Effective theory of a doubly charged singlet scalar: complementarity of neutrino physics and the LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  King, Stephen F ^a   Merle, Alexander ^a,b   Panizzi, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Neutrino Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929175018     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2014)124     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing, Rev. Mod. Phys.82 (2010) 2701 [arXiv:1002.0211] [INSPIRE].
2. H. Ishimori et al., Non-Abelian discrete symmetries in particle physics, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.183 (2010) 1 [arXiv:1003.3552] [INSPIRE].
3. S.F. King and C. Luhn, Neutrino mass and mixing with discrete symmetry, Rept. Prog. Phys.76 (2013) 56201 [arXiv:1301.1340] [INSPIRE].
4. S.F. King, A. Merle, S. Morisi, Y. Shimizu and M. Tanimoto, Neutrino mass and mixing: from theory to experiment, New J. Phys.16 (2014) 45018 [arXiv:1402.4271] [INSPIRE].
5. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
6. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
7. M. Hirsch, M.A. Diaz, W. Porod, J.C. Romao and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses and mixings from supersymmetry with bilinear R parity violation: a theory for solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev.D 62 (2000) 113008 [Erratum ibid.D 65 (2002) 119901] [hep-ph/0004115] [INSPIRE].
8. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett.B 94 (1980) 61 [INSPIRE].
9. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Proton lifetime and fermion masses in an SO(10) model, Nucl. Phys.B 181 (1981) 287 [INSPIRE].
10. J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev.D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
11. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 77301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
12. A. Zee, Quantum numbers of Majorana neutrino masses, Nucl. Phys.B 264 (1986) 99 [INSPIRE].
13. K.S. Babu, Model of ‘calculable’ Majorana neutrino masses, Phys. Lett.B 203 (1988) 132 [INSPIRE].
14. ISS Physics Working Group collaboration, A. Bandyopadhyay et al., Physics at a future neutrino factory and super-beam facility, Rept. Prog. Phys.72 (2009) 106201 [arXiv:0710.4947] [INSPIRE].
15. S.S.C. Law and K.L. McDonald, The simplest models of radiative neutrino mass, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 29 (2014) 1450064 [arXiv:1303.6384] [INSPIRE].
16. P.W. Angel, N.L. Rodd and R.R. Volkas, Origin of neutrino masses at the LHC: ΔL = 2 effective operators and their ultraviolet completions, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 73007 [arXiv:1212.6111] [INSPIRE].
17. K.S. Babu and C.N. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 667 [hep-ph/0106054] [INSPIRE].
18. F. Bonnet, M. Hirsch, T. Ota and W. Winter, Systematic decomposition of the neutrinoless double beta decay operator, JHEP03 (2013) 055 [Erratum ibid.04 (2014) 090] [arXiv:1212.3045] [INSPIRE].
19. P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang, T. Li and K. Wang, Neutrino masses and the CERN LHC: testing type II seesaw, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 15018 [arXiv:0805.3536] [INSPIRE].
20. E.J. Chun and P. Sharma, Search for a doubly-charged boson in four lepton final states in type-II seesaw, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 256 [arXiv:1309.6888] [INSPIRE].
21. K.S. Babu and C. Macesanu, Two loop neutrino mass generation and its experimental consequences, Phys. Rev.D 67 (2003) 73010 [hep-ph/0212058] [INSPIRE].
22. M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Predictive model for radiatively induced neutrino masses and mixings with dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 211802 [arXiv:1212.4806] [INSPIRE].
23. M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Radiative neutrino mass generation linked to neutrino mixing and 0νββ-decay predictions, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 13012 [arXiv:1402.0515] [INSPIRE].
24. M. Nebot, J.F. Oliver, D. Palao and A. Santamaria, Prospects for the Zee-Babu model at the CERN LHC and low energy experiments, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 93013 [arXiv:0711.0483] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Herrero-Garcia, M. Nebot, N. Rius and A. Santamaria, The Zee-Babu model revisited in the light of new data, Nucl. Phys.B 885 (2014) 542 [arXiv:1402.4491] [INSPIRE].
26. C.-S. Chen, C.Q. Geng and J.N. Ng, Unconventional neutrino mass generation, neutrinoless double beta decays and collider phenomenology, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 53004 [hep-ph/0610118] [INSPIRE].
27. F. del Águila, A. Aparici, S. Bhattacharya, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, A realistic model of neutrino masses with a large neutrinoless double beta decay rate, JHEP05 (2012) 133 [arXiv:1111.6960] [INSPIRE].
