Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Liu, Danlu ^a   Jin, Jiaxin ^a   Tian, Jinhui ^a   Yang, Kehu ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCISEARCH; CHECKLIST; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; FACTOR ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

CHECKLIST; ENDOSCOPY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84929377256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120911     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, Freeman M, Goldstein JL, Jensen DM, et al. (2002) Quality assessment of endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Jun; 55(7):798-801. PMID: 12024130
2. Kinney T (2010) Evidence-based imaging of pancreatic malignancies. Surg Clin North Am Apr; 90-(2):235-49. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.12.003 PMID: 20362784
3. Law JK 1, Stoita A, Weaver W, Gleeson FC, Dries AM, Blackford A, et al. (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves the pre-operative diagnostic yield of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: an international multicenter case series (with video). Surg Endosc Sep; 28(9):2592-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3508-8 PMID: 24718662
4. Bero LA, Jadad AR (1997) How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making. Annals of Internal Medicine Jul 1; 127(1):37-42. PMID: 9214251
5. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, Klassen TP, Tugwell P, Moher M, et al. (1998) Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA Jul 15; 280(3):278-80. PMID: 9676681
6. Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP, Booker L, Sigouin C, Fuentes M, et al. (2000) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ Feb 26; 320(7234):537-40. PMID: 10688558
7. Manchikanti L, Derby R, Wolfer L, Singh V, Datta S, Hirsch JA. (2009) Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5 Diagnostic accuracy studies. Pain Physician May-Jun; 12(3):517-40. PMID: 19461821
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med Aug 18; 151(4):264-9, W64. PMID: 19622511
9. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol Feb 15; 7:10. PMID: 17302989
10. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Abbate A, Testa L, Remigi E, Burzotta F, et al. (2006) Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study. BMJ Jan 28; 332(7535):202-9. PMID: 16415336
11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health careinterventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med Jul 21; 6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 PMID: 19621070
12. Willis BH, Quigley M (2011) The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol Dec 9; 11:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-163 PMID: 22151233
13. Al Faleh K, Al-Omran M (2009) Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews. BMC Pediatr. Jun 17; 9:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-38 PMID: 19534780
14. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. (2009) AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol Oct; 62(10):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 PMID: 19230606
15. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, et al. (2007) External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One Dec 26; 2(12):e1350. PMID: 18159233
16. Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath VA, Sharif MO (2011) An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci Oct; 19(5):440-7. PMID: 21986647
17. Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OO, Avezova R, Kossan G, Chew L, et al. (2010) From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dent J Jul 16; 4:84-91. doi: 10.2174/1874210601004020084 PMID: 21088686
18. Ma B, Guo J, Qi G, Li H, Peng J, Zhang Y, et al. (2011) Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals. PLoS One. 6(5):e20185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020185 PMID: 21633698
19. Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S (2013) Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One Dec 26; 8(12):e83138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138 PMID: 24386151
20. Shea B, Moher D, Graham I, Pham B, Tugwell P (2002) A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals. Eval Health Prof Mar; 25(1):116-29. PMID: 11868441
21. Silagy CA, Middleton P, Hopewell S (2002) Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. JAMA Jun 5; 287(21):2831-4. PMID: 12038926
22. Kirkham JJ 1, Altman DG, Williamson PR (2010) Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. PLoS One Mar 22; 5(3):e9810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009810 PMID: 20339557
23. Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, Harbord RM, Takwoingi Y (2010) Analysing and Presenting Results. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Edited by Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C. Oxford, United Kingdom: The Cochrane Collaboration 46-47. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3 PMID: 24022476
24. Booth A, Stewart L (2013) Trusting researchers to use open trial registers such as PROSPERO responsibly. BMJ Oct 2; 347:f5870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5870 PMID: 24088555
25. Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, et al. (2012) The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev Feb 9; 1:2. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-2 PMID: 22587842
26. Faggion CM Jr, Atieh MA, Park S (2013) Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. J Clin Periodontol Sep; 40(9):883-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12132 PMID: 23834263
27. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, et al. (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol Jul 3; 2:9. PMID: 12097142
28. Popovich I, Windsor B, Jordan V, Showell M, Shea B, Farquhar CM. (2012) Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches. PLoS One 7(12):e50403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050403 PMID: 23300526
29. Higgins J.P.T., Green S. (Eds.) (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011), The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available: www.cochranehandbook.org.
30. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med Oct 18; 155-(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 PMID: 22007046
31. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol Nov 10; 3:25. PMID: 14606960