General relationship of global topology, local dynamics, and directionality in large-scale brain networks

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Moon, Joon Young ^a   Lee, UnCheol ^a   Blain Moraes, Stefanie ^a   Mashour, George A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN NETWORKS; CRITICAL FEATURES; CRITICAL STEPS; DYNAMIC FLOWS; GLOBAL INTEGRATION; GLOBAL TOPOLOGY; INFORMATION FLOWS; LARGE-SCALES; LOCAL DYNAMICS; SPECIALISATION;

NETWORK TOPOLOGY;

ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ANESTHESIOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN NETWORK; BRAIN REGION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENTROPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KERNEL METHOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; OSCILLATOR; SYMBOLIC TRANSFER ENTROPY; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BRAIN; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929485234     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004225     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Friston KJ, Modalities, modes and models in functional neuroimaging. Science. 2009;326:399–403. doi: 10.1126/science.1174521 19833961
2. Sporns O, The human connectome: origins and challenges. NeuroImage. 2013;80: 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023 23528922
3. Stam CJ, Reijneveld JC, Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2007;1: 3. 17908336
4. Bullmore E, Sporns O, Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10: 186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575 19190637
5. Bullmore E, Sporns O, The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13: 336–349. doi: 10.1038/nrn3214 22498897
6. Rabinovich MI, Varona P, Selverston AI, Abarbanel HDI, Dynamical principles in neuroscience. Rev Mod Phys. 2006;78: 1213.
7. Rabinovich MI, Afraimovich VS, Bick C, Varona P, Information flow dynamics in the brain. Phys Life Rev. 2012;9: 51–73. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.11.002 22119154
8. Lv P, Guo L, Hu X, Jin C, Han J, Li L, et al. Modeling dynamic functional information flows on large-scale brain networks. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Intery. 2013;16: 698–705. 24579202
9. Akam T, Kullmann DM, Oscillatory multiplexing of population codes for selective communication in the mammalian brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15: 111–122. doi: 10.1038/nrn3668 24434912
10. Alstott J, Breakspear M, Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Sporns O, Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comp Biol. 2009;5: e1000408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000408 19521503
11. Rubinov M, Sporns O, van Leeuwen C, Breakspear M, Symbiotic relationship between brain structure and dynamics. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10: 55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-55 19486538
12. Honey CJ, Sporns O, Dynamic consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008;29: 802–809. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20579 18438885
13. Honey CJ, Kötter R, Breakspear M, Sporns O, Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104: 10240–10245. 17548818
14. Gilbert CD, Sigman M, Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron. 2007;54: 677–696. 17553419
15. Roland PE, Hilgetag CC, Deco G, Cortico-cortical communication dynamics. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8: 19. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00019 24847217
16. Mišić B, Vakorin VA, Paus T, Mcintosh AR, Functional embedding predicts the variability of neural activity. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011;5: 90. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00090 22164135
17. Vakorin VA, Mišić B, Krakovska O, McIntosh AR, Empirical and theoretical aspects of generation and transfer of information in a neuromagnetic source network. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011;5: 96. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00096 22131968
18. Tewarie P, Hillebrand A, van Dellen E, Schoonheim MM, Barkhof F, Polman CH, et al. Structural degree predicts functional network connectivity: a multimodal resting-state fMRI and MEG study. NeuroImage. 2014;97: 296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.038 24769185
19. Stam CJ, van Straaten EC, Go with the flow: use of a directed phase lag index (dPLI) to characterize patterns of phase relations in a large-scale model of brain dynamics. NeuroImage. 2012;62: 1415–1428. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.050 22634858
20. de Haan W, Mott K, van Straaten EC, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Activity dependent degeneration explains hub vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease. PLOS Comp Biol. 2012;8: e1002582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002582 22915996
21. Marinazzo D, Wu G, Pellicoro M, Angelini L, Stramaglia S, Information flow in networks and the law of diminishing marginal returns: evidence from modeling and human electroencephalographic recordings. PloS One. 2012;7: e45026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045026 23028745
22. Hassard BD, Kazarinoff ND, Wan YH, Theory and Applications of Hopf Bifurcation. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
23. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1983.
24. Strogatz SH, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. 1st ed. Cambridge (MA): Westview Press; 1994.
25. Hoppensteadt FC, Izhikevich EM, Weakly Connected Neural Networks. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
26. Rinzel J, Ermentrout GB, Koch C, Segev I, Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Synapses to Networks. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1998
27. Sherman A, Rinzel J, Rhythmogenic effects of weak electrotonic coupling in neuronal models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89: 2471–2474. 1549611
28. Petrov V, Gaspar V, Masere J, Showalter K, Controlling chaos in the Belousov—Zhabotinsky reaction. Nature. 1993;361: 240–243.
29. Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C, Phase dynamics for weakly coupled Hodgkin-Huxley neurons. Europhys Lett. 1993;23: 367–372.
30. Wilhelm T, Heinrich R, Smallest chemical reaction system with Hopf bifurcation. J Math Chem. 1995;17: 1–14.
31. Fussmann GF, Ellner SP, Shertzer KW, Hairston GN, Jr.Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator–prey system. Science. 2000;290: 1358–1360. 11082063
32. Kirk PDW, Toni T, Stumpf MPH, Parameter inference for biochemical systems that undergo a Hopf bifurcation. Biophys J. 2008;95: 540–549. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.126086 18456830
33. Izhikevich EM, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: the Geometry of Excitability and Bursting. 1st ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2007.
34. Wilson HR, Cowan JD, Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys J. 1972;12: 1–24. 4332108
35. Steyn-Ross DA, Steyn-Ross M, Freeman W, Modeling Phase Transitions in the Brain.1st ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
36. Daffertshofer A, van Wijk CM, On the influence of amplitude on the connectivity between phases. Front Neuroinform. 2011;5: 6. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00006 21811452
37. Albert R, Barabási A-L, Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74: 47–97.
38. Newman MEJ, The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003;45: 167–256.
39. Granger CWJ, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37: 424–438.
40. Seth AK, A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2010;186: 262–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.020 19961876
41. Staniek M, Lehnertz K, Symbolic Transfer Entropy. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100: 158101. 18518155
42. Mormanna F, Lehnertz K, David P, Elger CE, Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients. Physica D: Nonlin Phenom. 2000;144: 358–369.
43. Ko T-W, Ermentrout GB, Partially locked states in coupled oscillators due to inhomogeneous coupling. Phys Rev E. 2008;78: 016203. 18764031
44. Acebron J, Bonilla L, Pérez Vincente C, Ritort F, Spegler R, The Kurammoto model: a simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev Mod Phys. 2005;77: 137–185.
45. Breakspear M, Heitmann S, Daffertshofer A, Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the Kuramoto model. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4: 190. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00190 21151358
46. Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey CJ, Wedeen VJ, et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 2008;6: e159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159 18597554
47. Gong G, He Y, Concha L, Lebel C, Gross DW, Evans AC, et al. Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19: 524–536. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn102 18567609
48. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O, Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 15775–15786. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011 22049421
49. Lee H, Mashour GA, Noh G-J, Kim S, Lee U, Reconfiguration of Network Hub Structure after Propofol-induced Unconsciousness. Anesthesiology. 2013;119: 1347–1359. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a8ec8c 24013572
50. Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A, Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multichannel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28: 1178–1193. 17266107
51. Lee U, Kim S, Noh G-J, Choi B-M, Hwang E, Mashour GA, The directionality and functional organization of frontoparietal connectivity during consciousness and anesthesia in humans. Consciousn Cogn. 2009;18: 1069–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.004 19443244
52. Lee U, Ku S, Noh G-J, Baek S, Choi B-M, Mashour GA, Disruption of frontal–parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane. Anesthesiology. 2013;118: 1264–1275. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829103f5 23695090
53. Nicosia V, Valencia M, Chavez M, Díaz-Guilera A, Latora V, Remote synchronization reveals network symmetries and functional modules. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110: 174102. 23679731
54. Angelini L, Pellicoro M, Stramaglia S, Granger causality for circular variables. Phys Lett A. 2009;373: 2467–2470.
55. Alexander-Bloch AF, Vértes PE, Stidd R, Lalonde F, Classen L, Rapoport J, et al. The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23: 127–138. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr388 22275481
56. Kramer MA, Cash SS, Epilepsy as a disorder of cortical network organization. Neuroscientist. 2012;18: 360–372. doi: 10.1177/1073858411422754 22235060
57. Werner AG, Jirsa VK, Metastability, criticality and phase transitions in brain and its models. Biosystems. 2007;90: 496–508. 17316974
58. Perin R, Berger TK, Markman HA, Synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;180: 5419–5424.
59. Hlinka J, Coombes S, Using computational models to relate structural and functional brain connectivity. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;36: 2137–45.
60. Caminiti R, Ghaziri H, Galuske R, Hof PR, Innocenti GM, Evolution amplified processing with temporally dispersed slow neuronal connectivity in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106: 19551–19556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907655106 19875694
61. Caminiti R, Carducci F, Piervincenzi C, Battaglia-Mayer A, Confalone G, Visco-Comandini F, et al. Diameter, length, speed, and conduction delay of callosal axons in macaque monkeys and humans: comparing data from histology and magnetic resonance imaging diffusion tractography. J Neurosci. 2013;33: 14501–14511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0761-13.2013 24005301
62. Catanzaro M, Boguñá M, Pastor-Satorras R, Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. Phys Rev E. 2005;71: 027103. 15783457
63. Blain-Moraes S, Tarnal V, Vanini G, Alexander A, Rosen D, Shortal B, et al. Neurophysiological correlates of sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness. Anesthesiology. 2015;122: 307–16. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000482 25296108