Nasal-imv versus nasal-CPAP as an initial mode of respiratory support for premature infants with RDS: A prospective randomized clinical trial

Rawal Medical Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 197-202

  Salama, Ghassan S A ^a   Ayyash, Fadi F ^a   Al Rabadi, Anas J ^a   Alquran, Mohammad L ^a   Shakkoury, Ayoub G ^a  

^a Jordanian Royal Medical Service   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Premature; Surfactant; Ventilation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; CHEST INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMITTENT MANDATORY VENTILATION; LUNG DYSPLASIA; MALE; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; SEPSIS; STOMACH DISTENSION; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 84928891827     PISSN: 03035212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rusmawati A, Haksari EL, Naning R. Downes score as a clinical assessment for hypoxemia in neonates with respiratory distress. Paediatr Indones 2008;48:342-5.
2. Greenough A, Murthy V. Respiratory problems in the premature newborn. Pediatric Health 2009;3:241-9.
3. Kugelman A. International Perspectives: Nasal Ventilation in Preterm Infants: An Israeli Perspective. Neo Reviews 2009;10:el57-el65.
4. Bollen CW, Uiterwaal CS, van Vught AJ. Metaregression analysis of high frequency ventilation vs. conventional ventilation in infant respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:680-8.
5. Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Prendergast M, Milner AD. Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD000 456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000456.pub3
6. Bhandari V, Gavino RG Nedrelow JH, Pallela P, Salvador A, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatal 2007;27:697-703.
7. Davis PG, Lemyre B, De Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2001; Issue 3. Art. No: CD003-212. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.
8. Davis PG, Morley CJ, Owen LS. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: Continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14:14-20.
9. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001;107:638-41.
10. Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. PediatrPulmonol 1998;26:349-53.
11. Jarreau PH, Moriette G Mussat P, Mariette C, Mohanna A, Harf A, et al. Patient-triggered ventilation decreases the work of breathing in neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1176-81.
12. Ryan CA, Finer NN, Peters KL. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation offers no advantages over nasal continuous positive airway pressure in apnea of prematurity. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:1196-8.
13. Garland JS, Nelson DB, Rice T, Neu J. Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs. Pediatrics 1985; 76:406-10.
14. Millar D, Kirpalani H. Benefits of non-invasive ventilation. Indian Pediatr2004;41:1008-17.
15. Kugelman A, Feferkom I, Risking R, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr 2007;150:521-6.