Rise in microsurgical free-flap breast reconstruction in academic medical practices

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue , 2015, Pages S62-S65

  Dasari, Chanukya R ^a   Gunther, Sven ^a   Wisner, David H ^a   Cooke, David T ^a   Gold, Christopher K ^b   Wong, Michael S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic surgery; Autologous; Breast reconstruction; DIEP; Free flap; Microsurgery; Perforator

Indexed keywords

BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

FEMALE; FREE TISSUE FLAPS; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 84928824674     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000483     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hernandez-Boussard T., Zeidler K, Barzin A., et al. Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J. 2013; 19:463-469.
2. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa J.J., et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:320-326.
3. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara B.J., et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:15-23.
4. Pesce CE, Liederbach E, Czechura T., et al. Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 14:301-309.
5. Ter-Louw R.P., Patel KM, Sosin M, et al Patient-centred decision making in breast reconstruction utilising the delayed-immediate algorithm. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67:477-482.
6. Antony AK, McCarthy C, Disa J.J., Mehrara BJ. Bilateral implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, predictors, and matched cohort analysis in 730 2-stage breast reconstructions over 10 years. Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 72:625-630.
7. Damen TH, de Bekker-Grob EW, Mureau MA, et al. Patients' preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64:75-83.
8. Mohan AT, Al-Ajam Y, Mosahebi A. Trends in tertiary breast reconstruction: literature review and single centre experience. Breast. 2013; 22: 173-178.
9. Andree C, Munder BI, Seidenstuecker K, et al Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with DIEP flap after breast-conserving therapy. Med Sci Monit. 2012; 18:16-20.
10. Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis M.S., et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:1417-1424.
11. Visser NJ, Damen TH, Timman R, et al Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126:26-36.
12. Levine SM, Patel N, Disa JJ Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69:380-382.
13. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208:246-254.
14. Galante JM, Phan HH, Wisner DH Trauma surgery to acute care surgery: defining the paradigm shift. J Trauma. 2010; 68:1024-1031.
15. Ingram MT, Wisner DH, Cooke DT Practice patterns of academic general thoracic and adult cardiac surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148:1162-1166.
16. Marsoomi H, Wirth GA, Paydar K.Z., et al. Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. 64th California Society of Plastic Surgery Annual Meeting, Newport Beach, CA, 25 May 2014 [Abstract]
17. Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom C.D., et al. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122:19-28.
18. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Nelson J.A., et al. Propensity-matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of complications and cost: comparing abdominal free flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219:303-312.
19. Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic A.L., et al. Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132:35-46.
20. Dumanian GA. Discussion: applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133:11-13.
21. Wang TY, Nelson JA, Corrigan D, et al Contribution of plastic surgery to a health care system: our economic value to hospital profitability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129:154-160.
22. Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara B.J., et al. Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133:463-470.
23. Matros E, Yueh JH, Bar-Meir ED, et al. Sociodemographics, referral patterns, and Internet use for decision-making in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125:1087-1094.