Prospective assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio to assess coronary stenosis relevance: Results of ADVISE II international, multicenter study (ADenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation II)

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 824-833

  Escaned, Javier ^a,b   Echavarría Pinto, Mauro ^a,c   Garcia Garcia, Hector M ^c   Van De Hoef, Tim P ^d   De Vries, Ton ^e   Kaul, Prashant ^f   Raveendran, Ganesh ^g   Altman, John D ^h   Kurz, Howard I ⁱ   Brechtken, Johannes ^j   Tulli, Mark ^k   Von Birgelen, Clemens ^l   Schneider, Joel E ^m   Khashaba, Ahmed A ⁿ   Jeremias, Allen ^o   Baucum, Jim ^p   Moreno, Raul ^q   Meuwissen, Martijn ^r   Mishkel, Gregory ^s   Van Geuns, Robert Jan ^c   Levite, Howard ^t   Lopez Palop, Ramon ^u   Mayhew, Marc ^v   Serruys, Patrick W ^c   Samady, Habib ^w   Piek, Jan J ^d   Lerman, Amir ^x   more..

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e CARDIALYSIS   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^h St Anthony's Heart and Vascular Center and Colorado Heart and Vascular PC   (United States)

ⁱ WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j REGIONS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k North Florida Research Institute   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^m Wake Heart and Vascular   (United States)

ⁿ AIN SHAMS UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^o STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^p Greenville Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^q HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^r AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^s ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^t AtlantiCare   (United States)

^u HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE SAN JUAN   (Spain)

^v Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center   (United States)

^w EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^x Mayo Clinic   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

adenosine; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; instantaneous wave free ratio; physiology; vasodilation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORE LABORATORY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; INSTANTANEOUS WAVE FREE RATIO; INTRACORONARY PRESSURE GUIDE WIRE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HYPEREMIA; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADENOSINE; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADENOSINE; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84929573959     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S. Sen, J. Escaned, and I.S. Malik Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study J Am Coll Cardiol 59 2012 1392 1402
2. R. Petraco, J. Escaned, and S. Sen Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry EuroIntervention 9 2013 91 101
3. R. Petraco, J.J. Park, and S. Sen Hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy: implications for enhancing universal adoption of physiology-guided coronary revascularisation EuroIntervention 8 2013 1157 1165
4. C. Berry, M. van't Veer, and N. Witt VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1421 1427
5. N.P. Johnson, R.L. Kirkeeide, and K.N. Asrress Does the instantaneous wave-free ratio approximate the fractional flow reserve? J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1428 1435
6. S. Sen, K.N. Asrress, and S. Nijjer Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study) J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1409 1420
7. J.J. Park, R. Petraco, and C.-W. Nam Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve Int J Cardiol 168 2013 4070 4075
8. A. Jeremias, A. Maehara, and P. Généreux Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE Study J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 1253 1261
9. R. Petraco, J. Escaned, D. Francis, and J.E. Davies Challenging the need for hyperaemia Eurointervention 9 2013 167 168
10. S. Sen, S. Nijjer, R. Petraco, I.S. Malik, D.P. Francis, and I. Davies Instantaneous wave-free ratio: numerically different, but diagnostically superior to FFR? Is lower always better? J Am Coll Cardiol 62 2013 566
11. N.H. Pijls, J.A. van Son, R.L. Kirkeeide, B. De Bruyne, and K.L. Gould Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Circulation 87 1993 1354 1367
12. M. Echavarria-Pinto, R. Petraco, and T. van de Hoef Fractional flow reserve and minimum Pd/Pa ratio during intravenous adenosine infusion: very similar but not always the same EuroIntervention 2014 Oct 22 [E-pub ahead of print]
13. B. de Bruyne, J. Bartunek, S.U. Sys, N.H. Pijls, G.R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve Circulation 94 1996 1842 1849
14. P.M. Bossuyt, J.B. Reitsma, D.E. Bruns Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Clin Chem 49 2003 7 18
15. J. Escaned, and M. Echavarría-Pinto Moving beyond coronary stenosis: has the time arrived to address important physiological questions not answered by fractional flow reserve alone? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7 2014 282 284
16. P.A.L. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, N.H.J. Pijls FAME Study Investigators Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 2009 213 224
17. B. De Bruyne, N.H.J. Pijls, B. Kalesan FAME 2 Trial Investigators Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease N Engl J Med 367 2012 991 1001
18. G. Montalescot, U. Sechtem, and S. Achenbach 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur Heart J 34 2013 2949 3003
19. N.H. Pijls, and P.A. Tonino The crux of maximum hyperemia: the last remaining barrier for routine use of fractional flow reserve J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 10 2011 1093 1095
20. M. Echavarría-Pinto, T.P. Van de Hoef, and H. Garcia-Garcia Diagnostic accuracy of baseline distal-to-aortic pressure ratio to assess coronary stenosis severity. A post-hoc analysis from the ADVISE II study J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 2015 834 836
21. R. Petraco, S. Sen, and S. Nijjer Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 6 2013 222 225
22. P.B. Dattilo, A. Prasad, E. Honeycutt, T.Y. Wang, and J.C. Messenger Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2337 2339
23. N. Curzen, O. Rana, and Z. Nicholas Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain? The RIPCORD Study Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7 2014 248 255
24. H. Samady, and B.D. Gogas Does flow during rest and relaxation suffice? J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1436 1439
25. W.F. Fearon, B. Bornschein, P.A. Tonino Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) Study Investigators Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease Circulation 122 2010 2545 2550