–226.
228. Murphy, Lawrence, 1990. “Defining the Crime against Nature: Sodomy in the United States Appeals Courts, 1810–1940,” Journal of Homosexuality 19: 49–66.
229. Nash, Roderick, 1982. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven.
230. Nash, Roderick 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison, WI.
231. Nedelsky, Jennifer, 1990. “Law, Boundaries and the Bounded Self,” Representations 30: 162–189.
232. Nelkin, Dorothy, 1992. “The Social Power of Genetic Information,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 177–190.
233. Nelkin, Dorothy, 1996. “The ScienceWars: Responses to a Failed Marriage,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 114–122.
234. Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee, 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York.
235. Nelkin, Dorothy, and Laurence Tancredi, 1989. Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. New York.
236. Nelson, Michael P., 1998. “An Amalgamation of Wilderness Preservation Arguments,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 154–198.
237. Neu, Jerome, 2000. A Tear is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotions. New York.
238. Noske, Barbara, 1997. Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal.
239. Nussbaum, Martha, 1999. “ ‘Secret Sewers of Vice’: Disgust, Bodies and the Law,” in Susan Bandes (ed.), The Passions of Law. New York: 19–62.
240. Oelschlaeger, Max, 1991. The Idea of Wilderness from Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven.
241. Oelschlaeger, Max, 1992. “Wilderness, Civilization and Language,” in Max Oelschlaeger (ed.), The Wilderness Condition: Essays in Environment and Civilization. San Francisco: 271–308.
242. O’Neill, John, 1985. Five Bodies: The Human Shape of Modern Society. Ithaca, NY.
243. Opton, Edward, 1974. “Psychiatric Violence against Prisoners: When Therapy is Punishment,” Mississippi Law Review 45: 605–644.
244. Overall, Christine, 1987. Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Boston.
245. Pam, Alvin, 1995. “Introduction,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 1–6.
246. Paul, Diane, 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
247. Peller, Gary, 1985. “The Metaphysics of American Law,” California Law Review 73: 1151–1290.
248. Perlin, Michael, 1994. The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense. Durham, NC.
249. Perrine, Daniel, 1996. The Chemistry of Mind-Altering Drugs.Washington.
250. Pfeffer, Naomi, 1987. “Artificial Insemination, In-Vitro Fertilization and the Stigma of Infertility,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 81–97.
251. Posner, Richard, and K. Silbaugh, 1994. A Guide to America’s Sex Laws. Chicago.
252. Pound, Roscoe, 1908. “Mechanical Jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 8: 605–623.
253. Pound, Roscoe, 1931. “A Call for a Realist Jurisprudence,” Harvard Law Review 44: 697–711.
254. Powell, John, 1997. “The Multiple Self: Exploring between and beyondModernity and Postmodernity,” Minnesota Law Review 81: 1481–1520.
255. Price-Huish, Cecilee, 1997. “ ‘Born to Kill?’ Aggression Genes and their Potential Impact on Sentencing and the Criminal Justice System,” Southern Methodist University Law Review 50: 603–626.
256. Rapp, Rayna, 1988. “The Power of ‘Positive’ Diagnosis: Medical and Maternal Discourses on Amniocentesis,” in Karen Michaelson (ed.), Childbirth in America. South Hadley, MA: 103–116.
257. Redding, Richard, 1999. “Reconstructing Science through Law,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 23: 585–610.
258. Regan, Pamela, and Ellen Berscheid, 1999. Lust: WhatWe Know about Human Desire. Thousand Oaks, CA.
259. Reider, Laura, 1998. “Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories,” UCLA Law Review 46: 289–340.
260. Ricklefs, Robert, 1973. Ecology. Newton, MA.
261. Robinson, Daniel, 1996. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge, MA.
262. Rojek, Chris, 1993. Ways of Escape: Modern Transformations in Leisure and Travel. London.
263. Rosen, Jeffery, 1994. “Hugo Black: A Biography,” New Republic, 5 December, 110.
264. Rosenfeld, Michel, 1992. “Deconstruction and Legal Interpretation: Conflict, Indeterminacy and the Temptations of the New Legal Formalism,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 152–210.
265. Ross, Andrew (ed.), 1996. Science Wars. Durham, NC.
266. Ross, Colin, 1995. “Errors in Logic in Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 85–128.
267. Ross, Colin, and Alvin Pam (eds.), 1995. Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York.
268. Roth, Martha, 1998. Arousal: Bodies and Pleasures. Minneapolis.
269. Rothenberg, David, 1995a. “Introduction:Wildness Untamed: The Evolution of an Ideal,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: xiii– xxvii.
270. Rothenberg, David, 1995b. “Epilogue: Paradox Wild,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 213–218.
271. Rouse, Joseph, 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY.
272. Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1755-1983. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis.
273. Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1762-1963. Emile. London.
274. Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark McCauly, 2000. “Disgust,” in Michael Lewis and Jeanette Haviland-Jones (eds.), The Handbook of Emotions. New York: 637–653.
275. Sandelowski, Margarete, and Linda Corson Jones, 1996. “ ‘Healing Fictions’: Stories of Choosing in the Aftermath of the Detection of Fetal Anomalies,” Social Science and Medicine 42: 353–361.
276. Santoni, Ronald, 1993. “On the Existential Meaning of Violence,” Dialogue and Humanism 4: 139–151.
277. Sarat, Austin, 1990. “ ‘… The Law is All Over’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 343–379.
278. Sarat, Austin (ed.), 2001. Pain, Death and the Law. Ann Arbor.
279. Sarat, Austin, and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law’s Violence. Ann Arbor.
280. Scarry, Elaine, 1992. “The Declaration of War: Constitutional and Unconstitutional Violence,” in Austin Sarat and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law’s Violence. Ann Arbor: 23–76.
