Identification of genomic regions involved in tolerance to drought stress and drought stress induced leaf senescence in juvenile barley

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wehner, Gwendolin G ^a,b   Balko, Christiane C ^a,b   Enders, Matthias M ^a   Humbeck, Klaus K ^b,c   Ordon, Frank F ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^b Interdisciplinary Center for Crop Plant Research (IZN)   (Germany)

^c MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Barley; Drought stress; GWAS; Leaf senescence; QTL

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

GENETIC MARKER;

ADAPTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; DROUGHT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HORDEUM; INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT GENOME; PLANT LEAF; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DROUGHTS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HORDEUM; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84929429527     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0524-3     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Harlan JR, Zohary D. Distribution of wild wheats and barley. Science. 1966;153(3740):1074-80.
2. FAOSTAT. http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E (2014). Accessed 07 Jan 2015.
3. Thompson G, Woodward F. Some influences of CO2 enrichment, nitrogen nutrition and competition on grain yield and quality in spring wheat and barley. J Exp Bot. 1994;45(7):937-42.
4. Jamieson P, Martin R, Francis G. Drought influences on grain yield of barley, wheat, and maize. New Zeal J Crop Hort. 1995;23(1):55-66.
5. Rollins J, Habte E, Templer S, Colby T, Schmidt J, von Korff M. Leaf proteome alterations in the context of physiological and morphological responses to drought and heat stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Exp Bot. 2013;64(11):3201-12.
6. Long NV, Dolstra O, Malosetti M, Kilian B, Graner A, Visser RG, et al. Association mapping of salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 2013;126(9):2335-51.
7. El Hafid R, Smith DH, Karrou M, Samir K. Physiological responses of spring durum wheat cultivars to early-season drought in a Mediterranean environment. Ann Bot-London. 1998;81(2):363-70.
8. Coumou D, Robinson A. Historic and future increase in the global land area affected by monthly heat extremes. Environ Res Let. 2013;8(3):034018.
9. Ahuja I, de Vos RC, Bones AM, Hall RD. Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(12):664-74.
10. Tyagi K, Park MR, Lee HJ, Lee CA, Rehman S, Steffenson B, et al. Fertile crescent region as source of drought tolerance at early stage of plant growth of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. spontaneum). Pakistan J Bot. 2011;43(1):475-86.
11. Beck EH, Fettig S, Knake C, Hartig K, Bhattarai T. Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress. J Biosci. 2007;32(3):501-10.
12. Anjum SA, Xie X-y, Wang L-c, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African J Agri Res. 2011;6(9):2026-32.
13. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221-7.
14. Lim PO, Kim HJ, Nam HG. Leaf senescence. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:115-36.
15. Lee HK, Cho SK, Son O, Xu Z, Hwang I, Kim WT. Drought stress-induced Rma1H1, a RING membrane-anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase homolog, regulates aquaporin levels via ubiquitination in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell. 2009;21(2):622-41.
16. Qin F, Sakuma Y, Tran L-SP, Maruyama K, Kidokoro S, Fujita Y, et al. Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell. 2008;20(6):1693-707.
17. Xu D, Duan X, Wang B, Hong B, Ho T-HD WR. Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol. 1996;110(1):249-57.
18. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 2003;218(1):1-14.
19. Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F-W, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, et al. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res. 2008;105(1-2):1-14.
20. Zhu J-K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73.
21. Tunnacliffe A, Wise MJ. The continuing conundrum of the LEA proteins. Naturwissenschaften. 2007;94(10):791-812.
22. Campbell SA, Close TJ. Dehydrins: genes, proteins, and associations with phenotypic traits. New Phytol. 1997;137(1):61-74.
23. Barnabas B, Jager K, Feher A. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell Environ. 2008;31(1):11-38.
24. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sust Dev. 2009;29(1):185-212.
25. Jamieson PD, Martin RJ, Francis GS, Wilson DR. Drought effects on biomass production and radiation-use efficiency in barley. Field Crop Res. 1995;43:77-86.
26. Gonzales A, Martín I, Ayerbe L. Barley yield in water-stress conditions. The influence of precocity, osmotic adjustment and stomatal conductance. Field Crop Res. 1999;62:23-34.
