Performance of Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Cup in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Randomized Trial with Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1008-1013

  Wegrzyn, Julien ^a   Kaufman, Kenton R ^a   Hanssen, Arlen D ^a   Lewallen, David G ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Aseptic loosening; Cementless fixation; Osseointegration; Porous tantalum monoblock cup; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; OSTEOLYSIS; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SURVIVOR; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AGED; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TANTALUM; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84929595386     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Beck R.T., Illingworth K.D., Saleh K.J. Review of periprosthetic osteolysis in total joint arthroplasty: an emphasis on host factors and future direction. J Orthop Res 2012, 30:541.
2. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(1):128.
3. Howard J.L., Kremers H.M., Loechler Y.A., et al. Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(17):1597.
4. Huk O.L., Bansal M., Betts F., et al. Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg 1994, 76(4):568.
5. Sculco T.P. The acetabular component: an elliptical monoblock alternative. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17(4):118.
6. Bobyn J.D., Poggie J.J., Krygier J.J., et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86A(Suppl. 2):123.
7. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G., Hacking S., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg 1999, 81B:907.
8. Bobyn J.D., Toh K.K., Hacking S.A., et al. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14(3):347.
9. Poggie R.A., Brown T.D., Pedersen D.R. Finite elements analysis of peri-acetabular stress of cemented, metal-backed, and porous tantalum backed acetabular components. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1999, 24:747.
10. Komarasamy B., Vadivelu R., Bruce A., et al. Clinical and radiological outcome following total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cup. Acta Orthop Belg 2006, 72(3):320.
11. Kostakos A.T., Macheras G.A., Frangakis C.E., et al. Migration of the trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cup system. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(1):35.
12. Macheras G., Kateros K., Kostakos A., et al. Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(5):705.
13. Macheras G.A., Papagelopoulos P.J., Kateros K., et al. Radiological evaluation of the metal-bone interface of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg 2006, 88-B(3):304.
14. Malizos K.N., Bargiotas K., Papatheodorou L., et al. Survivorship of monoblock trabecular metal cups in primary THA: midterm results. Clin Orthop 2008, 466(1):159.
15. Mulier M., Rys B., Moke L. Hedrocel trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cups: mid-term results. Acta Orthop Belg 2006, 72(3):326.
16. Noiseux N.O., Long W.J., Mabry T.M., et al. Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components: early follow-up and failures in 613 primary total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(3):617.
17. Xenakis T.A., Macheras G.A., Stafilas K.S., et al. Multicentre use of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. Int Orthop 2009, 33(4):911.
18. Hanzlik J.A., Day J.S. Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(6):922.
19. Mayman D.J., Anderson J.A., Su E.P., et al. Wear data and clinical results for a compression molded monoblock elliptical acetabular component: 5- to 9-year data. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl. 2):130.
20. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of results evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 1969, 51(4):737.
21. Gruen T.A., Poggie R.A., Lewallen D.G., et al. Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(3):369.
22. Schmalzried T.P., Harris W.H. The harris-galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg 1992, 74(8):1130.
23. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976, 121:20.
24. Engh C.A., Bobyn J.D., Glassman A.H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 1987, 69(1):45.
25. Massin P., Schmidt L., Engh C.A. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplasty 1989, 4(3):245.
26. Nunn D., Freeman M.A., Hill P.F., et al. The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1989, 71(4):629.
27. Beaule P.E., Ebramzadeh E., Le Duff M.J., et al. Cementing a liner into a stable cementless acetabular shell: the double-socket technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:929.
28. Macheras G.A., Kateros K., Koutsostathis S.D., et al. The trabecular metal monoblock acetabular component in patients with high congenital hip dislocation: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg 2010, 92(5):624.
29. Meneghini R.M., Ford K.S., McCollough C.H., et al. Bone remodeling around porous metal cementless acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(5):741.
30. Moen T.C., Ghate R., Salaz N., et al. A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10years. Clin Orthop 2011, 469(2):382.
31. Kitamura N., Leung S.B., Engh C.A. Characteristics of pelvic osteolysis on computed tomography after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2005, 441:291.
32. Leung S., Naudie D., Kitamura N., et al. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(3):592.
33. Levi A.D.O., Choi W.G., Keller P.J., et al. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine. Spine 1998, 23(11):1245.
34. Martell J.M., Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1997, 79(11):1635.
35. Martell J.M., Berkson E., Berger R., et al. Comparison of two and three-dimensional computerized polyethylene wear analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85-A(6):1111.
36. Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011, 9:672.