Technical pitfalls in university rankings

Higher Education

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 859-866

  Bougnol, Marie Laure ^a   Dulá, Jose H ^b  

^a JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Colleges and universities; Principal component analysis; Rankings; US News and World Report

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929104699     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9809-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bougnol, M. L., & Dulá, J. H. (2006). Validating DEA as a ranking tool: An application of DEA to assess performance in higher education. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 339–365.
2. Bougnol, M. L., & Dulá, J. H. (2013). A mathematical model to optimize decisions for climbing in multi-attribute rankings. Scientometrics, 95, 785–796.
3. Casper, G., Criticism of College Rankings. (1996). Private letter to the editor of USNWR. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/president/speeches/961206gcfallow.html. Accessed March 2014.
4. Center for World-Class Universities (CWCU), Graduate School of Education of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. (2013). Academic Ranking of World Universities. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2013.html. Accessed April 2014.
5. CWTS Leiden ranking. (2013). http://www.leidenranking.com/ranking. Accessed April 2014.
6. De Vise, D. (2011). The ups and downs of U.S. news rankings. The Washington Post.
7. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245–259.
8. Enserink, M. (2007). Who ranks the university rankers? Science, 317, 1026–1028.
9. Filinov, N. B., & Ruchkina, S. (2002). Ranking of higher education institutions in Russia—Some methodological problems. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 407–421.
10. Gladwell, M. (2011). The order of things. The New Yorker.
11. Gnolek, S. L., Falciano, V. T., & Kuncl, R. W. (2014). Modeling change and variation in U.S. News & World Report college rankings: What would it really take to be in the top 20? Research in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9336-9.
12. Goldstein, H. D., & Spiegelhalter, J. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Series, 159, 385–443.
13. Jaschik, S. (2007). Battle lines on ‘U.S. News’. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/07/usnews. Accessed March 2014.
14. Joliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed). Berlin: Springer Series in Statistics.
15. Liu, N.-C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 127–136.
16. Quacquarelli and Symonds. (2012). World university rankings. http://www.iu.qs.com; Accessed March 2014.
17. Tofallis, C. (2012). A different approach to university rankings. Higher Education, 63, 1–18.
18. US News and World Report. (2013). Best colleges 2014 edition, Published by US News and World Report L.P., Washington, D.C.
19. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., van Eck, N. J., et al. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2419–2432.
20. Webster, T. J. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20, 235–244.