27. Li R-h, Guo P-g, Michael B, Stefania G, Salvatore C. Evaluation of Chlorophyll Content and Fluorescence Parameters as Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Barley. Agr Sci China. 2006;5(10):751-7.
28. Sayed MA, Schumann H, Pillen K, Naz AA, Leon J. AB-QTL analysis reveals new alleles associated to proline accumulation and leaf wilting under drought stress conditions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genet. 2012;13(61):1471-2156.
29. Teulat B, Borries C, This D. New QTLs identified for plant water status, water-soluble carbohydrate and osmotic adjustment in a barley population grown in a growth-chamber under two water regimes. TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 2001;103(1):161-70.
30. Blum A. Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci. 1989;29:230-3.
31. Verma V, Foulkes MJ, Worland AJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Caligari PDS, Snape JW. Mapping quantitative trait loci for flag leaf senescence as a yield determinant in winter wheat under optimal and drought-stressed environments. Euphytica. 2004;135:255-63.
32. Munne-Bosch S, Alegre L. Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31:203-16.
33. Miersch I, Heise J, Zelmer I, Humbeck K. Differential degradation of the photosynthetic apparatus during leaf senescence in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Biol. 2000;2:618-23.
34. Hörtensteiner S. Chlorophyll drgradation during senescence. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:55-77.
35. Breeze E, Harrison E, McHattie S, Hughes L, Hickman R, Hill C, et al. High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):873-94.
36. Rae A, Ferris R, Tallis M, Taylor G. Elucidating genomic regions determining enhanced leaf growth and delayed senescence in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell Environ. 2006;29(9):1730-41.
37. Robson PR, Farrar K, Gay AP, Jensen EF, Clifton-Brown JC, Donnison IS. Variation in canopy duration in the perennial biofuel crop Miscanthus reveals complex associations with yield. Journal of experimental botany. 2013;64(8):1-11.
38. Rodriguez IR, Miller GL. Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Determine the Chlorophyll Concentration, Nitrogen Concentration, and Visual Quality of St. Augustinegrass. Hort Sci. 2000;34(4):751-4.
39. Buchanan-Wollaston V, Earl HJ, Harrison E, Mathas E, Navabpour S, Page T, et al. The molecular analysis of leaf senescence - a genomics approach. Plant Biotechnol J. 2003;1:3-22.
40. Fischer AM. The Complex Regulation of Senescence. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2012;31(2):124-47.
41. Buchanan-Wollaston V, Page T, Harrison E, Breeze E, Lim PO, Nam HG, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling pathways between developmental and dark/starvation-induced senescence in Arabidopsis. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2005;42(4):567-85.
42. Emebiri LC. QTL dissection of the loss of green colour during post-anthesis grain maturation in two-rowed barley. TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 2013;126(7):1873-84.
43. Talukder A, McDonald GK, Gill GS. Effect of short-term heat stress prior to flowering and early grain set on the grain yield of wheat. Field Crop Res. 2014;160:54-63.
44. Inoue T, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y, An P, Eneji A. Effect of drought on ear and flag leaf photosynthesis of two wheat cultivars differing in drought resistance. Photosynthetica. 2004;42(2):559-65.
45. Borrell AK, Hammer GL, Henzell RG. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Sci. 2000;40(4):1037-48.
46. Ashraf M. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(1):169-83.
47. Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J. Status and Prospects of Association Mapping in Plants. Plant Genome J. 2008;1(1):5.
48. Miles CM, Wayne M. Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) Analysis. Nature Education. 2008;1(1):1-6.
49. Varshney RK, Paulo MJ, Grando S, van Eeuwijk FA, Keizer LCP, Guo P, et al. Genome wide association analyses for drought tolerance related traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Field Crop Res. 2012;126:171-80.
50. Li W-T, Liu C, Liu Y-X, Pu Z-E, Dai S-F, Wang J-R, et al. Meta-analysis of QTL associated with tolerance to abiotic stresses in barley. Euphytica. 2013;189(1):31-49.
51. Honsdorf N, March TJ, Hecht A, Eglinton J, Pillen K. Evaluation of juvenile drought stress tolerance and genotyping by sequencing with wild barley introgression lines. Mol Breeding. 2014;34(3):1475-95.
