메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 159, Issue 20, 2015, Pages

For the critical reader: Questions to ask about randomised trials;Voor de kritische lezer: Vragen bij gerandomiseerd onderzoek

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84929379951     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (1)

References (11)
  • 1
    • 41549117102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science
    • Vandenbroucke JP. Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e67.
    • (2008) PLoS Med. , vol.5 , pp. e67
    • Vandenbroucke, J.P.1
  • 3
    • 0028101076 scopus 로고
    • Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials
    • Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994;13:1715-26.
    • (1994) Stat Med. , vol.13 , pp. 1715-1726
    • Senn, S.1
  • 4
    • 84859001212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    • Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
    • (2011) BMJ , vol.343 , pp. d5928
    • Higgins, J.P.1    Altman, D.G.2    Gøtzsche, P.C.3
  • 5
    • 63449090101 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers
    • Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:464-75.
    • (2009) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.62 , pp. 464-475
    • Thorpe, K.E.1    Zwarenstein, M.2    Oxman, A.D.3
  • 6
    • 84925547817 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Explanatory trials versus pragmatic trials
    • nov 13 3
    • Sedgwick P. Explanatory trials versus pragmatic trials. BMJ. 2014;349(nov 13 3):g6694.
    • (2014) BMJ , vol.349 , pp. g6694
    • Sedgwick, P.1
  • 7
    • 84908441203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized trials with missing outcome data: How to analyze and what to report
    • Groenwold RH, Moons KG, Vandenbroucke JP. Randomized trials with missing outcome data: how to analyze and what to report. CMAJ. 2014;186:1153-7.
    • (2014) CMAJ , vol.186 , pp. 1153-1157
    • Groenwold, R.H.1    Moons, K.G.2    Vandenbroucke, J.P.3
  • 11
    • 11444261579 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?"
    • Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005;365:82-93.
    • (2005) Lancet , vol.365 , pp. 82-93
    • Rothwell, P.M.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.