Lessons learned from recruiting socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers into a pilot randomized controlled trial to explore the role of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) smoking

Trials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Thompson, Tom P ^a   Greaves, Colin J ^b   Ayres, Richard ^a   Aveyard, Paul ^c   Warren, Fiona C ^b   Byng, Richard ^a   Taylor, Rod S ^b   Campbell, John L ^b   Ussher, Michael ^d   Michie, Susan ^e   West, Robert ^e   Taylor, Adrian H ^a  

^a PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community medicine; Harm reduction; Physical activity; Primary care; Recruitment; Smoking cessation; Tobacco control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXERCISE ASSISTED REDUCTION THEN STOP SMOKING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL STATUS; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENGLAND; EPIDEMIOLOGY; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTAL MAIL; PREVALENCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELEPHONE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENGLAND; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTAL SERVICE; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STATE MEDICINE; TELEPHONE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84929307867     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafo M: Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012, 1248:107-123. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x
2. Chandola T, Head J, Bartley M: Socio-demographic predictors of quitting smoking: how important are household factors? Addiction 2004, 99:770-777. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00756.x
3. Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W, Boreham J, Jarvis MJ, Lopez AD: Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet 2006, 368:367-370. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68975-7
4. Vangeli E, Stapleton J, Smit ES, Borland R, West R: Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: a systematic review. Addiction 2011, 106:2110-2121. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.x
5. Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA, Marcus AC, Smith TL, Gaglio B, Levinson AH, et al.: Evaluating initial reach and robustness of a practical randomized trial of smoking reduction. Heal Psychol 2008, 27:780-788.
6. Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, France EK, Marcus A, Riley KM, Levinson A, et al.: Do behavioral smoking reduction approaches reach more or different smokers? two studies; similar answers. Addict Behav 2006, 31:509-518. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.039
7. Murray RL, Bauld L, Hackshaw LE, McNeill A: Improving access to smoking cessation services for disadvantaged groups: a systematic review. J Public Health 2009, 31:258-277. 10.1093/pubmed/fdp008
8. Bryant J, Bonevski B, Paul C, McElduff P, Attia J: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioral smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups. Addiction 2011, 106:1568-1585. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03467.x
9. Ranney L, Melvin C, Lux L, McClain E, Lohr KN: Systematic review: smoking cessation intervention strategies for adults and adults in special populations. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145:845-856. 10.7326/0003-4819-145-11-200612050-00142
10. Michie S, Jochelson K, Markham WA, Bridle C: Low-income groups and behaviour change interventions: a review of intervention content, effectiveness and theoretical frameworks. J Epidemiol Commun Heal 2009, 63:610-622. 10.1136/jech.2008.078725
11. Michie S, Rumsey N, Fussell S, Hardeman W, Johnston M, Newman S, et al.: Improving Health - Changing Behaviour: NHS Health Trainer Handbook. London: Department of Health and British Psychological Society; 2008.
12. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Heal 1999, 89:1322-1327. 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
13. Sixsmith J, Boneham M, Goldring JE: Accessing the community: gaining insider perspectives from the outside. Qual Heal Res 2003, 13:578-589. 10.1177/1049732302250759
14. Flanagan SM, Hancock B: "Reaching the hard to reach" - lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community sector). A qualitative study. BMC Heal Serv Res 2010, 10:92. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-92
15. Marcano Belisario JS, Bruggeling MN, Gunn LH, Brusamento S, Car J: Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012., 12: CD009187
16. Collins BN, Wileyto EP, Hovell MF, Nair US, Jaffe K, Tolley NM, et al.: Proactive recruitment predicts participant retention to end of treatment in a secondhand smoke reduction trial with low-income maternal smokers. Transl Behav Med 2011, 1:394-399. 10.1007/s13142-011-0059-6
17. Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, Cook JA, Kjeldstrom M, Johansen M, et al.: Methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2013, 3:e002360.
18. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al.: What influences recruitment to randomized controlled trials? a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2006, 7:9. 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
19. McCann S, Campbell M, Entwistle V: Recruitment to clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation. J Heal Serv Res Policy 2013, 18:233-241. 10.1177/1355819613483126
20. Taylor AH, Thompson TP, Greaves CJ, Taylor RS, Green C, Warren FC, et al.: A pilot randomized trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers. Health Technol Assess 2014, 18:1-324.
21. Department of Communities and Local Government: English Indices of Deprivation 2010. English Indices Deprivation 2010 2011. available from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2010
22. Life expectancy in Plymouth - produced as part of Plymouth's joint strategic needs assessment [ http://www.plymouth.gov.uk/jsnalifeexpectancyreport.pdf ]
23. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO: The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991, 86:1119-1127. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
24. Fagerstrom K: Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2012, 14:75-78. 10.1093/ntr/ntr137
25. Everson-Hock ES, Taylor AH, Ussher M: Readiness to use physical activity as a smoking cessation aid: a multiple behaviour change application of the transtheoretical model among quitters attending stop smoking clinics. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:156-159. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.016
26. West R, Hajek P, Stead L, Stapleton J: Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard. Addiction 2005, 100:299-303. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00995.x
27. Eastwood P: Statistics on smoking: England, 2013. Heal Soc Care Inf Cent 2013. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB11454/smok-eng-2013-rep.pdf
28. Coleman T, Agboola S, Leonardi-Bee J, Taylor M, McEwen A, McNeill A: Relapse prevention in UK stop smoking services: current practice, systematic reviews of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Heal Technol Assess 2010, 14:1-152. iii-iv
29. Cerin E, Leslie E: How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66:2596-2609. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012
30. Cerin E, Leslie E, Owen N: Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:1013-1020. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008
31. Turrell G, Haynes M, Wilson LA, Giles-Corti B: Can the built environment reduce health inequalities? A study of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and walking for transport. Heal Place 2013, 19:89-98.
32. West R, May S, West M, Croghan E, McEwen A: Performance of English stop smoking services in first 10 years: analysis of service monitoring data. BMJ 2013, 347:f4921. 10.1136/bmj.f4921
33. West R, Brown J: Smoking and Smoking Cessation in England 2011. London: Smoking in England, 2012. http://www.smokinginengland.info April 2012.
34. Berg JA: Gaining access to underresearched populations in women's health research. Heal Care Women Int 1999, 20:237-243. 10.1080/073993399245737
35. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE: The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Heal 2013, 103:e38-e46.
36. Hippisley-Cox J, Vinogradova Y: Trends in consultation rates in general practice 1995/1996 to 2008/2009: analysis of the QResearch database. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB01077/tren-cons-rate-gene-prac-95-09-95-09-rep.pdf
37. 92% patients have trust in their GP despite diminishing resources - RCGP response to GP patient survey results out today [ http://www.rcgp.org.uk/news/2013/december/92-per-cent-patients-have-trust-in-their-gp-despite-diminishing-resources.aspx ]