Depressive symptoms and problematic internet use among adolescents: Analysis of the longitudinal relationships from the cognitive-behavioral model

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 714-719

  Gámez Guadix, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AFFECT; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL CONTROL; SOCIAL NETWORK; SPAIN; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AFFECT; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SPAIN;

EID: 84929023575     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0226     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Matute H, Vadillo MA. (2012) Psicologá delas nuevas tecnolog?ás: Dela adicción a Internet a la convivencia con robots [Psychology of new technologies: from Internet addiction to coexistence with robots]. Madrid: Sntesis.
2. Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75:8-28.
3. Rodgers S, Chen Q. Internet community group participation: psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 10: 21-26.
4. Jelenchick LA, Eickhoff J, Christakis DA, et al. The Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS) for adolescents and young adults: scale development and refinement. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 35:171-178.
5. Carbonell X, Fúster H, Chamarro A, et al. Adicción a internet y móvil: una revisión de estudios empricos españ-oles. Papeles del Psicólogo 2012; 33:82-89.
6. Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK, et al. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic Internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health 2013; 53:446-452.
7. Jia R, Jia HH. Factorial validity of problematic Internet use scales. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:1335-1342.
8. Young KS, de Abreu CN. (2011) Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
9. Meerkerk GJ, Vanden Eijnden RJJM, Franken IHA, et al. Is compulsive Internet use related to sensitivity to reward and punishment, and impulsivity? Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:729-735.
10. Shapira NA, Lessig MC, Goldsmith TD, et al. Problematic Internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depression & Anxiety 2003; 17:207-216.
11. Spada MM, Langston B, Nik-cević AV, et al. The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 2008; 24:2325-2335.
12. Greydanus DE, Greydanus MM. Internet use, misuse, and addiction in adolescents: current issues and challenges. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine & Health 2012; 24:283-289.
13. Young KS, Yue XD, Ying L. (2011) Prevalence estimates and etiologic models of Internet addiction. In Young KS, de Abreu CN, eds. Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 3-17.
14. Caplan SE. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:1089-1097.
15. Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 2001; 17:187-195.
16. Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Calvete E. Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema 2013; 25: 299-306.
17. Ioravanti G, Primi C, Casale S. Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:761-766.
18. Caplan SE, High AC. (2011) Online social interaction, psychosocial well-being, and problematic Internet use. In Young KS, de Abreu CN, eds. Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 35-53.
19. Kim H-K, Davis KE. Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic internet use: evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:490-500.
20. Munõz-Rivas MJ, Fernández L, Gámez-Guadix M. Analysis of the indicators of pathological Internet use in Spanish university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2010; 13:697-707.
21. LaRose R, Lin CA, Eastin MS. Unregulated Internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology 2003; 5:225-253.
22. Young KS. Clasificación de los subtipos, consecuencias y causas dela adicción a Internet. Psicologá Conductual Revista Internacional de Psicologá Cĺnica dela Salud 2005; 13:463-480.
23. Gámez-Guadix M, Villa-George FI, Calvete E. Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic Internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence 2012; 35:1581-1591.
24. Caplan SE. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial wellbeing: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior 2002; 18:553-575.
25. Caplan SE. Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial wellbeing. Communication Research 2003; 30:625-648.
26. Tokunaga RS, Rains SA. An evaluation of two characterizations of the relationships between problematic Internet use, time spent using the Internet, and psychosocial problems. Human Communication Research 2010; 36:512-545.
27. Vanden Eijnden RJJM, Meerkerk GJ, Vermulst AA, et al. Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 2008; 44:655.
28. Davis RA, Flett GL, Besser A. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2002; 5:331-345.
29. Caplan SE, High AC. Beyond excessive use: the interaction between cognitive and behavioral symptoms of problematic Internet use. Communication Research Reports 2006; 23: 265-271.
30. Caplan S, Williams D, Yee N. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being among MMO players. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:1312-1319.
31. Chou C, Condron L, Belland JC. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review 2005; 17:363-388.
32. Derogatis LR, Fitzpatrick M. (2004) The SCL-90-R, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the BSI-18. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Pereda N, Forns M, Peró M. Dimensional structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory with Spanish college students. Psicothema 2007; 19:634-639.
34. Bentler PM. (2005) EQS 6.1 for Windows. Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
35. Byrne BM. (2006) Structural equation modeling with EQS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999; 6:1-55.
37. Sawyer MG, Pfeiffer S, Spence SH. Life events, coping and depressive symptoms among young adolescents: a one-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders 2009; 117:48-54.
38. Young KS. (2011) Clinical assessment of Internet-addicted clients. In Young KS, de Abreu CN, eds. Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, pp. 19-34.
39. Young KS. CBT-IA: the first treatment model for Internet addiction. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2011; 25: 304-312.