Perimetry in young and neurologically impaired children: The Behavioral Visual Field (BEFIE) Screening Test revisited

JAMA Ophthalmology

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 319-325

  Koenraads, Yvonne ^a   Braun, Kees P J ^a   Van Der Linden, Denise C P ^a   Imhof, Saskia M ^a   Porro, Giorgio L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUPUNCTURE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL VISUAL FIELD SCREENING TEST; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOTOMA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOTOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929035622     PISSN: 21686165     EISSN: 21686173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5257     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Porro G, Wittebol-Post D. Impairment of peripheral vision and its measurement. In: Dutton G, Bax M, eds. Visual Impairment in Children Due to Damage to the Brain. London, United Kingdom: Mac Keith Press; 2010:85-97.
2. Good WV, Jan JE, DeSa L, Barkovich AJ, Groenveld M, Hoyt CS. Cortical visual impairment in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38(4):351-364.
3. Mohn G, Van Hof-van Duin J. Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of visual functions in children with neurological disorders. Behav Brain Res. 1983;10(1):177-187.
4. Kolling GH,Wabbels B. Kinetic perimetry in neuroophthalmological practice. Strabismus. 2000;8(3):215.
5. Greve EL, Dannheim F, Bakker D. The Peritest: a new automatic and semi-automatic perimeter. Int Ophthalmol. 1982;5(3):201-214.
6. Donahue SP, Porter A. SITA visual field testing in children. J AAPOS. 2001;5(2):114-117.
7. Blumenthal EZ, Haddad A, Horani A, Anteby I. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(3):435-439.
8. Quinn LM, Gardiner SK, Wheeler DT, Newkirk M, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(6):983-989.
9. Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: amethod of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(10):2017-2026.
10. Murray I, Perperidis A, Brash H, et al. Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): a novel technique for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013:3186-3189.
11. Allen LE, Slater ME, Proffitt RV, Quarton E, Pelah A. A new perimeter using the preferential looking response to assess peripheral visual fields in young and developmentally delayed children. J AAPOS. 2012;16(3):261-265.
12. Pel JJM, van Beijsterveld MCM, Thepass G, van der Steen J. Validity and repeatability of saccadic response times across the visual field in eye movement perimetry. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2013;2(7):3.
13. Harding GF, Spencer EL,Wild JM, ConwayM, Bohn RL. Field-specific visual-evoked potentials: identifying field defects in vigabatrin-treated children. Neurology. 2002;58(8):1261-1265.
14. Sheridan MD. The STYCAR graded-balls vision test. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1973;15(4):423-432.
15. Hermans AJ, Van Hof-van Duin J, Oudesluys-Murphy AM. Visual outcome of low-birth-weight infants (1500-2500 g) at one year of corrected age. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(4):402-407.
16. Quinn GE, Dobson V, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Phelps DL, Palmer EA; The CRYO-Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Visual fields measured with double-arc perimetry in eyes with threshold retinopathy of prematurity from the cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity trial. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(9):1432-1437.
17. Dobson V, Brown AM, Harvey EM, Narter DB. Visual field extent in children 3.5-30 months of age tested with a double-arc LED perimeter. Vision Res. 1998;38(18):2743-2760.
18. Mayer DL, Fulton AB, CummingsMF. Visual fields of infants assessed with a new perimetric technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(3):452-459.
19. Porro GL, Hofmann J, Wittebol-Post D, et al. A new behavioural visual field test for clinical use in pediatric neuro-ophthalmology. Neuroophthalmology. 1998;19(4):205-214.
20. Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(1):77-82.
21. Koenraads Y, van der Linden DC, van Schooneveld MM, et al. Visual function and compensatory mechanisms for hemianopia after hemispherectomy in children. Epilepsia. 2014;55(6):909-917.
22. Lewis TL, Maurer D. The development of the temporal and nasal visual fields during infancy. Vision Res. 1992;32(5):903-911.
23. Tschopp C, Viviani P, Reicherts M, et al. Does visual sensitivity improve between 5 and 8 years? a study of automated visual field examination. Vision Res. 1999;39(6):1107-1119.
24. Allen D, Tyler CW, Norcia AM. Development of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the human infant. Vision Res. 1996;36(13):1945-1953.
25. Clohessy AB, Posner MI, Rothbart MK. Development of the functional visual field. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001;106(1-2):51-68.
26. Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Zimine S, Saudan-Frei S, Safran AB, Huppi PS. Visual recovery after perinatal stroke evidenced by functional and diffusion MRI: case report. BMC Neurol. 2005;5:17.
27. van der Aa NE, Dudink J, Benders MJNL, et al. Neonatal posterior cerebral artery stroke: clinical presentation, MRI findings, and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(3):283-290.
28. Guzzetta A, D'Acunto G, Rose S, Tinelli F, Boyd R, Cioni G. Plasticity of the visual system after early brain damage. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(10):891-900.
29. Delaney SM, Dobson V, Mohan KM. Measured visual field extent varies with peripheral stimulus flicker rate in very young children. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(9):800-806.
30. Mohan KM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Delaney SM, Leber NR. Does rate of stimulus presentation affect measured visual field extent in infants and toddlers? Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(4):234-240.
31. Delaney SM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Mohan KM, Weidenbacher HJ, Leber NR. Stimulus motion increases measured visual field extent in children 3.5 to 30 months of age. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(2):82-89.
32. Boyle NJ, Jones DH, Hamilton R, Spowart KM, Dutton GN. Blindsight in children: does it exist and can it be used to help the child? observations on a case series. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(10):699-702.