52. Teulat B, This D, Khairallah M, Borries C, Ragot C, Sourdille P, et al. Several QTLs involved in osmotic-adjustment trait variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 1998;96(5):688-98.
53. Guo P, Baum M, Varshney RK, Graner A, Grando S, Ceccarelli S. QTLs for chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in barley under post-flowering drought. Euphytica. 2008;163(2):203-14.
54. Nevo E, Chen G. Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant, Cell Environ. 2010;33(4):670-85.
55. McCouch S. Diversifying selection in plant breeding. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(10):e347.
56. Rode J, Ahlemeyer J, Friedt W, Ordon F. Identification of marker-trait associations in the German winter barley breeding gene pool (Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol Breeding. 2012;30(2):831-43.
57. Igartua E, Gracia MP, Lasa JM, Medina B, Molina-Cano JL, Montoya JL, et al. The Spanish barley core collection. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 1998;45:475-81.
58. Paech K, Simonis W. Pflanzenphysiologische Praktika Band I Übungen zur Stoffwechselphysiologie der Pflanzen. Berlin Göttingen Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1952.
59. Zaharieva M, Gaulin E, Havaux M, Acevedo E, Monneveux P. Drought and Heat Responses in the Wild Wheat Relative Roth. Crop Sci. 2001;41(4):1321-9.
60. Xu W, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT. Stay green trait in grain sorghum: relationship between visual rating and leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Breed. 2000;119:365-7.
61. Cartelat A, Cerovic ZG, Goulas Y, Meyer S, Lelarge C, Prioul JL, et al. Optically assessed contents of leaf polyphenolics and chlorophyll as indicators of nitrogen deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crop Res. 2005;91(1):35-49.
62. Krall JP, Edwards GE. RelaticHiship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Pysiol Plantarum. 1992;86:180-7.
63. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-7.
64. Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extractes by anthrone. Biochem J. 1954;57:508-14.
65. Grubbs FE. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics. 1969;11(1):1-21.
66. Fischer RA, Maurer R. Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat Cultivars. I Grain Yield Responses. Austral J Agr Res. 1978;29:897-912.
67. SAS. Enterprise Guide 4.3 of SAS System for Microsoft Windows. In Administering SAS Enterprise Guide 4.3. Cary NC, editor. USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008.
68. Comadran J, Kilian B, Russell J, Ramsay L, Stein N, Ganal M, et al. Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nature Genet. 2012;44(12):1388-92.
69. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945-59.
70. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611-20.
71. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes. 2002;2(4):618-20.
72. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glössl J, Kremer A. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Mol Ecol. 1998;7(3):317-28.
73. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633-5.
74. RCore. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. http://www.r-project.org .
75. Hill WG, Weir BS. Variances and Covariances Disequilibria of Squared Linkage in Finite Populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1988;33:54-78.
76. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403-10.
77. UniProt. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36 suppl 1:D190-D5.
78. Voorrips RE. MapChart: Software for the Graphical Presentation of Linkage Maps and QTLs. J Heredity. 2002;93(1):77-8.
79. Teulat B, Monneveux P, Wery J, Borries C, Souyris I, Charrier A, et al. Relationships between relative water content and growth parameters under water stress in barley: a QTL study. New Phytol. 1997;137:99-107.
80. Zhao J, Sun H, Dai H, Zhang G, Wu F. Difference in response to drought stress among Tibet wild barley genotypes. Euphytica. 2010;172(3):395-403.
81. Mamnouie E, Fotouhi Ghazvini R, Esfahani M, Nakhoda B. The effects of water deficit on crop yield and the physiological characteristics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. J Agr Sci Technol. 2010;8:211-9.
82. Ramírez DA, Yactayo W, Gutiérrez R, Mares V, De Mendiburu F, Posadas A, et al. Chlorophyll concentration in leaves is an indicator of potato tuber yield in water-shortage conditions. Sci Hortic -Amsterdam. 2014;168:202-9.
83. Khan MA, Ashraf M, Mujtaba S, Shirazi M, Khan M, Shereen A, et al. Evaluation of high yielding canola type Brassica genotypes/mutants for drought tolerance using physiological indices as screening tool. Pakistan J Bot. 2010;42(6):3807-16.
