Interspecies quantitative structure–activity–activity relationships (QSAARs) for prediction of acute aquatic toxicity of aromatic amines and phenols

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 301-323

  Furuhama, A ^a   Hasunuma, K ^a   Aoki, Y ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

acute aquatic toxicity; applicability; aromatic amines and phenols; interspecies QSAR; QSAAR

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; AMINES; AROMATIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; FISH; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; TOXICITY;

ACUTE AQUATIC TOXICITY; APPLICABILITY; AQUATIC TOXICITY; AROMATIC AMINE AND PHENOL; AROMATIC AMINES; DESCRIPTORS; INTERSPECIES QSAR; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE–ACTIVITY–ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TRAINING DATASET;

PHENOLS;

ALGAE; DAPHNIA; ORYZIAS LATIPES;

AMINE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; WATER POLLUTANT;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DAPHNIA; DRUG EFFECTS; GREEN ALGA; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ORYZIAS; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; WATER POLLUTANT;

AMINES; ANIMALS; CHLOROPHYTA; DAPHNIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORYZIAS; PHENOLS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TOXICITY TESTS, ACUTE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84928927772     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2015.1032347     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. H.J.M. Verhaar, C.J. Vanleeuwen, and J.L.M. Hermens, Classifying environmental pollutants. 1: Structure–activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity, Chemosphere 25 (1992), pp. 471–491.
2. G.D. Veith and S.J. Broderius, Rules for distinguishing toxicants that cause type-I and type-II narcosis syndromes, Environ. Health Perspect. 87 (1990), pp. 207–211.
3. F. Bajot, M.T.D. Cronin, D.W. Roberts, and T.W. Schultz, Reactivity and aquatic toxicity of aromatic compounds transformable to quinone-type Michael acceptors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 22 (2011), pp. 51–65.
4. E.U. Ramos, M.A. Vaal, and J.L.M. Hermens, Interspecies sensitivity in the aquatic toxicity of aromatic amines, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 11 (2002), pp. 149–158.
5. V. Aruoja, M. Sihtmäe, H.-C. Dubourguier, and A. Kahru, Toxicity of 58 substituted anilines and phenols to algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and bacteria Vibrio fischeri: Comparison with published data and QSARs, Chemosphere 84 (2011), pp. 1310–1320.
6. M.T.D. Cronin, T.I. Netzeva, J.C. Dearden, R. Edwards, and A.D.P. Worgan, Assessment and modeling of the toxicity of organic chemicals to Chlorella vulgaris: Development of a novel database, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004), pp. 545–554.
7. M.T.D. Cronin, Biological read-across: Mechanistically-based species-species and endpoint-endpoint extrapolations, in In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications, M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden, eds., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2010, Chapter 18, pp. 446–477.
8. P. Tremolada, A. Finizio, S. Villa, C. Gaggi, and M. Vighi, Quantitative inter-specific chemical activity relationships of pesticides in the aquatic environment, Aquat. Toxicol. 67 (2004), pp. 87–103.
9. S. Cassani, S. Kovarich, E. Papa, P.P. Roy, L. van der Wal, and P. Gramatica, Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies quantitative activity-activity modelling, J. Hazard. Mater. 258 (2013), pp. 50–60.
10. S.D. Dyer, D.J. Versteeg, S.E. Belanger, J.G. Chaney, and F.L. Mayer, Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006), pp. 3102–3111.
11. The US Environmental Protection Agency, Web-ICE v3.2.1; available at http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/fchain/webice/.
12. J. Devillers, P. Pandard, E. Thybaud, and A. Merle, Interspecies correlations for predicting the acute toxicity of xenobiotics, in Ecotoxicology Modeling, J. Devillers, ed., Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 85–115.
13. J. Devillers and H. Devillers, Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 467–500.
14. I. Lessigiarska, A.P. Worth, T.I. Netzeva, J.C. Dearden, and M.T.D. Cronin, Quantitative structure–activity–activity and quantitative structure–activity investigations of human and rodent toxicity, Chemosphere 65 (2006), pp. 1878–1887.
15. I. Kahn, U. Maran, E. Benfenati, T.I. Netzeva, T.W. Schultz, and M.T.D. Cronins, Comparative quantitative structure-activity-activity relationships for toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis and Pimephales promelas, ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim. 35 (2007), pp. 15–24.
16. X.J. Zhang, H.W. Qin, L.M. Su, W.C. Qin, M.Y. Zou, L.X. Sheng, Y.H. Zhao, and M.H. Abraham, Interspecies correlations of toxicity to eight aquatic organisms: Theoretical considerations, Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), pp. 4549–4555.
17. M. Nendza and A. Wenzel, Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 1. (Eco)toxicity profiles, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 13 (2006), pp. 192–203.
