Probing scale interaction in brain dynamics through synchronization

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 369, Issue 1653, 2014, Pages

  Barardi, Alessandro ^a,b   Malagarriga, Daniel ^b,c   Sancristobal, Belén ^d   Garcia Ojalvo, Jordi ^a   Pons, Antonio J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^d CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brain synchronization; Conductance based models; Multiscale dynamics; Neural mass models

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; MAMMAL; NEUROLOGY; SYNCHRONY; TOPOLOGY;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84929504911     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0533     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Koch C, Segev I. 1998 Methods in neuronal modeling: from synapses to networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Dayan P, Abbott L. 2001 Theoretical neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Gerstner W, Kistler WM. 2002 Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brunel N, van Rossum MC. 2007 Lapicque's 1907 paper: from frogs to integrate-and-fire. Biol. Cybern. 97, 337-339.(doi:10.1007/s00422- 007-0190-0)
5. Lindner B, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Neiman A, Schimansky- Geier L. 2004 Effects of noise in excitable systems. Phys. Rep. 392, 321-424.(doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2003.10.015)
6. Izhikevich EM. 2007 Dynamical systems in neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Kopell N, Ermentrout G, Whittington M, Traub R. 2000 Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1867-1872.(doi:10.1073/pnas.97. 4.1867)
8. Fourcaud-Trocmé N, Hansel D, Van Vreeswijk C, Brunel N. 2003 How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J. Neurosci. 23, 11 628-11 640.
9. Goldbach M, Loh M, Deco G, Garcia-Ojalvo J. 2008 Neurodynamical amplification of perceptual signals via system-size resonance. Physica D 237, 316-323.(doi:10.1016/j.physd. 2007.09.004)
10. Sancristóbal B, Vicente R, Sancho JM, Garcia-Ojalvo J. 2013 Emergent bimodal firing patterns implement different encoding strategies during gamma-band oscillations. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 7, 18.(doi:10. 3389/fncom.2013.00018)
11. Jansen BH, Rit VG. 1995 Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol. Cybern. 73, 357-366.(doi:10.1007/ BF00199471)
12. David O, Friston KJ. 2003 A neural mass model for MEG/EEG. Neuroimage 20, 1743-1755.(doi:10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.015)
13. Grimbert F, Faugeras O. 2006 Bifurcation analysis of Jansen's neural mass model. Neural Comput. 18, 3052-3068.(doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18. 12.3052)
14. Spiegler A, Knösche TR, Schwab K, Haueisen J, Atay FM. 2011 Modeling brain resonance phenomena using a neural mass model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002298.(doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002298)
15. Ahissar E, Vaadia E, Ahissar M, Bergman H, Arieli A, Abeles M. 1992 Dependence of cortical plasticity on correlated activity of single neurons and on behavioral context. Science 257, 1412-1415.(doi:10.1126/science.1529342)
16. Singer W, Gray CM. 1995 Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555-586.(doi:10.1146/annurev.ne. 18.030195.003011)
17. Fries P. 2005 A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 474-480.(doi:10. 1016/j.tics.2005.08.011)
18. Sancristóbal B, Vicente R, Garcia-Ojalvo J. 2014 Role of frequency mismatch in neuronal communication through coherence. J. Comput. Neurosci.(doi:10. 1007/s10827-014-0495-7)
19. Sotero RC, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Iturria-Medina Y, Carbonell F, Jimenez JC. 2007 Realistically coupled neural mass models can generate EEG rhythms Neural Comput. 19, 478-512.(doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.478)
20. Pons A, Cantero JL, Atienza M, Garcia-Ojalvo J. 2010 Relating structural and functional anomalous connectivity in the aging brain via neural mass modeling. NeuroImage 52, 848-861.(doi:10.1016/ j.neuroimage.2009.12.105)
21. Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR. 2013 Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures. Trends Neurosci. 36, 268-274.(doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.001)
22. Alivisatos AP, Chun M, Church GM, Greenspan RJ, Roukes ML, Yuste R. 2012 The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron 74, 970-974.(doi:10.1016/j. neuron.2012.06.006)
23. Faugeras O, Touboul J, Cessac B. 2009 A constructive mean-field analysis of multi population neuralnetworks with random synaptic weights and stochastic inputs. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 3, 1.(doi:10.3389/neuro.10.001.2009)
24. Rodrigues S, Chizhov AV, Marten F, Terry JR. 2010 Mappings between a macroscopic neural-mass model and a reduced conductance-based model. Biol. Cybern. 102, 361-371.(doi:10.1007/s00422- 010-0372-z)
25. Brunel N. 2000 Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8, 183-208.(doi:10. 1023/A:1008925309027)
26. Mazzoni A, Panzeri S, Logothetis NK, Brunel N. 2008 Encoding of naturalistic stimuli by local field potential spectra in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000239.(doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000239)
27. Vicente R, Gollo LL, Mirasso CR, Fischer I, Pipa G. 2008 Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17 157-17 162.(doi:10.1073/pnas.0809353105)
28. Gollo LL, Mirasso C, Villa AEP. 2010 Dynamic control for synchronization of separated cortical areas through thalamic relay. Neuroimage 52, 947-955.(doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009. 11.058)
29. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. 1998 Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393, 440-442.(doi:10.1038/30918)