281. Schlag, Pierre, 1991. “The Problem of the Subject,” Texas Law Review 69: 1627–1743.
282. Schott, Robin May, 1993. “Resurrecting Embodiment,” in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder: 171–185.
283. Schultz, Marjorie, 1990. “Reproductive Technology and Intention-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality,” Wisconsin Law Review 1990: 297–398.
284. Schwenger, Peter, 2001. “Words and the Murder of the Thing,” Critical Inquiry 28: 99–113.
285. Scruton, Roger, 1986. Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic. New York.
286. Scull, Andrew, 1981. “Moral Treatment Reconsidered: Some Sociological Comments on an Episode in the History of British Psychiatry,” in Andrew Scull (ed.), Madhouses, Mad-Doctors and Madmen. Philadelphia.
287. Shacochis, Bob, 1996. “Missing Children,” Harpers, October, 55–61.
288. Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1993. “Surrogate Mothers and Women’s Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction,” Signs 18: 618–639.
289. Shapiro, Michael, 1992. “Law, Culpability and the Neural Sciences,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law. Carbondale, IL: 179–202.
290. Shorter, Edward, 1997. A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. New York.
291. Simpson, Lorenzo, 1995. Technology, Time and the Conversations of Modernity. London.
292. Skinner, B. F., 1974. About Behaviorism. New York.
293. Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont, 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York.
294. Solomon, Lee, 1995. “Premenstrual Syndrome: The Debate Surrounding Criminal Defense,” Maryland Law Review 54: 571–600.
295. Solomon, Robert, 1993. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis.
296. Soper, Kate, 1995. What is Nature? Oxford.
297. Soule, Michael, and Gary Lease (eds.), Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction.Washington.
298. Stanworth, Michelle, 1987. “Reproductive Technologies and the Destruction of Motherhood,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 1–9.
299. Steeves, H. Peter, 1999. “They Say Animals Can Smell Fear,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 133–178.
300. Stich, Stephen, 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. Cambridge, MA.
301. Strathern, Marilyn, 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. London.
302. Stumpf, Andrea, 1986. “Redefining Motherhood: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies,” Yale Law Journal 96: 187–208.
303. Suggs, Ike, 1993. “Caught in the Act: Evaluating the Endangered Species Act, its Effect on Man and the Prospects for Reform,” Cumberland Law Review 24: 1–78.
304. Sullum, Jacob, 2000. “Curing the Therapeutic State: Thomas Szasz on the Medicalization of American Life” (www.reason.com).
305. Szasz, Thomas, 1990. The Untamed Tongue: A Dissenting Dictionary. La Salle, IL.
306. Talbot, Carl, 1998. “The Wilderness Narrative and the Cultural Logic of Capitalism,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 325–333.
307. Terborgh, John, 1999. Requiem for Nature.Washington.
308. Thomas, Keith, 1983. Man and the NaturalWorld: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London.
309. Torrey, E. Fuller, 1992. A Freudian Freud. New York.
310. Tribe, Lawrence, 1988. American Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. Mineola, NY.
311. Turiel, Elliot, 1983. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge.
312. Turner, Bryan, 1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford.
313. Turner, Jack, 1994. “The Quality ofWildness: Preservation, Control and Freedom,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild.Washington: 175–189.
314. Turner, Jack 1996. The Abstract Wild. Tucson.
315. Tushnet, Mark, 1996. “Defending the Indeterminacy Thesis,” Quinnipiac Law Review 16: 339–356.
316. Ulrich, Roger, 1993. “Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes,” in Stephen Kellert and E. O. Wilson (eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: 73–137.
317. Unger, Roberto, 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA.
318. Walker, Mark Thomas, 1996. “The Voluntariness of Judgment,” Inquiry 39: 97–119.
319. Waller, Donald, 1998. “Getting Back to the Right Nature:AReply to Cronon’s ‘The Trouble withWilderness’,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 540–567.
320. Weinreb, Lloyd, 1987. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA.
321. Wicke, Jennifer, 1991. “Postmodern Identity and the Legal Subject,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 455–473.
322. Wigmore, John Henry, 1914. “The Terminology of Legal Science with a Plea for the Science of Nomothetics,” Harvard Law Review 28: 1–9.
323. Wigmore, John Henry 1917. “The Problems of Law’s Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 247–272.
324. Wigmore, John Henry 1919. “Problems of Law’s Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 1–9.
325. Williams, Karen, 1998. “The Gift that Made me a Mother,” Good Housekeeping, April, 89.
326. Wilson, Edward O., 1975. Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA.
327. Wilson, Edward O.,1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA.
328. Winick, Bruce, 1997. The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment.Washington.
329. Winston, Mark, 1997. Nature Wars. Cambridge, MA.
330. Wolch, Jennifer, and Jody Emel, 1998. “Witnessing the Animal Moment,” in Jennifer Wolch and Jody Emel (eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in the Nature–Culture Borderlands. London: 1–25.
331. Wolfe, Alan, 1992. “Algorithmic Justice,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 361–386.
332. Wolin, Sheldon, 1960. Politics and Vision. Boston.
333. Wolpert, Lewis, and Alison Richard, 1997. The Passionate Mind: The Inner World of Scientists. Oxford.
334. Woods, Mark, 1998. “Federal Wilderness Preservation in the United States: The Preservation of Wilderness?” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 131–153.
335. Yagerman, Katherine, 1990. “Protecting Critical Habitat under the Federal Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 20: 811–856.
336. Yanagisako, Sylvia, and Carol Delaney, 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. London.
337. Young, Iris, 1990. “Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation,” in Iris Young, Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington, IN: 160–177.
338. Zachary, G. Pascal, 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA.
339. Zapf, Christian, and Eben Moglen, 1996. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 485–520.