Noninvasive techniques: Embryo selection by time-lapse imaging

A Practical Guide to Selecting Gametes and Embryos

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 177-189

  Campbell, Alison ^a  

^a CARE Fertility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929627318     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, et al. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 532-541.
2. Pribenszky C, Matyas S, Kovacs P, et al. Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by timelapse monitoring. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21: 533-536.
3. Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, et al. Elective single embryo transfer guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum Fertil 2008; 11: 131-146.
4. Fisch J, Rodriguez H, Ross R, et al. The graduated embryo score predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1970-1975.
5. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1270-1283.
6. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22: 632-646.
7. Van Royen E, Magelschots K, Vercruyssen M, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18(5): 1062-1069.
8. Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28(10): 1115-1121.
9. Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, et al. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(10): 2658-2671.
10. Munne S, Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 842-855.
11. Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, et al. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in vitro. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2634-2643.
12. Chavez SL, Loewke KE, Han J, et al. Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the fourcell stage. Nat Commun 2012; 3: 1251.
13. Montgomery S, Duffy S, Bowman N, et al. Does the duration of compaction differ in fragmented cleavage stage embryos that ultimately become euploid or aneuploidy blastocysts? Is this reflected in the timing of blastulation? ESHRE, London. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(Suppl 1): i1-i4.
14. Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, et al. Embryo Incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: A retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1481-1489.
15. Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, et al. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27: 140-146.
16. Herrero J, Alberto T, Ramsing NB, et al. Linking successful implantation with the exact timing of cell division events obtained by time-lapse system in the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril 2010; 94(4): S149.
17. Cruz M, Perez-Cano I, Gadea B, et al. Time-lapse video analysis provides a correlation between early embryo division kinetics and subsequent blastocyst formation and quality. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: P-115.
18. Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: A timelapse study. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1458-1463.
19. Best L, Campbell A, Duffy S, et al. Session 57: Does one model fit all? Testing a published embryo selection algorithm on independent time-lapse data. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: i87-i90.
20. Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, et al. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 26: 477-485.
21. Liebenthron J, Montag M, Koster M, et al. Influence of age and AMH on early embryo development realised by time-lapse imaging. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: P-135.
22. Bellver J, Mifsud A, Grau N, et al. Similar morphokinetic patterns in embryos derived from obese and normoweight infertile women: A time-lapse study. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 794-800.
23. Ciray HN, Aksoy T, Goktas C, et al. Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media-a sibling oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 891-900.
24. Basile N, Morbeck D, García-Velasco J, et al. Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: A time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 634-641.