Supporting scientific writing and evaluation in a conceptual physics course with calibrated peer review

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1513, Issue , 2013, Pages 318-321

  Price, Edward ^a   Goldberg, Fred ^b   Patterson, Scott ^b   Heft, Paul ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

conceptual physics; CPR; peer review; scientific writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928887561     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.4789716     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. F. Goldberg, E. Price, S. Robinson, D. Boyd-Harlow, and M. McKean. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010121, 2012.
2. F. Goldberg, S. Robinson, R. Kruse, N. Thompson, and V. Otero, Physical Science and Everyday Thinking, 2nd ed. Its About Time: Armonk, NY, 2009.
3. F. Goldberg, S. Robinson, and V. Otero, Physics and Everyday Thinking, Its About Time: Armonk, NY, 2005.
4. Calibrated Peer Review, http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/accessed July 1, 2012.
5. T. Volz, & A. Saterbak. Students strengths and weaknesses in evaluating technical arguments as revealed through implementing Calibrated Peer Review in a bioengineering laboratory. Across the Disciplines, 6, Special issue on Writing Technologies and Writing Across the Curriculum, 2009. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/technologies/volz-saterbak.cfm
6. Complete details are in the CPR documentation, available at http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/Downloads.aspx
7. A full description of the magnetism task is available at http://faculty.csusm.edu/price/LEP/CPR-example.html