Sequencing of EHR adoption among US hospitals and the impact of meaningful use

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 984-991

  Adler Milstein, Julia ^a   Everson, Jordan ^a   Lee, Shoou Yih D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL SOCIETY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY; MEANINGFUL USE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84929044636     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002708     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1628-38.
2. SM. 2014. http://www.himssanalytics.org/emram/emram. aspx with original model described in: http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_articles/himss_emr_definition_model_v1-0.pdf
3. Furukawa MF, Raghu TS, Spaulding TJ, et al. Adoption of health information technology for medication safety in U.S. hospitals, 2006. Health Aff 2008;27:865-75.
4. Botta M, Cutler D. Meaningful use: floor or ceiling? Healthcare 2014;2:48-52.
5. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "Meaningful Use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
6. van Schuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Anal 2003;11:139-63.
7. Mokken RJ. A theory and procedure of scale analysis: with applications in political research. Walter de Gruyter, 1971.
8. Loevinger J. The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of "scale analysis" and factor analysis. Psychol Bull 1948;45:507-29.
9. Meijer RR, Sijtsma K, Smid NG. Theoretical and empirical comparison of the Mokken and the Rasch approach to IRT. Appl Psychol Meas 1990;14:283-98.
10. DesRoches CM, Charles D, Furukawa MF, et al. Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012. Health Aff 2013;32:1478-85.
11. Dranove D, Forman C, Goldfarb A, et al. The trillion dollar conundrum: complementarities and health information technology. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012.
12. van der Ark LA. Mokken scale analysis in R. J Stat Software 2007;20:1-19.
13. Kuijpers RE, Van der Ark LA, Croon MA. Standard errors and confidence intervals for scalability coefficients in Mokken scale analysis using marginal models. Sociol Methodol 2013;43:42-69.
14. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
15. Chaudhry B, Jerome W, Shinyi W, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:E12-W8.