The Qualitative Study of Media Audiences

Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1991, Pages 23-42

  Lindlof, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928836398     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838159109364100     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (98)

1. Alexander, A., Ryan, M. S., & Munoz, P. (1984). Creating a learning context: Investigations on the interaction of siblings during television viewing. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 345–364.
2. Allen, R. C. (1985). Speaking of soap operas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3. Allor, M. (1988). Relocating the site of the audience: Reconstructive theory and the social subject. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 217–233.
4. Anderson, J. A. (1987). Communication research: Issues and methods. New York: McGraw–Hill.
5. Anderson, J. A. (1989, August). Some preliminary thoughts on the elaboration of audiences. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention, Washington, DC.
6. Anderson, J. A., & Meyer, T. P. (1988). Mediated communication: A social action perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Ang, I. (1985). Watching “Dallas”: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination (D. Couling, trans.). New York: Methuen.
8. Ang, I. (1989). Wanted: audiences. On the politics of empirical audience studies. in E.Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, & E.–M. Warth (Eds.), Remote control (pp. 96–115). New York: Routledge.
9. Ang, I. (1990). Culture and communication: Towards an ethnographic critique of media consumption in the transnational media system. European Journal of Communication, 5, 239–260.
10. Blee, K. M., & Billings, D. B. (1986). Reconstructing daily life in the past: An hermeneutical approach to ethnographic data. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 443—462.
11. Bryce, J., & Leichter, H.J. (1983). The family and television: Forms of mediation. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 309–327.
12. Carragee, K. M. (1990). Interpretive media study and interpretive social science. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 81–96.
13. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. F. Rendall, trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Drummond, P., & Paterson, R. (Eds.). (1986). Television in transition. London: British Film Institute.
17. Drummond, P., & Paterson, R. (Eds.). (1988). Television and its audience: International research perspectives. London: British Film Institute.
18. Ellen, R. F. (Ed.). (1984). Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct. London: Academic Press.
19. Evans, W. A. (1990). The interpretive turn in media research: Innovation, iteration, or illusion? Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 147–168.
20. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture: Popular pleasures and politics. New York: Methuen.
22. Fry, V. H., Alexander, A., & Fry, D. L. (1990). Textual status, the stigmatized self, and media consumption. in J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 519–544). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
24. Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Gillespie, M. (1990, June). The Mahabharata: From Sanskrit to sacred soap. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Dublin.
26. Granzberg, G. (1982). Television as storyteller: TheAlgonkian Indians of Central Canada. Journal of Communication, 32(1), 43–52.
27. Hajjar, W. J., & Setzer, R. (1988). The electronic storyteller: Sex and violence and the cultural confrontation of viewing television in Amazonia. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, New Orleans.
28. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. in S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.
29. Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (Eds.). (1980). Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–1979. London: Hutchinson.
30. Hobson, D. (1982). ‘Crossroads’: The drama of a soap opera. London: Methuen.
31. Hodge, R., & Tripp, D. (1986). Children and television. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32. Hoijer, B. (1990). Studying viewers' reception of television programmes: Theoretical and methodological considerations. European Journal of Communication, 5, 29–56.
33. Jenkins III, H. (1988). “Star Trek” rerun, reread, rewritten: Fan writing as textual poaching. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 85–107.
34. Jensen, K. B. (1986). Making sense of the news: Towards a theory and an empirical model of reception for the study of mass communication. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
35. Jensen, K. B. (1987). Qualitative audience research: Toward an integrative approach to reception. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 21–36.
36. Jensen, K. B. (1988). News as social resource: A qualitative empirical study of the reception of Danish television news. European Journal of Communication, 3, 275–301.
37. Jensen, K. B. (1990). When is meaning?: Communication theory, pragmatism, and mass media reception. in J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication yearbook 14 (pp. 3–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Jensen, K. B., & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Five traditions in search of the audience. European Journal of Communication, 5, 207–238.
39. Kramarae, C. (Ed.). (1988). Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
40. Kristeva, J. (1975). The subject in signifying practice. Semiotexte, 7 (3), 19–34.
41. Lemish, D. (1982). The rules of viewing television in public places. Journal of Broadcasting, 26, 757–781.
42. Liebes, T. (1989). On the convergence of theories of mass communication and literature regarding the role of the “reader.” In B. Dervin (ed.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 9 (pp. 123–143). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross–cultural readings of “Dallas.” New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Lindlof, T. R. (1987) a. Ideology and pragmatics of media access in prison. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 175–197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Lindlof, T. R. (1987) b. Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. Lindlof, T. R. (1988). Media audiences as interpretive communities. in J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 81–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Lindlof, T. R., & Grodin, D. (1990). When media use can’t be observed: Some problems and tactics of collaborative audience research. Journal of Communication, 40(4), 8–28.
48. Lindlof, T. R., & Meyer, T. P. (1987). Media use as ways of seeing, acting, and constructing culture: The tools and foundations of qualitative research. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 1–30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Lindlof, T. R., & Shatzer, M. J. (1989). Subjective differences in spousal perceptions of family video. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33, 375–395.
