Exploring the prospects for deliberative practices as a conflict-reducing and legitimacy-enhancing tool: The case of Swedish carnivore management

Wildlife Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 147-156

  Lundmark, Carina ^a   Matti, Simon ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929303552     PISSN: 09096396     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allard, C. 2006. Two sides of the coin - rights and duties: the interface between environmental law and Saami law based on a comparison with Aoteoaroa/New Zealand and Canada.-Luleå Univ. of Technology.
2. Bill 2008/09:210. En ny rovdjursförvaltning. - Swedish Parliamentary Record (in Swedish).
3. Bisi, J. et al. 2007. Human dimension on wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. - Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 53: 304-314.
4. Bohman, J. 1996. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy.-Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. Chambers, S. 1996. Reasonable democracy.-Cornell Univ. Press.
6. Cinque, S. 2008. I vargens spår. Myndigheters handlingsutrymme i förvaltningen av varg. - PhD thesis, Univ. of Gothenburg, (in Swedish).
7. Delli Carpini, M. X. et al. 2004. Public deliberation, discursive participation and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. - Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 7: 315-344.
8. Dietz, T. et al. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. - Science 302: 1907-1912.
9. Dryzek, J. S. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations.-Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Duit, A. and Löf, A. 2011. Acceptans genom medbestämmande? En analys av regional rovdjursförvaltning 2007-2011. - In: SOU 2012:22: Mål för rovdjuren. Official Reports of the Swedish Government, Dept of the Environment, (in Swedish), pp. 223-253.
11. Ekengren, A.-M. 2012. Vargfrågan och politiska skiljelinjer. Intressemobilisering i Sverige. - Statsvetenskaplig Tidskr. 114: 523-552 (in Swedish).
12. Elgin, D. and Weible, C. M. 2013. Stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy issues using policy analytical capacity and the advocacy coalition framework. - Rev. Policy Res. 30: 116-134.
13. Grimble, R. and Wellard, K. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. - Agric. Systems 55: 173-193.
14. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. 1996. Democracy and disagreement.-Harvard Univ. Press.
15. Hallgren, L. and Westberg, L. 2015. Adaptive management? Observations of knowledge coordination in the communication practice of Swedish game management. - Wildl. Biol. 21: 165-174.
16. Heberlein, T. A. and Ericsson, G. 2008. Public attitudes and the future of wolves Canis lupus in Sweden. - Wildl. Biol. 14: 391-394.
17. Jentoft, S. 1999. Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. - Mar. Policy 24: 141-148.
18. Lindvall, J. and Sebring, J. 2005. Policy reform and the decline of corporatism in Sweden - W. Eur. Politics 28: 1057-1074.
19. Matti, S. 2009. Exploring public policy legitimacy. A study of belief-system correspondence in Swedish environmental policy. - PhD thesis, Luleå Univ. of Technology.
20. Matti, S. and Sandström, A. 2011. The rationale determining advocacy coalitions: examining coordination networks and corresponding beliefs. - Policy Studies J. 39: 385-410.
21. Matti, S. and Sandström, A. 2013. The defining elements of advocacy coalitions: continuing the search for explanations to coordination and coalition structure. - Rev. Policy Res. 30: 240-257.
22. McLaverty, P. and Halpin, D. 2008. Deliberative drift: the emergence of deliberation in the policy process. - Int. Political Sci. Rev. 29: 197-214.
23. Meadowcroft, J. 2004. Deliberative democracy. - In: Durant, F. et al. (eds), Environmental governance reconsidered. MIT Press, pp. 183-217.
24. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action.-Cambridge Univ. Press.
25. Ostrom, E. 2001. Vulnerability and polycentric governance systems. - IHDP Newslett. 3/2001.
26. Pinkerton, E. (ed.) 1989. Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries.-Univ. of British Columbia Press.
27. Plummer, R. and FitzGibbon, J. 2004. Some observations on the terminology in co-operative environmental management. - J. Environ. Manage. 70: 63-72.
28. Ramirez, R. 1999. Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. - In: Buckles, D (ed.), Cultivating peace: conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. Int. Development Res. Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, pp. 101-128.
29. Rosenberg, S. W. 2007. Deliberation, participation and democracy: can the people govern?-Palgrave Macmillian.
30. Røskaft, E. et al. 2007. Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. - Wildl. Biol. 13: 172-185.
31. Saarikoski, H. et al. 2013. Understanding 'successful' conflict resolution: policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest. - Land Use Policy 32: 271-280.
32. Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. - In: Sabatier P. A. (ed.), Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, pp. 117-166.
33. Sandström, C. and Eriksson, G. 2009. Om svenskars inställning till rovdjursfrågor. - Rapport 2009:2. Umeå University, Sweden (in Swedish).
34. Sandström, C. et al. 2009. Management of large carnivores in Fennoscandia: new patterns of regional participation. - Human Dimensions Wildl. 14: 37-50.
35. SFS 2009:1474. Förordning om viltförvaltningsdelegationer (Decree on Wildlife Management Delegations). - Swedish Parliamentary Records, Stockholm (in Swedish).
36. Sjölander-Lindqvist, A. 2008. Local identity, science and politics indivisible: the Swedish wolf controversy deconstructed. - J. Environ. Policy Planning 10: 71-94.
37. SOU 2011:37. Rovdjurens bevarandestatus. - Official Reports of the Swedish Government, Dept of the Environment, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
38. SOU 2012:22. Mål för rovdjuren. - Official Reports of the Swedish Government, Dept of the Environment, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
39. SEPA 2011. En modell för ett utökat regional ansvar för rovdjuren m.m. Redovisning av regeringsuppdrag.-Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).
40. Uslaner, E. 2002. The moral foundations of trust.-Cambridge Univ. Press.
41. Weible, C. M. 2006. An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. - J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 17: 95-117.
42. Weible, C. M. et al. 2011. A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue. - Policy Studies J. 39: 350-360.
43. rd edn.-Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA.
44. Zachrisson, A. 2004. Co-management of natural resources. Paradigm shifts, key concepts and cases. Mountain Mistra Rep. No: 1.-Umeå Univ
45. Zachrisson, A. 2010. Deliberative democracy and co-management of natural resources: snowmobile regulation in western Sweden. - Int. J. Commons 4: 273-292.