Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 829-832

  Panteghini, Mauro ^a   Sandberg, Sverre ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL LABORATORY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT CARE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CLINICAL LABORATORY TECHNIQUES; CONSENSUS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84929091339     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0303     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Kallner A, McQueen M, Heuck C. The stockholm consensus conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine, 25-26 April 1999. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:475-585.
2. Fraser CG. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:837-40.
3. Horvath AR, Bossuyt PM, Sandberg S, St John A, Monaghan PJ, Verhagen-Kamerbeek WD, et al. Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies-is it possible? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:841-8.
4. Petersen PH. Performance criteria based on true and false classification and clinical outcomes. Influence of analytical performance on diagnostic outcome using a single clinical component. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:849-55.
5. Thue G, Sandberg S. Analytical performance specifications based on how clinicians use laboratory tests. Experiences from a post-analytical external quality assessment programme. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:857-62.
6. Ricós C, Álvarez V, Perich P, Fernández-Calle P, Minchinela J, Cava F, et al. Rationale for using data on biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:863-70.
7. Carobene A. Reliability of biological variation data available in an online database: need for improvement. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:871-7.
8. Braga F, Ferraro S, Lanzoni M, Szoke D, Panteghini M. Estimate of intraindividual variability of C-reactive protein: a challenging issue. Clin Chim Acta 2013;419:85-6.
9. Braga F, Ferraro S, Ieva F, Paganoni A, Panteghini M. A new robust statistical model for interpretation of differences in serial test results from an individual. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53: 815-22.
10. Bartlett WA, Braga F, Carobene A, Coşkun A, Prusa R, Fernandez-Calle P, et al. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:879-85.
11. Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Streichert T. Optimizing the use of the 'state-of-the-art' performance criteria. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:887-91.
12. Orth M. Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable?-The German point of view. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:893-8.
13. Schimmel H, Zegers I. Performance criteria for reference measurement procedures and reference materials. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:899-904.
14. Braga F, Infusino I, Panteghini M. Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:905-12.
15. Ceriotti F, Brugnoni D, Mattioli S. How to define a significant deviation from the expected internal quality control result. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:913-8.
16. Jones GR. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes-need for harmonisation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:919-24.
17. Oosterhuis WP, Sandberg S. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:925-37.
18. Nordin G. Before defining performance criteria we must agree on what a "qualitative test procedures" is. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:939-41.
19. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Pelloso M, Chiozza ML. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53: 943-8.
20. Sikaris K. Performance criteria of the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:949-58.
21. Sandberg S, Fraser C, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53: 833-5.
22. Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, Weykamp C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem 2011;57:1670-80.