Ten simple rules for effective online outreach

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1-8

  Bik, Holly M ^a,b   Dove, Alistair D M ^c   Goldstein, Miriam C ^d   Helm, Rebecca R ^e   MacPherson, Rick ^f   Martini, Kim ^g,h   Warneke, Alexandria ⁱ   McClain, Craig ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c Georgia Aquarium Research Center   (United States)

^d California Sea Grant   (United States)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Pelagia Consulting   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^h NOAA PACIFIC MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁱ SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIMPLE++;

DEEP SEA; EDITORIAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE; MARINE BIOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL MEDIA; WEB BROWSER; ALGORITHM; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE;

ALGORITHMS; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84929455786     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003906     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Bik HM, Goldstein MC (2013) An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoS Biol 11(4): e1001535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535 23630451
2. Bailyn E (2012) Outsmarting Social Media: Profiting in the Age of Friendship Marketing. Indiana: Que Publishing. 192 p.
3. Dickson D (27 June 2005) The case for a ‘deficit model’ of science communication. SciDevNet. Available: http://www.scidev.net/global/communication/editorials/the-case-for-a-deficit-model-of-science-communic.html. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.
4. Blum D, Knudson M, Henig RM (2006) A field guide for science writers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 336 p.
5. Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS (2011) Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus Horiz 54(3): 241–251.
6. Darling E, Shiffman D, Cȏté I, Drew J (2013) The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 6: 2–43.
7. Eysenbach G, (2011) Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res 13(4): e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2012 22173204
8. Priem J, Piwowar HA, Hemminger BM (2012) Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. Preprint. Available: arXiv:1203.4745. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.