Erratum: Modeling occupancy of hosts by mistletoe seeds after accounting for imperfect detectability (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:5 (e0127004) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127004);Modeling occupancy of hosts by mistletoe seeds after accounting for imperfect detectability

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Fadini, Rodrigo F ^a,b   Cintra, Renato ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO OESTE DO PARÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASHEW NUT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; HOST; HOST OCCUPANCY; LORANTHACEAE; METAPOPULATION; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PLANT PARASITIC PLANT DISEASE; PLANT SEED; PSITTACANTHUS PLAGIOPHYLLUS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; TREE; ANACARDIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MISTLETOE; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANACARDIUM OCCIDENTALE; PSITTACANTHUS;

ANACARDIUM; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MISTLETOE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEEDS; TREES;

EID: 84929377760     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163008     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Hanski I, Simberloff D. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. In: Hanski I, Gilpin M, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. London, UK: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 5-26.
2. Hanski I. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol. 1994; 63:151-162.
3. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 1998; 396:41-50.
4. Moilanen A. Patch occupacy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology. 1999; 80:1031-1043.
5. Ter Braak CJ, Hanski I, Verboom J. The incidence function approach to modelling of metapopulation dynamics. In: Bascompte J, Solé R V., editors. Modelling spatio-temporal dynamics in ecology. Austin, TX: Landes Biosciences; 1998. pp. 167-188.
6. Moilanen A, Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology. 1998; 79:2503-2515. PMID: 9582223
7. Thrall PH, Burdon JJ. Host-pathogen dynamics in a metapopulation context: the ecological and evolutionary consequences of being spatial. J Ecol. 1997; 85:743-753.
8. Laine A- L. Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant-pathogen metapopulation. J Evol Biol. 2005; 18:930-938. PMID: 16033565
9. Mccallum H, Barlow N, Hone J. How should pathogen transmission be modelled? Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16:295-300. PMID: 11369107
10. Overton JM. Dispersal and infection in mistletoe metapopulations. J Ecol. 1994; 82:711-723.
11. Aukema JE, Martínez Del Rio C. Variation in mistletoe seed deposition: effects of intra- and interspecific host characteristics. Ecography (Cop). 2002; 25:139-144.
12. Teodoro GS, van den Berg E, Arruda R. Metapopulation dynamics of the mistletoe and its host in savanna areas with different fire occurrence. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e65836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065836 PMID: 23776554
13. Martínez del Rio C, Silva A, Medel R, Hourdequin M. Seed dispersers as disease vectors: bird transmission of mistletoe seeds to plant hosts. Ecology. 1996; 77:912-921.
14. Aukema JE. Vectors, viscin, and Viscaceae: mistletoes as parasites, mutualists, and resources. Front Ecol Environ. 2003; 1:212-219.
15. Aukema JE, Martínez Del Rio C. Where does a fruit-eating bird deposit mistletoe seeds? Seed deposition patterns and an experiment. Ecology. 2002; 83:3489-3496.
16. Ward MJ, Paton DC. Predicting mistletoe seed shadow and patterns of seed rain from movements of the mistletoebird, Dicaeum hirundinaceum. Austral Ecol. 2007; 32:113-121.
17. Fadini RF, Gonçalves DCM, Reis RPF. Consistency in seed-deposition patterns and the distribution of mistletoes among its host trees in an Amazonian savanna. Aust J Bot. 2009; 57:640-646.
18. Rawsthorne J, Watson DM, Roshier DA. The restricted seed rain of a mistletoe specialist. J Avian Biol. 2012; 43:9-14.
19. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv. 1997; 24:38-49.
20. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology. 2002; 83:2248-2255.
21. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Knutson MG, Franklin AB. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology. 2003; 84:2200-2207.
22. Gu W, Swihart RK. Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol Conserv. 2004; 116:195-203.
23. Kéry M, Gregg KB. Effects of life-state on detectability in a demographic study of the terrestrial orchid Cleistes bifaria. J Ecol. 2003; 91:265-273.
24. Bailey LL, Simons TR, Pollock KH. Estimating site occupancy and species detection probability parameters for terrestrial salamanders. Ecol Appl. 2004; 14:692-702.
