Comparative analyses of hydraulic characteristics between the different structures of two anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs)

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 82, Issue , 2015, Pages 138-144

  Li, Sheng nan ^a   Nan, Jun ^a   Li, Hao yu ^b   Yao, Meng ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

COD removal; Dead space; Mixing pattern; Opposite folded plate reactor; Plane folded plate reactor

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MIXING; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC BAFFLED REACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND REMOVALS; COD REMOVAL; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DEAD SPACE; FOLDED PLATES; HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTIC; HYDRAULIC RESIDENCE TIME;

RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTION;

BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RESIDENCE TIME; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

EID: 84929453368     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.095     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson G.K., Campos C.M.M., Chernicharo C.A.L., Smith L.C. Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of lithium when used as a tracer for anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 1991, 25:755-760.
2. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association 1998, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C. 20th ed.
3. Asraf-Snir M., Gitis V. Tracer studies with fluorescent-dyed microorganisms-a new method for determination of residence time in chlorination reactors. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166:579-585.
4. Barber W.P., Stuckey D.C. Start-up strategies for anaerobic baffled reactors treating a synthetic sucrose feed. Proceeding of 8th International Conference on Anaerobic Digestion 1997, 2.
5. Barber W.P., Stuckey D.C. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res. 1999, 33:1559-1578.
6. Fogler H.S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering 2006, Pearson Education, England. 4th ed.
7. Grobicki A., Stuckey D.C. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Res. 1992, 26:371-378.
8. Ji J.Y., Zheng K., Xing Y.J., Zheng P. Hydraulic characteristics and their effects on working performance of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 116:47-52.
9. Kadlec R.H. The inadequacy of first-order treatment wetland models. Ecol. Eng. 2000, 15:105-119.
10. Langenhoff A.A.M., Intrachandra N., Stuckey D.C. Treatment of dilute soluble and colloidal wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: influence of hydraulic retention time. Water Res. 2000, 34:1307-1317.
11. Levenspiel O. Chemical Reaction Engineering 1972, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
12. Levenspiel O. Chemical Reaction Engineering 1999, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
13. McCarty P.L. One hundred years of anaerobic treatment. Anaerobic Digestion 1981: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion Held in Travemhunde 1982.
14. Mitsch W.J. What is ecological engineering. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 45:5-12.
15. Persson J., Somes N.L.G., Wong T.H.F. Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40:291-300.
16. Qi W.K., Hojo T., Li Y.Y. Hydraulic characteristics simulation of an innovative self-agitation anaerobic baffled reactor (SA-ABR). Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136:94-101.
17. Sarathai Y., Koottatep T., Morel A. Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22:1319-1326.
18. Tomlinson E.J., Chambers B. Effect of longitudinal mixing on the settleability of activated sludge. WRC Technical Report 1979, WRC.
19. Wang J., Huang Y., Zhao X. Performance and characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:205-208.
20. Young H.W., Young J.C. Hydraulic characteristics of upflow anaerobic filters. J. Environ. Eng. 1988, 114:621-638.