Pediatric professionals' attitudes about secondary findings in genomic sequencing of children

Journal of Pediatrics

Volumn 166, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1276-1282.e7

  Barajas, Miguel ^a   Ross, Lainie Friedman ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; E-MAIL; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL GENETICS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; AGED; DNA SEQUENCE; ETHICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN GENOME; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PARENT; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOETHICS; FEMALE; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENTS; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928826817     PISSN: 00223476     EISSN: 10976833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.032     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ACMG Board of Directors Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing Genet Med 14 2012 759 761
2. R.C. Green, J.S. Berg, W.W. Grody, S.S. Kalia, B.R. Korf, C.L. Martin for the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing Genet Med 15 2013 565 574
3. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ACMG Practice Guideline: Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomics: A Clarification https://www.acmg.net/docs/Incidental-Findings-in-Clinical-genomics-A-Clarification.pdf Accessed February 17, 2015
4. H.L. Rehm, S.J. Bale, P. Bayrak-Toydemir, J.S. Berg, K.K. Brown, J.L. Deignan for the Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing Genet Med 15 2013 733 747
5. N.A. Holtzman ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically Genet Med 15 2013 750 751
6. W. Burke, A.H.M. Antommaria, R. Bennett, J. Botkin, E.W. Clayton, and G.E. Henderson Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med 15 2013 854 859
7. M. Allyse, and M. Michie Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing Trends Biotechnol 31 2013 439 441
8. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts http://bioethics.gov/node/3169 Accessed February 17, 2015
9. L.F. Ross, M.A. Rothstein, and E.W. Clayton Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making JAMA 24 2013 367 368
10. R. Klitzman, P.S. Appelbaum, and W. Chung Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care JAMA 24 2013 369 370
11. R.C. Green, J.R. Lupski, and L.G. Biesecker Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional JAMA 24 2013 365 366
12. L.G. Biesecker Incidental variants are critical for genomics Am J Hum Genet 92 2013 648 651
13. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics Committee on Genetics and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Social Ethical and Legal Issues Committee Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children Pediatrics 131 2013 620 622
14. L.F. Ross, H.M. Saal, K.L. David, R.R. Anderson and the American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children Genet Med 15 2013 234 245
15. E.W. Clayton, L.B. McCullough, L.G. Biesecker, S. Joffe, L.F. Ross, S.M. Wolf for the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children Am J Bioeth 14 2014 3 9
16. ACMG Media Relation ACMG Updates Recommendations on "Opt Out" for Genome Sequencing Return of Results https://www.acmg.net/docs/Release-ACMGUpdatesRecommendations-final.pdf Accessed February 17, 2015
17. E. Salter Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard Theor Med Bioeth 33 2012 179 198
18. L.F. Ross Predictive genetic testing of children and the role of the best interest standard J Law Med Ethics 41 2013 899 906
19. D.B. Bailey, D. Skinner, A.M. Davis, I. Whitmarsh, and C. Powell Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging issues Pediatrics 121 2008 e693 e704
20. Y. Bombard, F.A. Miller, R.Z. Hayeems, B.J. Wilson, J.C. Carroll, and M. Paynter Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders Eur J Hum Genet 20 2012 498 504
21. J.R. Botkin, E.W. Clayton, N.C. Fost, W. Burke, T.H. Murray, and M.A. Baily Newborn screening technology: proceed with caution Pediatrics 117 2006 1793 1799
22. C. Andreasen, J.B. Nielsen, L. Refsgaard, A.G. Holst, A.H. Christensen, and L. Andreasen New population-based exome data are questioning the pathogenicity of previously cardiomyopathy-associated genetic variants Eur J Hum Genet 21 2013 918 928
23. C.A. Cassa, M.Y. Tong, and D.M. Jordan Large numbers of genetic variants considered to be pathogenic are common in asymptomatic individuals Hum Mutat 34 2013 1216 1220
24. L. Shahmirzadi, E.C. Chao, E. Palmaer, M.C. Parra, S. Tang, and K.D. Gonzalez Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing Genet Med 16 2014 395 399
25. D. Levenson Patients and families generally welcome secondary genomic findings: support for return of incidental findings may encourage shift toward predictive genetic testing Am J Med Genet 164A 2014 ix x
26. European Society of Human Genetics Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics Eur J Hum Genet 17 2009 720 721
27. Canadian Paediatric Society Guidelines for genetic testing of healthy children Paediatr Child Health 8 2003 42 45
28. Canadian Paediatric Society and Canadian College of Medical Geneticists Guidelines for genetic testing of healthy children-addendum: a joint statement with the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists Paediatr Child Health 13 2008 311 312
29. Z. Lohn, S. Adam, P. Birch, A. Townsend, and J. Friedman Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing Am J Med Genet A 161A 2013 542 549
30. A.A. Lemke, D. Bick, D. Dimmock, P. Simpson, and R. Veith Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study Clin Genet 84 2013 230 236
31. J.H. Yu, T.M. Harrell, S.M. Jamal, H.K. Tabor, and M.J. Bamshad Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing Am J Hum Genet 95 2014 77 84
32. D.A. Asch, M.K. Jedrziewski, and N.A. Christakis Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals J Clin Epidemiol 50 1997 1129 1136
33. S. Kellerman, and J. Herold Physician response to surveys: a review of the literature Am J Prev Med 20 2001 61 67
34. C. Thorpe, B. Ryan, S.L. McLean, A. Burt, M. Stewart, and J.B. Brown How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians Fam Pract 26 2009 65 68