25. Royle JA, Nichols JD, Kéry M. Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect. Oikos. 2005; 110:353-359.
26. McCarthy MA, Moore JL, Morris WK, Parris KM, Garrard GE, Vesk PA, et al. The influence of abundance on detectability. Oikos. 2013; 122:717-726.
27. Moilanen A. Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application. Oikos. 2002; 96:516-530.
28. Martin TG, Wintle A, Rhodes JR, Field A, Low-Choy SJ, Tyre AJ, et al. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations. Ecol Lett. 2005; 8:1235-1246. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00826.x PMID: 21352447
29. Fadini RF, Lima AP. Fire and host abundance as determinants of the distribution of three congener and sympatric mistletoes in an Amazonian savanna. Biotropica. 2012; 44:27-34.
30. Medel R, Vergara E, Silva A, Kalin-Arroyo M. Effects of vector behavior and host resistance on mistletoe aggregation. Ecology. 2004; 85:120-126.
31. Roxburgh L, Nicolson SW. Patterns of host use in two African mistletoes: the importance of mistletoe-host compatibility and avian disperser behaviour. Funct Ecol. 2005; 19:865-873.
32. Kuijt J. Monograph of Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs. Ann Arbor: The American Society of Plant Taxonomists; 2009. p. 361.
33. Cintra R. Spatial distribution and foraging tactics of tyrant flycatchers in two habitats in the Brazilian Amazon. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 1997; 32:17-27.
34. Roxburgh L, Nicolson SW. Differential dispersal and survival of an African mistletoe: does host size matter? Plant Ecol. 2008; 195:21-31.
35. Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle A, Pollock KH, Bailey LL. Occupancy estimation and modeling. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006. p. 344.
36. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1989. p. 532.
37. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel Inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004; 33:261-304.
38. Hines JE. Presence: software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. Laurel: USGS-PWRC; 2006.
39. Guerra TJ, Pizo M A. Asymmetrical dependence between a neotropical mistletoe and its avian seed disperser. Biotropica. 2014; 46:285-293.
40. Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, MacKenzie DI, Wintle BA, McCarthy MA. Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: A response to "fitting and interpreting occupancy models." PLoS One. 2014; 9:e99571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099571 PMID: 25075615
41. Monteiro RF, Martins RP, Yamamoto K. Host specificity and seed dispersal of Psittacanthus robustus (Loranthaceae) in south-east Brazil. J Trop Ecol. 1992; 8: 307-314.
42. Fadini RF. Non-overlap of hosts used by three congeneric and sympatric loranthaceous mistletoe species in an Amazonian savanna: host generalization to extreme specialization. Acta Bot Brasilica. 2011; 25:337-345.
43. Geils BW, Mathiasen RL. Intensification of dwarf mistletoe on southwestern Douglas-fir. For Sci. 1990; 36:955-969.
44. Shaw D, Freeman EA, Mathiasen RL. Evaluating the accuracy of ground-based hemlock dwarf mistletoe rating: a case study using the wind river canopy crane. West J Appl For. 2000; 15:8-14.
45. Muir JA, Moody B. Dwarf mistletoe surveys. In: Geils BW, Tovar JC, Moody B, editors. Mistletoes of north american conifers. Ogden: USDA Forest Service; 2002. pp. 67-73.
46. Heller RC, Gega R V. Detection of forest diseases by remote sensing. J For. 1973; 71:18-21.
47. Mathiasen RL, Hoffman JT, Guyon JC, Wadleigh LL. Comparison of two roadside survey procedures for dwarf mistletoes on the Sawtooth National Forest, Idaho. Gt Basin Nat. 1996; 56:129-134.
48. Daugherty CM, Mathiasen RL. Estimates of the incidence of mistletoes in pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Cocconino National Forest, Arizona. West North Am Nat. 2003; 63:382-390.
49. Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H. Metapopulation processes in epiphytes inferred from patterns of regional distribution and local abundance in fragmented forest landscapes. J Ecol. 2006;856-868.
50. Johansson V, Ranius T, Snäll T. Epiphyte metapopulation dynamics are explained by species traits, connectivity, and patch dynamics. Ecology. 2012; 93:235-241. PMID: 22624304
51. Snäll T, Ehrlen J, Rydin H. Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. Ecology. 2005; 86:106-115.
52. Zartman CE, Nascimento HEM, Cangani KG. Fine-scale changes in connectivity affect the metapopulation dynamics of a bryophyte confined to ephemeral patches. J Ecol. 2012; 100:980-986.
53. Snäll T, Ribeiro PJ Jr., Rydin H. Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch-tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos. 2003; 103:566-578.