84. Babar M, Reynolds M, Van Ginkel M, Klatt A, Raun W, Stone M. Spectral reflectance to estimate genetic variation for in-season biomass, leaf chlorophyll, and canopy temperature in wheat. Crop Sci. 2006;46(3):1046-57.
85. Fotovat R, Valizadeh M, Toorchi M. Association between water-use efficiency components and total chlorophyll content (SPAD) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under well-watered and drought stress conditions. J Food Agr Env. 2007;5(3/4):225.
86. Fang Z, Bouwkamp JC, Solomos T. Chlorophyllase activities and chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence in non-yellowingmutant and wild type of Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Exp Bot. 1998;49(320):503-10.
87. Netto AT, Campostrini E, Oliveira JG, Bressan-Smith RE. Photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen, chlorophyll a fluorescence and SPAD-502 readings in coffee leaves. Sci Hortic -Amsterdam. 2005;104(2):199-209.
88. Silva MA, Jifon JL, Da Silva JAG, Sharma V. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2007;3(19):193-201.
89. Veselov D, Sharipova G, Veselov S, Kudoyarova G. The effects of NaCl treatment on water relations, growth, and ABA content in barley cultivars differing in drought tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008;27(4):380-6.
90. Fricke W, Peters WS. The biophysics of leaf growth in salt-stressed barley. A study at the cell level. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(1):374-88.
91. Szira F, Bálint AF, Börner A, Galiba G. Evaluation of Drought-Related Traits and Screening Methods at Different Developmental Stages in Spring Barley. J Agr Crop Sci. 2008;194(5):334-42.
92. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 1993;4(2):215-23.
93. Bandurska H. Does proline accumulated in leaves of water deficit stressed barley plants confine cell membrane injury? I. Free proline accumulation and membrane injury index in drought and osmotically stressed plants. Acta Physiol Plant. 2000;22(4):409-15.
94. Sperdouli I, Moustakas M. Interaction of proline, sugars, and anthocyanins during photosynthetic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought stress. J Plant Physiol. 2012;169(6):577-85.
95. Kuznetsov VV, Shevyakova N. Proline under stress: biological role, metabolism, and regulation. Russ J Plant Physl. 1999;46(2):274-87.
96. Kishor P, Kavi B, Sreenivasulu N. Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue? Plant, Cell Environ. 2014;37(2):300-11.
97. Kocsy G, Laurie R, Szalai G, Szilágyi V, Simon-Sarkadi L, Galiba G, et al. Genetic manipulation of proline levels affects antioxidants in soybean subjected to simultaneous drought and heat stresses. Physiol Plant. 2005;124(2):227-35.
98. Sofalian O, Behi M. Assessment of winter survival in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using molecular markers and some physiological traits. J Agr Fac Gaziosmanpasa University. 2013;30(2):45-54.
99. Al-Saady N, Khan A, Rajesh L, Esechie H. Effect of salt stress on germination, proline metabolism and chlorophyll content of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum gracium L.). Plant science: an international journal of experimental plant biology. 2012;7:176-85.
100. Keyvan S. The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. J Anim Plant Sci. 2010;8:1051-60.
101. Bajji M, Lutts S, Kinet J-M. Water deficit effects on solute contribution to osmotic adjustment as a function of leaf ageing in three durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars performing differently in arid conditions. Plant science: an international journal of experimental plant biology. 2001;160(4):669-81.
102. Basu PS, Sharma A, Sukumaran NP. Changes in net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in potato leaves induced by water stress. Photosynthetica. 1998;35(1):13-9.
103. Sanchez FJ, Manzanares M, de Andres EF LTJ, Ayerbe L. Tugor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crop Res. 1998;59:225-35.
104. Wingler A, Purdy S, MacLean JA, Pourtau N. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):391-9.
105. Rajcan I, Dwyer LM, Tollenaar M. Note on relationship between leaf soluble carbohydrate and chlorophyll concentrations in maize during leaf senescence. Field Crop Res. 1999;63(1):13-7.
106. Zebarjadi A, Kakaei M, Mostafaie A. Genetic variability of some traits in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under drought stress and non-stress conditions. Biharean Biologist. 2011;5(2):127-31.
