The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota

mBio

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Zarraonaindia, Iratxe ^a,b   Owens, Sarah M ^a,c   Weisenhorn, Pamela ^c   West, Kristin ^d   Hampton Marcell, Jarrad ^a,c   Lax, Simon ^c   Bokulich, Nicholas A ^e   Mills, David A ^e   Martin, Gilles ^f   Taghavi, Safiyh ^d   van der Lelie, Daniel ^d   Gilbert, Jack A ^a,c,f,g,h  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d Center of Excellence for Agricultural Biotechnology FMC Corporation   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Sparkling Pointe ^*  (United States)

^g MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^h ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTINOMYCETALES; AMINO ACID METABOLISM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTEROIDETES; BIODEGRADATION; BIOGEOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLEXIBACTERACEAE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GLUCONOBACTER; GRAPE; HARVESTING; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; ORGANOLEPTIC PROPERTY; PASTEURELLALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; RHIZOBIALES; SOIL ACIDITY; SOIL MICROFLORA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STREPTOCOCCUS; TAXONOMY; VINEYARD; XANTHOMONADALES; XENOBIOTIC METABOLISM; BACTERIUM; BIOTA; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PH; PHYLOGENY; SOIL; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VITIS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BRADYRHIZOBIUM; RHIZOBIACEAE; VITACEAE; VITIS;

BACTERIAL DNA; CARBON; NITROGEN; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 16S; SOIL;

BACTERIA; BIOTA; CARBON; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NITROGEN; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VITIS;

