Moving towards sustainable resources: Recovery and fractionation of nutrients from dairy manure digestate using membranes

Water Research

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 80-89

  Gerardo, Michael L ^a   Aljohani, Nasser H M ^a   Oatley Radcliffe, Darren L ^a   Lovitt, Robert W ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digestate; Membrane filtration; Nutrient recovery; Process economics

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; ELECTROSTATICS; MANURES; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; NUTRIENTS; RECOVERY; SOLUTIONS;

DAIRY MANURES; DIGESTATE; FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS; FILTRATION EFFICIENCY; MEMBRANE FILTRATIONS; NUTRIENT RECOVERY; PHOSPHATE IONS; PROCESS ECONOMICS; RESOURCE RECOVERY; SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES;

FERTILIZERS;

AMMONIA; NITROGEN; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORUS; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; FERTILIZER; MANURE;

AMMONIA; AMMONIUM; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; DAIRY FARMING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FILTRATION; FRACTIONATION; MANUFACTURING; MANURE; MEMBRANE; NITROGEN; PH; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORUS; SPECIATION (CHEMISTRY); SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ALKALINITY; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; ECONOMICS; FILTRATION; FRACTIONATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROLOGY; LEACHING; MANURE; NUTRIENT; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PH; POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDIMENTATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE AREA; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THICKNESS; ZETA POTENTIAL; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BOVINE; DAIRYING; DEVICES; FEASIBILITY STUDY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECYCLING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AMMONIA; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CHEMICAL FRACTIONATION; DAIRYING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FERTILIZERS; FILTRATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MANURE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHOSPHATES; PHOSPHORUS; RECYCLING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84929429461     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Al-Rashdi B.A.M., Johnson D.J., Hilal N. Removal of heavy metal ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 315(0):2-17.
2. Ali N.a., Halim N.S.A., Jusoh A., Endut A. The formation and characterisation of an asymmetric nanofiltration membrane for ammonia-nitrogen removal: effect of shear rate. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(5):1459-1465.
3. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, Amarican Public Health Association, Washington.
4. Ariza M.J., Cañas A., Benavente J. Electrokinetic and electrochemical characterizations of porous membranes. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2001, 189(1-3):247-256.
5. Ballet G.T., Hafiane A., Dhahbi M. Influence of operating conditions on the retention of phosphate in water by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290(1-2):164-172.
6. Beardsley T.M. Peak phosphorus. BioScience 2011, 61(2):91.
7. Chapman Wilbert M., Delagah S., Pellegrino J. Variance of streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 161(1-2):247-261.
8. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, Technomic Company, Inc., Swizerland.
9. Chiu T.Y., James A.E. Electrokinetic characterisation techniques on asymmetric microfiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2007, 301(1-3):281-288.
10. Chun M.-S., Lee S.-Y., Yang S.-M. Estimation of zeta potential by electrokinetic analysis of ionic fluid flows through a divergent microchannel. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 266(1):120-126.
11. Commission, E Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 Concerning the Protection of Waters against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources 1991, 1-8.
12. Cornejo C., Wilkie A.C. Greenhouse gas emissions and biogas potential from livestock in Ecuador. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2010, 14(4):256-266.
13. Desloover J., Woldeyohannis A.A., Verstraete W., Boon N., Rabaey K. Electrochemical resource recovery from digestate to prevent ammonia toxicity during anaerobic digestion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46(21):12209-12216.
14. Fenton O., Ó hUallacháin D. Agricultural nutrient surpluses as potential input sources to grow third generation biomass (microalgae): a review. Algal Res. 2012, 1(1):49-56.
15. Gaterell M.R., Gay R., Wilson R., Gochin R.J., Lester J.N. An economic and environmental evaluation of the opportunities for substituting phosphorus recovered from wastewater treatment works in existing UK fertiliser markets. Environ. Technol. 2000, 21(9):1067-1084.
16. Gerardo M.L., Oatley-Radcliffe D.L., Lovitt R.W. Integration of membrane technology in microalgae biorefineries. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 464(0):86-99.