18. M. Nendza and M. Müller, Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 2. Physico-chemical descriptors, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh. 19 (2000), pp. 581–598.
19. Results of eco-toxicity tests data conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan, 2014; available at http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/sesaku/02e.pdf.
20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Test no. 201: Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test, OECD, Paris, 2006.
21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Test no. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test, OECD, Paris, 2004.
22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Test no. 203: Fish Acute Toxicity Test, OECD, Paris, 1992.
23. R – A Language for Describing Molecular Patterns; available at http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html.
24. D. Weininger, SMILES, A chemical language and information-system.1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28 (1988), pp. 31–36.
25. A description of butachlor is available from the US EPA’s online warehouse ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource); available at http://actor.epa.gov/actor/GenericChemical?casrn=23184-66-9.
26. A description of pretilachlor is available from the US EPA’s online warehouse ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource); available at http://actor.epa.gov/actor/GenericChemical?casrn=51218-49-6.
27. A description of triclosan is available from the US EPA’s online warehouse ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource); available at http://actor.epa.gov/actor/GenericChemical?casrn=3380-34-5.
28. A.B. Dann and A. Hontela, Triclosan: Environmental exposure, toxicity and mechanisms of action, J. Appl. Toxicol. 31 (2011), pp. 285–311.
29. P. Boger, B. Matthes, and J. Schmalfuss, Towards the primary target of chloroacetamides – new findings pave the way, Pest Manag. Sci. 56 (2000), pp. 497–508.
30. KATE is an ecotoxicity QSAR modelling system researched and developed by the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) under contract from the Japanese Ministry of the Environment from FY 2004 to FY 2014; available at http://kate.nies.go.jp.
31. A. Furuhama, T. Toida, N. Nishikawa, Y. Aoki, Y. Yoshioka, and H. Shiraishi, Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity (KATE) system, version, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 21(2010), pp. 403–413.
32. J.L. Durant, B.A. Leland, D.R. Henry, and J.G. Nourse, Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002), pp. 1273–1280.
33. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2013; available at http://www.R-project.org.
34. A. Furuhama, Y. Aoki, and H. Shiraishi, Development of ecotoxicity QSAR models based on partial charge descriptors for acrylate and related compounds, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 23 (2012), pp. 731–749.
35. L. Eriksson, J. Jaworska, A.P. Worth, M.T.D. Cronin, R.M. McDowell, and P. Gramatica, Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 1361–1375.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 69: Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure–activity relationships [(Q)SAR] models, OECD, Paris, 2007.
37. J. Jaworska, N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova, and T. Aldenberg, QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set in descriptor space: A review, ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim. 33 (2005), pp. 445–459.
38. V. Aruoja, M. Moosus, A. Kahru, M. Sihtmaee, and U. Maran, Measurement of baseline toxicity and QSAR analysis of 50 non-polar and 58 polar narcotic chemicals for the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chemosphere 96 (2014), pp. 23–32.
39. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2013.0801, Chemical Computing Group Inc., Montreal, Canada, 2013.
40. CIMPL, 2.04, CimplSoft Inc.; available at http://www.cimplsoft.com/.
41. J. Gasteiger and M. Marsili, Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges, Tetrahedron 36 (1980), pp. 3219–3228.
42. H. Kuramochi, K. Kawamoto, K. Miyazaki, K. Nagahama, K. Maeda, X.-W. Li, E. Shibata, T. Nakamura, and S.-I. Sakai, Determination of physicochemical properties of tetrabromobisphenol A, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27 (2008), pp. 2413–2418.
43. ClogP; see the CLOGP reference manual at http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/clogp/index.html. The underlying program of CLOGP is copyrighted by Pomona College and BioByte, Inc. (Claremont, CA).
44. ACD/LogD, version 2014, Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, Canada; details about the log D prediction module calculation are available at http://www.acdlabs.com/products/percepta/predictors/logd/.
45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 194, Guidance on grouping of chemicals, 2nd edition, OECD, Paris, 2014.
46. C.L. Russom, S.P. Bradbury, S.J. Broderius, D.E. Hammermeister, and R.A. Drummond, Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 948–967.
47. The US Environmental Protection Agency, ECOSAR; available at http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/tools/21ecosar.htm.