28. P.W. Angel, Y. Cai, N.L. Rodd, M.A. Schmidt and R.R. Volkas, Testable two-loop radiative neutrino mass model based on an LLQdcQdceffective operator, JHEP10 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1308.0463] [INSPIRE].
29. F. del Águila, A. Aparici, S. Bhattacharya, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Effective Lagrangian approach to neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino masses, JHEP06 (2012) 146 [arXiv:1204.5986] [INSPIRE].
30. J.C. Romao and J.P. Silva, A resource for signs and Feynman diagrams of the standard model, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 27 (2012) 1230025 [arXiv:1209.6213] [INSPIRE].
31. J.M. Cornwall, D.N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Derivation of gauge invariance from high-energy unitarity bounds on the s matrix, Phys. Rev.D 10 (1974) 1145 [Erratum ibid.D 11 (1975) 972] [INSPIRE].
32. C.E. Vayonakis, Born helicity amplitudes and cross-sections in non-Abelian gauge theories, Lett. Nuovo Cim.17 (1976) 383 [INSPIRE].
33. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].
34. M.S. Chanowitz and M.K. Gaillard, The TeV physics of strongly interacting W ’s and Z’s, Nucl. Phys.B 261 (1985) 379 [INSPIRE].
35. K.L. McDonald and B.H.J. McKellar, Evaluating the two loop diagram responsible for neutrino mass in Babu’s model, hep-ph/0309270 [INSPIRE].
36. W. Rodejohann, Neutrino-less double beta decay and particle physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys.E 20 (2011) 1833 [arXiv:1106.1334] [INSPIRE].
37. H. Pas, M. Hirsch, H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and S.G. Kovalenko, A superformula for neutrinoless double beta decay. 2. The short range part, Phys. Lett.B 498 (2001) 35 [hep-ph/0008182] [INSPIRE].
38. J. Bergstrom, A. Merle and T. Ohlsson, Constraining new physics with a positive or negative signal of neutrino-less double beta decay, JHEP05 (2011) 122 [arXiv:1103.3015] [INSPIRE].
39. F. Simkovic, J. Vergados and A. Faessler, Few active mechanisms of the neutrinoless double beta decay and effective mass of Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 113015 [arXiv:1006.0571] [INSPIRE].
40. GERDA collaboration, M. Agostini et al., Results on neutrinoless double beta decay of76Ge from phase I of the GERDA experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 122503 [arXiv:1307.4720] [INSPIRE].
41. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 10001 [INSPIRE].
42. F. Cei, Latest results of the MEG experiment, talk presented at the EPS-HEP Conference, http://eps-hep2013.eu/, Stockholm Sweden July 19 2013 [PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)333] [INSPIRE].
43. N. Haba and H. Murayama, Anarchy and hierarchy, Phys. Rev.D 63 (2001) 53010 [hep-ph/0009174] [INSPIRE].
44. M. Lindner, A. Merle and W. Rodejohann, Improved limit on θ13and implications for neutrino masses in neutrino-less double beta decay and cosmology, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 53005 [hep-ph/0512143] [INSPIRE].
45. A. Merle and W. Rodejohann, The elements of the neutrino mass matrix: allowed ranges and implications of texture zeros, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006)73012 [hep-ph/0603111] [INSPIRE].
46. S.F. King, A. Merle and A.J. Stuart, The power of neutrino mass sum rules for neutrinoless double beta decay experiments, JHEP12 (2013)05 [arXiv:1307.2901] [INSPIRE].
47. H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].
48. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado and T. Schwetz, Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision, JHEP12 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1209.3023] [INSPIRE].
49. T2K collaboration, K. Abe et al., Observation of electron neutrino appearance in a muon neutrino beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014)61802 [arXiv:1311.4750] [INSPIRE].
50. M. Malek, Life after νeappearance: what NEXT for T2K?, talk given at the What NExT? NExT meeting on BSM physics in light of LHC, Planck results and θ13discovery, available online at https://indico.nbi.ku.dk/getFile.py/access?contribId=16&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=616, Southampton U.K. November 27 2013.
51. H.C. Chiang, E. Oset, T.S. Kosmas, A. Faessler and J.D. Vergados, Coherent and incoherent (μ−, e−) conversion in nuclei, Nucl. Phys.A 559 (1993) 526 [INSPIRE].
52. M. Raidal and A. Santamaria, Muon electron conversion in nuclei versus μ → eγ: an effective field theory point of view, Phys. Lett.B 421 (1998) 250 [hep-ph/9710389] [INSPIRE].
