Social media in academia: How the Social Web is changing academic practice and becoming a new source for research data

IT - Information Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 203-206

  Weller, Katrin ^a   Strohmaier, Markus ^a  

^a GESIS LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929470015     PISSN: 16112776     EISSN: 21967032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/itit-2014-9002     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Berry, D.M. (Ed.) (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. In A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431.
3. Hendler, J., Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T., & Weitzner, D. (2008). Web science. Communications of the ACM, 51(7), 60. doi:10.1145/1364782.1364798
4. Hey, T. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, 308(5723), 817-821.
5. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.-L., Brewer, D.,.. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721-723.
6. Mahrt, M., Weller, K., & Peters, I. (2014). Twitter in scholarly communication. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and Society (pp. 399-410). New York: Peter Lang.
7. Nentwich, M., & König, R. (2012). Cyberscience 2.0: Research in the age of digital social networks. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.
8. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
9. Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. Retrieved from arXiv:1203.4745v1.
10. Pscheida, D., Albrecht, S., Herbst, S., Minet, C., & Köhler, T. (2014). Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft: Erste Ergebnisse des Science 2.0- Survey 2013 des Leibniz-Forschungsverbunds "Science 2.0". Datenreport 2013. Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden, Medienzentrum.
11. Tokar, A., Beurskens, M., Keuneke, S., Mahrt, M., Peters, I., Puschmann, C., van Treeck, T., & Weller, K. (Eds.) (2012). Science and the Internet. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
12. Waldrop, M. M. (2008). Science 2.0. Scientific American 298(5), 68-73.