Sampling frequency of fetal heart rate impacts the ability to predict pH and BE at birth: A retrospective multi-cohort study

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2015, Pages L1-L12

  Li, Xuan ^a   Xu, Yawen ^a   Herry, Christophe ^b   Durosier, L Daniel ^f   Casati, Daniela ^c   Stampalija, Tamara ^d   Maisonneuve, Emeline ^f   Seely, Andrew J E ^b,g,h   Audibert, Francois ^f   Alfirevic, Zarko ^e   Ferrazzi, Enrico ^c   Wang, Xiaogang ^a   Frasch, Martin G ^f  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d INSTITUTE FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH IRCCS BURLO GAROFOLO   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

fetal heart rate; fetus; monitoring, labour; prediction; sampling rate

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; ERRORS; HEART; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; NEONATAL MONITORING;

'CURRENT; COHORT STUDIES; DATA SET; FETAL ECG; FETUS; FOETAL HEART RATES; MONITORING, LABOR; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SAMPLING FREQUENCIES; SAMPLING RATES;

FORECASTING;

OVIS ARIES;

ACIDOSIS; BIOLOGY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; LABOR; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PH; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACIDOSIS; COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84929659214     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/5/L1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bates D and Maechler M 2014 Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods R package version 1.1-4 edn
2. Bernardes J and Garrido A 1995 Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labour based on 2-s sampling. Can it proceed with confidence? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 63 105-7
3. Bravi A, Green G, Longtin A and Seely A J 2012 Monitoring and identification of sepsis development through a composite measure of heart rate variability PLoS One 7 e45666
4. Bravi A, Longtin A and Seely A J 2011 Review and classification of variability analysis techniques with clinical applications Biomed. Eng. Online 10 90
5. Chudacek V, Spilka J, Bursa M, Janku P, Hruban L, Huptych M and Lhotska L 2014 Open access intrapartum CTG database BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14 16
6. Chudacek V, Spilka J, Janku P, Koucky M, Lhotska L and Huptych M 2011 Automatic evaluation of intrapartum fetal heart rate recordings: a comprehensive analysis of useful features Physiol. Meas. 32 1347-60
7. Doret M, Helgason H, Abry P, Goncalves P, Gharib C and Gaucherand P 2011 Multifractal analysis of fetal heart rate variability in fetuses with and without severe acidosis during labor Am. J. Perinatol. 28 259-66
8. Durosier L D, Green G, Batkin I, Seely A J, Ross M G, Richardson B S and Frasch M G 2014 Sampling rate of heart rate variability impacts the ability to detect acidemia in ovine fetuses near-term Front. Pediatr. 2 38
9. Fox J and Weisberg S 2011 An {R} Companion to Applied Regression (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage)
10. Frasch M G et al 2014 Correlating multidimensional fetal heart rate variability analysis with acid-base balance at birth: a prospective cohort study Physiol. Meas. 35 L1-12
11. Georgieva A, Papageorghiou A T, Payne S J, Moulden M and Redman C W 2014 Phase-rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth BJOG 121 889-94
12. Goldberger A L, Amaral L A, Glass L, Hausdorff J M, Ivanov P C, Mark R G, Mietus J E, Moody G B, Peng C K and Stanley H E 2000 PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals Circulation 101 E215-20
13. Goncalves H, Costa A, Ayres-De-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Rocha A P and Bernardes J 2013 Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 51 665-76
14. Goncalves H, Rocha A P, Ayres-De-Campos D and Bernardes J 2006 Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: the effect on linear and nonlinear parameters Physiol. Meas. 27 307-19
15. Hastie T and Efron B 2013 Lars: Least Angle Regression, Lasso and Forward Stagewise R package version 1.2 edn
16. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology 1996 Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use Circulation 93 1043-65
17. Helgason H, Abry P, Goncalves P, Gharib C, Gaucherand P and Doret M 2011 Adaptive multiscale complexity analysis of fetal heart rate IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 2186-93
18. Warrick P A, Hamilton E F, Precup D and Kearney R E 2010 Classification of normal and hypoxic fetuses from systems modeling of intrapartum cardiotocography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57 771-9