53. S.F. King, A. Merle and L. Panizzi, μ-e conversion in a class of effective models containing doubly-charged scalars, work in progress.
54. ATLAS collaboration, Search for doubly-charged Higgs bosons in like-sign dilepton final states at TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2244 [arXiv:1210.5070] [INSPIRE].
55. CMS collaboration, A search for a doubly-charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2189 [arXiv:1207.2666] [INSPIRE].
56. G. Azuelos, K. Benslama and J. Ferland, Prospects for the search for a doubly-charged Higgs in the left-right symmetric model with ATLAS, J. Phys.G 32 (2006) 73 [hep-ph/0503096] [INSPIRE].
57. C.-S. Chen, C.-Q. Geng, J.N. Ng and J.M.S. Wu, Testing radiative neutrino mass generation at the LHC, JHEP08 (2007)22 [arXiv:0706.1964] [INSPIRE].
58. T. Han, B. Mukhopadhyaya, Z. Si and K. Wang, Pair production of doubly-charged scalars: neutrino mass constraints and signals at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007)75013 [arXiv:0706.0441] [INSPIRE].
59. C.-S. Chen, C.-Q. Geng and D.V. Zhuridov, Same-sign single dilepton productions at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 666 (2008) 340 [arXiv:0801.2011] [INSPIRE].
60. A.G. Akeroyd and H. Sugiyama, Production of doubly charged scalars from the decay of singly charged scalars in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011)35010 [arXiv:1105.2209] [INSPIRE].
61. A.G. Akeroyd and S. Moretti, Production of doubly charged scalars from the decay of a heavy SM-like Higgs boson in the Higgs triplet model, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011)35028 [arXiv:1106.3427] [INSPIRE].
62. H. Sugiyama, K. Tsumura and H. Yokoya, Discrimination of models including doubly charged scalar bosons by using τ lepton decay distributions, Phys. Lett.B 717 (2012) 229 [arXiv:1207.0179] [INSPIRE].
63. F. del Águila, M. Chala, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Discriminating between lepton number violating scalars using events with four and three charged leptons at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 725 (2013) 310 [arXiv:1305.3904] [INSPIRE].
64. K.S. Babu, A. Patra and S.K. Rai, New signals for doubly-charged scalars and fermions at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013)55006 [arXiv:1306.2066] [INSPIRE].
65. A. Chaudhuri, W. Grimus and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Doubly charged scalar decays in a type-II seesaw scenario with two Higgs triplets, JHEP02 (2014)60 [arXiv:1305.5761] [INSPIRE].
66. F. del Águila, M. Chala, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Distinguishing between lepton number violating scalars at the LHC, EPJ Web Conf.60 (2013) 17002 [arXiv:1307.0510] [INSPIRE].
67. A. Alloul, M. Frank, B. Fuks and M.R. de Traubenberg, Doubly-charged particles at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013)75004 [arXiv:1307.1711] [INSPIRE].
68. B. Dutta, R. Eusebi, Y. Gao, T. Ghosh and T. Kamon, Exploring the doubly charged Higgs of the left-right symmetric model using vector boson fusion-like events at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014)55015 [arXiv:1404.0685] [INSPIRE].
69. F. del Águila and M. Chala, LHC bounds on lepton number violation mediated by doubly and singly-charged scalars, JHEP03 (2014)27 [arXiv:1311.1510] [INSPIRE].
70. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
71. S.F. King, A. Merle and L. Panizzi, Signatures at the LHC of doubly-charged scalars in classes of models of loop-generated neutrino mass, work in progress.
72. P. Meade and M. Reece, BRIDGE: Branching Ratio Inquiry/Decay Generated Events, hep-ph/0703031 [INSPIRE].
73. CMS collaboration, Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker, 2014 JINST9 P10009 [arXiv:1405.6569] [INSPIRE].
74. G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman, Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields, Nucl. Phys.B 44 (1972) 189 [INSPIRE].
75. J.C. Collins, Renormalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1984) [INSPIRE].
76. A. Pich, Effective field theory: course, hep-ph/9806303 [INSPIRE].
77. A.I. Davydychev and J.B. Tausk, Two loop selfenergy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion, Nucl. Phys.B 397 (1993) 123 [INSPIRE].
78. T. Binoth, C. Buttar, P.J. Clark and E.W.N. Glover, Proceedings of 65thScottish Universities Summer School in Physics: LHC physics (SUSSP65), CRC Press, U.S.A. (2012).