Underreporting in political science survey experiments: Comparing questionnaires to published results

Political Analysis

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 306-312

  Franco, Annie ^a   Malhotra, Neil ^b   Simonovits, Gabor ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929675895     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpv006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson, Richard G. 2013. Registration and replication: A comment. Political Analysis 21:38-39.
2. Asendorpf, J. B., M. Conner, F. De Fruyt, J. De Houwer, J. J. A. Denissen, K. Fiedler, S. Fiedler, D. C. Funder, R. Kliegl, B. A. Nosek, M. Perugini, B. W. Roberts, M. Schmitt, M. A. G. van Aken, H. Weber, and J. M. Wicherts. 2013. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality 27:108-19.
3. Casey, Katherine, Rachel Glennerster, and Edward Miguel. 2012. Reshaping institutions: Evidence on aid impacts using a preanalysis plan. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127:1755-1812.
4. Chambers, Christopher D. 2013. Registered reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex 49:609-10.
5. Chan, An-Wen, and Douglas G. Altman. 2005. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed:Review of publications and survey of authors. British Medical Journal 330:753.
6. Chan, An-Wen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Mette T. Haahr, Peter C. Gøtzsche, and Douglas G. Altman. 2004. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. Journal of the American Medical Association 291:2457-65.
7. Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science 345:1502-1505.
8. Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2015. Replication data for: Underreporting in political science survey experiments: Comparing questionnaires to published results. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/28766 Dataverse [Distributor] V1 [Version], January 21, 2015.
9. Gelman, Andrew, Jennifer Hill, and Masanao Yajima. 2012. Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparisons. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 5:189-211.
10. Gelman, Andrew, and Francis Tuerlinckx. 2000. Type S error rates for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures. Computational Statistics 15:373-90.
11. Gerber, Alan, and Neil Malhotra. 2008. Do statistical reporting standards affect what is published? Publication bias in two leading political science journals. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3:313-26.
12. Humphreys, Macartan, Raul Sanchez de la Sierra, and Peter van der Windt. 2013. Fishing, commitment, and communication:A proposal for comprehensive nonbinding research registration. Political Analysis 21:1-20.
13. King, Gary, Emmanuela Gakidou, Nirmala Ravishankar, Ryan T. Moore, Jason Lakin, Manett Vargas, Martha María Téllez-Rojo, Juan Eugenio Hernández Ávila, Mauricio Hernández Ávila, and Héctor Hernández Llamas. 2007. A "politically robust" experimental design for public policy evaluation, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26:479-506.
14. Laitin, David D. 2013. Fisheries management. Political Analysis 21:42-47.
15. Miguel, E., C. Camerer, K. Casey, J. Cohen, K. M. Esterling, A. Gerber, R. Glennerster, D. P. Green, M. Humphreys, G. Imbens, D. Laitin, T. Madon, L. Nelson, B. A. Nosek, M. Petersen, R. Sedlmayr, J. P. Simmons, U. Simonsohn, and M. Van der Laan. 2014. Promoting transparency in social science research. Science 343:30-31.
16. Monogan III, James E. 2013. A case for registering studies of political outcomes: An application in the 2010 House elections. Political Analysis 21:21-37.
17. Moreno, Santiago G., Alex J. Sutton, Erick H. Turner, Keith R. Abrams, Nicola J. Cooper, Tom M. Palmer, and A. E. Ades. 2009. Novel methods to deal with publication biases: Secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications. British Medical Journal 339:b2981.
18. Rising, Kristin, Peter Bacchetti, and Lisa Bero. 2008. Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of publication and presentation. PLoS Medicine 5:217.
19. Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22:1359-1366.