107. Wingler A, Roitsch T. Metabolic regulation of leaf senescence: interactions of sugar signalling with biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Biol. 2008;10 Suppl 1:50-62.
108. Wang M, Jiang N, Jia T, Leach L, Cockram J, Waugh R, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic and morphologic traits in highly structured populations of barley cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;124(2):233-46.
109. Cockram J, White J, Zuluaga DL, Smith D, Comadran J, Macaulay M, et al. Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(50):21611-6.
110. von Korff M, Grando S, Del Greco A, This D, Baum M, Ceccarelli S. Quantitative trait loci associated with adaptation to Mediterranean dryland conditions in barley. TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 2008;117(5):653-69.
111. Wagner R, Aigner H, Funk C. FtsH proteases located in the plant chloroplast. Physiol Plant. 2012;145(1):203-14.
112. Liu J-X, Bennett J. Reversible and irreversible drought-induced changes in the anther proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes IR64 and Moroberekan. Mol Plant. 2011;4(1):59-69.
113. Buchanan-Wollaston V. The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(307):181-99.
114. Shi Y, Wang Z, Meng P, Tian S, Zhang X, Yang S. The glutamate carboxypeptidase AMP1 mediates abscisic acid and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013;199(1):135-50.
115. Simova-Stoilova L, Demirevska K, Petrova T, Tsenov N, Feller U. Antioxidative protection in wheat varieties under severe recoverable drought at seedling stage. Plant Soil Environ. 2008;54(12):529-36.
116. Lyzenga WJ, Stone SL. Abiotic stress tolerance mediated by protein ubiquitination. Journal of experimental botany. 2012;63(2):1-18.
117. Sobeih WY, Dodd IC, Bacon MA, Grierson D, Davies WJ. Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial root-zone drying. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(407):2353-63.
118. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Mittler R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(3):1143-51.
119. Choi D-W, Zhu B, Close T. The barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) dehydrin multigene family: sequences, allele types, chromosome assignments, and expression characteristics of 11 Dhn genes of cv Dicktoo. TAG Theoretical and applied genetics Theoretische und angewandte Genetik. 1999;98(8):1234-47.
120. Rampino P, Pataleo S, Gerardi C, Mita G, Perrotta C. Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant, Cell Environ. 2006;29(12):2143-52.
121. Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Saez A, Rubio S, Antoni R, Dupeux F, et al. Modulation of drought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A PP2Cs. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2009;60(4):575-88.
122. Schilling RK, Marschner P, Shavrukov Y, Berger B, Tester M, Roy SJ, et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H+ -pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) improves the shoot biomass of transgenic barley and increases grain yield in a saline field. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;12(3):378-86.
123. Garcia V, Bruchet H, Camescasse D, Granier F, Bouchez D, Tissier A. AtATM is essential for meiosis and the somatic response to DNA damage in plants. Plant Cell. 2003;15(1):119-32.
124. Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Minami H, Kagaya Y, Hattori T. Differential activation of the rice sucrose nonfermenting1-related protein kinase2 family by hyperosmotic stress and abscisic acid. Plant Cell. 2004;16(5):1163-77.
125. Anderberg RJ, Walker-Simmons M. Isolation of a wheat cDNA clone for an abscisic acid-inducible transcript with homology to protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(21):10183-7.
126. Chalker-Scott L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochem Photobiol. 1999;70(1):1-9.
127. Pellegrineschi A, Reynolds M, Pacheco M, Brito RM, Almeraya R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. Stress-induced expression in wheat of the Arabidopsis thaliana DREB1A gene delays water stress symptoms under greenhouse conditions. Genome/National Research Council Canada = Genome/Conseil national de recherches Canada. 2004;47(3):493-500.
128. Koyama T, Nii H, Mitsuda N, Ohta M, Kitajima S, Ohme-Takagi M, et al. A regulatory cascade involving class II ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR transcriptional repressors operates in the progression of leaf senescence. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(2):991-1005.
129. Song W-Y, Zhang Z-B, Shao H-B, Guo X-L, Cao H-X, Zhao H-B, et al. Relationship between calcium decoding elements and plant abiotic-stress resistance. Int J Biol Sci. 2008;4(2):116.