Guidelines for reporting quantitative methods and results in primary research

Language Learning

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 470-476

  Norris, John M ^a   Plonsky, Luke ^b   Ross, Steven J ^c   Schoonen, Rob ^d  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Research design; Research reporting; Statistical significance; Statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929155743     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12104     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33-40.
2. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
3. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2010). The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
4. Journal Article Reporting Standards Working Group. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839-851.
5. Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.