50. Livingstone, S. (1988). Viewers' interpretations of soap opera: The role of gender, power and morality. in P. Drummond & R. Paterson (Eds.), Television and its audience: International research perspectives (pp. 83–107). London: British Film Institute.
51. Long, E. (1989). Feminism and cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 427–435.
52. Lofland, J. (1971). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
53. Lull, J. (1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6, 198–209.
54. Lull, J. (1982). A rules approach to the study of television and society. Human Communication Research, 9, 3–16.
55. Lull, J. (1987). Thrashing in the pit: An ethnography of San Francisco punk subculture. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 225–252). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56. Lull, J. (Ed.). (1988). World families watch television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57. Lull, J. (1990). Inside family viewing. London: Routledge.
58. Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. McRobbie, A. (1978). Working class girls and the culture of femininity. in Women's Studies Group (ed.), Women take issue: Aspects of women's subordination (pp. 96–108). London: Hutchinson.
60. Meyer, T. P. (1989). Reflections on cultivation theory and consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 786–789.
61. Meyer, T. P., Traudt, P. J., & Anderson, J. A. (1980). Nontraditional mass communication research methods: An overview of observational case studies of media use in natural settings. in D. Nimmo (ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 261–275). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
62. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Michaels, E. (1985). Constraints on knowledge in an economy of oral information. Current Anthropology, 26, 505–510.
64. Mishler, E. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Moores, S. (1988). ‘The box on the dresser’: Memories of early radio and everyday life. Media, Culture and Society, 10, 23–40.
66. Moores, S. (1990). Texts, readers and contexts of reading: Developments in the study of media audiences. Media, Culture and Society, 12, 9–29.
67. Morley, D. (1980). The ‘Nationwide’ audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
68. Morley, D. (1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Comedia.
69. Morris, M. (1977). An excursion into creative sociology. New York: Columbia University Press.
70. Nielsen, J. M. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist research methods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
71. Pacanowsky, M. E., & Anderson, J. A. (1982). Cop talk and media use. Journal of Broadcasting 26, 741–756.
72. Palmer, P. (1986). The lively audience: A study of children around the TV set. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
73. Pearson, R. E., & Uricchio, W. (1989, May). Amplifying the muted voices of the past: Toward a theory of historical reception. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, San Francisco.
74. Press, A. (1989). Class and gender in the hegemonic process: Class differences in women's perceptions of television realism and identification with television characters. Media, Culture and Society, 11, 229–251.
75. Prus, R. (1987). Generic social processes: Maximizing conceptual development in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16, 250–293.
76. Rabinow, P., & Sullivan, W. H. (Eds.). (1987). Interpretive social science (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
77. Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, partriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
78. Radway, J. (1988). Reception study: Ethnography and the problems of dispersed audiences and nomadic subjects. Cultural Studies, 2, 359–376.
79. Reid, L. N., & Frazer, C. F. (1980). Television at play. Journal of Communication, 30(4), 66–73.
80. Richardson, K., & Corner, J. (1986). Reading reception: Mediation and transparency in viewers' accounts of a TV programme. Media, Culture and Society, 8, 485–508.
81. Seiter, E., Borchers, H., Kreutzner, G., & Warth, E. M. (1989). Remote control: Television, audiences, and cultural power. London: Routledge.
82. Shimanoff, S. (1980). Communication rules. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83. Sieber, S. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335–1359.
84. Sigman, S. (1987). Application of ethnographic methods to communications research: A case study with discussion. in S. Thomas (ed.), Culture and communication: Methodology, behavior, artifacts, and institutions: Studies in communication, Vol. 3 (pp. 50–64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
85. Silverstone, R. (1989). Let us then return to the murmuring of everyday practices: A note on Michel de Certeau, television and everyday life. Theory, Culture & Society, 6, 77–94.
86. Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg, A., & Livingstone, S. (1989, May). Families, technologies and consumption: The household and information and communication technologies. Paper presented to the ESRC Programme at the Information and Communication Technologies Conference, Brunei University, Uxbridge, England.
87. Simon, R. I., & Dippo, D. (1986). On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 17, 195–202.
88. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
89. Spigel, L. (1989). The domestic economy of television viewing in postwar America. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 337–354.
90. Steeves, H. L. (1987). Feminist theories and media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 95–135.
91. Stewart, J., & Philipsen, G. (1984). Communication as situated accomplishment: The cases of hermeneutics and ethnography. in B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 5 (pp. 179–217). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
92. Streeter, T. (1984). An alternative approach to television research: Developments in British cultural studies at Birmingham. in W. D. Rowland & B. Watkins (Eds.), Interpreting television (pp. 74–97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
93. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
94. Traudt, P. J., & Lont, C. M. (1987). Media logic–in–use: The family as locus of study. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 139–160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
95. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
96. Van Willigen, J. (1986). Applied anthropology: An introduction. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
97. Wartella, E. (1987). Commentary on qualitative research on children. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 109–118). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
98. Wolf, M. A. (1987). How children negotiate television. in T. R. Lindlof (ed.), Natural audiences: Qualitative research of media uses and effects (pp. 58–94). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.