EID: 84928797120     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02527-14     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Kogel KH, Franken P, Hückelhoven R. 2006. Endophyte or parasite— what decides? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:358–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001.
2. Newton AC, Fitt BD, Atkins SD, Walters DR, Daniell TJ. 2010. Pathogenesis, parasitism and mutualism in the trophic space of microbe-plant interactions. Trends Microbiol 18:365–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.002.
3. Van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Monchy S, Schwender J, Miller L, Ferrieri R, Rogers A, Wu X, Zhu W, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J, Newman L. 2009. Poplar and its bacterial endophytes: coexistence and harmony. Crit Rev PlantSci 2 8:346–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680903241204.
4. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918.
5. Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. 2010. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024.
6. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28: 1327–1350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9.
7. Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD. 2004. Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:243–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455.
8. Chanway CP, Shishido M, Nairn J, Jungwirth S, Markham J, Xiao G, Holl FB. 2000. Endophytic colonization and field responses of hybrid spruce seedlings after inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Forest Ecol Manage 133:81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00300-X.
9. Berg G, Smalla K. 2009. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x.
10. Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Schulze-Lefert P. 2013. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:807–838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
11. Van Overbeek L, Van Elsas JD. 2008. Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:283–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00469.x.
12. Weinert N, Piceno Y, Ding G-C, Meincke R, Heuer H, Berg G, Schloter M, Andersen G, Smalla K. 2011. PhyloChip hybridization uncovered an enormous bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of different potato cultivars: many common and few cultivar-dependent taxa. FEMS Microb i o l Ecol 75:497–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01025.x.
13. Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, Rauf P, Huettel B, Reinhardt R, Schmelzer E, Peplies J, Gloeckner FO, Amann R, Eickhorst T, Schulze-Lefert P. 2012. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488:91–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11336.
14. Lindow SE, Brandl MT. 2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875–1883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003.
15. Whipps JM, Hand P, Pink D, Bending GD. 2008. Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype. J Appl Microbiol 105:1744–1755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03906.x.
16. Redford AJ, Bowers RM, Knight R, Linhart Y, Fierer N. 2010. The ecology of the phyllosphere: geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves. Environ Microbiol 12:2885–2893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02258.x.
17. Barata A, Malfeito-Ferreira M, Loureiro V. 2012. The microbial ecology of wine grape berries. Int J Food Microbiol 153:243–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.025.
18. Verginer M, Leitner E, Berg G. 2010. Production of volatile metabolites by grape-associated microorganisms. J Agric Food Chem 58:8344–8350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf100393w.
19. Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, Mills DA. 2014. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E139–E148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317377110.
20. Gilbert JA, van der Lelie D, Zarraonaindia I. 2014. Microbial terroir for wine grapes. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA111:5–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320471110.
21. Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull JG, Gangl H, Sessitsch A. 2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds: identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization. Microb Ecol 62:188–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9883-y.
22. Martins G, Lauga B, Miot-Sertier C, Mercier A, Lonvaud A, Soulas M-L, Soulas G, Masneuf-Pomarède I. 2013. Characterization of epiphytic bacterial communities from grapes, leaves, bark and soil of grapevine plants grown, and their relations. PLoS One 8:e73013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073013.
23. Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S, Tremblay J, Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, del Rio TG, Edgar RC, Eickhorst T, Ley RE, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Dangl JL. 2012. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11237.
24. Goumans DE, Chatzaki AK. 1998. Characterization and host range evaluation of Pseudomonas viridiflava from melon, blight, tomato, chrysanthemum and eggplant. Eur J Plant Pathol 104:181–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008675704834.
25. Goss EM. 2004. Genetic diversity, recombination and cryptic clades in Pseudomonas viridiflava infecting natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 169:21–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.031351.
26. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31: 814–821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676.
27. Bokulich NA, Joseph CM, Allen G, Benson AK, Mills DA. 2012. Nextgeneration sequencing reveals significant bacterial diversity of botrytized wine. PLoS One 7: e36357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036357.
28. Ottesen AR, Peña A, White JR, Pettengill JB, Li C, Allard S, Rideout S, Allard M, Hill T, Evans P, Strain E, Musser S, Knight R, Brown E. 2013. Baseline survey of the anatomical microbial ecology of an important food plant: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). BMC Microbiol 13:114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-114.
29. Young IM, Ritz K. 2000. Tillage, habitat space and function of soil microbes. Soil Tillage Res 53:201–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00106-3.
30. Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA. 2011. Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 3202–3210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00133-11.
31. Kutschera U. 2007. Plant-associated methylobacteria as co-evolved phytosymbionts: a hypothesis. Plant Signal Behav 2:74–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.2.4073.
32. Fahrbach M, Kuever J, Remesch M, Huber BE, Kämpfer P, Dott W, Hollender J. 2008. Steroidobacter denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a steroidal hormone-degrading gammaproteobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2215–2223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65342-0.
33. Ismail W, Ru Chiang Y. 2012. Oxic and anoxic metabolism of steroids by Bacteria. J. Bioremediation Biodegrad S1:001. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.S1-001.
34. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA. 2005. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 4951–4959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005.
35. Nairz M, Schroll A, Sonnweber T, Weiss G. 2010. The struggle for iron—a metal at the host-pathogen interface. Cell Microbiol 12: 1691–1702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01529.x.
36. Sessitsch A, Hardoim P, Döring J, Weilharter A, Krause A, Woyke T, Mitter B, Hauberg-Lotte L, Friedrich F, Rahalkar M, Hurek T, Sarkar A, Bodrossy L, van Overbeek L, Brar D, van Elsas JD, Reinhold-Hurek B. 2012. Functional characteristics of an endophyte community colonizing rice roots as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:28–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-08-11-0204.
37. Compant S, Kaplan H, Sessitsch A, Nowak J, Ait Barka E, Clément C. 2008. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN: from the rhizosphere to inflorescence tissues. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:84–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00410.x.
38. Leveau JHJ, Tech JJ. 2011. Grapevine microbiomics: bacterial diversity on grape leaves and berries revealed by high-throughput sequence analysis of 16S rRNA amplicons. Acta Hort (ISHS) 905:31–42.
39. Beattie GA, Lindow SE. 1999. Bacterial colonization of leaves: a spectrum of strategies. Phytopathology 89:353–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.5.353.
40. Wilson M, Hirano SS, Lindow SE. 1999. Location and survival of leafassociated bacteria in relation to pathogenicity and potential for growth within the leaf. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1435–1443.
41. Mortimer R, Polsinelli M. 1999. On the origins of wine yeast. Res Microbiol 150:199–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(99)80036-9.
42. Bokulich NA, Ohta M, Richardson PM, Mills DA. 2013. Monitoring seasonal changes in winery-resident microbiota. PLoS One 8:e66437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066437.
43. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R. 2012. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8.
44. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303.
45. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. BioInformatics 26:2460–2461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.
46. Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26:266–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp636.
47. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07.
48. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2009. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26:1641–1650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp077.
49. Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang P-L, Lotia S, Pico AR, Bader GD, Ideker T. 2012. A travel guide to cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods 9:1069–1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2212.
50. De’Ath G. 2012. mvpart: multivariate partitioning. R package version 1.2-6. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mvpart.
51. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2013. Vegan: community ecology package. R pv 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package_vegan.
52. Knights D, Costello EK, Knight R. 2011. Supervised classification of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:343–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00251.x.
53. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
54. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A, Wilkening J, Edwards RA. 2008. The metagenomics RAST server—a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9:386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-386.