17. Gerardo M.L., Zacharof M.P., Lovitt R.W. Strategies for the recovery of nutrients and metals from anaerobically digested dairy farm sludge using cross-flow microfiltration. Water Res. 2013, 47(14):4833-4842.
18. Gerardo M.L., Lord A.M., Lovitt R.W. An investigation of pH mediated extraction and precipitation of phosphorus from sludge using microfiltration: processing and costs. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2015, (accepted for publication).
19. Haynes W.M. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 2011-2012 2011, Taylor & Francis.
20. Hong S.U., Malaisamy R., Bruening M.L. Separation of fluoride from other monovalent anions using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes. Langmuir 2007, 23(4):1716-1722.
21. Hong S.U., Ouyang L., Bruening M.L. Recovery of phosphate using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 327(1-2):2-5.
22. Huisman I.H., Trägårdh G., Trägårdh C., Pihlajamäki A. Determining the zeta-potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 147(2):187-194.
23. Janson J.-C. Protein Purification: Principles, High Resolution Methods, and Applications 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
24. Klavon K.H., Lansing S.A., Mulbry W., Moss A.R., Felton G. Economic analysis of small-scale agricultural digesters in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 54(0):36-45.
25. López-Muñoz M.J., Sotto A., Arsuaga J.M., Van der Bruggen B. Influence of membrane, solute and solution properties on the retention of phenolic compounds in aqueous solution by nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66(1):194-201.
26. Lovitt R., Zacharof M., Gerardo M. Nutrient recovery from sludge using filtration systems. 17th European Biosolids and Organic Resources Conference, Leeds, UK 2012.
27. Luo J., Wan Y. Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration - a critical review. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 438(0):18-28.
28. Nyström M., Kaipia L., Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 98(3):249-262.
29. Oatley D.L., Llenas L., Pérez R., Williams P.M., Martínez-Lladó X., Rovira M. Review of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes and verification of the single oriented layer approximation. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2012, 173(0):1-11.
30. Oh-Ishi M., Maeda T. Separation techniques for high-molecular-mass proteins. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 771(1):49-66.
31. Ozaki H., Sharma K., Saktaywin W. Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters. Desalination 2002, 144(1-3):287-294.
32. Pronk W., Palmquist H., Biebow M., Boller M. Nanofiltration for the separation of pharmaceuticals from nutrients in source-separated urine. Water Res. 2006, 40(7):1405-1412.
33. Rico C., Rico J.L., Tejero I., Muñoz N., Gómez B. Anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of dairy manure in pilot plant for biogas production: residual methane yield of digestate. Waste Manag. 2011, 31(9-10):2167-2173.
34. Semião A.J.C., Schäfer A.I. Estrogenic micropollutant adsorption dynamics onto nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 381(1-2):132-141.
35. Smith V.H., Schindler D.W. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24(4):201-207.
36. Smith V.H., Tilman G.D., Nekola J.C. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 1999, 100(1-3):179-196.
37. Strathmann H. Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology 2011, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
38. Szoke S., Patzay G., Weiser L. Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values. Desalination 2003, 151(2):123-129.
39. Szymczyk A., Pierre A., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Characterisation of the electrokinetic properties of plane inorganic membranes using streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 134(1):59-66.
40. Tonini D., Martinez-Sanchez V., Astrup T.F. Material resources, energy, and nutrient recovery from waste: are waste refineries the solution for the future?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47(15):8962-8969.
41. van Straaten P. Encyclopedia of Soil Science 2008, 241-247. Springer, Netherlands. W. Chesworth (Ed.).
42. Vanthoor-Koopmans M., Wijffels R.H., Barbosa M.J., Eppink M.H.M. Biorefinery of microalgae for food and fuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135(0):142-149.
43. Wang D.-X., Su M., Yu Z.-Y., Wang X.-L., Ando M., Shintani T. Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions. Desalination 2005, 175(2):219-225.
44. Wood S., Cowie A. A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertiliser production. Research and development division. IEA Bioenergy Task 2004, vol. 38.
45. Yang J., Bellmann C., Grundke K., Michel S., Kostiuk L., Kwok D.Y. Characterization of porous membranes by zeta-potential under an ac electric field: analytical treatment of time-dependent electroosmostic flow. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 225(1-2):155-164.